Culture FDA approves another generic abortion pill, prompting outrage from conservatives - Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri also criticized the move in a post on X, stating, "I have lost confidence in the leadership at FDA."

https://www.npr.org/2025/10/02/nx-s1-5561155/fda-generic-abortion-pill
https://archive.is/kQ0jt

WASHINGTON — Federal officials have approved another generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, a regulatory formality that quickly triggered pushback from anti-abortion groups and politicians aligned with the Trump administration.

Drugmaker Evita Solutions announced on its website that the Food and Drug Administration signed off on its low-cost form of the pill, which is approved to end pregnancies through 10 weeks.

Students for Life Action, which opposes abortion, in a statement Thursday called the approval "a stain on the Trump presidency and another sign that the deep state at the FDA must go."

Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri also criticized the move in a post on X, stating, "I have lost confidence in the leadership at FDA."

A spokesperson for the agency said the FDA "has very limited discretion in deciding whether to approve a generic drug," and added that FDA officials do not "endorse any product."

The criticism comes as Republican President Donald Trump's top health officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., face growing pressure from abortion opponents to reevaluate mifepristone, which was approved 25 years ago and has repeatedly been deemed safe and effective by FDA scientists.

HEALTH

NPR's 'Embedded': Why doctors think women can have safe abortions without their help

In a letter to Republican attorneys general last month, Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary pledged to conduct a full review of the drug's safety.

Under Makary and Kennedy, the FDA has repeatedly delayed decisions on vaccines, ultimately narrowing the terms of approval for this year's COVID-19 shots. That type of political intervention was previously highly unusual at the FDA, where career scientists typically make such decisions.

The FDA approved the original version of mifepristone in 2000 and gradually eased access over time. That included approving the first generic pill, from drugmaker GenBioPro, in 2019.

In 2021, the FDA under Democratic President Joe Biden permitted online prescribing and mail-order delivery of the drug, greatly expanding access. Abortion opponents have been fighting the change ever since.

Approval of generic drugs is typically a rote process at the FDA, with multiple copycat versions usually approved after the patent on the original drug expires. In most cases, generic drugmakers only need to show that their drug matches the ingredients and formula used in the original medication.

"This is exactly how our system is supposed to work, and it has worked this way for decades," said Mini Timmaraju of Reproductive Freedom for All. "Career scientists and civil servants at the FDA did their jobs."

The FDA typically approves such applications within 10 months. But filing documents posted to the FDA's website show that Evita Solutions filed its application to market mifepristone four years ago.

On its website, Evita states that it "believes that all people should have access to safe, affordable, high-quality, effective, and compassionate abortion care."

CULTURE

A new podcast follows the origins of Misoprostol from stomach ulcer to abortion pill

The company said in an email that the drug is expected to launch in January of next year.

Approval of a second generic is unlikely to affect access to the pill, which is typically taken with another drug, misoprostol. The combination accounts for roughly two-thirds of all U.S. abortions. Mifepristone dilates the cervix and blocks the hormone progesterone, while misoprostol causes the uterus to cramp and contract.

Access to mifepristone is restricted across large sections of the country because of state laws that ban abortion — including medication abortion — or impose separate restrictions on the drug's use. Those laws are subject to a number of ongoing lawsuits that are winding their way through the legal system.

Restrictions on the pill are not supported by most major medical societies, including the American Medical Association.
 
The FDA's job is only to check if drugs had gone through correct testing and check for side effects, not to be a moral guardian for types of drugs that already exist in the market. If politicians want to ban those kinda od drugs, it's their own responsibility.

Plus a cheaper abortion drug will be used primarily by Niggers...
 
If you don't like it? Don't ask for an Rx for it.... simple!
 
These conservatives realize trump explicitly went hands off on abortion right? As long as the drugs have the intended effects and are not harmful in other ways the FDA is not responsible for anything else.If they want the drugs to stop, they should petition the state or local government lol.
 
The FDA's job is only to check if drugs had gone through correct testing and check for side effects, not to be a moral guardian for types of drugs that already exist in the market.
I don't know if you've realized, but this entire administration is based around the idea of using tools designed for mundane things to fight "the culture war." This is on the same level as the FCC threatening to revoke broadcast licenses because people say mean words about Trump.
 
The FDA's job is only to check if drugs had gone through correct testing and check for side effects, not to be a moral guardian for types of drugs that already exist in the market. If politicians want to ban those kinda od drugs, it's their own responsibility.

Plus a cheaper abortion drug will be used primarily by Niggers...
lmao they don't get abortions, that's for rich white girls. Every kid a hoodrat pops out is another claim to benefits.
 
WASHINGTON — Federal officials have approved another generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, a regulatory formality that quickly triggered pushback from anti-abortion groups and politicians aligned with the Trump administration.
No matter what bans/imposing forces are put on abortion, people will still do it. Restricting abortion rights mainly just makes it harder for people to receive that care (hanger)

People will always be retarded and not use prophylactics if they don't want a child, but if they're heavy-handed into having a kid they don't want, then they'll be horrible parents. Teaching sex ed to kids in hopes that they'll learn to use prophylactics clearly isn't a solution either
 
No matter what bans/imposing forces are put on abortion, people will still do it. Restricting abortion rights mainly just makes it harder for people to receive that care (hanger)

People will always be retarded and not use prophylactics if they don't want a child, but if they're heavy-handed into having a kid they don't want, then they'll be horrible parents. Teaching sex ed to kids in hopes that they'll learn to use prophylactics clearly isn't a solution either
The reason I oppose abortion when people can willingly sterilize is simple.
If you let the same government - that, by nature of its scope, influence, and monopoly on violence, have the most influence on the upper and lower bounds of your quality of life - determine that arbitrarily unimpressive quality of life is justification for a mercy killing, you have set a monstrous precedent.
 
Nah, sounds like leftist faggotry
1755712435744q.png
STQND BQCK AND something to that effect
 
Atrás
Top Abajo