- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2022
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
When I was doing research on Shaun Reese, I also ran into that DeviantArt account. I couldn't find anything linking Shaun to it beyond a shared online username. There is a chance Daily Mail has this bit wrong but I personally find it funny normies are being subjected to vore fetishist art. I had to look at it, and now other people do too. Suffah!
Two things, I think.I'm totally clueless by what this means. Can you explain?
Can you elaborate/post the full thing?The clip is the Rose Garden interview where Trump appears dismissive of Kirk’s death. That’s entirely edited.
Good point. I agree with this.Why not? Give a reason besides "he was faithful to his wife". That's not even relevant in the question at hand.
They were both outwardly men of God, both the leaders of the biggest social movements of their time, both friends and involved with politicians and the politics of the time, both were famous advocates of peace, both were investigated by the FBI for fear of being a subversive political group, both were assassinated in extremely similar manners (they were both shot in the neck)
Is it just because Charlie Kirk is White and a White man isn't capable of having as much social impact as a black man? Charlie Kirk and Martin Luther King Jr. were different men for sure, there's only one Charlie Kirk. but their similarities can't just be ignored, Charlie Kirk is this generation's MLK easily in terms of implication of assassination and their respective impacts they've had on people, and it's laughable that people would deny that. Kind of worrying though since it's up to us to keep Charlie Kirk's legacy alive and people are already surrendering to niggers.
Of course they were reproduced, we didn't get tea style screenshots of their messages app and there were obvious ellipses implying there was more to the messages than they copy-pasted into a press release document.
If Stephen Colbert was assassinated live on his show, shot in the neck live for all to see like Robert DeNiro in Joker (yes I know his shows are pre-recorded but still.) I would not even think about laughing. That would be very fucked up.If a piano fell on Stephen Colbert, I'd chuckle
And this is why I hate Blue MagaOf course they were reproduced, we didn't get tea style screenshots of their messages app and there were obvious ellipses implying there was more to the messages than they copy-pasted into a press release document.
We won't see the complete ones until the trial, if at all. I hope this faggot doesn't get Epsteined or kill himself for real because that trial is gonna be a spectacle.Of course they were reproduced, we didn't get tea style screenshots of their messages app and there were obvious ellipses implying there was more to the messages than they copy-pasted into a press release document.
The holiest site in Christendom, the Church of the Holy sepulchre, is smack dab in the middle of Jerusalem.> second pilgrimage to Isreal
evangelical christians make it hard to discount jew conspiracies with how hard they cuck for said jews
The absolute fuck did you bring me into this for? I hold no opinions on Kimmel's cancellation. I give not a fuck about late night host drama.So as I understand it, it wasn’t just the monologue that pissed off the FCC. It was the deceptive editing in the clip that accompanied the monologue. The clip is the Rose Garden interview where Trump appears dismissive of Kirk’s death. That’s entirely edited. The combination of the two is what pissed Trump and the FCC off.
It’d be like how Null wants you to mark AI shit as AI shit here. Because it can trick retards. I think people like @CaliforniaRaisin thought it was just the comments. It was the totality of the opening. Kind of like the 60 Minutes interview with Kamala where here retarded answers were edited to give a false impression (seriously watch that and the unedited version).
The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial “public harm” if aired.
>We hit some new lows over the weekendJimmy Kimmel dijo:We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and want everything they can to score political points from it.
Sure. Saying that a word is carrying a lot of weight suggests that the meaning of a claim or argument not only hinges on it, but also that it's misleading or carries with it assumptions that the person calling attention to the word doesn't agree with. It's a way of saying that a given word is quite a stretch. (Not the best explanation, but close enough for this discussion.)I'm totally clueless by what this means. Can you explain?
it looks like he got called out for not understanding that reconstructed obviously fuckin meant "recovered from their devices after they tried to delete them" and not "invented wholesale while torturing Lance Twiggs at gitmo," and has since deleted this thread
The left's entire obfuscation strategy to take the heat off themselves has been to tell lies, then hope they spread before the truth can get its shoes on.it looks like he got called out for not understanding that "reconstructed" obviously fuckin meant "recovered after they tried to delete them" and not "invented wholesale," and has since deleted this thread
he's now backpedaling and "clarifying" that he was wrong but also still right, since you can't trust transcripts in a court document unless you're holding the the evidence in your own hands
Honestly this is true. Now would be a great time for anyone who might be interested to go clean up the Kiwi farms Wikipedia page, the Donald Trump Wikipedia page, and any page they've censored with their bullshit.the wikipedia article got much more serious now, moved all the groyper shit to comspiracy thoery territory, and the details of the assassination is much clearer. maybe someone stepped up to that silver faggot. now might be a good time to fix the gamergate article
Trump and the FCC had nothing to do with Kimmel getting taken off the air, it was Nexstar's decision alone. I wish people would stop repeating this lie that Trump and the FCC are the reasons Kimmel got fired.So as I understand it, it wasn’t just the monologue that pissed off the FCC. It was the deceptive editing in the clip that accompanied the monologue. The clip is the Rose Garden interview where Trump appears dismissive of Kirk’s death. That’s entirely edited. The combination of the two is what pissed Trump and the FCC off.
Very reasonable response from them.
women are much more vulnerable to (perceived) peer pressure than menIs there a reason why all of the celebrating and grandstanding is mainly women? Like, the normal everyday people. I get the media and conservative talking heads, they gotta chase that bag. But like, my buddy and I barely talked about it; said its a fucked situation — meanwhile his wife posted a 6 part Instagram reel of her screaming to the phone in their kitchen of why Kirk's death is a good thing and she doesn't care if she loses friends over a "Nazi's" death.
Just seems overly performative, even for this generation.