Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

You must recognize this media MO: Lying about Charlie Kirk and his fanatical supporters (which is now defined as anyone who ever interacted with him peacefully), misquoting him (and them), consciously mischaracterizing him (and them) as violent oppressors who rejected unity and peace at every turn — to the point where Tyler Robinson had no choice but to murder Charlie Kirk.

In short, saying whatever the fuck they have to say to cast his murder as not a crime or moral failure but an act of necessary heroism.

It’s the Gaza playbook from start to finish. Congratulations, you’re all genocidal maniacs!
"Well, Your Honor, my client didn't feel a desire to shoot up that peaceful church assembly, so much as he felt he owed it to them."
 
I think this was like an hour after the troon news dropped.

Ver archivo adjunto 7928041
That's been debunked by the FBI:
" a biological male"
1758091076508.webp

1758091084371.webp
 
Oh my God I wish these fucking niggers could just stick with whatever retarded shit they come up with for more than one day I'm getting fucking whiplash from this shit.
The mind and the narrative of the reactionary idealist is one of kaleidescopic and ever-changing moods, shapes, and colors.
 
FWIW, one of the accounts people were looking at made it a habit of posting this on a regular basis. It was covered previously in the thread but not sure if it was highlighted.
Predicting someone's death every day is a pretty good bit, but I'm not sure if I'd want to get a visit from feds for being right.

Somewhat related but.. Some of you are really out of touch with other people and it really shows. Sometimes it's not very deep.
I've always seen people online try to psychoanalyze random videos and I half-blame Jim Can't Swim for that one. During the Ukraine war, every single clip was watched frame-by-frame to see if people acted consistent with some Thomas the Train autist's understanding of reality. One example I remember was a video going around where a soldier got killed or heavily wounded trying to help his friend, and one of the first responses was someone asking "why did he go to help his friend instead of providing covering fire? seems suspicious". Why is guy in active combat friend acting weird after his friend was shot? I guess doing the frame-by-frame analysis on funerals is the natural conclusion of that.

Honestly, its frustrating to talk about anything in depth (not just the Charlie Kirk situation) because everything HAS to be a conspiracy.
I think it's similar to something I mentioned above. Something doesn't exactly match what they expect, so it must be fake/staged/gay/israel. It's a mix of low awareness that other people don't always act rationally or exactly how you'd expect, especially in highly stressful situations, and a touch of being kicked in the head by a horse.

It’s the Gaza playbook from start to finish. Congratulations, you’re all genocidal maniacs!
Since you mentioned it, I'm curious now, what is your take on the genocide in gaza?
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7928179
Ver archivo adjunto 7928181
Ver archivo adjunto 7928190Ver archivo adjunto 7928189
On the subject of people dancing on Charlie Kirk grave. The anti-Charlie Kirk rightwing groups I find the most hilarious are the /pol/ Twitter accounts bitching and moaning about conservative caring about Charlie Kirk. These are always the accounts that are exposed for being run by someone non-white or a Pajeet. Ironically I think /pol/ might be even less white than the Nick Fuentes catboy faction.

It's been rumored that's Daryle Lamont Jenkins in the 90s/early 2000s when he was still skinny.
Nose, ear and chin matches. Mind that there is 20+ years between those pics.
1758091538559.webp
 

Bill Ackman Allegedly Ambushed Charlie Kirk Over Israel Criticism Weeks Before Assassination​

source/archive
1.webp

The veneer of the surface-level narrative about Kirk's murder clouds public perception from examining the events that led to his death on a deeper level, as the acceptance of an explanation that largely and seemingly all-too-conveniently triggers the confirmation bias of the supporters grieving his loss is much easier to process.

As is always the case, contemplating the role nefarious forces operating in the shadows may have had in any seismic political development affecting the United States must lead to addressing questions about Israel. Kirk's assassination is no different. While the FBI continues to provide the public with updates on the investigation into alleged assassin Tyler Robinson, mounting evidence of Kirk's falling out with the pro-Israel lobby at the foundation of America's political establishment raises serious questions about the political turmoil the conservative activist was engulfed in leading up to his death. That evidence paints a chaotic picture in which it becomes clear that the enemies Kirk made within his base of support were far more powerful than the left-wing radicals who are alleged to be behind his murder.

Those in the independent alternative media landscape close to Kirk memorialized their slain friend and colleague, and in doing so, many had pointed to a stark development in the progression of his political ideology. They shed light upon how Kirk, whose political activism has included devout support for the State of Israel and Jewish people, began to contemplate a new perspective on Israel's influence over the United States. According to a report from The Grayzone, that development of Kirk's ideology led to tremendous conflict with powerful Zionist figures shaping US politics. The Grayzone report illustrated the scale of that tension by revealing that pro-Israel billionaire Bill Ackman ambushed Kirk in what the publication describes as an "intervention" over the conservative activist's growing criticism of Israeli influence in Washington.

3.webp


According to the report, the Ackman-led ambush occurred in early August when the billionaire lured Kirk into a meeting of conservative political influencers in the Hamptons under the guise of discussing the emergence of Socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayoral race. Sources cited by The Grayzone detailed how the meeting devolved into an outright assault on Kirk led by Ackman alongside other Zionist figures in attendance who voiced their vitriol over his increasingly critical tone against Israel. Pro-Zionist figures at the meeting included Seth Dillion, the CEO of Babylon Bee; PragerU personality Xaviaer DuRoussear; libertarian social media influencer Emily Wilson, known under her brand Emily Saves America; former Goldman Sachs trader turned conservative influencer Arynne Wexler; ultra-Zionist influencer and agent provocateur Nate Friedman; Ory Rinat, former adviser to Jared Kushner; and CJ Pearson, the chair of the Republican National Committee's Youth Advisory Council.

According to sources, the hosts of the event presented Kirk with an itemized list of what they deemed were his offenses against Israel, leading Kirk to what those in attendance described as being "horrified." One such source conveyed that the ambush left Kirk concerned that he was being blackmailed by the pro-Israel contingent in his base of support.

Ackman contacted The Grayzone regarding its report to unequivocally deny the claims. In his correspondence with The Grayzone, he stated that he intended to release a public statement regarding what transpired during his meeting with Kirk in early August. While Ackman told a reporter at The Grayzone that he has "receipts" proving his version of events, when asked to provide them to the publication, he declined to do so.

Ackman followed through on his intent to release his own account of his meeting in the Hamptons with Kirk. In a statement released on his account on X, Ackman refuted the claims raised by The Grayzone report. Ackman directed the statement at Candace Owens, who echoed the allegations made by The Grayzone report. In his statement, Ackman denied making any threats to Kirk or attempting to blackmail him and disavowed the premise that he felt threatened by his changing stance on Israel, which Ackman used the opportunity to describe his assessment of. Instead, what Ackman described was a collaborative event in which Kirk and TPUSA members organized the agenda to include the topics of The Cultural Landscape of Dating and Marriage; The Convergence of East and West; Mamdani, The New Threat to America; and The Economic Future of America, which Ackman said Kirk asked him to moderate the discussion of and host the question and answer session that followed it.

While acknowledging that discussions regarding Israel took place during the meeting, Ackman described them as civil and insinuated that an open discourse on the topic was welcome. In addition to denying those discussions led to any ambush against Kirk, Ackman maintained that he and Kirk remained on good terms following the meeting and continued to correspond with each other in the weeks leading up to his assassination. However, nowhere in Ackman's statement does he include any of the aforementioned "receipts" he referred to in his correspondence with The Grayzone. Ackman's statement lacked any incontrovertible evidence of his account of the meeting that he alluded to as vindication of the allegations made against him in The Grayzone report.

4.webp


Although Ackman disavowed the idea that he felt threatened by Kirk's evolving stance on US-Israel relations, the meeting he attended in the Hamptons was not an isolated instance of Kirk being subjected to the pressure of America's Zionist lobby. In the weeks leading up to the meeting from August 4th to 5th, Kirk had already begun to face scrutiny as the changing political tone on the subject of Israel had become evident.

Following the onset of the war between Israel and Iran, Kirk met with US President Donald Trump. During the meeting, Kirk attempted to convince Trump against entering the US into the conflict on Israel's behalf. A source attending the meeting stated Trump lashed out at Kirk in response before shutting down the conversation. In the weeks following that meeting with Trump, the source in attendance stated that Kirk revealed he had become bombarded by allies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In describing Kirk's reaction to those intimidation tactics, the source stated “He was afraid of them."

The fallout between Kirk and the Zionists who once rallied to his side continued to escalate in July when Turning Point USA held its Student Action Summit in Tampa, Florida. Criticism of Israel's influence over the Trump administration was a central point of the discussion during the summit, a position Tucker Carlson amplified during his speech at the event when he raised questions about Israel's involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficking operation. Carlson addressed the long-held position that Epstein was working as an intelligence asset for Israel and it was met with raucous applause from the crowd, a scene that may have marked the point of no return for Kirk.

5.webp


According to a source close to Kirk, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went as far as reaching out to the late political activist to offer a massive transfusion of funding into TPUSA —an offer that Kirk firmly rejected. That refusal was not enough to entirely dissuade Netanyahu from continuing to court Kirk, as he offered to fly him out to Jerusalem to attend a meeting between them 2 weeks before his death. Kirk also refused the invitation from Netanyahu to meet with him in Israel.

In the weeks following the backlash against the TPUSA Student Action Summit in July, Kirk began to voice his frustration with the pro-Israel contingent of his supporters publicly. On August 6th, just one day after meeting with Ackman, Kirk joined the Megyn Kelly Show to air his frustration over Israel with its eponymous host. Kirk succinctly summarized the avalanche of criticism that befell him by stating, “I have less ability… to criticize the Israeli government than actual Israelis do. And that’s really, really weird," during his interview with Kelly. A cursory examination of Kirk's history on X also shows that the last post he made mentioning Israel was around that same timeframe on August 14th.

Despite the crucible of political pressure Kirk was put under by the Zionist axis, he remained undeterred with his increasing criticism of Israel. This was apparent during what turned out to be the last interview he ever held on the Charlie Kirk Show when he asked guest Ben Shapiro pointed questions about the ongoing conflict led by Israel in the Gaza Strip. During the interview, Kirk dared to question Shapiro on whether or not the media was providing Americans with the truth about Israel before going on to address criticism that Israel was committing an ethnic cleansing in Gaza. While only being framed as playing devil's advocate, Kirk's decision to ask the question left Shapiro visibly unsettled.

6.webp


Following Kirk's assassination, Shapiro assumed an entirely different stance. Following the murder, Shapiro wasted no time in promising to "pick up that blood-stained microphone where Charlie left it" in a commitment to carrying on Kirk's legacy. Those remarks were joined by an outpouring of support from pro-Israel figures and Israeli government officials like Minister of National Security and self-admitted Jewish supremacist Itamar Ben-Gvir. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu immediately offered a eulogy for Kirk before joining Newsmax TV's Greta Van Susteren in an interview in which, for some reason, he chose to announce to the world that Israel was not a part of Kirk's assassination in a decision that embodied the Shakespearean line from Hamlet, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." The public reaction to Kirk's assassination, meant to paint him as an unwavering ally of Israel, was even amplified by US President Donald Trump, who posted an image of himself hugging Kirk in front of an American and Israeli flag.

It was not until the days following the outpouring of mourning over Kirk's murder that a focus could be brought to the growth of his political consciousness, which led him away from unconditional support for Israel. While that renewed focus was initially one of pure speculation, if not apophenia, the patterns brought to light by those examining the final months of Kirk's life in politics have coalesced into something far more concrete in the wake of The Grayzone's report about Bill Ackman's alleged ambush.

The events leading up to and following Charlie Kirk's meeting with Bill Ackman in early August demonstrate how little the billionaire and his cohorts were able to reverse the course of the late conservative activist's departure from the pro-Israel position that he built his career on until the months preceding his assassination. In the days following his murder, this dimension of the political chaos that enveloped Kirk's life has been entirely overlooked by major media outlets continuing to cover the investigation into the assassination. Instead, their focus has been on shaping a narrative that stokes the flames of a culture war that threatens to turn the once-great nation of the United States into smoldering ashes. That narrative and the chaos it unfurls provide a perfect facade to keep Americans from examining how much of a factor Kirk's changing position on Israel may have played into his untimely demise.
 
Maybe I’m retarded and have finally become a complete schizo but I still think this was a glownigger operation. A very successful one I suppose. Like, the supposed shooter has a tranny gf that he’s willing to throw his life away for but they don’t even have one picture together?

The guy just happens to take a picture with a computer with a fucking Epstein island screensaver? The street shitter FBI director is lying right now about Epstein not being a child trafficker and lied about the first two guys they arrested being the perpetrator but we’re supposed to trust Pajeet on this one? The photo of the “snipers perch” was right in front of the tent Charlie was sitting in but the bullet clearly came from the side. And now this same guy who was smart enough to meticulously plan the hit, infiltrate a crowded event, and successfully pull off an assassination and evade the feds for almost 2 days is also a big enough retard to confess to the whole thing on a fucking text message where both zoomer faggots are talking like 60 year boomers writing a screenplay? Fuck off. The Kikes are getting lazy but I guess they don’t really even have to try anymore
 
The events leading up to and following Charlie Kirk's meeting with Bill Ackman in early August demonstrate how little the billionaire and his cohorts were able to reverse the course of the late conservative activist's departure from the pro-Israel position that he built his career on until the months preceding his assassination.
This was already debunked ITT. Charlie's own people came out to say it didn't happen like this.

That said, I'm really enjoying this shiny new Oyster on my wrist given to me by Jewish High Command.
 
eh, i'm sort of inclined to believe his friends aren't particularly invested in politics if this is the reaction they can muster for Charlie Kirk getting assassinated.
This doesnt change the fact its retarded to call the shooter apolitical and in the very same article show that he was the one his friends went to for political news
 
I hope all you cunts have been crying your eyes out, otherwise you and your entire extended family are going to a best korea starvation camp.

Ver archivo adjunto 7928237
No one's asking you to performatively cry over him (something you tried to force everyone to do for George Floyd), they're asking you to not immediately celebrate it and call for more violence before promptly bitching out and resorting to retarded mental gymnastics because you suddenly realized maybe trying to spark a second civil war might not actually be a good thing.
 
This next live event and all it's high profile guests had me realize that for probably at least a year, I'm gonna have to be nervous that yet another shot will be fired on air, kill someone, and everything will get fucked up even worse. My heart can't take it, T.
 
its retarded to call the shooter apolitical
This morning ITT we covered the fact that the sole source for this claim is a guy who used to be in school with Robinson. He was described as “one of the people who knew him best” because he showed the reporter a picture of them on a school camping trip years ago. It’s beyond farcical and is being eaten up by thousands of people with no critical thinking skills or mind at all. (See also: Those ITT who can’t decode direct, unambiguous statements.)
 
His text messages really give an amazing insight into how delusional and retarded these people really are. This guy legitimately thought, with no actual planning, that he was just going to walk away and live the rest of his life completely fine and then confess this to the freak troon on his deathbed. They really have no concept of reality whatsoever reddit has legitimately made these idiots think they're geniuses. His whole James Bond plan was "oh man I hope I can get that fingerprinted, very unique rifle (that apparently his grandpa recognized literally as soon as he saw a picture) I stole from my family back before anyone finds it right beside where I murdered someone"

This morning ITT we covered the fact that the sole source for this claim is a guy who used to be in school with Robinson. He was described as “one of the people who knew him best” because he showed the reporter a picture of them on a school camping trip years ago. It’s beyond farcical and is being eaten up by thousands of people with no critical thinking skills or mind at all. (See also: Those ITT who can’t decode direct, unambiguous statements.)

Same energy as Kimmel and all the "journalist" retards who's calling him "clearly MAGA" because his family was republican, ignoring that he was "quiet, smart, peaceful and not political" for his entire (republican) life until he "started to become political after spending a lot of time online". How a normal person reads that as "OH LOOK REPUBLICANS ARE MURDERING EACH OTHER" and not "he was normal until he got consumed by violent troon rhetoric 24/7 online and from his tranny boyfriend" has to be willfully ignorant because even now I can't believe that many people are actually THAT stupid. This is literally how radicalization works.

If someone spends 20whatever years being a normal happy person and then once they start interacting with troons, they suddenly get very passionate about troons "problems" and repeating troon phrases....gee whiz what could that possibly mean? And who's easiest to get violent? Someone who had all their beliefs destroyed (and was likely tsk tskd by the troon about how his family are literally nazis)
 
Última edición:
Rainbow/moralfag me if needed, but it was a huge sigh of relief to have some of my more reasonable lefty friends horrified by this whole affair.

I honestly wonder if this will be a turning point (pardon the pun) for some of them.
as a Bernie person i had the exact same reaction as shoe, which was surprising as she was never someone i ever followed or even understood. I think there are a small but meaningful number of of ppl discovering due to the repulsive gravedancing that they still have a moralfag left in them.

IMG_2874.webp

I've had to drop IRL friends I've had since high school and when my discord group for playing BFV pretended to not see the issues with people excusing violence, i realized they had become a composite sketch of the shooter. We are all in our late 20s/early 30s, we met in college in a purple rust-belt state and the group was politically diverse. The guys who got careers and mostly got married/started families stopped showing up a the discord by covid. I was one of the few who stayed behind and was on way less than them. They are all left-wing heckin wholesome women-respecter incels. two started tranny chasing out of their persistent failure to land women and one got axed from a bullshit NPS office job by DOGE.

They sit and stew on discord, play helldivers 2, and get more radical and madder and more resentful each day as the world increasingly leaves them behind. None of them are going to do any killing themselves, but they refuse to condemn Kirk's killing in a kind of sulky antiwork "you deserve to die because voters don't want to subsidize my neetdom" attitude. Shoe's point about them being atomized bugmen, childless and miserable is the exact explanation of how they can be so evil. So much of society rests on most people reproducing in ways only becoming fully apparent now.
 
Última edición:
How many times has the narrative been changed by their side at this point?
For just this?
-it was a shot in celebration,
-it was a republican
-It was a groyper because nobody else calls anyone gay ever (wat)
-nobody was celebrating his death (this one really made me want to hurt someone, as its insultingly not the case)
-celebrating his death is free speech
-There is no tranny.
-Ok theres an effeminate man in a gay ass onesie but hes not trans
-ok shes trans but its JUST a roommate
-the tranny couldn't be a roommate, he lived with his parents
-Hes actually the victim because he was deeply in love with the tranny

I might be missing some, but I think that could be a good amount.

54,000 is a huge number.
I feel the need to point out, THIS IS NOT just 54,000 members, this is REQUESTS FOR CHAPTERS. Granted, there could be some overlap, but assuming even something as nutty as 10 requests sent in PER prospective chapter, this is 5,400 new chapters.

Thats potentially fucking HUUUUGE....
 
Atrás
Top Abajo