Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Ver archivo adjunto 7956551
tyler kinda looks like gavrilo princip. sad the man dying of TB looks better than the guy raised in a middle class american family
Gavrilo Princip would be insulted to be compared to Tyler.

Btw, the guys of American Thinker ranted about Charlie Kirk and the Civil Rights act of 1964.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk remains a shock to the American public sphere. After he was killed while debating college students in Utah, his critics galvanized themselves by saying he was not a good debater and therefore in some substantial measure, brought the assassination upon himself. I have seen many in my own profession endorse such a view, and it is unsurprising yet an increasing danger on all college campuses.

One of the myriad of salacious criticisms of Charlie Kirk is his rejection of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This public argument designed to impugn Kirk as a white supremacist and/or racist is like the flood of false claims designed to overwhelm defenders of his campus activity. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was a highly important success of the Civil Rights movement and leaders such as James Farmer Jr. and Martin Luther King Jr.. It was not an achievement that was uniformly affirmed by all advocates fighting for the rights of blacks in the United States. Malcolm X said that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was a fraudulent deal designed to trick blacks into “voting for white liberals.” James Meredith was so opposed to the term “Civil Rights” that he refused to ever use the term. He believes strictly in local action to solve anti-black racism. Assassinations of both men were attempted, but neither man deserved this violence in response to their criticism and they certainly were not anti-black. Malcolm X had said controversially of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy that “the chickens have come home to roost,” hateful rhetoric mirrored by recent American academic and Jacobin Ward Churchill writing about 9/11. Malcolm X was disciplined by Elijah Muhammed for that remark and yet even that speech did not justify the assassination of Malcolm X in 1965.
 
I used to think Western feminists wouldn't be so eager to bow to Islamic rule, but after seeing Queers for Palestine, how eagerly they cry "islamophobia!", demanding tens of millions of Islamic immigrants into their societies, how hard they fight to defend the rape and grooming gangs, how eagerly they exchange real life consequences for a meager handful of internet brownie points, and how hard they cheer for the assassination of anyone who has doubts about Islam, I've changed my mind. The west is too naive.
I have my issues with Attwood, but her Aunt characters have turned out to be an incredibly accurate depiction of that kind of woman.
 
George Floyd was a career criminal(8 jail stints), absentee father, and a habitual drug user who died of a drug overdose.

And the left laid him out in state and gave his family an American flag like he was some sort of national hero.

The entire disgraceful Floyd debacle was a politically-orchestrated farce that honored a man as a hero who was, by all objective standards, a complete piece of shit.

And jailed and innocent white man for no other reason than he was white.
 
That's a very broad list of offenses. Even suicide? Huh.

George Floyd's death was mocked relentlessly when his "crime" was using a counterfeit $20 to buy cigarettes. It was never even determined if he knew it was counterfeit.

His prior conviction for armed robbery in 2007 is consistently brought up as a whole 'gotcha' to justify mocking what was an unjust killing of a man who had served his time, learned from his mistakes, and became a force of genuine good in his community.

Charlie Kirk was a white supremacist grifter whose entire rhetoric was emblematic of what I believe to be the sickness at the core of America, I have no sympathy save for the children who will grow up without a father. The traits I just described are largely considered a positive here however, so this reply is likely an exercise in futility. But I digress.

The culture war/identity politics are a smoke screen, and I consider there being one less grifter to distract/indoctrinate people to be a net positive. Though I personally would have rather seen him decline in popularity and become irrelevant.
Are you against White Supremacy? You sound like that's supposed to be a bad thing.

What's wrong with you nigger?
 
I wonder how long Tyler is going to act all hard and not cooperate. It takes a rather serious individual to tolerate solitary confinement for 23 hours a day. Especially a Zoomer who is used to constant and never ending stimulation from Discord, games, TV, phones, and so on.

He'll cave eventually.
 
I told people the Disney corporation won't even tell Jimmy Kimmel to apologize. If anything, Disney themselves will start pushing the narrative that Charlie Kirk was killed by a MAGA supporter on shows. Disney were the first that pushed narrative Kyle Rittenhouse killed unharmed black men to begin with.
 
