That's the freaky part to me. I didn't follow Kirk much, but none of the smarmy "THIS is the guy you're grieving??" posts have even registered as extreme to me. If you could travel back in time to 2000 and show the average blue voter his sizzle reel of chud moments, they'd probably just say that he's an abrasive douche at worst. 99% of them would ask you what the fuck a trans is. No disrespect to Charlie, but if THIS is the arch-chud that gets killed in broad daylight, these freaks will eat my children alive and force me to watch.
That's dead eyed DU/stoner/killer right there. RIGHT THERE, she'd have done it herself and blame Jesus for her doing if caught.
I'd just like to mention to the half of a person that remembered I exist that I'm not banned, I'm just preventing myself from fedposting in anger something I'd regret.
That apology is so disingenuous. It's worded in a way that still makes it sound like Charlie did something wrong. Writing"what he actually did was demonstrate how some people cherry pick from the bible " immediately after writing "Charlie Kirk advocated stoning gays" is completely designed to make a reader put Kirk advocates stoning gays and demonstrated the bible together in their head. He knows his audience of fans wouldn't like him to say that he was outright wrong and Kirk advocated nothing of the sort. And he knows exactly how people cherry-pick, and he wrote it accordingly. He 'apologised' without actually clearing Charlie's name in the heads of the people who praised him for hating Kirk.
x 73 x 22 x 36 x 6 x 1 x 2 x 1
Yes, but this is an old man coasting old fame alone. Like Mark Hamil. Nobody fucking cares what King has to say about it really. It is just Hollywood celeb= said my opinion back to me = good. Nobody was really convinced either way. Leftist who follow King haven't moved, people who oppose him still think he is a coked up pedo.
Usually I'm against these types of reporting shenanigans. But now, fuck it. Losing their careers has be too easy on these fuckers for too long now. They don't have jobs anyway.I posted a PSA on Charlie's thread. I think it might be useful to share it here too.
Reacciones:
None of them have real jobs.
Indeed, going after the 'careers' doesn't matter to them. fedpost what's fedpost needed fedddddssposttinnggggg.
It's an own goal for the Right. If you look at the thread about what went wrong with the Left, you will see people who hated cancel culture and abuse of government institutions such as courts. If the Right embraces the same tactics, there's not much reason to vote for them once immigration is reformed. Cancel culture only seems to work for government-approved opinions and gives a false sense of agency to the keyboard warrior.
I have no idea wtf you're even trying to say there. Don't bother trying to translate that babble into human language.
I know a lot of people by avatar too.
ngl I had Romney Clan style ousted neocon as my dark horse pick
LMAO, next you're gonna say our greatest ally planned this.
In 1980 there was a particularly nasty Republican strategist named Lee Atwater. He eventually eventually became a liability to the Right. Newt Gingrich is known for his pissing contest shutting down the government. People get tired of taxpayer funded ego games. A bright spot during the first Trump administration was his disinclination to fund another Starr Report on Mrs Clinton. If the second Trump Administration runs wild sacking people over the milder tweets (such as "he died for his beliefs") it removes a reason to vote for his proteges.
That's not milder, what are you talking about? Lol. His beliefs did not necessitate his death. Rage bait somewhere else.
Ok, that makes more sense and yeah, I mostly can see that POV
You vill not live in ze ethnically homogenous community. You vill not be independent. You vill live with ze niggers und eat ze bugs.
