US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
The White House Communication director's statement on the Nobel Prize:
Ver archivo adjunto 8020693
Source (Archive)

A Vance shitpost:
Ver archivo adjunto 8020694
Source (Archive)
You don't need to read books to solve it, its easy to understand how to solve this conflict.

When someone Launches a missile you take the finger that pressed the button and you smash it with a hammer and you Keep fucking doing that until both sides learn that "Firing missile gets your finger broken"
 
Just to let you know the new Camp of the Saints reprint is coming in Hardcover soon, in case you didn't get the paperback. Unrelated tweet below:

Ver archivo adjunto 8020697

Ver archivo adjunto 8020698

it is a moral imperative that Arch Dat Trump get built, just for the aesthetic karma that is needed to make up for the faggotry of a fallen continent.


edit: Hegseth dropping some common sense truth:

Ver archivo adjunto 8020707
hegsethcommonsense.mp4
What's going to happen to the EU governments without US support. We're about to find out.
 
Does the United States have room in the federal budget to recreate Europe's greatest landmarks in case everything goes to pot? It would certainly be a worthy cultural endeavor to attempt though I have no clue where you'd put everything.
Why not invade, and take over Europe? The browns can be deported, or killed (their choice). The remaining White europeans can be enslaved as punishment for this shit. Maybe their grandchildren can be free once everyone has been properly Americanized.
 
It did, where we went wrong was the nation building shit, if we just bombed Saddam and left we would have been fine.
We did bomb and invade and leave in 1991….

Then hilariously left the Shia and Kurds out to get genocided

Our politicians literally cannot help themselves but try to nation build, the idea we are just gonna bomb a country and leave is just beyond :optimistic:
 
What I found really compelling about Brave New World is that the sci-fi dystopian civilization is mostly just set-dressing, and not actually that relevant to the plot. At the end of the day, Bernard's feelings of alienation and isolation don't come from him feeling at odds with the sci-fi dystopia he lives in; it mostly comes from him being an autistic manlet who has trouble relating with normies. You could re-write the story to set it in current year, remove all the sci-fi elements, and still get like 99% of the point across - because the real dystopia in BNW isn't the test tube baby caste system, it's the fake mass-manufactured media that keeps the masses complacent and retarded.
 
Última edición:
Yeah why not worked so well with saddam
Perhaps a page could be taken from the Cold War playbook. Prop up a pro-American caudillo and call it a day. None of this "democracy building" non-sense for a country that clearly doesn't have the best experience with it. Modern Venezuela after all, was founded by a dictator (Boliviar) and one must remember that Chavez (who established the current government in the country) was elected to office.
 
Perhaps a page could be taken from the Cold War playbook. Prop up a pro-American caudillo and call it a day. None of this "democracy building" non-sense for a country that clearly doesn't have the best experience with it. Modern Venezuela after all, was founded by a dictator (Boliviar) and one must remember that Chavez (who established the current government in the country) was elected to office.
Yeah there is a reason Cold War nation building was much more effective: not saying it was perfect but post 1991 nation building has been a disaster.

Was bolivar really a dictator? Never knew that always assumed he wasn’t a cauldillo and that’s why so many South Americans worship him.
 
What I found really compelling about Brave New World is that the sci-fi dystopian civilization is mostly just set-dressing, and not actually that relevant to the plot. At the end of the day, Bernard's feelings of alienation and isolation don't come from him feeling at odds with the sci-fi dystopia he lives in; it mostly comes from him being an autistic manlet who has trouble relating with normies. You could re-write the story to set it in current year, remove all the sci-fi elements, and still get like 99% of the point across.
My personal theory is that ALL dystopian literature is about the author's present.
 
What I found really compelling about Brave New World is that the sci-fi dystopian civilization is mostly just set-dressing, and not actually that relevant to the plot. At the end of the day, Bernard's feelings of alienation and isolation don't come from him feeling at odds with the sci-fi dystopia he lives in; it mostly comes from him being an autistic manlet who has trouble relating with normies. You could re-write the story to set it in current year, remove all the sci-fi elements, and still get like 99% of the point across - because the real dystopia in BNW isn't the test tube baby caste system, it's the fake mass-manufactured media that keeps the masses complacent and distracted.
A major part of his alienation comes from his wife getting all her dopamine hits via interactive TV, where the people praising her and telling her she's beautiful can't see her chemically destroyed hair and ruined skin. That wasn't quite possible yet when the book was written, but Instagram and filters have made it real.
 
Yeah there is a reason Cold War nation building was much more effective: not saying it was perfect but post 1991 nation building has been a disaster.

Was bolivar really a dictator? Never knew that always assumed he wasn’t a cauldillo and that’s why so many South Americans worship him.
Boliviar to my understanding started off as a sort of idealist republican but over time became disillusioned and authoritarian. In his final years he proclaimed: all who have served the Revolution have plowed the sea.

He apparently did believe that a government should conform to the needs and character of its region and inhabitants so perhaps some inspiration can be taken from that idea.
 
The guy is a massive shill for multipolarity and exaggerates everything. He's a has been that third worldists prop up because they agree with him
He is a "Neo"-Realist. One has to be a special kind of lunatic to try to marry Realism, International Anarchism with "Institutionalism", international socialism.
They are by definition not compatible
 
What I found really compelling about Brave New World is that the sci-fi dystopian civilization is mostly just set-dressing, and not actually that relevant to the plot. At the end of the day, Bernard's feelings of alienation and isolation don't come from him feeling at odds with the sci-fi dystopia he lives in; it mostly comes from him being an autistic manlet who has trouble relating with normies. You could re-write the story to set it in current year, remove all the sci-fi elements, and still get like 99% of the point across - because the real dystopia in BNW isn't the test tube baby caste system, it's the fake mass-manufactured media that keeps the masses complacent and distracted.
Bernard and John the savage long for Gods presence in their lives. For true human ties and connections, for meaning. I know this is rage bait, but if you truly don't understand or sympathize with their struggle you might not be human.
 
Prop up a pro-American caudillo and call it a day. None of this "democracy building" non-sense for a country that clearly doesn't have the best experience with it.
The Dubya administration's obsession with forcing democracy on Arabs led to Hamas ruling Gaza and Iran almost completely infiltrating the government of Iraq to the point where Soleimani would sometimes sit in meetings instead of the Prime minister. It was idiotic
 
We did bomb and invade and leave in 1991….

Then hilariously left the Shia and Kurds out to get genocided

Our politicians literally cannot help themselves but try to nation build, the idea we are just gonna bomb a country and leave is just beyond :optimistic:
in 1991 we left the Regime in tact.

Funny how when you halfass war things go badly but when you don't fuck around and put the enemy leadership in the ground the enemy loses power like Hamas is now.
 
Does the United States have room in the federal budget to recreate Europe's greatest landmarks in case everything goes to pot? It would certainly be a worthy cultural endeavor to attempt though I have no clue where you'd put everything.
Don't worry, we are way ahead of you. We've been preserving the landmarks of Europe and beyond for a while now in the filthy cesspit the beautiful city that is Las Vegas
vegas eiffel tower.webp
vegas arc de triomphe.webp
vegas luxor.webp

We even have a spare Statue of Liberty for when Mamdani gets elected and tears down the real one and replaces it with a statue of Lenin in a hijab:
vegas statue of liberty.webp
 
Atrás
Top Abajo