That's a very broad list of offenses. Even suicide? Huh.

George Floyd's death was mocked relentlessly when his "crime" was using a counterfeit $20 to buy cigarettes. It was never even determined if he knew it was counterfeit.

His prior conviction for armed robbery in 2007 is consistently brought up as a whole 'gotcha' to justify mocking what was an unjust killing of a man who had served his time, learned from his mistakes, and became a force of genuine good in his community.

Charlie Kirk was a white supremacist grifter whose entire rhetoric was emblematic of what I believe to be the sickness at the core of America, I have no sympathy save for the children who will grow up without a father. The traits I just described are largely considered a positive here however, so this reply is likely an exercise in futility. But I digress.

The culture war/identity politics are a smoke screen, and I consider there being one less grifter to distract/indoctrinate people to be a net positive. Though I personally would have rather seen him decline in popularity and become irrelevant.
Thank you for your sincere response, and for giving Charlie's children sympathy even though you thought Charlie was a "white supremacist grifter whose entire rhetoric was emblematic of what I believe to be the sickness at the core of America". I pray you're able to forgive him someday.

I would also like to clarify that 'in perpetration of a serious violent or heinous crime', is my distinguishing characteristic, so nonviolent crimes, misdemeanor or low felon level violence, or those who have served their time like George Floyd aren't who I'm necessarily considering. I'm referring more to first degree felonies the likes of mass shooters and murderers. (For the record, I consider human trafficking, drug smuggling, and creation and distribution of CSAM to be heinous crime, though it probably has some legal definition that's different).
 
The culture war/identity politics are a smoke screen, and I consider there being one less grifter to distract/indoctrinate people to be a net positive.

Jesus fucking christ. This "both sides" shit is shameless. Stop pretending to be the middleman you pseudo-intellectual. You'll call kirk a White supremacist because he dare question the legitimancy of some dumb black woman's position (libtards do this all the fucking time for white men but apparently they aren't entitled to bullets for it) and lie about Fentanyl Floyd being murdererd (despite no bruising to his neck, no damage to his hyoid bone or larynx, and no conjunctival petechiae), and then say that giving a fuck after one of the biggest conservative commentors was just murdered is just a "culture war issue" to blow off the heat they're getting. Why do culture war issues only distract "right-wingers"? Is thinking that charlie kirk is a nazi a distraction from the real issues like gazans starving or something? Is the idea that the police are racist a "culture war" issue that distracts people from real issues like inflation? This goes both ways you complete faggot. Only when right-wingers participate, or FIGHT BACK, on any issue is this appeal to triviality pulled.

"The police are racist and it's just a big distraction when conservatives question my beliefs and also I will fight tooth and nail for the fact that police are racist. Also did I tell you already that racist police are a culture war issue?"

You are a complete retard and are a captive audience to midwit breadtubers and their awful essays. No critical thinking skills once so ever.

Floyd basically lived his whole life by 50 and Kirk was just getting started at 30, not even close comparison.
Sorry, but some people are more important than others.

People watched Kirk's videos. They heard his voice, and saw him on TV. Lots of people were fans of his and looked up to him. And others, like me, are just familiar with him after how ever many years he's been active in politics. You could say that many people had a parasocial relationship with this guy. When someone like him dies violently, people are going to be really fucking upset when someone is who essentially a friend is murdered on video. This is literally how empathy actually works and is why people feel more empathy for friends and family and not for some literally who guy. Liberals will notice this and act all confused because they never had any empathy to begin with.
 
Última edición:
That's a very broad list of offenses. Even suicide? Huh.

George Floyd's death was mocked relentlessly when his "crime" was using a counterfeit $20 to buy cigarettes. It was never even determined if he knew it was counterfeit.

His prior conviction for armed robbery in 2007 is consistently brought up as a whole 'gotcha' to justify mocking what was an unjust killing of a man who had served his time, learned from his mistakes, and became a force of genuine good in his community.

Charlie Kirk was a white supremacist grifter whose entire rhetoric was emblematic of what I believe to be the sickness at the core of America, I have no sympathy save for the children who will grow up without a father. The traits I just described are largely considered a positive here however, so this reply is likely an exercise in futility. But I digress.

The culture war/identity politics are a smoke screen, and I consider there being one less grifter to distract/indoctrinate people to be a net positive. Though I personally would have rather seen him decline in popularity and become irrelevant.
You are a nigger.

You are a nigger for saying that George Floyd “learned his lesson and didndu nuffin,” despite being a violent career criminal. Moreover, you are a mega-nigger for insinuating that Charlie Kirk, who was expressly against the concept of DEI and remarked that those with higher melanin should be hired when they are qualified, is a White supremacist. In that way, you have refuted Charlie, in that your kind is too stupid to ever function in White society, due in large part to your impulsivity and low IQ.

Log of the forum and go beat your kid, or whatever you pavement apes like doing in your spare time.

nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger, nigger…
 
That's a very broad list of offenses. Even suicide? Huh.

George Floyd's death was mocked relentlessly when his "crime" was using a counterfeit $20 to buy cigarettes. It was never even determined if he knew it was counterfeit.

His prior conviction for armed robbery in 2007 is consistently brought up as a whole 'gotcha' to justify mocking what was an unjust killing of a man who had served his time, learned from his mistakes, and became a force of genuine good in his community.

Charlie Kirk was a white supremacist grifter whose entire rhetoric was emblematic of what I believe to be the sickness at the core of America, I have no sympathy save for the children who will grow up without a father. The traits I just described are largely considered a positive here however, so this reply is likely an exercise in futility. But I digress.

The culture war/identity politics are a smoke screen, and I consider there being one less grifter to distract/indoctrinate people to be a net positive. Though I personally would have rather seen him decline in popularity and become irrelevant.

You are 100% mentally ill/probably sexually abused/retarded. Please kill yourself for the greater good.
 
Sorry, but some people are more important than others.

People watched Kirk's videos. They heard his voice, and saw him on TV. Lots of people were fans of his and looked up to him. And others, like me, are just familiar with him after how ever many years he's been active in politics. You could say that many people had a parasocial relationship with this guy. When someone like him dies violently, people are going to be really fucking upset when someone is who essentially a friend is murdered on video. This is literally how empathy actually works and is why people feel more empathy for friends and family and not for some literally who guy. Liberals will notice this and act all confused because they never had any empathy to begin with.

Just a reminder, they had the audacity to go, "Why is everyone having to care about some guy they never knew about until his death?" despite they NEVER iterated anything similar to the random drug induced black dude that they burned countless cities and worsened race relations over. They knew NOTHING about him or his past yet was treated like a martyr. WE treat Kirk - a man that suffered a quick but brutal death for the war crimes of being a REPUBLICAN - like a martyr and suddenly we're all doing the Nazi salute in solidarity.

How FUN is that??
 
Última edición:
A FMJ or any type of jacketed or solid round I completely agree. Frangibles are nothing but dust in just a few inches of penetration. It's the only thing I can concieve of that would "leave the bullet" in his neck. Which again, I don't think is what happened.

A soft point or hollow point potentially could, depending on the angle and what it hit as it passed through the body. Both types of bullets are designed to expand quickly and dump a lot of energy in a real hurry, leaving a wide permanent and temporary wound channel in the process. Depending on the angle and path traveled, it could have dumped a lot of energy, hit a bone or two, and lost all of it's energy before having a chance to exit. And I have never personally seen any company offering frangible .30-06. Not saying they don't exist, only saying I'm unaware of them. Frangible ammo tends to be in pistol calibers, shotgun shells, or small rifle calibers like 5.56mm/.223.
 
Jesus fucking Christ. Right now would be the perfect time for the left not to do anything stupid and I just woke up to the news that there was a shooting at an ICE facility. These people are on thin ice and they don't get off the ice, they start jumping up and down.

HOW MUCH does the left have to do in the span of a month before people go "maybe these fucking people are loony?"
 
They tried to kill ICE agents by blindingly firing into the office. The result was that pretty much all of the victims are illegals, who got caught in the line of fire, because they were the ones in the lobby not behind counters and stuff.

This is impressive fucking retardation.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo