💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Hey Nick, just fire up a stream if you want attention!
Archive
1761411504.png

In response to a thread about "adult actresses" finding Christianity. Almost as if there's some bad blood.
Archive
1761411706.png

Uh, bitter.
Archive
1761411934.png
 
Última edición:
Hey Nick, just fire up a stream if you want attention!
Archive
Ver archivo adjunto 8077664

In response to a thread about "adult actresses" finding Christianity. Almost as if there's some bad blood.

Ver archivo adjunto 8077674
He's not wrong in that last reply. Christians should be ashamed that they fell for Nick's fake Christian grift, and how him being exposed as a Satanic child abusing degenerate drug addict still hasn't lost him all of his fans and followers.
 
He's on a tweet storm. Nothing crazy or juicy yet but he's in need of affirmation and is pissed off. Just like last night he posted his stream announcement for attention, now he wants to see those likes and retweets flood in to ease the sting of capitulating to Aaron Imholte yesterday.

If he's starting a full blown manic cycle we are in for some fucking kino, boys :really:
 
Does anyone remember the transcripts from the previous hearing where we ended up getting illegally recorded footage from STMS alogs?
Useful_Mistale got some funds to buy the transcripts but he's getting ghosted by the useless cretins of Minnesota.
Should the funds be used to buy this hearing's transcript instead? Otherwise, he will refund those who contributed.

I think instead of messing with refunding crypto, we should put the funds towards the transcript of this hearing. It appears to be much more significant. Supposedly an agreement has been reached, that's a pretty major milestone in this homosexual kerfuffle.
 
Does anyone remember the transcripts from the previous hearing where we ended up getting illegally recorded footage from STMS alogs?
Useful_Mistale got some funds to buy the transcripts but he's getting ghosted by the useless cretins of Minnesota.
Should the funds be used to buy this hearing's transcript instead? Otherwise, he will refund those who contributed.

I think instead of messing with refunding crypto, we should put the funds towards the transcript of this hearing. It appears to be much more significant. Supposedly an agreement has been reached, that's a pretty major milestone in this homosexual kerfuffle.
The in camera stuff wouldn't be in the transcript, right? And according to people who were there, nothing happened in open court.
 
lmao, I can't believe this guy tried to lecture others about what good thumbnails are. They look like the shitty AI-generated Warhammer lore videos that Youtube keeps spamming to me, but with the twist that they're presented by a zesty alcoholic.
Plus most of them have the yellow piss filter that was probably caused by the flood of Ghibli-style AI. Anyone remotely competent would have removed that to look distinctive. Also they just generally look like shit because Nick is fucking retarded.
 
Does anyone remember the transcripts from the previous hearing where we ended up getting illegally recorded footage from STMS alogs?
Useful_Mistale got some funds to buy the transcripts but he's getting ghosted by the useless cretins of Minnesota.
Should the funds be used to buy this hearing's transcript instead? Otherwise, he will refund those who contributed.

I think instead of messing with refunding crypto, we should put the funds towards the transcript of this hearing. It appears to be much more significant. Supposedly an agreement has been reached, that's a pretty major milestone in this homosexual kerfuffle.
I think we're not going to be allowed the transcripts until at least Nick's HRO is settled.
He'll possibly even pay for it himself in an appeal attempt, which significantly reduces cost for our own copy.
 
Yeah. Nick answering self-incriminating questions under oath about an actual crime would be just great.
He could take the Fifth. However, in a civil case, the fact-finder (judge or jury) can take that into account and infer he's guilty, unlike if you take it in a criminal case. If he did take the Fifth he almost certainly would lose outright. Or he could commit perjury, which would also be fun, especially if there's actual evidence proving otherwise.
which then prompted White's smug retort that Aaron is free to plead the Fifth and with the catch that he'd be subjected to a negative inference assuming the worst about what his refused testimony could have been
I'll note this isn't a mandatory adverse inference, the fact-finder may use it, though. I think in this case it is a virtual certainty the inference would be taken, especially considering the strong corroborative evidence that Nick indeed did commit this felony.
The in camera stuff wouldn't be in the transcript, right? And according to people who were there, nothing happened in open court.
Probably not. I'd have to know more about Minnesota to know for sure, but generally, the whole purpose of doing something in camera is to encourage the parties to speak candidly without worrying about it being used. I know they sometimes actually are recorded if it's something like an argument about the admissibility of potentially sensitive information, where if the court uses that information to make an appealable decision, it might be needed for an appeal.

Such proceedings are generally off the record, though.

I'm virtually certain the reason these proceedings were for the purpose of the judge slamming these two retards' heads together and telling them to get their shit together.
 
Última edición:
In response to a thread about "adult actresses" finding Christianity. Almost as if there's some bad blood.

Part of this goes back to the origins of "Scandinavian incel prudes". A long while back, Nick was invited to some church event and he tried to preach outreach to onlyfans woman and camgirls. That rather than being critical of onlyfans, that his church needed to reach out to get these career minded onlyfans young women participating in church life. After all, they were pursuing a good career for women and only doing it to have money to take their kids to disneyworld. And many women on onlyfans are totally rich and own private islands.

Needless to say, the people at his church he shared these wonderful ideas with were not accepting of them. And he was really mad about it in the aftermath.

Nick seems more overtly hostile to Christianity in those messages though. I'm sure he has not in any way got over the CPS complaint about his dirty and hungry kids made by people in the church. Its also been a while since he shared his religious ideas about him being just like King David or how nothing he can do can be a sin.
 
He could take the Fifth. However, in a civil case, the court can take that into account and infer he's guilty, unlike if you take it in a criminal case. If he did take the Fifth he almost certainly would lose outright. Or he could commit perjury, which would also be fun, especially if there's actual evidence proving otherwise.

Were Nick to have taken the stand, he would play word games and try to Ron Toye his way around the question. And in doing so, he'd accidentally confess. That's exactly what he did when the cops questioned him during his child endangerment arrest. He tried outsmarting a 90 iq cornfed midwestern high school educated cop and ended up getting outsmarted and confessing to the crime.

Of the two, Melton is the only one that would have been smart enough to plead the 5th.

Nick seems more overtly hostile to Christianity in those messages though. I'm sure he has not in any way got over the CPS complaint about his dirty and hungry kids made by people in the church. Its also been a while since he shared his religious ideas about him being just like King David or how nothing he can do can be a sin.

When Nick was crying about the State taking his rights away, he emphasized how he was no longer free because he couldn't go to his church. Forgetting, I guess, that he never returned to that church after they snitched to the cops about him abusing and endangering his children, so even if he had been free to go to that church he wouldn't have.
 
I concur with @Folgers Can, especially because I want to believe that Nick's actions when he was at his most deranged (November 2024) continues to haunt him today.
All you had to do Nick, was not act like a raging spastic retard. One moment of weakness, one singular indulgence of revenge against Aaron, and see what it has earned you.
 
Nick seems more overtly hostile to Christianity in those messages though. I'm sure he has not in any way got over the CPS complaint about his dirty and hungry kids made by people in the church. Its also been a while since he shared his religious ideas about him being just like King David or how nothing he can do can be a sin.

"THEY WANT ME TO FEED MY KIDS, SEAN!!!!!!!"
 
All you had to do Nick, was not act like a raging spastic retard.
All he had to do was PULL UP. Instead, in an intensely homosexual manner, when Null suggested this, he flipped out and called him screaming and crying from the shower, stark naked. How gay.
According to Nick, both the facts and law were on Nick's side and the HRO was facially frivolous and Nick had a plan to defeat it. But he finds himself losing anyway.
As @Potentially Criminal pointed out, the odds were on his side if he had addressed this in any remotely normal fashion. It might have just gone away immediately at the first hearing. His insane "strategy" has led to him being under the "Balldo of Damocles" for literally months squandering enormous amounts of money. This is maybe the one time SEEEEEAN actually thought the law was on Nick's side.

This is a serious case of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory when literally doing nothing would have been the better option.

Also this:
Screenshot 2025-10-25 141055.png
Note his intense contempt for Christians after having grifted them out of hundreds of thousands of dollars to fuck over Vic Mignogna and line his pockets. He did this with his fake act of being an actual Christian, while saying Jesus was just some guy, one among a myriad of his retarded, heretical opinions.
 
All he had to do was PULL UP. Instead, in an intensely homosexual manner, when Null suggested this, he flipped out and called him screaming and crying from the shower, stark naked. How gay.

As @Potentially Criminal pointed out, the odds were on his side if he had addressed this in any remotely normal fashion. It might have just gone away immediately at the first hearing. His insane "strategy" has led to him being under the "Balldo of Damocles" for literally months squandering enormous amounts of money. This is maybe the one time SEEEEEAN actually thought the law was on Nick's side.

This is a serious case of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory when literally doing nothing would have been the better option.

Also this:
Ver archivo adjunto 8077827
Note his intense contempt for Christians after having grifted them out of hundreds of thousands of dollars to fuck over Vic Mignogna and line his pockets. He did this with his fake act of being an actual Christian, while saying Jesus was just some guy, one among a myriad of his retarded, heretical opinions.
This is a good point. But we are also into what makes a lolcow a lolcow territory. They are not known for making good choices.

I'm not American, a native English speaker or a lawyer, but I knew fast the nature of a HRO in Minnesota. I studied the case law, the reasons, excuses, etc. I saw that examples made up case law.

Soliciting a montage was never going to be persuasive. Who the fuck does that? Then tries to submit it as evidence. HRO's don't care who started it.

They are granted on the interim on a trust basis that what was disclosed was true. You then challenge it by showing the person lied. I mean a real lie, not Nick definition.

You don't defeat them by saying "All true, but Aaron ate my goo!" Ffs.
 
Ralph’s law strikes again “For every W, there is an impending and subsequent L.” If Nicks this pissy and erratic, odds are his 300 exhibits did dick all.

SUFFAH balldo
 
Atrás
Top Abajo