💰 Grifter Sam Hyde / Samuel Whitcomb Hyde / Million Dollar Extreme (MDE) / COM98 / 1Team / HydeWars / alienmode / @wigger / 'The Candyman' - Millennial anti-humorist, Carnegie Mellon University art student, 'World Peace' writer and creator, born-again Christian and groyper convert. The Marky Post to End All Marky Posts.

I'm still confused about the Marky situation. Sam (allegedly) buttfucked a 15 / 16 year old when he was (allegedly) 29 and the common consensus I see from Sam enjoyers on this site largely seems to boil down to its okay because [insert reasons] meanwhile I've seen people get crucified for far less by Kiwifarms.

Am I missing some important information or is this just another case of "my e-daddy can do no wrong because I find him funny"?
There’s three main reasons why Sam never faced and consequences or backlash from Marky.
  1. World Peace got canceled and Sam was already blacklisted when the allegations started gaining traction. Sam was completely out of the mainstream so of course there was never any mainstream coverage of it. Sam was back underground so no one outside of his hardcore fans knew about it.
  2. For years, Markyposting was only really a thing on /pol/ and /tv/ when Sam when get brought up. For years, Markyposting was only ever known by hardcore Sam fans in the interim period between World Peace and the Idubbbz documentary. When people on Reddit or Twitter would talk about Sam they would usually just say the typical “he’s racist” “he’s a nazi”. It’s only in the past two years or so that Markyposting has gone mainstream. That’s why I believe Idubbbz never brought it up.
  3. The third and probably main reason why is that Marky herself has moved on and never pressed charges.
 
Sam Hyde's fans universally react with "who cares i never thought he was a good person he's just a funny gorilla" and Nick Fuentes's the raped universally react with "she deserved it lol raped your body my choice also you're jewish". Why would Marky ever bother doing more than talking about it in private? What does she stand to gain? Who can she possibly convince that actually matters to them? No one. It's a fool's errand. She could come out with conclusive proof and people would just shrug and say "15/16? That's an adult in Romania. He does good work for the cause and that's what matters".
I was mostly referring to Channing there, rather than Marky herself.
 
My point is that their assertion that their ancestors had some sort of proto-hitlerian racial purity ancestor-worshipping religion is entirely made up. The majority of what we know about pre-christian European religion was documented almost entirely by Christians, who preserved the religion with bias and had a vested interest in easing the pagans into conversion by preserving pagan traditions within a Christian moral framework.
Oh indubitably. Although, not all of it was done with conversion in mind, I reckon that most actually was done purely out of academic interest. Certainly the monks in Iceland writing down the Norse sagas and the priests in Rome and Constantinople writing down the works of the Antiquity and the Ancient Greek and Roman myths/poetry were doing so with a bias, same as ancient historians did before them, but I think the goal was historical/cultural preservation, since, before the printing press written word was hardly useful for conversion purposes, as most people could not read.

Its much more likely that pre-christian European religion was closer to modern day hinduism than Twitter nazi shit or Christianity, and Hinduism isn't really known for building functioning societies. So all of these larpers on X pretending that they've "discovered" their ancestral religion and it just so happens that their ancestors religion aligned perfectly with the political and racial ideology they already held before becoming pagan (and no, of course they don't literally believe in their own gods, how could you expect someone to actually believe their religion is real) should be laughed out of the rightwing sphere for their fundamental misunderstanding of what it even means to have a religion.
I’d argue it was closer to Japanese Shintoism. Animalistic and more primitive philosophically and ritualistically. Nowhere near the complexity, nor as deep as Christianity or Islam. It is no wonder both overcame paganism without much difficulty.
I don't care how long we're been doing Christianity. We did some form of "paganism" far, far, far longer. It is no comparison. Its also largely irrelevant to whether or not something is true or even that good.
Yeah, but not the same kind of religion, right? Paganism is not the same religion across Europe. You had thousands of different gods, pantheons and idols across millennia, none sticking for too long. Then we had uninterrupted Christianity for two thousand years, when our people actually settled on this continent in their respective lands and we had Christianity as we formed our individual languages, customs and identities, shaping all those at the same time.
It's part and parcel? Never denied that. I'm saying thats incredibly unfortunate, it severely weakens us, directly leads to hostile peoples hijacking our societies, and that we can do so much better. We have our own traditions that are far superior and dont rely on dogshit theological grounds or made up Hebrew bloodlines.
If it’s so weak, how come it defeated and assimilated the mighty pagans and elevated Europe to the peak where it still remains in everything? Not gonna argue chud takes, btw.
Sit back and learn to accept it. Christianity is collapsing for everyone except Africans, and what you'd call "pagan" has seemingly sprung up out of nowhere. This will only accelerate.
Maybe traditional Christianity and religiosity in general are on the decline, although the trends recently among the younger generations kinda undermine that notion, but the cultural impact and effect still remain.
 
