🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[The Omni Cuckold]

Lines 17 and 18 of the second page are Destiny judicially admitting to receiving child porn

Important piece here is that Destiny's use of the term "sex worker" in his response implies an adult choice in the context of consensual work.

Rose was not old enough to consent to any of this sexual stuff with Destiny.

Any sexual activities by Destiny to include sharing these videos is exploitative and illegal.

 

[EMP4THCHAN]

Can you explain to me, slowly and like I'm braindamaged, how Pxie asking for something to be sealed and that not happening is "losing" the case?

I love when a phantom W appears for tiny because this thread swells with the most quality troglodytes in existence.

Firstly, to be clear (and I would never word it this way, but because you did I'll entertain), I don't consider it a W for anyone but Destiny, and that ISN'T a good thing. I do not like a single thing about the dude, and I've made that very clear via my other comments in this thread, but I will give you some grace considering I don't think we've interacted before and you may have just missed my posts.

To answer your question: I never specified how or why she's losing the case, so I don't know how you came to the conclusion that I was honing in on the release of the file in particular, but you're wrong there. I read the file and it's just factual that she seems to be losing the case in general. Aka, nothing is going her way, and she isn't getting any relief from the bullshit that has occurred, because Destiny has zero OPSEC (also he's a narcissist, so he doesn't give a fuck if shit gets leaked anyway).

Pxie has marketed herself as someone that is fairly book smart, but is somehow still notoriously ditsy (which I'm guessing/hoping is just for the simp factor?).
She was retarded by trusting Destiny in the first place, despite the fact that he has an extensive record of being an untrustworthy person when it comes to personal/sexual proclivities, I mean the guy has had this thread for how long now, and they hooked up when? You're telling me NOBODY warned her because they didn't see this coming somehow (most easy to predict event ever). Doubt.

Regardless, it's unfortunate that she's factually losing the case as of right now, because judging by the transcript, everyone is throwing their hands up into the air and saying "Well... he did try to get them to take the photos down and he didn't distribute them after the law was put in place, soo....".

That's my take. Sorry if I missed anything or came off autistic (that happens sometimes), you're free to DM me if you're still uncertain of my position on Fartstiny or the case in general.
I want to reaffirm that I don't take any pleasure from watching Pxie lose and I don't think she deserved this at all, even if her decision to trust Destiny was foolish and easily avoided, had she just done research on him before trusting him with her body/feelings.

 

[Nail In My Coffin]

He said he's in the "French part of Switzerland."

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2XkEB4nQL7o:7022

I thought he was in the US already because of the event on November 3rd, because he already recorded the Oxford debate and because he said he was going to spend Halloween with Nathan. What is he doing in Switzerland of all places? Nothing shows up in his Schedule.

And my bad I would link with timestamps and such but I'm on mobile and everything's awkward posting from a phone.

After a second listen my understanding is that the Hijab debate is tomorrow and that it won't be live streamed but rather prerecorded. He also talks about another debate (with an Israeli? Or about Israel) that was filmed in the UK (maybe when he was there a weekish ago?) that has become corrupted. He doesn't think he can do anything about that as he will have left the UK by then.

He debated this 'HUGE' Israeli guy a few days ago supposedly but this was at his home on a video call. Very confusing, Destiny please address.

(That's a very bad picture)

 

[The Omni Cuckold]

What is he doing in Switzerland of all places?

Lower age of consent.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Lower age of consent.

Or MAID depending on how court goes for him

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

Yes. KF will say no because KF is just a cope hospital.

^In case anyone wanted to hear how this statement would sound when factoring in anon's accent.

Anyway, admitting you recieved cp is not the flex you think it is stevie boy. I saw that jeets now have a new cope that KF got the wrong girl. There just happened to be a girl who looks identical, lives in the area and was a minor at the time like solo said. Watch as his big "crazy win" winds up being the judge saying "Regarding the minor, that is between cumpire and whatever prosecutor feels like padding his resume with easy wins".

 

[Code Cave]

Destiny just said on his stream in response to a chatter saying "everyone calls you a pedophile now" by replying "every claim made about that is incorrect, just give it a month or two."

He's saying everything about the Rose situation is incorrect?

This obviously relates to the stuff he was vagueposting about.

@Code Cave @GarlicFragment @StrangerMe

Again, all he's doing is performing for the idiots left in his audience. It's obvious the girl posted in the thread is Rose, and there's government records and data brokers confirming her age. He said Cherry was lying about filing a police report too, but he was wrong. Pxies lawyers said they hired a PI to find her, but who knows, maybe they're lying about all of it and that's just another epic troll filing ripped from KF. If that was the case (it's not), it would still hilarious that they're fucking with him. Try and enjoy the ride, all of this is still very funny stuff folks!

- He says anything relating to Melina would have been 'way before statute date' and says they have 'fucked themselves' by subpoenaing her this late into the case.

Iirc he sent Rose at least 3 videos of Melina, Rose is 17 here, they've been "chatting" for a couple of days and she's already seen Destiny eating Melina's asshole:

Very confusing, Destiny please address.

I'm not going to watch his stream going over it, my guess is there's nothing new in it but he done his whole "bad guy / good guy" voice to signal to his autistic audience how they should feel. It's also not surprising if Pxie (PBUH) was nervous or stumbled giving testimony about her porn videos being leaked, and Destiny should obviously be more comfortable in a public speaking scenario. The only other thing I've seen is confirming that he read the sealed transcript on stream, but that was obvious anyway.

https://archive.ph/9T6Cu

He's so mad this is costing him money. I don't think anyone has ever seriously asked Pxie to post receipts for her lawyers, and I don't see why she would have to. At this point I hope Joan is doing this purely for the love of the game.

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

Destiny really likes insisting on how the judge was questioning Pxie.

These are pretty great questions by the judge. They sure would look bad if they were to be read in his strawman voice.

Ver archivo adjunto 8089636Ver archivo adjunto 8089638

Wait is this really why he was going "HELL YEAH BASED JUDGE IS ON THE IMPLIED CONSENT TEAM!" a while back?

 

[Bert killed Ernie. Why?]

I'm not going to watch his stream going over it, my guess is there's nothing new in it but he done his whole "bad guy / good guy" voice to signal to his autistic audience how they should feel. It's also not surprising if Pxie (PBUH) was nervous or stumbled giving testimony about her porn videos being leaked, and Destiny should obviously be more comfortable in a public speaking scenario. The only other thing I've seen is confirming that he read the sealed transcript on stream, but that was obvious anyway.

I feel like I do need to watch it because other than making Pxie's embarrassing dirty texts public, I don't see why he cared so much about unsealing these transcripts. I don't see anything that makes Pxie look particularly dishonest or contradictory. I read the whole transcript and maybe I'm just really biased against Destiny, but it doesn't seem damning at all. It just makes Destiny looks like a prick.

Can anyone summarize how Destiny thinks anything in this transcript makes him look like the good guy and Pxie look like the bad guy?

It really does seem like the only reason he would want this published is because Andy B reads out her messages.

 

[Anime afficionado]

Probably. To Tiny the judge asking a very reasonable question like "so you believe that you had implied consent?" must mean that judge agrees with him in some way (which of course it doesn't, at all)

But that's just what Tiny does. So to anyone that hasn't keeping up, Destiny has been running his mouth about the case every since it started, and twisting anything that happens in to some type of "win" for him for the sake of his audience. It's all performative nonsense.

The merits of the actual case itself hasn't yet been litigated in court, and every time up to that point that Destiny has to send Brettler's law firm another six figgies to prepare a document is based.

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

I'm not going to watch his stream going over it

I have speedread the transcript and the tldr is:

>pxie was pushed by brettler on her bringing up recording in the first place, this is kinda the best thing going for d in this doc
>andy unleashed his inner jeet and was asking a lot of sexual shit
>they tried pulling the "isnt the lawsuit causing more people to view this" shit
>she made a weird remark about her ex that while corrected by her lawyer later could be taken out of context
>destiny said rose sent him a lot of sexual content and that he sent her sexual content back, aka he admitted, under oath, to 2 felonies
>he was pushed a bit on his lack of taking actions as promised to pxie and the technical shit like blurring
>andy b ended his side by saying the case has no merit etc. The jeets claim the judge said this, but its andrew who did
>a weird thing where the judge seems to have been confused on the case needing malice happened. I wish pxies lawyers made it clear that the FEDERAL case she is suing on doesnt need malice, but they did some gay shit of "all non-con transmissions are malicious in nature"

 

[Bert killed Ernie. Why?]

Probably. To Tiny the judge asking a very reasonable question like "so you believe that you had implied consent?" must mean that judge agrees with him in some way (which of course it doesn't, at all)

But that's just what Tiny does. So to anyone that hasn't keeping up, Destiny has been running his mouth about the case every since it started, and twisting anything that happens in to some type of "win" for him for the sake of his audience. It's all performative nonsense.

The merits of the actual case itself hasn't yet been litigated in court, and every time up to that point that Destiny has to send Brettler's law firm another six figgies to prepare a document is based.

Honestly, it seems like the judge took Pxie and her lawyer's side more than Destiny and Andy B's in the transcript. I'm not a lawyer though.

I don't personally see a lot of reason to call it revenge porn, but he is certainly trying to get revenge on Pxie in any other way that he can.

>she made a weird remark about her ex that while corrected by her lawyer later could be taken out of context

This is the part where she says she didn't have her ex's consent and then later says she did, right? That part was weird and made me wonder what the fuck she was talking about. Not sure what that has to do with Destiny having consent or not, though.

THE COURT: You don't recall sending him a video of somebody else?

THE WITNESS: I recall my former boyfriend, who I would refer to as that guy, the guy, a guy, didn't want me to send videos of us, like, experimenting and stuff like that. I just don't -- I can't verify, like, the specificity of the message because I don't have those messages.

 

[Pentamidine]

Regardless, it's unfortunate that she's factually losing the case as of right now, because judging by the transcript, everyone is throwing their hands up into the air and saying "Well... he did try to get them to take the photos down and he didn't distribute them after the law was put in place, soo....".

She's gonna lose unless they can back up AbbyMC's claims about getting sent Pxie's video after the effective date of the statute. I say they survive the motion to dismiss or summary judgement or whatever but they don't win in front of a jury. Destiny DEFINITELY has edited his version of logs to remove evidence of him sending the video after the effective date, and I don't think an adverse inference from him not preserving evidence properly is enough to overcome that.

Unless they pulled some Matlock shit and actually subpoenaed Discord in time and have a copy, but aren't going to tip their hand since they don't have to share evidence for impeachment during discovery, Pxie's not going to win the lawsuit.

That would be kino, though. If those bumbling strip mall lawyers actually got the logs from Discord but saw the games Destiny was playing with his copy, so kept onto theirs as an impeachment ambush. It would be an actual Perry Mason moment

 

[Madone]

She's gonna lose unless they can back up AbbyMC's claims about getting sent Pxie's video after the effective date of the statute. I say they survive the motion to dismiss or summary judgement or whatever but they don't win in front of a jury.

Remember they only need to prove it on a balance of probability (50%+1)

Destiny DEFINITELY has edited his version of logs to remove evidence of him sending the video after the effective date, and I don't think an adverse inference from him not preserving evidence properly is enough to overcome that.

How about a negative inference PLUS contemporaneous evidence PLUS a pattern of behavior established by the fact that he sent it to a minor within 3 days of meeting her. How does that not reach “more probably than not” ?

I share your worries but there are good reasons to be optimistic. Honestly my fear is that Abby refuses to testify.

 

[Pentamidine]

How does that not reach “more probably than not” ?

I'm not trying to be a negative nancy, but for AbbyMC we have he said vs. she said, but the "he" will likely have evidence (edited Discord logs) to back him up. The issue isn't whether Destiny sent them, it's when he sent them. The portion you highlighted doesn't say that Destiny just sent a sex tape of Pxie, but that he sent a sex tape generally.

a pattern of behavior established by the fact that he sent it to a minor within 3 days of meeting her.

That works in Destiny's favor, he sent that Rose person the vid as soon as he started talking to her (when she was 17 but before the date the statute went into effect).

The screenshots from Solo are definitely in ddmmyyyy format. Destiny definitely originally sent the Pxie vid to Rose before the effective date of the statute. Unless it comes out in discovery that he sent it to someone after the statute went into effect (which it won't - because Destiny has edited the logs), or unless they can back up AbbyMC's claim, Pxie's not going to come out on top.

 

[Madone]

The issue isn't whether Destiny sent them, it's when he sent them.

I’m pretty sure there is a statement from Destiny under oath somewhere in which he claims to have met AbbyMC in 2023

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

and I don't think an adverse inference from him not preserving evidence properly is enough to overcome that.

Sorry but why wouldn't it be?
Unless I'm misunderstanding how this works they would get instructed something among the lines of "The defendant clearly deleted some of those messages and we do not know the content of those messages. You may assume that whatever was in those messages would prove that the defendant is guilty(or liable)".
And reminder this is civil court, not criminal. The bar that needs to be met here is "more likely than not" and when he deletes bunch of messages I think it's more likely than not that those particular messages would be damaging to his case.

 

[NotSoEmpathchan]

Destiny just said on his stream in response to a chatter saying "everyone calls you a pedophile now" by replying "every claim made about that is incorrect, just give it a month or two."

I know nothing about legal proceedings and such, but let's take this at face value. Is there any reason he couldn't say one of the following right now instead of waiting for it to appear in court docs months later?

"Rose was 18+."
"The person identified by KF is not Rose's real identity."
"Atti Hall was underage, but the vids I received were Atti's cousin/friend who was of legal age."
"I was actually talking to Rose's pimp the whole time so I wasn't sexting a minor."

I know he's playing word games by not explaining what "that" is and just stating it's incorrect, but I want to know if by some miracle Rose was of age would there be a reason he couldn't state that right now?

 

[Jesus was a λῃστής]

I see Moonface Cohen posted some new UFA posters.

This one is especially horrifying. I am going to pressure wash my eyeballs now.

 

[Code Cave]

Long post, sorry.

W Pxie, absolutely hilarious calling out the creepy male feminist thing he does:


"that's quite the L" is hilarious


I find it very weird that Lonerbox hangs around with Dan so much after he gave Destiny DMs to attack Pxie with:

again:


Destiny keeps having a stroke saying Pxie hasn't submitted any evidence, but the judge literally told them the Abby affidavit is evidence. Maybe he just didn't remember this part?


Is he saying there's no world where Melina would allow him to send her videos around? But he sent Rose multiple videos of Melina? And he admitted to doing it without her permission during the bob7 stuff?


He confirms he spoke to Rose on twitter initially:

In his affidavit he said Discord:

He references "the google drive link", so it looks like he's admitting Pxies video WAS on google drive? His implication here is that he somehow knows the specific google drive URL of the Pxie video, and he didn't find it in his logs:

He's saying he didn't get explicit consent from Pxie to share the video:

Here's how the CARDII law defines consent:


"Potentially"


Lav knew (I don't think she's ever explained how she knew) that Destiny hooked up with Pxie. Pxie messaged Destiny about this, they bring it up but Destiny manages to kind of dodge it. If Pxie didn't want anyone to even know they had hooked up, why would she be okay with him sending the video around?


Destiny implying that there's no way Rose knew who Pxie was:

Rose said she watched a lot of Destiny's content, so she probably did know it was Pxie (to be clear, the "her" in this message is his Nazi Queen Lauren Southern):

Destiny "would say" he has consent to share the videos of the women involved. Every single woman identified in the KF videos (Melina, Pxie, Stasia) have all said he did not have consent, so this is a lie.

I never even took a video with Chaeiry, aktually it was a secretly recorded audio file thats currently part of a police investigation against me

He can't do anything against KF, but he opposed Pxie trying to

He's saying he didn't have a link to a folder full of porn on google drive, some of the people in JSTLK's discord say he does:

Judge doesn't understand technology, thankfully friend of the threat hey-ZEUS cleared that up:


Nothing particularly interesting or scandalous here. Obviously Destiny is going to sperg out about everything and hype it up, but even from Pxies side it wasn't anything new really. Just Andy B reading out the sexts Destiny already leaked to paint her as a whore, which is his MO.