UK Bacon and ham ban demanded by scientists claiming cancer link - Mudslime trojan horse to ban pork or legitimate health concern? You decide!

*Just as a side note, I had to correct multiple errors
:story:

By Zahra Khaliq

Leading scientists are demanding a ban on supermarket bacon and ham, warning that chemicals used in their production are linked to more than 50,000 bowel cancer cases in the UK.

Nitrites - the preservatives that keep processed meats pink and extend their shelf life - are estimated to cause around 5,400 cases annually, with treatment for each patient averaging £59,000 and costing the NHS roughly £3 billion over the past decade. The warning comes after the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified processed meat as a Group 1 carcinogen - placing it at the same high-risk category as tobacco or asbestos. Despite the known risks, ministers have taken virtually no action to curb public exposure, says Professor Chris Elliot OBE, founder of the Institute for Global Food Security and former government advisor.

He said: "A decade on from the WHO report, the UK Government has done virtually nothing to reduce exposure to nitrites - the curing agents that make these products pink and long-lasting but also create nitrosamines, compounds known to trigger cancer. Every year of delay means more preventable cancers, more families affected, and greater strain on the NHS.”

The scientists stress that the ongoing use of nitrites has inflicted severe human and financial toll, and they are pushing for urgent measures to prevent further avoidable cancers. Their conclusions, drawn from data from Cancer Research UK and the British Journal of Cancer, underline the hidden cost of Britain's reliance on processed meats.

The experts now written to Health Secretary Wes Streeting pushing him to ban nitrites in processed meats - as well as the European Union's health and food safety commissioner, urging similar action, while acknowledging that the EU has already begun to reduce permitted nitrite levels.

Their pioneering 2015 report looked at data from more than 800 studies and found that for every 50g of processed meat eaten a day, the risk of colorectal cancer rose by 18%. According to the experts, it is the combination of nitrites and processing methods used in meats like bacon, ham and sausages that produces carcinogenic compounds. As much as 90% of bacon sold in the UK is believed to contain nitrites, which have been linked not only to bowel, prostate and breast cancer.

Professor Robert Turesky, of the University of Minnesota, who contributed to the original WHO report, said the evidence is stronger ten years on from when the report was published. "A decade later, it is even stronger, and many preventable cancers have likely occurred," he said. "The evidence now calls for public health action”.

Scientists are calling on the Health Secretary to allow clear signage on the front of processed meat packets warning consumers of nitrite-cured products and its cancer risks. In the long-term, they are demanding for nitrite to be phased out and backed by regulatory measures to ensure compliance, as well as funding to allow smaller producers to move to safer alternatives. Currently, nitrite-free meat, sold as "naked" bacon make up just 5-10% of the market.

Bowel cancer ranks as the fourth most common cancer in the UK, with roughly 44,000 new cases a year, and 142,000 in the US. Warning signs include changes in bowel habits - such as persistent diarrhoea or constipation, a feeling of incomplete emptying, and blood in the stool.

Other symptoms to watch out for include stomach pain, bloating, unexpected weight loss and fatigue.

Edit:

I’m retarded. Added link & archive

(L/A)
 
Última edición:
You know what else causes a lot of death and suffering every year?
Islamic terror attacks.
1761573527282.png
You know one would think that a religion that causes thousands of deaths a year might be subject to a little more scrutiny. Wonder why that does not happen.

This site, totally underrated by the way, tracks attacks and has for quite some time so if you are curious.
1761573678252.png
 
Professor Robert Turesky, of the University of Minnesota, who contributed to the original WHO report, said the evidence is stronger ten years on from when the report was published. "A decade later, it is even stronger, and many preventable cancers have likely occurred," he said. "The evidence now calls for public health action”.
Trust me bros the evidence is totally worse now!

These worthless fucks.
 
Processed meats are not high risk for cancer nor should they be categorized as such. The relative risk increases anywhere frome 6 to 72% depending on cancer type but the absolute risk still remains extremely small. They use relative risk increase to justify listing those as carcinogens.

For example the absolute risk of colorectal cancer is 4.6% by age 74, and goes up to 5.2% if you eat processed meat every day.

I personally consider all of this a part of the globohomo anti-meat agenda, but in the UK I will just assume it's Muslims trying to impose Sharia on everyone.
 
In case you wonder why they align with the Muzzie Shitstains on this, pork is the cheapest and most accessible cut of meat to plebs. Bacon is easy to preserve. Pork loss would cut meat consumption in a third.
 
On Saturday morning, I ate a glorious bacon sandwich while pirating the Netflix Kirsten Bell series where she considers converting to Judasim for love. As a result, all weekend I've been thinking about how very fucking delicious bacon is and that no-one will ever take it from me for any reason ever.
 
Oh fuck off, X causes cancer studies are often absolute bullshit.

"We think X causes cancer let us test it"
*Take 300 times the amount of X chemical a human will encounter in an entire lifetime, shove it up rats ass all at once, Rat gets cancer*
"OH MY GOD X CAUSES CANCER!"

We should take this Scientist and force him to drink 300 Times the amount of Water a Human Drinks over their lifetime and see how he fares from it.
 
This nitrate thing has been going on for decades and from my understanding, there is no conclusive evidence against them.. Many vegetables, including leafy green ones, contain nitrates. A sausage maker I know said the average leaf of spinach contains 150-250x the nitrates in one of his sausages. I haven't seen anything on cancer or bowel cancer specifically as the research I'm familiar with focuses on the heart.Leafy green veggies have been linked to healthier hearts while processed meats have been linked to high blood pressure, heart disease, etc. So, why the difference?

I've read studies positing that artificially added nitrates break down the meat into harmful compounds where as the vegetables with high nitrates have mechanisms to prevent this type of breakdown. I've seen other studies say that there are compunds in veggies that control how nitrates get digested in a way that doesn't happen with nitrates in meats. There are other studies that say the health effect differences between nitrate containing vegetables and processed meat have no conclusive link to the nitrates themselves.

They just don't know at this point.
 
Oh fuck off, X causes cancer studies are often absolute bullshit.

"We think X causes cancer let us test it"
*Take 300 times the amount of X chemical a human will encounter in an entire lifetime, shove it up rats ass all at once, Rat gets cancer*
"OH MY GOD X CAUSES CANCER!"

We should take this Scientist and force him to drink 300 Times the amount of Water a Human Drinks over their lifetime and see how he fares from it.
Kind of like when medical researchers were so desperate to find a link between marijuana and brain damage that they gassed monkeys with pot smoke. The monkeys got brain damage from the oxygen deprivation. Actual quote from researcher Robert Heath "Alcohol is a simple drug with a temporary effect. Marijuana is complex with a persisting effect."
 
Atrás
Top Abajo