Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Luckily, I put him on ignore before I hit the 1000-moron cap.

@Null We need more than 1000 ignore slots!
Yeah I listened to @John Andrews Stan earlier and finally put him on ignore.

I had no problem putting what felt like 50 people on ignore earlier, but I kept thinking that Maori was OK. I might un ignore them later. I second the need to have thread specific ignore lists.
 
I am not a troll, what I was saying in the analogy was that we should be careful not to deify him as the left deifies people. You people seem to think I was saying Kirk was like Floyd, which I wasn't. I was saying that the left turned Floyd into a ditey, we should not do the same, even though we agreed with Kirk. The fact that the left picked Floyd is their own moral failing. I don't know why people can't see this.

I'll make it simple: We should not be making ANYONE a christlike figure just because they stood for something we agreed on or we support them, let the left play that game, it makes them look stupid, we should not look stupid too.

Kirk shouldn't have been killed, and he died simply expressing his First Amendment right. I also agree with many points he made, but we should not make a national holiday out of his death or give him national honors, and I feel many politicians would be so happy to do that.

Why am I against that? Because the man was not elected by the people, and he was a political speaker. That's it.

It's the same house of thought why the left shouldn't be making floyd a national holiday. Except the values of the left are all fucked, so they think Floyd should have the same national outrage as a man getting killed for simply speaking/using his First Amendment right.


Am I clear now?
You do have a point that we shouldn't immediately be sanctifying Kirk, but really there's no other way to describe now as a martyr that exposed the real evil in the hearts of the far-left through their deeds and reactions.
 
A new Steam curator group, "CharlieTweetsDetected," has been created.
CharlieTweetsDetected.webp
(link)
 
Was he friends Before or AFTER becoming big? If it was before then he might be artificial. He got big BEFORE usaid got cut. NOTE how after usaid was cut Nepal had a revolution, something that they were paying to prevent by "supporting atheism". I do not think the left is organic, and i am wondering if the handlers were funded by usaid and now all the npcs are running rampant.
I think it was after, but he clearly cares about him enough to personally gather a bunch of Twitch employees and wish Hasan a happy birthday a year ago.
 
Kirk shouldn't have been killed, and he died simply expressing his First Amendment right. I also agree with many points he made, but we should not make a national holiday out of his death or give him national honors, and I feel many politicians would be so happy to do that.
I think I understand your argument but I do disagree with it. I also want to note that Israel has had multiple national days of mourning for the Oct 7 victims which I think is the correct thing to do politically and civically.
 
only reason it makes them look stupid is because all the "martyrs" they chose recently are good for nothing lowlife criminals like trayvon, mike brown, and floyd lol
if they were more selective in who they raise up it wouldn't look retarded at all. like, if some chud were to murder obama or AOC, those would serve as highly effective martyr figures to the left
I dunno about obama. I have a nasty feeling that if the epstein files were to come out, which will probably be around midterms for the most effective political damage, that he and the clintons would probably become despised overnight. even steven hawking is getting shit for his connection to epstein, and he was one of those scientists that the left put on a big pedestal.
 
I'll make it simple: We should not be making ANYONE a christlike figure just because they stood for something we agreed on or we support them, let the left play that game, it makes them look stupid, we should not look stupid too.

Where do statues and monuments fit into this schema? We know you don't want half-mast flags for non-government employees, what about statues.
 
So you'd rather they hide that? And what good would that do anyone?

Correct me if I'm misunderstanding your point. We've seen enough with Trump's career in the past ten years to understand collectively what silencing people accomplishes.
Truthfully? I don't know. I'm not saying these people have no right to say what they want to say. But I also believe that if you announce your joy at someone you disagree with's assassination. Then you're a problem. The thing is this isn't "just a few people." But way too fucking many.

Let me ask. There was a teacher who announced joy at this and was fired. This same guy is teaching kids. Do I want this guy to teach my kids? Considering all I've seen from how other teachers try to indoctrinate students? No I don't. At the same time. Do you trust medical professionals to care for you if they openly cheer for the assassination of someone who believes the same things as you do? I wouldn't.

Free speech is important, but if you're cheering for the assassination of political rivals and for the political beliefs of half the country. I don't blame the thought process of "These people cheered and want me dead, so they must be punished for it."


It may be punishing people who "use their free speech" But I don't blame people who want people who want them dead to be punished.
 
JD Vance just brought this type of energy with his closing comments. The right are tired.
Vance is a good rhetorician but hasn't proved himself capable of holding power. Most of his vice presidency has been him posting on X. He also completely failed to squash or embrace the "Baby Face Vance" meme.

Saying this as someone who initially thought Vance was the perfect 48th.

Edit: If I'm wrong, then tell me why, I'd love to see Vance be capable.
 
Última edición:
Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose.
Exactly, self defense isn't violence. It is a right to preserve your right to life in the event someone tries to take it away.
Or get fired by an employer wanting to protect their employees and workplace culture.
I'd argue getting someone fired is a civil action and not an action of a government or vigilantism. Me calling a McDonald's manager because a threatened me when I bought a burger with a maga hat isn't going through the government but it also isn't violent. And the kicker is, since it's not a government job, while it is true the employer doesn't have to give a shit. I can simply stop going, tell my friends to stop going and we all move somewhere else. Now, they could still not comply. But if commies are limited to a local McDonalds then they will slowly wallow away. The only duty of the government is to strip any funding in this scenario. If it's a government job then the purging is the government's job. Remove commies from burdening taxpayers. Then they will have to learn to behave to function with the rest of us. And by doing so, this will deprogram them from their commie ways.
Well, they have mobile lethal injection vans with mobile crematories now, so it's just becoming more subtle. Just saying.
True, and Russia still murder's it's opposition in the electorate. They've improved. But like I said, we're still better. And, much like them. I'd love to remain better. The only way we fall beneath them is to fall to their level. Again why getting violent in response to mere loony behavior and not psycho violence is simply bad for the nation? If they aren't a direct danger to you or anyone around you or your property, then it's best to leave them be and hopefully let them heal with the country. It's clear the commies have made a lot of us sick who would otherwise be well. We're should stand to end the sickness, not the sick. If they are free to be here strip them only of what is necessary. Allow time and most will heal.
 
>gets stroked
>turns republichud

wish I got stroked like that damn G
hardy little cockroach that refuses to die
Dude he's not just surviving right now, he's thriving. You are going to see a lot more of him in the next couple years whether you like it or not.

We must send him the sonichu amulet if we want any chance of stopping him.
 
but shouldn't we at least try to uphold the values of our country? What values did Kirk believe in and die for?
I was going to make a thread on this for Deep Thoughts, but I’ll post a summarization here:

If you look at right-left dynamics, do not bother with the trend of modern day talking points. It will just boil down to MAGA-NeoCon-Disaffecfed Liberal-SocDem conversations that mean nothing.

You want to try to take it down to its essence. Right means order. I have used her before, but Ana Kasparian became right wing when her vision of order was disrupted by the very same policies and people she championed. Therefore, every individual has a sense of order that creates the collective thought. Since 2021, the centrist-right population of America has known that there is a problem with:

- The economy
- Cultural issues

This was their collective thought but at every point when this was brought up by the population at large they were shouted down by the leftist institutions (or the Cathedral). It is not a coincidence that the woman who was running a database on all the people celebrating Charlie’s murder were either part of the public education system, an NGO, a non-profit, a university, trans movements, corporate press media, and retail flunkies who flushed out of college.

So when someone like Charlie Kirk changes the outcome by converting would be young demographic voters to Republican they viewed it as a sin against them. As sinners in their mind, they didn’t want the debate. They wanted it to end because it upsets their plans for power. That it is out in the open as celebrated should clue in normies as to how they view the normal America.

This isn’t a debate about progressive tax vs fixed tax or sentencing on schedule 1 drugs. This is about a collective thought across America fighting against an ideology that looks to rip the roots of values out of the country and replace it with what they deem as acceptable.
 
Most people capitalizing on kirk's murder don't give a shit about anything he did or said, but are glad to now be given license to own the libs.

Feds will martyr him to usher in a refreshed age of censorship, deplatforming, and de-personing. Thank goodness Americans are steadfast in their 2A rights because they won't realize until too late that they've given up their 1st.
maybe im misunderstanding you

How soon is to soon to start a Charlie Kirk, in memory of, alt coin called KirkKoin with 5x standard gas fees?

In all seriousness do you remember when SOMEONE shot the president of the untied states in the head and then someone shot the guy who shot the president and NO ONE asked any questions? No one is advocating for the patriot act 2.0 this is long overdue, repressed, sadness, anger, and feeling ignored that the American people are showing themselves and the world that "they arent going to take it" any more.

No one is talking about legislature

No one is talking about setting long term precedent

No one is talking about "calls to action"

all this is, is a turning point in our nation where the Right is not going to sit passively by and be bullied into silence by the left but will instead use their own virtue signaling strategys
 
I think it was after, but he clearly cares about him enough to personally gather a bunch of Twitch employees and wish Hasan a happy birthday a year ago.
AT-cm_YAHDpEX2VzsXEEdTwZqhiw.mp4
Well that's concerninng.
Kirk shouldn't have been killed, and he died simply expressing his First Amendment right. I also agree with many points he made, but we should not make a national holiday out of his death or give him national honors, and I feel many politicians would be so happy to do that.
Was kirk a freemason? Back in the civil war they would halt battles just so they could burry members with honors. Granted, i will counter your point by arguing that he should be buried with honors so that we de-escalate political tensions. we do NOT want a boogaloo, and frankly we are in a cold one. Everyone is gangster until the supply chain gets disrupted.
 
Dude he's not just surviving right now, he's thriving. You are going to see a lot more of him in the next couple years whether you like it or not.
I already admitted to not liking it. He is thriving now but he was all but forgotten for years.

Good thing its only a matter of time till he fucks up and does something incredibly gay and embarrasing again. Then Kino Casino and other alogs can alog him like they used to when he was first on the decline.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo