Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

1758301493916.webp
 
I'm totally clueless by what this means. Can you explain?
Two things, I think.

1. "Beloved" implies everyone loves them, which is untrue.
2. The irony that leftists can think SOME rich white guys are ok while OTHERS are not when they are all about shit like "eat the rich" shines through. They just love those rich white guys so much they are allowed to say whatever they want, apparently.
 
Why not? Give a reason besides "he was faithful to his wife". That's not even relevant in the question at hand.

They were both outwardly men of God, both the leaders of the biggest social movements of their time, both friends and involved with politicians and the politics of the time, both were famous advocates of peace, both were investigated by the FBI for fear of being a subversive political group, both were assassinated in extremely similar manners (they were both shot in the neck)

Is it just because Charlie Kirk is White and a White man isn't capable of having as much social impact as a black man? Charlie Kirk and Martin Luther King Jr. were different men for sure, there's only one Charlie Kirk. but their similarities can't just be ignored, Charlie Kirk is this generation's MLK easily in terms of implication of assassination and their respective impacts they've had on people, and it's laughable that people would deny that. Kind of worrying though since it's up to us to keep Charlie Kirk's legacy alive and people are already surrendering to niggers.
Good point. I agree with this.
 
If a piano fell on Stephen Colbert, I'd chuckle
If Stephen Colbert was assassinated live on his show, shot in the neck live for all to see like Robert DeNiro in Joker (yes I know his shows are pre-recorded but still.) I would not even think about laughing. That would be very fucked up.

A piano falling on someone like in Looney Tunes is inherently funny no matter who it is.
 
Of course they were reproduced, we didn't get tea style screenshots of their messages app and there were obvious ellipses implying there was more to the messages than they copy-pasted into a press release document.
We won't see the complete ones until the trial, if at all. I hope this faggot doesn't get Epsteined or kill himself for real because that trial is gonna be a spectacle.
 
So as I understand it, it wasn’t just the monologue that pissed off the FCC. It was the deceptive editing in the clip that accompanied the monologue. The clip is the Rose Garden interview where Trump appears dismissive of Kirk’s death. That’s entirely edited. The combination of the two is what pissed Trump and the FCC off.

It’d be like how Null wants you to mark AI shit as AI shit here. Because it can trick retards. I think people like @CaliforniaRaisin thought it was just the comments. It was the totality of the opening. Kind of like the 60 Minutes interview with Kamala where here retarded answers were edited to give a false impression (seriously watch that and the unedited version).
The absolute fuck did you bring me into this for? I hold no opinions on Kimmel's cancellation. I give not a fuck about late night host drama.
 
Quick guide on why Kimmel's quote violates FCC policy in case you find yourselves debating a mouthbreather or fencesitter. It makes me MATI every time I see some bowlegged, knock-kneed, timid sheeple of a person desperately screaming to know what the hell was so bad about Kimmel's comment. So go ahead and digest this so that you can vomit it back out for them like you're feeding a retarded baby bird. Just remember that there are bad faith actors out there deliberately trying to confuse the issue, too. Terrorists, the lot of them.
The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial “public harm” if aired.
Jimmy Kimmel dijo:
We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and want everything they can to score political points from it.
>We hit some new lows over the weekend
"Something bad is occurring." Vital part of the quote that a lot of retards miss.
>with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them
What's the bad part he was setting up? Oh yeah, the bad part is that MAGA is distancing themselves from an assassin. So what's the fucking alternative, Jimmel? That they should welcome him as a true MAGA? That they should take a knee and proclaim to the heavens that yes, this was our guy, we own this?
This is the part where he implied the assassin was MAGA. Don't ever forget it. Jimmy Kimmel absolutely implied that the shooter was MAGA, and implied that it was bad of MAGA to act otherwise.
>this kid
Zooming in here, Tyler Robinson is 22. Is Kimmel painting the shooter in a positive or a negative light? Why is he describing Robinson as a kid? Is he saying Robinson is doe-eyed and innocent like a kid? Is he romanticizing a potential MAGAchud? Or is he romanticizing a left wing gunman? Pick a fucking lane, propagandist. I know he'll just claim "oh, I'm just an old man, everyone looks young to me" but that's still absolutely dogshit. It's further showing that he isn't treating this situation seriously in the least.
>and want everything they can to score political points from it.
Suggesting that MAGA is coldly playing a game for the sake of winning it, as if they aren't feeling any emotions at all and just want to beat the politics game. That's absolutely rich coming from a leftist propagandist. All these vigils being held for Charlie Kirk aren't real, it's just performance art to cover for the MAGAchuds trying to hide beneath empathy and win the politics game that way. Fucking sickening way to downplay all of this.

"Okay, but is this KNOWINGLY broadcasting falsehoods??? He was just working with what the rest of us knew!!!"
The story was still developing while this episode was in production. We only had secondhand accounts of what the bullet casings' inscriptions meant, for example. Nobody knew for certain what Tyler Robinson's true political affiliation was, even though it was already leaning towards the left. Meanwhile in Kimmel's desperate rush to throw out jabs at Republicans as usual, he made assumptions about Tyler's affiliation and slandered MAGA for it. There's an important principle to understand here: f you know nothing, but you say something anyways, you're inventing fiction. Speculative fiction, but still fiction. Still fearmongering. You're still lying and publishing falsehoods to create a narrative before we even have firsthand facts to go with.

By the time the episode aired, we knew for certain that all signs pointed towards the shooter being extremely left wing. Jimmy Kimmel rushed ahead too fast with the wild speculations floating around the Internet, and he got shitcanned for it.

"So many other channels under the FCC have broadcasted much worse things!!! Won't the FCC be abused to take down so much more, including right wing shows???"
Maybe it should be used. Perhaps we're getting into personal opinions territory here, but if the FCC can be used to take down more shows, maybe they should. That which can be destroyed by the truth, should be. Or however that feelgood quote goes. Turnabout is fair play; go ahead and use that fire extinguisher on Fox News if it makes you happy. I hate talking heads injecting hysteria into the news no matter which side they're on, so that's fine by me.

If a show gets taken down unjustly, then the decision should be fought over in court like a man. You still have rights even if you get kicked around. Stop getting fucking hysterical about rights being taken away. A man got shot, and some yappy, biased fuckhead talked shit over it and now tragically has to live with the millions of dollars he earned through the job he just lost. You can start screeching about losing your right to free speech when Antifa goons point a gun to your head and demand that you recite the communist party's mantras and truths or else.
 
I'm totally clueless by what this means. Can you explain?
Sure. Saying that a word is carrying a lot of weight suggests that the meaning of a claim or argument not only hinges on it, but also that it's misleading or carries with it assumptions that the person calling attention to the word doesn't agree with. It's a way of saying that a given word is quite a stretch. (Not the best explanation, but close enough for this discussion.)

In this particular case, someone said that we are in a dangerous place politically because even "beloved" television personalities like Colbert and Kimmel are having their shows canceled. However, given that both of them are smug assholes with shows that pander to a narrow demographic and have relatively small partisan audiences as a result, "beloved" is a serious stretch.
 
Última edición:
it looks like he got called out for not understanding that reconstructed obviously fuckin meant "recovered from their devices after they tried to delete them" and not "invented wholesale while torturing Lance Twiggs at gitmo," and has since deleted this thread

he's now backpedaling and "clarifying" that he was wrong but also still right, since you can't trust transcripts in a court document unless you're holding the the evidence in your own hands

 
Is there a reason why all of the celebrating and grandstanding is mainly women? Like, the normal everyday people. I get the media and conservative talking heads, they gotta chase that bag. But like, my buddy and I barely talked about it; said its a fucked situation — meanwhile his wife posted a 6 part Instagram reel of her screaming to the phone in their kitchen of why Kirk's death is a good thing and she doesn't care if she loses friends over a "Nazi's" death.

Just seems overly performative, even for this generation.
 
it looks like he got called out for not understanding that "reconstructed" obviously fuckin meant "recovered after they tried to delete them" and not "invented wholesale," and has since deleted this thread

he's now backpedaling and "clarifying" that he was wrong but also still right, since you can't trust transcripts in a court document unless you're holding the the evidence in your own hands

The left's entire obfuscation strategy to take the heat off themselves has been to tell lies, then hope they spread before the truth can get its shoes on.
 
the wikipedia article got much more serious now, moved all the groyper shit to comspiracy thoery territory, and the details of the assassination is much clearer. maybe someone stepped up to that silver faggot. now might be a good time to fix the gamergate article
Honestly this is true. Now would be a great time for anyone who might be interested to go clean up the Kiwi farms Wikipedia page, the Donald Trump Wikipedia page, and any page they've censored with their bullshit.

So as I understand it, it wasn’t just the monologue that pissed off the FCC. It was the deceptive editing in the clip that accompanied the monologue. The clip is the Rose Garden interview where Trump appears dismissive of Kirk’s death. That’s entirely edited. The combination of the two is what pissed Trump and the FCC off.
Trump and the FCC had nothing to do with Kimmel getting taken off the air, it was Nexstar's decision alone. I wish people would stop repeating this lie that Trump and the FCC are the reasons Kimmel got fired.
 
Is there a reason why all of the celebrating and grandstanding is mainly women? Like, the normal everyday people. I get the media and conservative talking heads, they gotta chase that bag. But like, my buddy and I barely talked about it; said its a fucked situation — meanwhile his wife posted a 6 part Instagram reel of her screaming to the phone in their kitchen of why Kirk's death is a good thing and she doesn't care if she loses friends over a "Nazi's" death.

Just seems overly performative, even for this generation.
women are much more vulnerable to (perceived) peer pressure than men
being a loud mouthed shitlib harpy is the hip thing to do in many female spaces, so that's what they emulate
 
Atrás
Top Abajo