Death to gender! Freedom to the queers! But gender dies through eating its own tail. Gender is dying already. Its death rattle is upon us, but it still has time to save itself. It is on us to hurry it along to its final end. To speed it on. To make it...
Accelerate.
I've been procrastinating hard on making this thread, but since
Charlie Kirk was assassinated last month by a demented leftoid gunt guarding his tranny girlfriend, I thought the farms would be interested in learning about the ideology that's possibly inspiring autistic retards to gun down normal people in broad daylight. The Anarchist Library presents
The Gender Accelerationist Tranifesto (A).
You can read the entire screed yourself, but I'll be posting what I consider to be some of the most noteworthy excerpts with limited commentary, as I'm not the best at deciphering marxist gobbledygook. Emphasis my own. Skip to part 5 for the real juicy stuff. Let's begin with the material basis:
1. Gender: Its Function and Origins
Material Basis
[..]
So where does gender’s material base lie? Gender is produced primarily by the division of reproductive labor. Reproductive labor is any labor that helps to produce the next generation, including sex, birth, childcare, and homemaking, and gender is defined by how this labor is divided up, with the different genders being distinct classes which are expected to perform specific sorts of tasks regarding reproductive labor.
The way gender differs between cultures is determined by how these tasks are divvied up between the genders. The particular characteristics that this produces are what is known as the superstructure. So, while gender is produced by this material base, it also involves an amalgamation of various stereotypes, ways of dress, formal speech, etc in its superstructure which differ how we experience our gender.
And this applies to all cultures. The Bugi people of Indonesia, rather than the two genders of our society, have five genders in total. Calabai and calalai people have biological characteristics that have been gendered as male and female respectively, but they adopt the reproductive labor tasks typically assigned to makkunrai (roughly equivalent to women) and oroané (roughly equivalent to men) which provides them with a different social class. More interestingly, however, are the bissu, the fifth gender, which fills a role distinct from the other four. They fill special ceremonial religious practices and are said to be a mixture of the four other genders. Whereas makkunrai and calabai take on typically feminine reproductive labor tasks, such as homemaking, and oroané and calalai take on typically masculine ones, such as providing support for their spouse, the bissu transcend this and engage in their own tasks.
I'm sure you've noticed by now that these retards love digging up esoteric backwater brown people cultures to justify their nonsensical raison d'etre. I've never even heard of this tribe, but my superficial research on the matter revealed to me the same truths that are obfuscated in every other discussion about cultures with supposed third genders: these tribes knew full well who was a man and who was a woman. The calabai and calalai were the dykes and fags of the Bugis, and the bissu are akin to an eunuch class reserved for those born with DSDs. The BBC article even points out that the calabai do not impersonate women nor possess any mythos about being born in the wrong body. I'm sure if I scoured further than this sanitized westoid puff piece, I could find reports of the calabai/lai being mistreated and looked down upon by their conformist counterparts.
Sex and Gender
But sex is a thing and, if it isn’t the basis of gender, what is it? Well, this formulation isn’t wrong, per se, it’s merely backwards. Gender forms the basis of sex. We are not born with sex already within us. We have penises, vaginas, breasts, beards, chromosomes, etc, but these things are not sex on their own. They are features of our biology, but we group them into sexes. When we call penises boy parts we are creating and imposing gender upon the body.
What this means is that sex is the gendering of our biological features. We assign gender to our biology and claim them to be innate. This is used to present the gender class system as a natural thing that just exists rather than a social system that gets imposed upon us. By gendering our bodies, we act as if gender just is rather than it being something that we’ve created. As such, sex serves to reinforce and defend gender.
Because sex isn’t some inherent thing, but an element of gender’s superstructure, it has changed over time. The earliest people could only have gendered the features that are plainly visible, such as genitals. It’s only as our understanding of anatomy progressed that we were able to gender things like ovaries. Most recently, chromosomes have been gendered because of their relationship to features we’ve already gendered.
Lol. Retard,
you're the one working backwards. You could call men and women skoomas and skimbos respectively and the human race would instinctually recognize and categorize the differences between the two sexes, because above all else we are
mammals and sex is the very basis of our reproduction.
Enforcement and Sexual Violence
[...]
So, if not the state, how is it imposed? Through sexual violence. When we look to statistics on the issues, what we find is that rates of sexual violence are higher among women than among men and among queer people than among straight men....Trans people face higher rates of sexual violence than cis people of the same gender as them...
[...]
Sexual violence fills the role among women and queer people that police violence fills among many others. Indeed, while police violence does exist, it is quite frequently sexually charged when applied to women and queer people. Among queer people specifically, sexual violence is often done with explicitly correctional purposes. That is, sexual violence, particularly rape, is often used against queer people specifically to make them straight and cis....
Uh-oh, schizo alert.
The Modern Gender Binary
There aren’t any current genderless societies. Though there are many variations, all have created a division of reproductive labor which has produced a gender system. Indeed, they’ve been around since at least the first civilizations developed the first writing systems. Gender is the first system of power developed by society.
It's almost as if "genderless societies" aren't conducive to functional civilizations. Anyways, the rest of this passage was just kvetching about muh colonialism. with the author's thesis being that the imposition of a gender binary "destroys individual culture and choice."
II. Patriarchy
Intersection between queer theory and feminism o algo.
[...]
This class dynamic of man over woman is the principal dynamic of patriarchy, but they do not comprise the only two classes. Instead, we find that some people relate to reproductive labor differently than how it’s imposed upon the population. This is especially the case with regards to sex, when someone engages in sexual relations that do not fit with the dynamics imposed by patriarchy. This includes people who are sexually attracted to people of the same gender (gay/lesbian people), of multiple genders (bisexual/pansexual people), or no gender (asexual people). In addition, people whose gender is different from the one patriarchy assigns to them can’t be classed as neatly as people who accept the assignment by gender. While they might be personally men or women, they aren’t treated by society in quite the same way so they comprise a distinct social class. Characteristic to this is the detachment of sex and romance from reproducing the next generation. While it’s still possible for all of these groups to reproduce the next generation, it is no longer a necessary part of sex and romance.
Since this third class is defined by it’s difference from those of the first two classes, it is named queer. Queer people are all those who relate differently to the division of reproductive labor assigned to them by patriarchy. Because of the different relations, queer people are inherently subversive to the class system as a whole and constitute the revolutionary class under patriarchy.
So this explains why all deviants have been lumped under the "queer" umbrella as of late, but I still don't understand the purpose of diving society along these lines instead of economic standing like in old-fashioned communism.
Saying “Yes” to Gender
[...]
Here we can listen to the analysis of Judith Butler: Performative acts, that is all the little actions you take which construct an identity, are key to understanding how gender functions on an individual level. We find these in the most basic things we do and say, “I am a woman”, “No, I can’t play with that. It’s a boy toy”, “Boys will be boys”. These acts produce an identity, both within ourselves and within others. You identify as a woman or a man and identify others as men or women by engaging in these acts.
[...]
This serves as a method of control and reproduction. Gender isn’t inherent, but it spreads by assigning us to a class and forcing us to say yes to that class. “Yes, I am a man. It is who I am and who I always have been. I cannot escape it or deny it. I am a man.” This is nothing but a lie we are forced to repeat. But by repeating it enough, we come to believe it. Gender becomes natural, inescapable, eternal. It ceases to be an imposed identity and becomes an eternal part of who we are. By objecting to my gender, you are objecting to that which is inherently me.
Developing an identity based on "performative acts" sounds like a you problem. I don't think anyone that doesn't have some kind of developmental or personality disorder formulates their sense of self based on how other people perceive them. Do you simply cease to exist when you're alone? Even funnier is that though the author condemns this line of thinking, performative acts are precisely what trannies use to validate themselves as the opposite gender, but it's okay when they do it because....? This entire section is a confusing self-own.
III. Communism
Karl Marx is currently boiling in his own excrement for all eternity btw.
The Communist Movement
[...]
Communism conceived in this way is a movement against the present social order, one seeking the liberation of those oppressed. This should not be seen as an ideal we strive for, but a real, active movement that exists in the present day. We don’t find communism in plans for the future, but, rather, in a worker sabotaging his workplace, a wife who escapes from her abusive husband with her children, Naxalites engaging in guerrilla warfare against the Indian government, rioters rejecting the police to loot and burn their cities, etc.
Within the communist movement we find all the important work being done in the present day. The communist movement isn’t about some far off ideal, but the immediate communism it produces. It’s an active revolt against the present state of things which is communizing society immediately, not some theorists in a university considering the world from his armchair. It simply states the present state of things must go, and then takes action to make it so.
Communism, surmised: a dog shitting in its bed in rebellion. I still don't understand exactly
why the present state of things must go? How exactly does discarding material reality make society safer for women and kweers? What a shitty manifesto.
You'll have to read the rest of the Communism section yourself. This OP is already dreadfully long and I simply don't have the energy to dissect that slop.
IV. Twilight of Gender
Saying “No” to Gender
[...]
When you get assigned the male class, but you loudly assert the opposite, you have said “no” to gender. Gender gave you what you are, but you turned away in disgust. You are not a man, you are something else. Some find comfort in womanhood, others in something entirely outside, but whichever path you take, you have said no to gender.
[...]
When you sit apart from your assignment, you are transgender.
The author can't keep his story straight. If you're a failson "finding comfort in womanhood," you're doing the exact opposite of rejecting gender. Your
entire claim to womanhood is the extremely tenuous concept of gender. Trannies swear fealty to "gender" more than anyone else. Also, do note how they are trying to lump anyone who's GNC under the transgender umbrella.
Revolution
...Indeed, if enough people reject the gender assigned to them, gender cannot function.
And trans people are those rejecting their gender, saying “no” to gender. This is a modern phenomenon which is subversive toward gender and presents us with a path forward. Here we find the core to the revolutionary potential of queer people. If everyone says “no” to gender, everyone ceases to accept it, then gender is lost. We find similar strategies among resistance to other class systems. People fight capitalism through a refusal to work, a general strike against it. Similarly, a collective “no” to gender rejects the class system and allows us to take it to its knees.
This would be nothing but a revolution. It’s an overhaul of society which allows for queer people to take its reigns and remake it in our image. This act of class abolition by queer people, including a self-abolition of our own class, is a daring attack upon gender. It takes over society to transform it and eliminate class from it. This means that such a revolution would be the dictatorship of the queer.
V. Dictatorship of the Queer
They literally want to kill you.
Queer Power
Far too often people do not seek the liberation of queer people, only our assimilation. Gay assimilation is the mainstream LGBT rights movement, but it does not go far enough. If all we do is assimilate, we are still subject to the power and domination of the gender class system. We aren’t free, just folded into the existing system of oppression and domination.
And it’s dangerous, too. Assimilation provides gender with the chance to escape its final end. If gender can assimilate gayness, lesbianism, bisexuality, transgender people, and all other modes of queerness, it will become flexible and accommodate for the forces driving it towards its end. If we assimilate, gender might never end.
[...]
Queer power is separate from the existing institutions. We declare our difference, unashamed and proud. We don’t join their projects. We don’t participate in their systems. We don’t increase their power. In its place, we must make our own!
This means creating queer organizations and institutions. Counterpowers to the dominant patriarchal class system. These allow for us to provide people with what they need for transition, including providing HRT drugs, supporting victims of sexual assault, empowering women outside of the system, and ultimately providing spaces to be different, to escape the domination of gender.
Pink Terror
...Queer power needs violence to destroy gender. A sustained terror against those who seek to enforce gender and prevent gender’s death, a pink terror, is a necessity in the revolution against gender.
[...]
This means that the queer organizations and institutions we build for queer power must be militant, armed organizations. It’s not enough to provide a space outside of patriarchy, we must arm ourselves to defend those spaces and to render an assault upon the overarching structures of power that seek to enforce gender upon us. This means that our queer organizations must be, or include, queer militias to fight against the structures of power.
[...]
This can also provide queer people with a framework for fighting against misgendering and deadnaming. When people continuously and knowingly use the wrong pronouns and names for others, it is a form of violence against them. Doing so frequently leads to self-harm and sometimes suicide by queer people. As such, we need to defend and back other queer people up. Such violence against queer people cannot go unanswered and cannot be acceptable. But we should keep proportional responses in mind. Misgendering doesn’t warrant murder.
You just
know they added that last sentence just so the feds don't come knocking on their door. They absolutely believe blowing your brains out is adequate reprisal for the sin of misgendering. But I thought we were rejecting gender guise!!
Bash Back
Gender won’t go down without a fight; a counter-revolution will appear to tear us down. Against the gender accelerationist movement, movements will develop to defend, or even regress, gender. Historically, revolutionary movements often find themselves followed by fascist movements rejecting the call for the new world and seeking a rejuvenation of the present one through rebirth. These fascist movements embrace hypermasculinity and seek to exacerbate the domination of masculinity over society.
Here we find our clearest enemy, and the new fascist movements of the present will react to our accelerationism with reaction and counter-revolution. Here the queer militias will be needed to defend the revolution against advancing reaction. Conflict will inevitably get bloody and we’ll fight in the streets as needed to shut down the counter-revolution and ensure our victory.
Victory At All Costs
We cannot stop part way or allow for our defeat. Gender means the domination of all and sustained violence against women and queer people. We cannot allow for our defeat and our eyes must be upon victory. This isn’t merely a choice, it’s a necessity.
Holy mental illness.
Ok, so what? Anyone can publish schizophrenic essays on the internet. But walk with me for a moment. We have zoomers like Tyler Robinson becoming so radicalized they're willing to kill and die on the altar of tranny rights. We have genderspecials describing in excruciating detail their rape/murder fantasies for JKR and other "terfs" online with zero consequence. There are tens of thousands of ticking timebombs flaunting their ill-gotten firearms in
r/transguns just itching for the "trans genocide" to pop off. And not only do the
"queer militias" already exist, they're being supported directly by massive NGOs.
TL;DR: Arm yourselves.
![LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV]](http://uploads.kiwifarms.pa/data/avatars/l/61/61177.jpg?1699571951){kind=avatar}