The Marky stuff only stays relevant because he has repeatedly shown that it actually bothers him. Whether its because he actually feels remorse or because he doesn't want his career ruined again; who knows. But he's made the mistake of letting 4chan trolls know it actually works so its never going to stop now.
At this rate he's going to trip over himself in conjunction with that. The Harland stuff was bad, I didn't know about the Matan stuff.
This is what people want? A guy who freaks out when he doesn't have control of a situation? And he also thinks a Mexican "White Nationalist" has it right?

But I'm suppose to buy overpriced, grotesque, graphic tees at $50 and listen to him struggle through a podcast that they update maybe once every 3.5 weeks to support whatever the fuck he's trying to do right now.

Sam Hyde has talked about how white people need to be saved for the past decade yet he chose to have a kid with an asian girl. How does that make any sense.
Ver archivo adjunto 7926967
>"We must save White people!"
>Is a rice-burner

Par for the course now-a-days.
 
What consequence do you expect from a crime without a victim? It only makes you look more like a faggot.
 
Someone posted this on Twitter, mark me late if already posted, but perhaps Sam has had a change of tune about Charlie Kirk since this:

Sam Hyde Charlie Kirk.mp4
Can he have a normal conversation?

Sperging about the jews 24/7 doesn't help the cause, it just makes the "Right" look retarded. The jews/illuminati/whatever have been amassing power for more than a century, we aren't saving the world in a day.

Those Charlie Kirk segments about jews funding anti-white propaganda proves to me Charlie knew all along like everyone else, but being a sperg about it gets you blacklisted like the retards Sam and Fuentes...
 
Sam Hyde has talked about how white people need to be saved for the past decade yet he chose to have a kid with an asian girl. How does that make any sense.
Ver archivo adjunto 7926967
As a fan of Sam's who is also racist, this confuses me more than anything but it's also one of his funniest bits. MDE is renowned for being the most heckin' racist white nationalist fascist comedy troop of all time and 2/3 members have mixed kids.
 
Sperging about the jews 24/7 doesn't help the cause
I knew he was an anti-semite and didn't really care but the JDS was on display on the podcast and potentially now with the Kirk shooting, though I don't think he's retarded enough to try and squander whatever momentum he may have as a 'serious' commentator.
 
So Marky made her statement, it's just that nobody ever seems to have cared about it. In her statement Marky alleges something that many have already suspected, that the video "Boston Ross" (archive) by Sam Hyde is about Marky.
This section should include the original audio now that it's been uncovered.
Lots of cool info. Brandon Buckingham's video felt like it was missing a lot of shit, and the lack of even mentioning Kurush felt like he was rewriting history. Glad to see James went over it.

Also, the uncensored audio from Boston Ross—as it turns out, Sam isn't saying Marky.
(cut) 4zs7km (25m34.9s - 26m1.5s).mp4
 
This is what people want? A guy who freaks out when he doesn't have control of a situation? And he also thinks a Mexican "White Nationalist" has it right?
It seems that way. Anybody reasonable who tries to bring reason into the realm of online political discourse ends up shot. Apologies in advance for dragging that in this thread as well, but it's true. The market "corrected" itself in a way that should surprise no one. This is a place for people like Sam Hyde and Nick Fuentes. It will remain that way because anyone with sane political views isn't obsessing over it on the computer, they are watching footy and having sex.
 
The only things sort of missing from the OP rewrite are Sam's business controversies (secretly recording Don Jolly's firing, Charls's schizo meltdown about Sam in the middle east, James Price's video of his firsthand experiences with Sam confirming some of the things Charls said) but otherwise very thorough. 👍
 
I'm still confused about the Marky situation. Sam (allegedly) buttfucked a 15 / 16 year old when he was (allegedly) 29 and the common consensus I see from Sam enjoyers on this site largely seems to boil down to its okay because [insert reasons] meanwhile I've seen people get crucified for far less by Kiwifarms.

Am I missing some important information or is this just another case of "my e-daddy can do no wrong because I find him funny"?
Basically that. Fans thinking he can do no wrong. It is a mix of women hate and e-daddy worship.
 
It seems that way. Anybody reasonable who tries to bring reason into the realm of online political discourse ends up shot. Apologies in advance for dragging that in this thread as well, but it's true. The market "corrected" itself in a way that should surprise no one. This is a place for people like Sam Hyde and Nick Fuentes. It will remain that way because anyone with sane political views isn't obsessing over it on the computer, they are watching footy and having sex.
Calling Humpty Dumpty “reasonable” is hilarious, mate. He was a milktoast version of Nick Fuentes.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo