"YOU NEED Republicans to feel fear to be able to turn off the temperature" is a clear-cut justification of political violence coming from him; he is rationalizing a justification for it. If Republicans are too abrasive, then it's ok to commit direct acts of violence against them until they turn it off. Dems can call them Nazis or extremists, a threat to democracy, people who want to destroy America, traitors for Russia, Biden saying they are agents of chaos and darkness—and it isn't supposedly held to the same basic standard as Trump's rhetoric to "incite violence"?
His argument is then: if they can, I can—without even basic questioning of should I? and for what? His argument is completely retarded; he thinks violence will beat violence from the right? It will just give justification for Trump to install more authoritarian rule, it will embolden the right because by being targeted they know they have a direct effect on a system that tries to suppress them and shows insecurity and vulnerability, so it is legit the contrary that will happen, that fucking moron who just focus on pointless optic. Doing political violence is 100% fucking bad if you are a liberal. Destiny and his gang of morons have difficulty conceptualizing that their ideology is the dominant one on most levels of society. Less than 20 years ago people were questioning if gay marriage should be legal or not; now a few years ago we were questioning if you should be fired or put into jail for not using someone's preferred pronoun correctly. You, as the dominant ideology, doing political violence signals to others your vulnerability and legitimizes the non-dominant ideology; for the non-dominant ideology who hang on institutional distrust, political violence boosts them. Political violence from liberals won't boost liberalism; it threatens it. Especially if you kill someone like Charlie Kirk, who is basically just a speaker that can be replaced, that doesn't disorganize the power structure one bit.
10 white nationalists doing political violence and 10 liberals doing political violence isn't the same thing. One is clearly more unhinged, useless, and retarded because at least one seeks power (understandably, because they don't have it) and the other already has it culturally, socially, etc... its like a pro-ukranian doing terrorist act because ukraine dont receive enought money in europe. So if a liberal commits political violence, it is because he has great fear that his ideology will lose power. Their retardation is still treating liberalism as some form of equal in power or an underdog not just in optic now but in rationalisation thats why Destiny isnt smart, ruining his reputation agin for political violence that have no benefit to the ideology you push or your logic is being edgy( the insecurity because you suck cock) and somewhat it shape your argument while being retarded. presentaton vs substance.