Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Ah so you just informed us that your opinion is quite irrelevant.What shit hole do you hail from?
What you're seeing in this thread is definitely religious level hysteria.
No they just are not ghouls.
Kirk thought it was hilarious when Palestinians died
Or retarded liars.
Grifters gotta grift.
No greater evidence than this flaming pile of hogshit of a thread.
Seethe


The retards and thread-shitters are feisty today huh?
 
But we go back to weighing some of those options from before. If these people don't have any will at all to elevate themselves, and they can't immediately resonate with the fact that the guy who made his whole life about extending them an open hand was assassinated in front of thousands of their cohort on a college campus, what cost is worth paying to drag them kicking and screaming into the light? Letting go of human decency? Respect for the dead?
Your problem is you think you can scold people into not acting like this, and you can't, it will make them even more prone to mocking Kirk and make others think you're a finger-wagging faggot who wants to destroy fun. There's going to be a backlash to this outrage if it goes on any longer in it's current form.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7949618
It's improbable, but not impossible. Just because his people are framing it as some kind of religious miracle doesn't mean it's actually a religious miracle. There is a scientific explanation for why the bullet was still in there.
The religious nuts saying that it was impossible to try to make it his first miracle into sainthood are just as bad as the "I know everything about guns and there's literally no possible way this could have happened" amateur bullet forensics experts. I mean it happened. Sometimes weird stuff like that just happens, but stranger things have happened. Not every one in a million is a conspiracy theory for the X-Files or a supernatural miracle from Jesus. Sometimes it's just a one in a million.
The claim that Charlie kirk didn't have an exit wound is made by Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet.
Personally i'm going to wait for the coroners report or a statement from people actually involved in the investigation and not some religious clout-chaser trying to canonize Kirk
 
1758548643493.webp x
 
The claim that Charlie kirk didn't have an exit wound is made by Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet.
Personally i'm going to wait for the coroners report or a statement from people actually involved in the investigation and not some religious clout-chaser trying to canonize Kirk
Exactly we don't even know if it's true yet. What I'm saying is if it is true, be prepared to read in that coroner's report that his spinal cord was just shattered like a jigsaw puzzle, because being hit with a round like that which didn't exit means it put all it's force into the spine.
Personally I think we are going to hear that there was an entry wound, but it wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't. Like I said One in a million things happen every once in awhile, that's why they are called one in a millions.
 
Was he not wearing a plate that deflected the bullet up into his neck?
I thought that seemed pretty plausible as to why the bullet didn't continue on.
 
For the last 15 years or so, they have been subjected to the flagrant intolerance of people who label themselves as those who strive for social progress while actively undermining anything related to that term.
I just want to point out that in these people's minds, the only "social progress" they're willing to accept is whatever tears down and disrupts society as it currently stands, all out of the delusional belief that tribalism is the true ideal state of man, supposedly before concepts like individual wealth ownership and personal property came to be.

It isn't based on "social theory", however; it's based on Gnostic religious belief about the structure and nature of the universe, and man's current placement therein (humans with a fragment of the Divine are actually being oppressed by a Demiurge (an insanely jealous being who seeks to prevent the re-forming of the Divine) which takes the form of traditional religious depictions of God being a loving and supportive Father.)
 
Última edición:
Your problem is you think you can scold people into not acting like this, and you can't, it will make them even more prone to mocking Kirk and make others think you're a finger-wagging faggot who wants to destroy fun. There's going to be a backlash to this outrage if it goes on any longer in it's current form.
I somewhat agree with this. I think general mockery should be fine(le small face), and i have seen some guys butt-hurt over comments that are clearly not mocking his death.At the same time its fine to "cancel" people that openly jubilate, say his assassination is good and needed, while calling for more covertly or explicitly.There SHOULD be some backlash for that.
The claim that Charlie kirk didn't have an exit wound is made by Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet.
His whole write-up about charlie having "super bones"(Or a super strong neck? That's a bit ironic yes?) reads to me like when Trump claims that the doctors told him he was the healthiest man they had ever seen.Probably a boiled down exaggeration. Wait for official autopsy!
 
Here's hoping the Church of MAGA does actually demand some kind of canonization for Kirk and the Vatican will send the most greasy, rugged, asshole South Italian Cardinal who hates America in general to investigate and he tells the MAGs to go fuck themselves lol

And hot dam that ceremony was some of the creepiest shit I've seen in my life.
 
My honest reaction to clips I saw from memorial:
Ver archivo adjunto 7949622
Widow wearing white less than a month after her husbands' death is cherry on top. Muh conservative values, surprised they didn't choose Village People as the soundtrack.
Bro you cant joke about this. He was a PODCASTER. It's not cool when a member of the media dies.
 
Your problem is you think you can scold people into not acting like this, and you can't, it will make them even more prone to mocking Kirk and make others think you're a finger-wagging faggot who wants to destroy fun. There's going to be a backlash to this outrage if it goes on any longer in it's current form.
We're not scolding, we're getting them fired :smug:
 
Leftists really cannot accept Kirk is being mourned by people, and are directly calling him and everyone supporting him a nazi.

1758548833829.webp

Worth noting that the comic is wrong about Wessel writing a song, the song the comic is talking about is named after him and was written after he died. Also interesting how they use the term "Proxenetism" instead of saying "his landlord thought he was bringing hookers in" because the author is desperate to make muddy the waters. It's PURE COINCIDENCE the two killers were commies!

If the artstyle looks familiar, or the name, it's because this was made by the famous lolcow Assigned Male. It was also posted on their BlueSky, which is how I learned that the leftists are STILL pushing the narrative of the killer being right wing.
 
Your problem is you think you can scold people into not acting like this, and you can't, it will make them even more prone to mocking Kirk and make others think you're a finger-wagging faggot who wants to destroy fun. There's going to be a backlash to this outrage if it goes on any longer in it's current form.
Again, I don't really see how important of an issue this is for several reasons.

The people being "canceled" for gravedancing are almost entirely ideologically motivated progressives and leftists who are openly promoting their support for political violence being used against their opposition, on main accounts tied to their public identities. I think it's completely valid that any right-leaning person out there wouldn't want these people teaching their kids, administering their healthcare or even making their coffee. I also see it as a positive that the right is finally willing to impose some kind of cost on its enemies, even if it's in this form. If you're American, do you think you could have gotten away with celebrating George Floyd's death on normie social media with your real name attached without something like this happening?

There's a tradeoff here where we're weighing the benefit of imposing costs on the ideologically motivated left vs. the cost of alienating neutral people or causing backlash. Is it worth more inaction and more occupation of the "moral high ground" in order to avoid any backlash?

And what alternative course of action are you offering?
 
His whole write-up about charlie having "super bones"(Or a super strong neck? That's a bit ironic yes?) reads to me like when Trump claims that the doctors told him he was the healthiest man they had ever seen.
I think what the doctors were trying to tell him was that he had so many health issues that none of them could actually affect him.

three stooges syndrome.gif

I believe it's known as "Three Stooges Syndrome".
 
Here's hoping the Church of MAGA does actually demand some kind of canonization for Kirk and the Vatican will send the most greasy, rugged, asshole South Italian Cardinal who hates America in general to investigate and he tells the MAGs to go fuck themselves lol

And hot dam that ceremony was some of the creepiest shit I've seen in my life.
Bro you cant joke about this. He was a PODCASTER. It's not cool when a member of the media dies.
Thread shitters, shitting together :neckbeard:

We're not scolding, we're getting them fired :smug:
PQTRIOTS IN CONTROL?
 
I somewhat agree with this. I think general mockery should be fine(le small face), and i have seen some guys butt-hurt over comments that are clearly not mocking his death.At the same time its fine to "cancel" people that openly jubilate, say his assassination is good and needed, while calling for more covertly or explicitly.There SHOULD be some backlash for that.
My thing is, if you are going to just mock and be an arrogant smug dick and gloat about the man's death behind the protection of "It's just a joke can't you take a joke?" is on par with those annoying little faggots who physically assault or harass people on streams and then when they are getting the fuck kicked out of them they holler out "IT'S JUST A PRANK BRO"
If you're going to be a tasteless, mocking, gloating little queer, you are going to be shamed and told to shut up and rightfully so. If you want to hit me with an actual JOKE like Count Dankula did, I'm fine with it. I think the day after the shooting when we found out that the shooter was a tranny hawk, faggot antifa furry, he said "Well at least we know it wasn't the Jews this time" and nobody lost their shit because it was actually a dark joke.
But let's look at the key word in my last sentence: JOKE. There's a clear difference between jokes and mocking someone who was shot in front of their small kids before his body is in the ground. People know the difference and playing coy is just annoying to me. People can say whatever they want about Charlie Kirk and he deserved to die or whatever, and that's fine. That's their constitutional right. But it's also my constitutional right to call somebody it tasteless faggot who should be kicked in the testicles buy an NFL punter, that's my constitutional right.
Nobody is saying that these people aren't allowed to say this nasty shit, but we don't have to like it either.
 
I think people need to remember the real forgiveness isn't saying someone shouldn't be punished or justice be served. That DOJ group (I always forget their name) is insidious and preys on that to have victims of crime conflate Christian forgiveness with a lack of punishment.
There's a reason forgiveness, mercy, and justice are maintained as separate concepts. Forgiveness is for your own benefit; mercy is for theirs. Justice is punishment meeting the crime. You can forgive, but refuse mercy. You can grant mercy in the name of justice without forgiveness. You can forgo mercy and forgiveness and still be just. The people who conflate the three are seeking to destroy justice entirely.
Leftists really cannot accept Kirk is being mourned by people, and are directly calling him and everyone supporting him a nazi.
Labelle living down to his usual standards, I see.
 
We're not scolding, we're getting them fired :smug:
"Trump will get you fired for saying something mean about some guy you didn't know existed until today" is something the left will turn to their advantage.
Again, I don't really see how important of an issue this is for several reasons.

The people being "canceled" for gravedancing are almost entirely ideologically motivated progressives and leftists who are openly promoting their support for political violence being used against their opposition, on main accounts tied to their public identities. I think it's completely valid that any right-leaning person out there wouldn't want these people teaching their kids, administering their healthcare or even making their coffee. I also see it as a positive that the right is finally willing to impose some kind of cost on its enemies, even if it's in this form. If you're American, do you think you could have gotten away with celebrating George Floyd's death on normie social media with your real name attached without something like this happening?

There's a tradeoff here where we're weighing the benefit of imposing costs on the ideologically motivated left vs. the cost of alienating neutral people or causing backlash. Is it worth more inaction and more occupation of the "moral high ground" in order to avoid any backlash?

And what alternative course of action are you offering?
If you keep threatening people will firings because they said "I don't care about Charlie Kirk", they'll get tired with you pretty quickly. This can easily be a repeat of the 2000's where the left regains power by the right being a bunch of moral busybodies that annoy too many people with things they don't care about.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo