UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
If Musk built the DID system, I'm sure he could blag access to patient details to use for his brain implant system.
For the FBPE goons, I'd happily have them interred at HMP Musk.

More bad news for Labour, with Rayner being blasted in yet another scandal and Lady Nugee caught up in a drugs scandal...



It never rains, it just shitstorms with these idiots.
 
I've been wondering if recent events are connected.

PA is proscribed (dumb word) as a terrorist group.
Attack happens
Police can break-up crowds and disperse protests.

Doesn't seem much but PA marches are a good chance for reconnaissance and hide in a crowd.
Intelligence community was warned an attack on synagogue, and more would/will happen as a celebration of the 1 year anniversary of October 7th attacks.
Protests can be broken up if intel comes in that a crowd attack is planned.

I think the gov might be shitting themselves and not because of whitey.
 
I've been wondering if recent events are connected.

PA is proscribed (dumb word) as a terrorist group.
Attack happens
Police can break-up crowds and disperse protests.

Doesn't seem much but PA marches are a good chance for reconnaissance and hide in a crowd.
Intelligence community was warned an attack on synagogue, and more would/will happen as a celebration of the 1 year anniversary of October 7th attacks.
Protests can be broken up if intel comes in that a crowd attack is planned.

I think the gov might be shitting themselves and not because of whitey.

Not everything is connected, but many are. The problem is working who is who.
 
Not everything is connected, but many are. The problem is working who is who.
Welcome to Cluedo.

Sir Keir Starmer has been fatally attacked, and it is up to you to bring the perpetrator to justice (or, at the very least, force-feed him/her a vegan sausage roll).

There are six suspects, but who is responsible:

Mrs. Peacock is an avowed bourgeois communist and a member of Palestine Action
Colonel Mustard is a patriot and member of Reform UK, also hates niggers and co.
Reverend Green is a moderate who is pro-Burnham and despises the evil Starmer Government.
Professor Plum is Jewish, pro-Israel and a Netanyahu fan boy.
Miss Scarlet is Russian, pro-Putin and almost certainly a KGB agent.
Mrs. White is a Pensioner whose money was taken by Starmer and given to Ukraine.

Good luck, Detective!

 
I think the gov might be shitting themselves and not because of whitey.
On the flipside, they're probably hoping something does happen because then they can swoop in with self-appointed, overreaching new powers and 'solve' the problems they allowed to fester in the first place. Or it's all a psyop. Never let a crisis go to waste and all that!
 
Welcome to Cluedo.

Sir Keir Starmer has been fatally attacked, and it is up to you to bring the perpetrator to justice (or, at the very least, force-feed him/her a vegan sausage roll).

There are six suspects, but who is responsible:

Mrs. Peacock is an avowed bourgeois communist and a member of Palestine Action
Colonel Mustard is a patriot and member of Reform UK, also hates niggers and co.
Reverend Green is a moderate who is pro-Burnham and despises the evil Starmer Government.
Professor Plum is Jewish, pro-Israel and a Netanyahu fan boy.
Miss Scarlet is Russian, pro-Putin and almost certainly a KGB agent.
Mrs. White is a Pensioner whose money was taken by Starmer and given to Ukraine.

Good luck, Detective!

Oh it has to be Colonel Mustard then, because he's not only is he a straight white man, but he's a far-right Nazi too! I'm also going to pretend that Mrs. White's fingerprints weren't all over the scene too... Guilty as charged!
 
Welcome to Cluedo.

Sir Keir Starmer has been fatally attacked, and it is up to you to bring the perpetrator to justice (or, at the very least, force-feed him/her a vegan sausage roll).

There are six suspects, but who is responsible:

Mrs. Peacock is an avowed bourgeois communist and a member of Palestine Action
Colonel Mustard is a patriot and member of Reform UK, also hates niggers and co.
Reverend Green is a moderate who is pro-Burnham and despises the evil Starmer Government.
Professor Plum is Jewish, pro-Israel and a Netanyahu fan boy.
Miss Scarlet is Russian, pro-Putin and almost certainly a KGB agent.
Mrs. White is a Pensioner whose money was taken by Starmer and given to Ukraine.

Good luck, Detective!

Peacock or White.
 
Honestly the synagogue attack should prove that the two tier system doesn't really exist, the police managed to kill exactly one arab and one jew in perfect synchronicity.
 
While I want to lol at the leftist fannies protesting about Gaza getting btfo, you know this will be used for any hotel/anti immigration protests. Labour have properly put the boot on our necks now.
It's almost as if the entire government doesn't actually give a shit and it's only desire is control. But hey think about the other side of the coin, if the prisons are all full of gaza fags then they'll have even less room for normal people. What was that thing they said for years about protests being important and a key part of democracy? The mask has been slipping for decades and it's been incredibly clear for a long time that democracy is a scam and nowhere near the utopian system we are conditioned to believe it is. But now a core part of democracy is just banned. Next they'll just decide that you can't vote for who's in charge and get stuck with someone the entire country and even the rest of his party hates. Oh. Wait.
Pretty shit arson job
Yea it kinda looks like he just poured petrol on the front door and then on the fucking concrete outside as if rocks are going to burn? Glad to be once again correct. Isn't it crazy that some dumb retard that didn't even go to uni predicted more firebombings? Should have put a bet in because that shit is free money.
 
The government just blocked access to Imgur because they wouldn't buy the expensive as fuck ID checking system. Now Steam Workshop mods that use Imgur to layout their descriptions (including my own stuff) are all fucked up and I need a VPN to use fucking Steam.

I am unironically fucking pissed. This government can suck my dick I'M GOING TO FED POST AAAAHHHH
Use a rimgo instance. If you know how it's easy to set up an automatic redirect but it's also not hard to manually change the URL.

 
My biggest fear is a right wing government coming into power and rounding up every paki, arab, darkie, jew, faggot and cripple and putting them into a work camp to be forced to do grueling manual labour or else they get shot in the head.

Because what if they forget to round up the gypsies?
Not happening, they don't want to recreate Pontins.

News time

Oxford Mail claims the people putting up flags are a roving band of racists Scousers. Source, a single unnamed person
Scousers 'drove 175 miles from Liverpool to put up England flags', an Oxford householder has bemoaned.

The group of about seven people were spotted putting up St George's Crosses at Green Road Roundabout in Headington last week.
John, who declined to give his surname, said he drove past and spoke to the group, who he accused of "stirring up trouble".

He said the group has proved to him the problem is not a "local thing" in Oxford but others from further afield "looking to cause trouble".

"I was driving past and I saw them with a ladder putting up the flags," he said.
"They were not from around here as I spoke to them and they said they are from Liverpool.
"It's a long way to come to put up a flag, but they said they wanted to put them up higher than they were before because they claimed 'foreign people' had taken them down.


"One suggested they should put grease on the lamppost to stop others from taking it down, and it was also suggested bacon should be wrapped around it."
John said he is "very upset" about the group putting the flag up, saying: "It's my neighbourhood and we are not racist.
"Oxford has a lot of cultures here and this is a sinister move towards an organised show from a few people.
"It's the rise of the far right."
Hilarious fact. The article says 0 comments, if you click on it they've there and are universally mocking the article.

Labour mayor used his position to try to get visas for his friends and family
A Labour politician abused his mayoral office to try to secure immigration visas to bring 41 family members and friends from Bangladesh to Britain, a Telegraph investigation has found.
Cllr Mohammad Amirul Islam sent both “official” and “doctored” letters emblazoned with his council’s crest and logo to the British High Commission in Dhaka in an attempt to get visa applications treated “favourably”.
The letters, seen by The Telegraph, reveal how he wrote to embassy staff urging them to “ensure a smooth visa application process” for “good friends” and family to attend his inauguration as mayor of Enfield council, in north London.

Mr Islam, 47, is being investigated by the Home Office over alleged immigration offences. He has also been found to have brought the council into disrepute by “showing a lack of integrity” by using his position improperly to “assist family, friends and associates in obtaining visas” and “advance personal and private interests”.
The case illustrates how the immigration system can be abused by elected local council politicians.
A 160-page “confidential” independent investigation commissioned by the local authority concludes that Mr Islam sent some letters a year before he became mayor, with a few sent before he even knew he would assume the role.
The report was commissioned after the Home Office contacted the council in May 2024 to say embassy staff in Bangladesh had received a letter from its deputy mayor regarding visas.
The investigation report, marked “restricted” and “not for publication”, catalogues how some letters included passport numbers and dates of birth, which were added to try to ensure the “prompt” handling of the visa applications.
Some were sent by the mayoral office while later ones were “doctored” to look official and were believed to have been sent by the councillor.

“It is apparent that the Council considers it acceptable for their deputy mayor to use council resources (which would include letter-headed paper, officer support, and their status as deputy mayor) to support the visa applications of friends and family for the specific purpose of these people attending their predicted inauguration as mayor… The investigation has found that Cllr Islam went way beyond these limitations, seeking to use his position and status as a councillor, deputy mayor and eventually mayor, in an attempt to advantage various friends and family members.
While most of the letters purported to be an invitation to a special ceremony associated with the Council (most usually claimed by Cllr Isam to be his inauguration as mayor), some did not. Furthermore, the timing of some of the letters (some nearly a year before this ceremony, including letters prepared by [the] Mayoral Services Manager, and one after it had occurred) leads us to question whether this was the true purpose.
While we note Cllr Islam’s assertions that he did not believe he was doing anything wrong, we consider that his doctoring of the council letter templates and his continuing attempts to deny responsibility for many of the letters somewhat undermines his position.
Given the findings of our investigation, we consider that Cllr Islam did attempt to use his position improperly to cause an advantage to various friends and family; and that when doing so, he misused the resources of the council.
When considering whether by this conduct he brought his office and/or authority into disrepute, we recognise the importance the public places on their elected representatives demonstrating integrity and not using their position.council resources for personal gain. In addition, as deputy mayor and then mayor (making him Enfield’s most senior civic representative) Cllr Islam is expected to set the highest of standards and embody the principles that are most highly valued within our community.
We have little doubt that his conduct would seriously damage the reputation of his authority and its councillors more generally.

Despite 41 Bangladeshis being invited to the eventual mayor-making ceremony in May 2024, it is believed only one person from that list turned up.
The conclusions of the confidential file mark an ignominious chapter for the Ponders End ward councillor who struggled to hold back tears when inaugurated as the borough’s first mayor born in Bangladesh.
Investigators found that on the “balance of probabilities”, he had wrongly used his office as deputy mayor to support the visa applications.
Mr Islam told investigators that in using his mayor’s office to support visa applications, he was doing what some previous mayors-to-be before him had done.
Thirteen letters were sent using the council’s official mayoral office team. Mr Islam agreed a further six were “prepared and sent” by him. The provenance of the remaining 11 were disputed, but investigators believe “on the balance of probabilities” they too were sent by Mr Islam.
The cybersecurity specialist was found to have “doctored” the latter letters after being told council staff felt “uncomfortable” drawing up letters supporting visa applications.
Enfield Council document
Letters were sent to embassy staff in Dhaka to ‘ensure a smooth visa application process’ for friends and family of Cllr Islam
All the letters were either signed by him or a council employee acting on his behalf, and offered “full support and endorsement” for a “good friend” or relative from Bangladesh to visit the UK “for a special ceremony organised by my office in Enfield”. Many add: “Their presence at the event is of great importance to me.”
Those “letters of welcome” explained how there was “a commitment to cover all expenses” with visitors staying at his Enfield home.
They concluded: “I kindly request that you consider their visa applications favourably to facilitate their travel to the UK.”
While the report concludes it was “acceptable” for deputy mayors to use “council resources” to support visa applications for people from abroad to attend inaugurations, Mr Islam “went way beyond these limitations, seeking to use his position and status as a councillor, deputy mayor and eventually mayor, in an attempt to advantage various friends and family members”.
It continues: “Furthermore, the timing of some of the letters (some nearly a year before this ceremony, including letters prepared by [the] Mayoral Services Manager, and one after it had occurred) leads us to question whether this was the true purpose…
“The evidence suggests a pattern of behaviour where he used council resources and letterheads to support visa applications, even when not officially authorised. His denials regarding some letters are not sufficiently convincing when weighed against the other evidence.”

The evidence suggests a pattern of behaviour where he used Council resources and letterheads to support visa applications, even when not officially authorised. His denials regarding some letters are not sufficiently convincing when weighed against the other evidence.

All of the letters relevant to this investigation were written on official letterhead Council paper (or paper doctored to make it appear as such) and were signed as being from Cllr Islam.

A standard visitor’s visa allows someone to visit the UK for up to six months to see family and friends, attend a business trip or study.
Although Mr Islam, who completed his year as mayor in May, has been told to issue an unreserved apology, he has yet to do so.
Cllr Georgiou Alessandro, the leader of the council’s Conservative group, said: “The Enfield Labour council knew about these allegations long before he became mayor and he was still allowed to take office. This all brings deep shame upon the council. He should resign.”
Mr Islam, a married father of two, told The Telegraph he remained adamant he did nothing wrong. He told the investigation he reported to Bangladeshi police an “agency” there which he believed was responsible for doctoring some letters and “forging” his signatures.
He said that as someone born in Bangladesh who arrived in the UK in 2003, his family was understandably “proud” he would become mayor and was eager to attend his inauguration.
The councillor said none of the visa applications he supported was successful so no one came to the UK.

A Home Office spokesman said: “It would be inappropriate to comment on an active investigation, but all allegations of immigration crime are thoroughly investigated and appropriate action is taken where necessary.”
The councillor, who now sits as an independent councillor, was suspended from the Labour Party in June 2025 pending the outcome of an investigation.
An Enfield council spokesman said the authority “fully supports” the conduct committee’s conclusion he “brought his office into disrepute”. It is currently “in correspondence with Mr Islam to ensure he obeys sanctions, which include him not using his position as a councillor to support any visa applications, undergoing code of conduct training and a “request not to wear his past mayor’s badge again”.
Asked why the council barred the press and public from a hearing about its independent investigation, which was also not published, the council spokesman said: “The council is confident that the process was fair and transparent while also protecting the confidentiality of various parties involved.
“The decision notice has already been published on the website with the minutes to follow once approved by the committee.
“We expect the highest level of standards and conduct from councillors. We are satisfied that the committee review has addressed the concerns raised about Mr Islam’s conduct following the thorough and comprehensive investigation undertaken.”

NHS Fife try to change its claims mid-trial and get told to swivel

A last-ditch attempt by NHS Fife to change its legal defence against Sandie Peggie has been rejected.
Lawyers representing the health board made an eleventh-hour request to alter its pleadings by introducing a new line of defence, claiming that it was the manner of Ms Peggie’s behaviour, rather than her beliefs, which justified her suspension.
The nurse was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with trans medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023.
Ms Peggie was placed on special leave after Dr Upton, a biological male who identifies as a woman, made an allegation of bullying and harassment, and cited concerns about “patient care”.

The nurse lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation.
The case, which has already run for two months at a cost of at least £220,500, was at the closing stages earlier this month when the hospital’s lawyers tried to introduce a new line of defence based on “objectionable manifestation” of belief.
The argument, which legal commentators have dubbed the “Bananarama defence” after the group’s 1980s hit It Ain’t What You Do, It’s The Way That You Do It, claimed that it was the manner of Ms Peggie’s behaviour rather than her views which justified the hospital’s actions.
The defence drew on a previous Court of Appeal judgment in Higgs v Farmor’s School, which held that while people are free to hold protected beliefs, employers can take action if those beliefs are expressed in ways that are inappropriate, offensive or disproportionate in the workplace.
Jane Russell KC, representing Dr Upton and the hospital, argued that the amendment was necessary to reflect the “true nature” of the case, claiming that Ms Peggie’s conduct went “too far”.
The tribunal heard that Dr Upton was left feeling “really upset” by the exchange in the female changing rooms.
The doctor said that Ms Peggie repeatedly questioned their gender identity and compared the situation to those in prisons in what Dr Upton perceived to be a reference to the trans rapist Isla Bryson.
Accepting the amendment would have risked pushing the case into next year with witnesses having to be recalled and potential further appeals.
But the panel has now refused the application to amend the pleadings, ruling the objectionable manifestation argument was already raised implicitly in the board’s existing pleadings and skeleton argument.
It has, however, granted a narrower amendment to the list of issues – the case management document setting out what the tribunal will decide.
Judge Sandy Kemp found that the failure to include the point in the list of issues earlier in the case was “negligence” on the part of NHS Fife’s lawyers.
Deliberations are set to begin in mid-October.

Burnham makes it clear he wants to undo Brexit (if it was ever in doubt)

Wedding law reforms. Remember this one, I anticipate it being cited in a few decades time for more Sharia law child brides as well as other coerced weddings given it allows groups like humanists to carry out legal ceremonies.
Marrying couples to have more freedom over how they say ‘I do’, with reforms allowing them to get married on beaches and at heritage sites.

Announced today (2 October), it is estimated that the biggest overhaul to marriage law since the 19th century could also open up 12,000 jobs and add over £100 million to the public purse.

The reforms will give couples more choice in how they get married, making the process simpler, fairer and less costly, while ensuring the dignity and integrity of marriage is protected.

Under the reforms, couples will be able to marry in a wider range of locations provided venues meet strict standards of being appropriate and dignified.

These changes will mean marriage law reflects modern Britain, making it more straightforward for couples to have legally binding religious ceremonies - including Sikh, Muslim, Buddhist and Hindu weddings - and allow non-religious groups, such as Humanists, to conduct legally binding ceremonies for the first time.

This will also be a significant boost to the economy as it is estimated the reforms could lead to a 3% increase in weddings in England and Wales, adding £535 million to the economy over the next 10 years, supporting 1,800 more businesses and delivering on the Plan for Change to kickstart growth.

Minister for Family Law, Baroness Levitt KC said:

Marriage is one of our country’s most celebrated traditions and our plans will allow couples to have the wedding day of their dreams.

Our reforms will protect the solemnity and dignity of marriage while providing more choice for couples and unlocking untapped opportunities for the economy.
Minister for Victims and Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls, Alex Davies-Jones said:

Mine and my husband’s wedding day was incredibly special – personal, meaningful and an unforgettable celebration of our love. Every couple deserves the same.

Our wedding laws should match our country’s needs. These vital reforms will mean couples from all walks of life can celebrate their commitment without outdated restrictions getting in the way.
The reforms announced will see regulation of weddings shift away from buildings and onto the officiants running the ceremony, offering couples greater freedom to shape their big day.

ENDS

Further information:

  • Planned changes follow Law Commission recommendations from July 2022 to modernise marriage law and break down unnecessary barriers to weddings for engaged couples.
  • The Government will undertake a consultation early next year.
  • Legislation to reform marriage law will be introduced when parliamentary time allows.

The Greens continue to push the guy who cheers on Hamas on 07/10 to the forefront. Remember, they support rape by every minority not just transgender ones.

A Green Party councillor has admitted that he is “not a good politician”.
Mothin Ali, who chanted “Allahu akbar” when he won his seat last year, made the comments in a meandering conference speech that attacked Sir Keir Starmer, capitalism and the “rise of fascism”.
The Leeds city councillor and deputy leader of the Greens drew laughter and applause from delegates at the party’s annual gathering in Bournemouth as he declared: “I am not a good politician, but I try to be a good man”.
He accused society of losing “the willingness to engage in uncomfortable conversations” and called for “empathy” and “kindness” – virtues he claimed the Greens could teach others.
Mr Ali, a former Labour member, told delegates he quit the party in 2020 after Sir Keir declined to attend an iftar meal because “an organisation which provided tents to displaced Palestinians was going to be there”, prompting cries of “shame” from the audience.
“Only in the Green Party are you free to speak,” he said. “We’re kind, but we are also ready to show our teeth.”
Mothin Ali accused society of losing 'the willingness to engage in uncomfortable conversations' and called for 'empathy' and 'kindness'

Mr Ali also claimed that last year’s riots, triggered by the Southport attacks, were “the Farage riots” and warned of “the rise of Trump’s fascism” in America.
Mr Ali also warned of a Europe where “they point at black and brown people, they point at Muslims, they point at immigrants and say ‘they’re the problem’.”
He told Green Party members that “immigrants are the backbone of the NHS” and later said “your enemies aren’t other poor people – your enemies are those who extract wealth from our society to fill their coffers”.
Turning to matters of public spending, Mr Ali said there was never money for services but “always money for war” and added that it was “time for our governments to start putting us first. It’s time for the rich to pay”.
He concluded his speech by draping a garland of flowers over the shoulders of Zack Polanski, the party leader.
(L-R) Sian Berry MP, Mothin Ali, deputy leader of the Green Party, Rachel Millward, deputy leader of the Green Party and Carla Denyer MP applaud the speech of Green Party leader Zack Polanski on the first day of the Green Party Conference, at Bournemouth International Centre on October 3, 2025 in Bournemouth, England.

In an earlier speech, Rachel Millward, the party’s co-deputy leader, called for rivers to be given rights.
She later told The Telegraph that this would be a “set of rights under law, including the right to be free of pollution”.
The rights would be enforced “through guardians” who could hold water companies to account.
 
Última edición:
I'm gonna embrace my inner gyppo and steal @Made In Wales bit (unlike that tight bastard though I'll include the images), just because today's edition of The Observer was just too damn fucking funny not to share, especially the "opinion" columns, sheer pure lunatic delusion abounds; how do they manage to be so wrong about everything?

https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/its-time-to-stop-dismissing-jewish-fears/https://archive.is/rxim0
1759687458069.png

To those who fuel an atmosphere that makes antisemitic violence inevitable, we will no longer accept it​


For Jews the attack on a Manchester synagogue was devastating but also devastatingly unsurprising. Jews have had enough of being gaslit about the hatred we face. Don’t tell us the hostility we see, hear and feel is imagined, exaggerated or understandable.

Hatred, often in the guise of “anti-Zionism”, has festered for years and surged following Hamas’s massacre of Jews on 7 October 2023. Jews around the world are traumatised by events, not just thousands of miles away, but in the streets, campuses, workplaces and public spaces of their countries, including Britain. On the day of the Manchester attack, spontaneous “pro-Palestinian” demonstrations sprung up. Concern for Palestinians motivates some protesters but those who mobilise them include Islamists and other violent ideologues who find nothing more energising than dead Jews, and the Palestinian cause a convenient vector.

Here are two simple facts: first, British Jews are not the Israeli government and should not be conflated with it. Second, the overwhelming majority of British Jews have a profound connection to Israel – through religion, history, culture and family ties.
Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people and the world’s only Jewish state. Zionism, the movement that secured Jewish self-determination in our homeland, is the greatest achievement of the Jewish people since biblical times. Most British Jews are Zionists. The Zionists accepted UN resolution 181 in 1947 that mandated both a Jewish state and an Arab state. It is Zionists who will find a secure peace with the Palestinian people. To rail against “Zionists” reveals either shameful ignorance or hostility to Jews, stoking antisemitism.
Jewish schools, synagogues and communal events need extensive security with good reason. Without that security, led by the Community Security Trust (CST) and bolstered by community volunteers, the death toll in Manchester would have been higher.
Related articles:

Soul-searching is needed among those who wittingly or unwittingly feed an atmosphere that makes antisemitic violence inevitable.

From Glastonbury, where a singer chanted “death to the IDF” after launching an antisemitic rant to the national broadcaster that aired it. The same BBC that has refused to call Hamas terrorists even after its members hacked, raped, shot and burned their way through the south of Israel. From Gary Lineker sharing content depicting “Zionists” as rats to those who call for an intifada, which both Jews and antisemites hear as a call for anti-Jewish violence.
We will no longer accept it. On this there is broad consensus among Jews, but there needs to be broad consensus among the wider public.
The authorities need to do more to clamp down on calls for violence. The term “hate-marches” to describe the pro-Palestinian rallies that have dominated our streets is sadly accurate. Where Jew-hatred is normalised, anti-Jewish violence is incubated.

The father of the Manchester attacker praised the Hamas terrorists who carried out the 7 October attackers as “God’s men on earth”. We need honest conversations and concerted action to address the prevalence of Islamist ideology and the support for jihadism that undoubtedly exists within many pro-Palestinian campaigns.
We do not, however, need bigots of another stripe using the fears of the Jewish community in their own campaigns to vilify British Muslims. We do not need a far-right minister in Israel’s government, Amichai Chikli, using the attack to trumpet his support for the anti-Muslim street demagogue and bigot, Tommy Robinson.

And we do not need Jewish suffering manipulated as a talking point by those wanting to paint a lurid picture of “broken Britain” for their own political gain.
The Jewish community appreciates the support from successive governments for the CST. But we can also profoundly disagree with the timing of the government’s decision to recognise Palestinian statehood, as I do, without accusing Sir Keir Starmer of supporting terror or denigrating his heartfelt response to the Manchester attack as “crocodile tears”.

We should be clearheaded about the tolerance, respect and decency that makes Britain great and has enabled Jews to thrive here. Throughout much of Jewish history authorities enabled, ignored or carried out acts of hatred and violence against Jews. Last week, police neutralised the attacker within seven minutes of being called.

Nevertheless, mainstream Britain needs to take Jewish fears seriously and engage with determination and moral courage about the hatred we face. Muslim communities also need to speak up about the malignant forces that ferment hate and violence in their name. Those who would murder Jews won’t stop with Jews.
We celebrate what is good about this country, but demand more from our leaders and fellow citizens to ensure that the Britain we love prevails. If not, I fear the echoes of Maurice Ogden’s The Hangman will be felt by us all: “First the alien and then the Jew… I did no more than you let me do”.
Mick Davis is a past chairman of the Jewish Leadership Council and co-founder of The London Initiative
https://observer.co.uk/news/nationa...r-have-any-part-in-farages-populist-extremism/https://archive.is/GZTTi

1759687587434.png

To describe asylum seekers as thieves or rapists encourages the worst sort of prejudice. We don’t need Trump’s mouthpiece anywhere near No 10​

At the start of the second world war, President Roosevelt was forced by his Republican opponents to agree that America would not enter it.
Hitler then made the unbelievable mistake of challenging America’s sovereignty by attacking the convoys upon which we depended before they reached the open sea. I have been privileged to live since then within the safety and security of the Pax Americana that one president after another has sustained since they helped to secure victory in 1945.

The United Nations with its wide spread of social and cultural agencies; Marshall Aid to help fund the post-war rebuilding of Europe; and the Nato alliance to ensure it could not happen again – I gave a speech in tribute to all this in 1986 called An Alliance not an Empire.
There are other uncomfortable memories from the end of the 1930s. The rise of fascism found its followers from the top to the bottom of European societies in Germany, Italy and Spain, while Oswald Mosley marched his followers through London’s East End. It required Churchill’s iron determination to stop his Conservative colleagues seeking peace with Hitler.
When the second world war ended, the abiding view was that it must never be allowed to happen again. Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman – the latter would become French prime minister – were among the most influential Europeans who created the European Coal and Steel Community. Churchill articulated the idea: “We must create a kind of United States of Europe.” Note his words; he said “we” not “they”.


Harold Macmillan set us off on the controversial post-imperial journey; Ted Heath secured our accession to the Treaty of Rome. Margaret Thatcher’s greatest achievement was to help create the European Single Market; John Major secured the Maastricht compromise that prevented free movement and kept us out of the single currency. I worked for them all and remain convinced of the arguments in favour of Europe. Now, if the Conservatives want to return to power, they would do well to remember what our party did then and why.
I am dismayed by the drift of events in world politics. The economic collapse of 2008 and the Covid crisis have seriously unnerved confidence in governments and the rightwing equivalents to the fascists of the 1930s are back on the march – Le Pen in France, AFD in Germany, FDI in Italy, Vox in Spain and, conspicuously, Reform in this country. Much of President Trump’s language in America coincides with words here in Europe. The immigrant has replaced the Jew as the problem that needs a solution, although recent events have cast a dark cloud.

The overwhelming majority of asylum seekers want to share our standards
There is no question that we need effective control of our borders, but we must recognise that they are Europe’s as well, and we should join them in creating secure frontiers everywhere. However, first let us understand the nature, motive and scale of what we all face.

The mobile phone is available worldwide. Our living standards, while criticised here, are much higher than in many other parts of the world. That simple reality together with the consequences of global warming, which are threatening coastal communities, will increase pressure on all our borders.
The overwhelming majority of asylum seekers want to share in our standards and escape from persecution or civil war. To describe them as thieves or rapists is not just dishonest but encourages the worst sort of prejudice in our communities. If you want further proof, visit any part of our health services, social services, public and private sector offices or academia.
I have no faith in the present government’s ability to rebuild our economy but expect it will stumble along for the next four years. I want the Conservatives back in power.

There are five broad issues that they must address: the defence of the realm; the restoration of strength and confidence in our economy; the rule of law; the threat to our environment from pollution, global warming and climate change; and the restoration of British influence in the world. This is an agenda that should appeal to the younger electorate that will be in place by the next election. It will require courage; the country is living beyond its means. Many people will not like the necessary changes. We must not abandon the shared laws of Europe – so important to our citizens. The threat from global warming must not be ignored in the hope that it may not happen.

European companies need the same scale of research and development support as available to their competitors in America, China and, increasingly, India. That cannot be done by nation states working alone. We must play a leading part in building a more effective European military capability within Nato and prevent a Russian victory in Ukraine.

Above all, we must make clear that we will never have any part in the populist extremism of Nigel Farage.
We have to deal with president Trump for the next three years. We don’t need his mouthpiece anywhere near No 10.
Michael Heseltine was an MP from 1966 to 2001. He has been a cabinet minister in various departments and deputy prime minister from 1995 to 1997. His new book, From Acorns to Oaks: An Urgent Agenda to Rebuild Britain, is published by Biteback.
https://observer.co.uk/news/politic...-fears-grow-over-far-rights-embrace-of-crypto/https://archive.ph/V0YJz

1759687907603.png

Hard-to trace digital transactions could lead to hostile states or criminal organisations secretly making political donations and threatening democracy​

When Elon Musk appeared on huge screens dotted along Whitehall last weekend calling for thousands of attendees at far-right campaigner Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally to “fight back… or die”, the tech billionaire’s image was accompanied by the logos of the event’s sponsors. All but one were cryptocurrencies.
It highlighted the arrival in Britain of a global pattern: the embrace by extreme rightwing movements of decentralised digital currencies.

Athena Bitcoin Global, one of the main sponsors of the event, which saw up to 150,000 people gather in central London, has been accused of profiting from cybercrime in the US.
This month, the attorney general for the District of Columbia (DC) accused the company, which makes bitcoin ATMs that exchange the cryptocurrency for cash and vice versa, of knowingly profiting from scams targeting elderly victims for “life-altering” sums of cash.
In a lawsuit filed against Athena, DC attorney general Brian Schwalb alleged that 93% of the deposits in that district in its first five months were “the product of outright fraud”.

One elderly victim is alleged to have lost $98,000 (£72,000) over the course of three days after being exploited by scammers. The average age of the victims was 71.
“Not only has Athena done little to nothing to prevent this fraud,” the lawsuit stated, “but it has instead pocketed hundreds of thousands of dollars in undisclosed fees on the backs of scam victims and adopted policies to prevent these victims from recovering any of their losses.”
Historically, there’s been one form of money. It’s been issued by the central bank, and that’s been controlled by the government. That isn’t the case any more
Tom Keatinge, Royal United Services Institute

Authorities have long warned that cryptocurrencies pose an urgent challenge to the UK’s democracy by enabling hostile state actors and foreign nationals to secretly donate to political parties.
Tom Keatinge, director of the Royal United Services Institute’s Centre for Finance and Security, said: “The average person in the UK might think of it as being a marginal thing, but in that [far-right] community – which is a growing community – it’s mainstream.

“Historically, there’s been one form of money. It’s been issued by the central bank, and that’s been controlled by the government. That isn’t the case any more.”
Athena has also come under scrutiny for its operation in El Salvador. It charged millions of dollars to install and maintain hundreds of bitcoin ATM terminals, despite little uptake of the scheme. In 2022, the company settled a lawsuit with a contractor that had alleged it went unpaid after helping address failures in developing an app to go with Athena’s Chivo-branded ATMs in El Salvador. A deposition stated that flaws in the Chivo app had led to 400,000 fraudulent accounts receiving government stipends that cost the local taxpayer between $12m and $24m
Matias Goldenhörn, Athena’s chief executive, declined to answer specific questions but said in a statement: “Athena believes the UK must break free from anti-free speech tyranny if it is to endure as a western nation. We were proud to sponsor the rally.”
Alleging a smear campaign, he said bitcoin was “the free speech of money” and added: “Attempts to suppress speech or financial freedom only prove why it matters.”
Two other crypto companies sponsored the event. Fomo, a crypto coin, and V-Social, mooted as an X-style social network that promises crypto rewards.
Ashley Ward, owner of Fomo and V-Social, said: “I have no interest in politics. My opinion is really simple – I don’t like to see our country being eroded in terms of free speech.”

“I don’t believe that Islam is our real enemy. I believe all religions and ideas should be protected and that radicalised individuals from either religion or politics are the true threat,” he added. Ward also confirmed he used a smaller Robinson march on 1 June last year, when an estimated 15,000 people gathered in central London, to promote an earlier version of the Fomo coin, bragging on Telegram messenger of “access to the biggest names in the political space”.
Advance UK, a new political party announced by former Reform UK co-deputy leader Ben Habib also sponsored the rally last weekend. Robinson, 42, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is an Advance UK member.
Cryptocurrency transactions can be easy to obscure and there are fears their involvement in the UK’s political system could lead to uncontrolled levels of cash from hostile states or organised crime.

In Moldova, its president, Maia Sandu, has warned that Russia is planning an “unprecedented” interference campaign in the country’s forthcoming election, including deploying $100m of crypto.
In May Reform UK’s leader, Nigel Farage, announced at a conference in Las Vegas that his party would be the first in Europe to accept cryptocurrencies as donations.
Senior Labour MPs have expressed concern about the prospect of crypto-based political donations and are pressing ministers to delay the much anticipated elections bill, designed to change electoral oversight laws, so that it can include a clause banning them.
Ireland, Brazil and Greenland have all banned crypto donations.

MPs fear that crypto can be manipulated to artificially lower valuations, so that political donations fall below the reportable thresholds – which can be as low as £500 – or that AI could be used to make thousands of sub-threshold donations at a given moment.
They plan to use the forthcoming Labour party conference to “crystalise” the approach, one said.
Labour MP Liam Byrne, who sits on the joint committee on national security strategy, said: “Ministers should not present the bill until they have put in place platinum-plated provisions around crypto.”
https://observer.co.uk/news/opinion-and-ideas/article/my-son-recently-found-a-swastika/https://archive.ph/ZVLAq
1759688198287.png

The Manchester attack didn't come as a shock. The only surprise is it hasn’t happened sooner​

Like many Jews I was not shocked by what happened in Manchester last Thursday. Numbed, yes. Scared and upset, yes. But not shocked. We’ve known this was coming for a long time. The only surprise is it hasn’t happened sooner.
Every synagogue has, for many years, had members on a rota for security duty, led by more experienced volunteers from the invaluable Community Security Trust (CST). Members of my family were doing it this week. I take my turn on the rota, though I can’t imagine there are many things less intimidating than me in an oversized stab-proof vest armed with a walkie-talkie. Whenever I’ve been on duty I spend most of my time watching cars driving past and wondering “what if”.

It's not just synagogues either. Jewish schools have guards, metal detectors and active shooter drills. And for good reason. In 2024 and 2023 there was a 100% increase in antisemitic incidents logged by the CST from the two years before that. This includes online abuse, which is now standard for any Jew with a public profile, and has got worse since X stopped removing openly racist posts. But it also includes regular vandalism of synagogues. Just last month five in Golders Green were attacked and smeared with human excrement, including the entrance to a Jewish nursery. My son recently found a swastika drawn on the pavement at the end of our street.

This ever present sense of risk is frightening, and has left many Jews feeling unwelcome in the UK. It’s hard to see things improving, as violence in the Middle East and the rise of the far right in Europe and America has led to a resurgence in age old tropes. Education is one route. I’m a trustee of the Holocaust Educational Trust and we work with thousands of schools, using history to show where antisemitic ideas can lead. We know this work does make a difference to young people that engage. But in an era where it’s easier than ever to share emotive disinformation it can feel like an increasingly unfair fight.
It's a fight we share with other minorities that are increasingly threatened by violence, abuse and intimidation. Alongside protecting Jews, the CST has advised Hindu temples, Sikh gurdwaras and mosques. They helped set up Tell MAMA, which combats anti-Muslim hate crimes – incidences of which have risen dramatically in recent years. It’s critical that, like the numerous Muslim organisations that offered support in the past few days, we continue to stand together and work against hatred.

To stand with others is to choose hope over fear, and to avoid letting antisemites define us solely as victims. As the late Rabbi Jonathan Sacks wrote: “The Jewish way is to rescue hope from tragedy. However dark the world, love still heals. Goodness still redeems. Terror, by defeating others, ultimately defeats itself, while the memory of those who offered kindness to strangers lives on.”
https://observer.co.uk/news/opinion...this-could-be-the-last-waltz-for-rightwingers/https://archive.ph/WYlkY
1759688328423.png

People are tired of their favourite celebrity television shows being used for reputation repair​

In the past five years, British audiences have begun to brace themselves at the announcement of reality TV casts. Scanning a grid of faces, the dreaded thought appears: which rightwing figure has joined my most beloved TV show to rehabilitate their public image?
Political figures have long used reality shows to transition from politician to personality – Ed Balls and Ann Widdecombe did Strictly Come Dancing; Stanley Johnson did I’m a Celebrity ... Get Me Out of Here; George Galloway did Big Brother – to lesser and greater degrees of success. But recently, rather than a vehicle for shifting careers, reality TV has become a vehicle for reputational recovery, utilised increasingly by controversial and disgraced conservative figures hoping to wash away a bad public impression by making a lovable fool of themselves to audiences of millions.

This trend began when the former health secretary Matt Hancock, the Covid pandemic health secretary, made it to the final of I’m a Celebrity in 2022, despite major public pushback when his casting was announced. He was followed in 2023 by the Reform UK founder Nigel Farage, then ex-leader of Ukip, who also made it to the end, with viewers warming to him in spite of their distaste for his politics. Both were grudgingly liked by viewers by the end of the series, humanised by their trials and errors – and their normal interactions with more likable castmates.

This autumn, the trend has ballooned, with two British reality TV institutions following suit simultaneously. Last month, Big Brother announced it would have the young Tory influencer Emily Hewertson as one of its housemates for the new series, which began last week. It came just weeks after news that Thomas Skinner, the former Apprentice candidate and friend of JD Vance, would appear on the new series of Strictly.
It’s obvious why broadcasters have continued to cast these controversial figures. They generate public outrage and give shows free press, dominating tabloid coverage, opinion columns and social media posts, and often breaking through to publications that otherwise wouldn’t cover these programmes. The downsides, despite protestations from critics, have been minimal.

Viewers who these selections might alienate rarely watched shows like I’m a Celeb anyway – and it was hardly the case that these programmes had pristine, highbrow reputations that could be damaged by attention-seeking castings. Ratings, of course, don’t distinguish between who is and isn’t hate-watching, and these selections did create ratings boosts (2 million more people watched the first episode of Hancock’s series compared with the previous year’s).

Many viewers said they left the room when Thomas Skinner hit the dancefloor
Cast members have also tended to get what they want out of their appearances too. It’s no surprise that after a decade of failed attempts, Farage was elected as an MP just six months after he appeared on the show – slingshotted back into cultural relevance after a slow fade since 2016.
But viewers’ patience for this gimmick may be reaching its end. In a public vote on Monday, Hewertson was the first housemate evicted from Big Brother. And while Skinner has yet to face a similar test, his attempt to play the lovable buffoon hasn’t induced much warmth among the public or in the press. He has been the target of many unflattering tabloid stories: one in the Sun, where Skinner admitted to cheating on his wife, followed by another in the Mirror suggesting Skinner’s company may have misused a Covid loan.

After his first dance last Saturday, social media seemed less delighted and more turned off, with many viewers saying they literally left the room when it was his turn on the dancefloor. It’s worth noting that, after having no politicians in 2024, rumoured castmates for this season of I’m a Celeb are also Westminster-free.
In an era when our political climate feels louder, it’s no surprise that in shows that help people switch off, audiences don’t want to be confronted with those who remind them of reality. It is likely that by 2026, these figures will be left searching for a new shameless benefactor – one offering a fresh way to profit off laundering their reputations.
https://observer.co.uk/news/columnists/article/altruism-is-holding-britain-together/https://archive.ph/3HhKd

1759688709185.png

Volunteers keep vital services afloat and offer an antidote to our ever more isolated society​

It is three decades since Robert D Putnam published Bowling Alone, his essay on the decline of social ties in America. Fewer people were going to church, he noticed, joining social clubs or becoming members of a union: they were watching television instead. Replace television with social media, and Putnam explains our present moment, including in Britain. By almost every indicator we are becoming more isolated, polarised and antisocial. Except perhaps one.

Britain’s vast army of volunteers can go unnoticed. Perhaps we take them for granted – after all, the tradition can be traced back to the almshouses of the 10th century. But quietly, these altruists are resisting the narrative that the bonds of civic society are unravelling. At last measure, between 2021 and 2022, some 25 million people in England and Wales had donated their time to others.

These people are not just helping out at the village fete or coaching the local football team. They are holding a surprising number of our most vital services together. These include the police, which relies on 14,000 volunteers, and the NHS, to which 71,828 people last year donated more than 6.4m hours in England alone. Among these are defibrillator-trained volunteers who rush to emergencies alongside ambulances, blue lights flashing on their cars. A recent report by London Economics found volunteering in England contributes some £24.7bn a year to GDP.

Perhaps the most dramatic illustration of our extraordinary reliance on volunteers can be found at the coast. Should a boat or a swimmer get into trouble near the shore, the responsibility often falls on people who work for free. America’s coastguard is a fearsome branch of the armed forces, answering to the secretary of homeland security. Britain’s, by contrast, is a resolutely civilian enterprise – more Dad’s Army than military operation. Its heroes are drawn from local towns and villages, accountable only to their stirring pledge to save lives at sea.
Quietly, these altruists are resisting the narrative that civic society is unravelling

Not every bit of it is done for free. Salaried members of the coastguard, part of the Department for Transport, take emergency calls, coordinate rescues, man helicopters and small aeroplanes, and occasionally drag large vessels to safety. But much of the rest of the work is voluntary. About 3,000 unpaid coastguard rescue officers are responsible for rushing into the water to save swimmers, tramping along beaches looking for missing people, and clambering along cliffs to rescue people who get stuck.

And when boats are needed, the coastguard calls on one of the 238 seaside stations run by the Royal National Lifeboat Institution – an organisation founded 200 years ago, which has 7,800 volunteers in its lifeboat crews, as well as 140 lifeguards. Locals train for about six months at weekends and on evenings for the privilege of being paged in the middle of the night to pull someone out of the dark waters.

A country that relies on volunteers is admirable, but fragile. The RNLI costs a hefty £190m to run, and depends almost entirely on donations from the public – but these fluctuate year by year, any dip putting lives at risk. In 2019, for example, its balance book dropped by £28.7m, and it was operating at a £6.3m loss. Former chief executive Mark Dowie said he would avoid tamping down the service, but cuts were coming.

Those who work for free can also be harder for an “employer” to control. Altruism and a shared cause can bond people – but may also drive them apart, particularly when views are strong and there is no prospect of losing a salary if things kick off. Charities are famously rife with internal politics. Last year, a culture of “division and distrust” among RNLI crew members at one rescue station in Wales was judged to make it “unsafe to run”, and it was obliged to close for several months.
That can extend to national politics, too. Volunteer armies are uniquely able to resist pressure from governments – a vital strength or a terrible weakness, depending on your views. The RNLI has for decades floated serenely above politics, a symbol of uncomplicated patriotism. But now its methods are coming into conflict with those of some politicians.

The charity is bound to its compassionate values – if a vessel is in trouble, the RNLI must save everyone on board. But that now involves bringing to safety some people who Brits have voted to keep out. Last year, 1% of its callouts were to small boats crossing the channel: it saved the lives of 58 migrants, including children. Nigel Farage has claimed the charity is “increasingly becoming a taxi service”. Criticism helped in some respects – donations soared after his comments. But the organisation has come under increasing attack from the tabloid press and from rightwing groups.

All this points to the vulnerability of a volunteer nation. What if these philanthropists simply stopped turning up? A report this month by charity Works4U concludes we would “quickly descend into a dystopian state” with “an increase in social disorder and social isolation”, reduced health and falling productivity.
Luckily, that seems unlikely. In fact, fewer people volunteer than would like to – recent work by the charity Pro Bono Economics found about two thirds of unemployed people would be interested in volunteering to prepare them for finding work. Meanwhile, those who give their time freely would need to be compensated with about £2,400 a year to get the same boost to their wellbeing. The urge to get out and help other people turns out to be surprisingly resilient.
https://observer.co.uk/news/columnists/article/n0510mgasylum/https://archive.ph/1ZDEC
1759688887758.png

The number of unaccompanied children seeking asylum in Britain has soared, and many are being put at risk having got here​

Taj arrived in Britain in 2018 hiding in the wheel arch of a bus. He was 16 years old and had travelled alone from his home in Darfur, where he had been tortured. He fled Sudan to Libya, and then through Italy to France. In France he was homeless and hungry, and spent time living on the streets. When he saw a chance to travel to Britain, he seized it.

“I knew the bus had a British number plate. All I had was a small bottle of water and one apple – I nearly fell off three times,” he says. The journey was terrifying, although the bus kept him warm in the freezing temperatures. “On the third day the bus was still for a long time, and I thought, I can’t take this any longer. I need to get off, I’m going to die anyway.” He left the wheel arch – and found that the bus was on a ship, moving across the Channel. “I had made it,” he remembers.
When the boat docked in England it was dark. In the confusion he was discovered by border police, and he was questioned for a long time about his age. “I didn’t know the language”, he says. “All I knew how to say was yes.” After a conversation he barely followed, he saw the police had written on their forms that he was 28. “Once I understood that, I was very worried.”
He was sent to an adult immigration detention centre where he spent the night. But the Home Office social workers who carried out his formal age assessment the next morning accepted he was 16 – in fact, they initially suspected he was much younger and had to be convinced otherwise – and he was taken to a care home in Bedford while his asylum claim was considered.

Taj was one of a growing number of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) who arrive in Britain alone and end up in the care system – a cohort that now makes up almost one in 10 “looked after” children. In 2014 there were 2,050 UASC in council care; by 2024, as the number of displaced people around the world has risen, the figure was 7,380.

In the course of reporting this story, The Observer has spoken with five people with direct personal experience of navigating the asylum system as an unaccompanied child, as well as officials, academics, charities, and care workers. What has emerged is a picture of twin crises: a slow, legally complex and politically charged asylum process and an overwhelmed care system. Caught between them a group of vulnerable young people – at risk of being treated as adults, with potentially dangerous consequences.
1759688852802.png
Foster carer Tina Fenner at home in Sevenoaks, Kent. 28/8/25
The house Taj was sent to in Bedford was run by the local authority, and shared with five other “looked after” teens – mostly young Brits. He liked them, but it was a volatile living situation. Fights would often break out, which he scrupulously avoided in case it damaged his asylum claim. “I didn’t want any trouble,” he says.
Taj found he did not fully understand the asylum system he was in – and neither, it seemed, did many of the people looking after him. “There were 10, 20 social workers” who came in and out of the care home on shifts. It was difficult, he says, to work out the rules. “I wanted to go to school, but they said no, I needed to wait”.
Asylum seekers aged between 16 and 18 are entitled to education, but access can vary by postcode, and schools may baulk at admitting them as they do not feel able to meet their complex needs. A 2022 study found some 21% of lone asylum seeking children were missing school, compared with just 2% of other kids in the care system. “If I had been able to go to school I would be in a very different place now,” he says.
He stayed in the care home until he was 18, during which time he was granted refugee status. He now has settled status – which means he can live in Britain permanently and is able to work. When he looks back at his time in care, he thinks it could have been smoother. “I would have liked to be in foster care,” he says. “But that is very hard to find.”

The UK is in the middle of a “fostering crisis”: the numbers of households approved for care dropped from 45,370 in 2021 to 42,615 in 2024, most likely because the cost of living crisis has made it less affordable.
A lot of [foster carers] are scared of the unknown – worried they won’t be able to communicate… They don’t realise how rewarding it can be

Asylum seeking children are some of the hardest to place. The majority of these lone children – 89% – are between 16 and 18, as the perils of the passage to Britain tend to rule out younger kids. Some 96 % are boys, in part because girls are less likely to attempt these long journeys, where they would be in danger of sexual violence. It is also because boys have a greater chance of fitting Britain’s strict asylum rules, says Marianne Lagrue, policy manager at Coram, a legal charity that specialises in helping child asylum seekers.
These rules require asylum seekers to demonstrate a “well-founded” fear of persecution based on their individual circumstances. Lagrue says boys are more likely to fit this definition, as they may be pressured into conscription as a child soldier, for example, or involved in gang warfare.
Tina Fenner, who lives in Sevenoaks in Kent, has fostered “about 50” asylum-seeking children in the last 20 years, all while bringing up her own daughter, and running a chocolate shop. “A lot of [foster carers] are scared of the unknown – worried they won’t be able to communicate with sanctuary-seeking children,” she says. “They don’t realise how rewarding it can be.”

The effect of foster care is visible in the data. If they are at school, unaccompanied refugees who live in care homes perform at around three years behind their non migrant peers – but for those in foster care that gap narrows to a year and a half. A clinical review by Oxford University found refugee kids who are fostered have significantly better mental health.
“Living with foster parents also helps them to integrate,” says Lagrue. “It can be hard to acclimatise if you are not with a family – who can teach you everything from bus timetables onwards.”

Wali was smuggled into Britain from Afghanistan in 2016 aged 14, suffering from PTSD after experiencing conflict. He was fostered by “five or six” successive families, some of whom he felt “didn’t like the job” and were unapproachable, and others with whom he had a “really positive” time and with whom he still stays in touch. Still, he says that peers who ended up in local authority housing had it worse. They made easy pickings for local gangs – who enticed them with offers of money or companionship. “They are the most vulnerable people because they never think they belong anywhere and they can’t earn,” he says.
In 2023 it emerged that 464 unaccompanied asylum-seeking children had gone missing from hotels. The Home Office placed 6,257 of them in hotel accommodation between July 2021 and January 2024, initially in response to the pandemic. Some were as young as 12.
Local police interviews with children who were subsequently found revealed that some had run away to join family members who were in Britain, but others had been trafficked or exploited.

According to the Home Office, 78 of the missing 464 children have still not been found. A Home Office spokesperson said: “We take children going missing extremely seriously. We continue to regularly review our systems for updates if this takes place, sharing relevant information with local police forces investigating the matter.”
Last year, the high court ruled that the “routine” use of hotels for these children was unlawful, and the Home Office says it stopped using them in this way in January 2024. But according to a BBC report published earlier this year, unaccompanied migrant children continue to disappear from local authority care: between 2023 and 2024 in Kent some 153 went missing for periods of time – the longest of these periods was over a year. Kent county council said that any child going missing was a “serious concern” and the council made “every effort to prevent this from happening”.
1759688808697.png
Nurse Rishan
Even those in foster care – with someone like Tina Fenner looking out for them – can struggle within the system. Fenner feels it is often too crude to cope with the nuances of these children’s situations.
“I was looking after one Albanian girl who had been trafficked into the country for sex,” she says. “We specifically asked for a female interpreter for her asylum interview at the Home Office, but we were given a male one. Of course she wouldn’t go into detail of why she was seeking asylum”.
It was only at Fenner’s insistence that a female interpreter was provided at a second interview. “If I don’t help these children through the system they can end up in absolute limbo,” she says.

Research published this summer by the London School of Economics, found “almost all” young asylum seekers lacked a trusted adult to help them through it. “One young person I worked with didn’t even understand what asylum meant”, says Dr IIona Pinter, an LSE researcher and one of the authors. Many didn’t know they were entitled to support from the Refugee Council, for example, or charities such as Banardo’s, and had to track down immigration solicitors alone.
The lack of specialised support makes life hard for everyone, says Anthony Okereke, leader of Greenwich council. “If we don’t get it right, not only does the child suffer but we as local authorities have to sort out the mess.” Councils are obliged to support those who have been in care as children – or for more than 13 weeks before their 18th birthday – while challenges to asylum claims are ongoing. This responsibility can continue until these young people are 25.
Last year councils spent £286m on unaccompanied young refugees, more than three times the bill of a decade ago – mostly on housing. Despite government efforts to distribute these young people more evenly around the country, certain boroughs bear the brunt of the cost, particularly southern councils such as Kent, which has an obligation to look after lone children when they arrive in small boats in Dover. In Wokingham, one in every four children in care are refugees, and in Hampshire it is one in five.

Meanwhile, the Home Office increasingly disbelieves young people who arrive unaccompanied claiming to be under 18. Age disputes last grabbed headlines back in 2016, during a period that the right wing feared adult migrants were passing themselves off as children. “Tell us the tooth!” bellowed the Sun, demanding dental checks, thought to give more accurate age assessments.
The adults can tell they are children and they are treated differently – adults take their food or fight with them

But now a growing number of children are being incorrectly placed in hotels or hostels with adults. There were 12 times more age disputes in 2023 than in 2011, outpacing the rate of increase in asylum-seeking children. Research from 2024, which looked at a sample of these disputes, found that in more than half the cases children were incorrectly assessed as older than they were and placed in adult accommodation at “significant” risk.
“They are treated with the most appalling hostility at the border with officials laughing at them, and shouting,” says Rivka Shaw, policy officer at Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit. Once in a hostel, “the adults can tell they are children and they are treated differently – adults take their food or fight with them,” says Shaw.
It can also put even more strain on local authorities once these children are distributed around the country. “If a child is assigned to an adult hotel in Manchester, then they are that council’s problem” – meaning the council must suddenly find the money to care for the newly discovered minor, without warning.
What is the solution? Pinter’s report concludes it lies in helping young people through the asylum process with greater speed, and giving them access to an adult they can rely on. It recommends the government provides funding to local councils for legal guardians for these children, as well as free legal advice. Okereke agrees that there needs to be more “joined up thinking” between councils and the government.

But the current political temperature around asylum seekers is unlikely to help progress. Lagrue has been campaigning for children to be allowed to bring over family members to support them – something they are not currently permitted to do – which could potentially take strain off the care system. But she fears the government’s decision to temporarily suspend the family reunion scheme, announced this month, will scupper this.
Meanwhile, anger over the use of hotels for adult asylum seekers could put those children wrongly assessed as adults at even greater risk. The shadow justice minister, Robert Jenrick, has called for people to be held in “rudimentary prisons” while their claims are assessed, while No 10 is considering placing them in buildings on industrial sites or on Ministry of Defence land.
Before 2018, the use of “holding centres” like these was more common. “The first boy that got me into fostering children was an Iraqi boy who was in a holding centre, assessed as being over 16,” says Fenner. “He was actually 13, and one of the older guys had tried to rape him.”
The plan to return to holding centres worries her. “It could be very dangerous for young people,” says Fenner. “The atmosphere in those places is highly charged – a lot of the people who are in there are not their usual selves.”

Meanwhile, charities fear that things are only getting worse for these often traumatised young people – moved from lodging to lodging, or left in local authority housing with very little to do but fret over their asylum status. A year or two in limbo is hard for an adult, but much harder for a teenager, who could suffer from this setback for decades.
“I was fortunate. There was genuine emotion towards my situation from my foster parents – they were super helpful to me,” says Wali. “The British system is not easy. It feels like it doesn’t matter if you are underage.”
Some, like Taj and Wali, will, after long and difficult journeys, ultimately make a happy and productive life for themselves in Britain. Many will not be so lucky.

Profiles​

Tina Fenner

Tina Fenner heard about the struggles faced by lone asylum-seeking children from a social worker after she adopted her daughter Cecilia. No sooner had she taken in her first foster child, a 13-year-old from Iraq, than social workers called her up with her second, a boy from Afghanistan.
A similar phone call has followed every couple of months for the past 20 years – often with very little information about the children involved – and she has always taken them in. Fenner paused fostering only once, during the year Celia was doing her GCSEs.
“My second foster child now owns a very successful fish and chip shop”, she says. “Many are happily married now”. They all stay in touch.

Mateo*

Mateo arrived in Croydon in 2018, aged 16, having travelled alone from Albania. He was put in foster care in a large house with many other asylum-seeking children, but found his foster parents were largely uninterested in talking to him.
“I mostly stayed in my room,” he says. When he turned 17 he was moved to a shared care home, but says a gang would hang around the house, targeting him. It took him “three or four years” to understand the asylum system he was in, and he felt unsupported by social workers. His asylum application needed a medical report, a trafficking expert, and a statement, but he says he wasn’t properly informed about this.
The Home Office refused his application. He is still contesting it.

Rishan

Rishan fled Sudan in 2014, aged 16. Her family had entered Sudan from Eritrea illegally and were at risk of being tortured or killed if they were returned.
She was transported to Britain by people smugglers and the journey took a year, after which she was placed with a “loving” foster family who helped her learn English and with whom she is still in touch. She is now an NHS nurse and helps young refugees in her spare time.
“Things have changed, fewer young people are able to get foster care,” she says. “They are sitting around in hotels, with no access to education or work, nothing to do. We see them isolating and developing mental health issues.”

Ahmed

Ahmed came to Britain in 2018, aged 16, fleeing Sudan. His uncle was involved in politics and the volatile political environment had put the family at risk.
He travelled in the back of a lorry, dodging people traffickers who he says put refugees to work in carwashes or farms. Once in the UK, Ahmed was sent to the City of Westminster, and placed in a hostel for teens in the care system, which also housed young people who had recently left jail. Many of the residents of the building were selling drugs and starting fights.
“I was very scared,” he remembers. It took a year and a half to get his asylum status. He was able to go to college, and is now working.

I had to stop at 7 or I'd be here all day, the entire publication is a goldmine of that looney left stuff the guys at the pub all chat shit about but you never actually see in real life.
 
Última edición:
Former Man U payer and noted geopolitical expert wanker Gary Neville has decided to off us the benefit of his enormous wisdom on the Heaton Park attack. Is it a result of Islam being a violent shithole religion populated by sub 90 IQ browns? Is it a result of jews being murderous cunts in Gaza? No it's the fault of white dudes putting up flags:

He continued: 'When I was driving to Salford City last night, going down Littleton Road, I seen probably 50 or 60 Union Jack flags. And on the way back I went down the parallel road, Bury New Road, which has got the Jewish community right at its heart and they’re out on the streets, defiant, not hiding or in fear.

'I just kept thinking as I was driving home last night that we’re all being turned on each other. And the division that’s being created is absolutely disgusting. Mainly created by angry, middle-aged white men, who know exactly what they’re doing.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo