Ughubughughughughughghlug
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Mayo, 2019
I don't hold this as an actual strong stance, but it's an idea that's very unpopular, unfamiliar and I want to share it for everyone to chew.
More slave states would have helped to end slavery faster.
Thomas Jefferson at times restricted slavery expansion, as he did with the Old Northwest, although in practice the enforcement of that was poor and so there was some slavery established. (Nonetheless, I think it still had a clear effect.) However, he prevaricated on this; at times he was more anti-slavery, at times less, as it changed with world events and his life. And likewise his views of how to deal with slavery changed.
The case for more slave states was an idea he was advancing at one point that extending slavery to more of the West would spread the slave population thinner, hence making it easier to enact gradual emancipation in the states that practiced it. At first glance, this sounds retarded, but here's the thing: real life isn't some strategy game where you have, like, fixed population levels in every province. The only thing that matters to determining the TOTAL amount of Blacks is the total amount that already exists. Jefferson recognized that since the Atlantic Slave Trade had been banned (again, his work, again, smugglers circumvented it to an extent) the only population growth Black America could have would be natural fertility, whereas Whites had both fertility and immigration.
This is actually why the South goes from being the larger to the smaller region of the country, why the South retains its original colonial British culture and why slaves go from a notable chunk of the Northern population to Blacks being like cryptids: the North gets tons of mass immigration, the South much less so.
From Jefferson's point of view, allowing the Southern population to bring their slaves into the West may create more pro-slavery Congressmen, sure, but it also spreads that limited Black population thinner to where it's more likely for these states to be able to shift to anti-slavery in the long run.
After first hearing this it really stuck in my mind.
More slave states would have helped to end slavery faster.
Thomas Jefferson at times restricted slavery expansion, as he did with the Old Northwest, although in practice the enforcement of that was poor and so there was some slavery established. (Nonetheless, I think it still had a clear effect.) However, he prevaricated on this; at times he was more anti-slavery, at times less, as it changed with world events and his life. And likewise his views of how to deal with slavery changed.
The case for more slave states was an idea he was advancing at one point that extending slavery to more of the West would spread the slave population thinner, hence making it easier to enact gradual emancipation in the states that practiced it. At first glance, this sounds retarded, but here's the thing: real life isn't some strategy game where you have, like, fixed population levels in every province. The only thing that matters to determining the TOTAL amount of Blacks is the total amount that already exists. Jefferson recognized that since the Atlantic Slave Trade had been banned (again, his work, again, smugglers circumvented it to an extent) the only population growth Black America could have would be natural fertility, whereas Whites had both fertility and immigration.
This is actually why the South goes from being the larger to the smaller region of the country, why the South retains its original colonial British culture and why slaves go from a notable chunk of the Northern population to Blacks being like cryptids: the North gets tons of mass immigration, the South much less so.
From Jefferson's point of view, allowing the Southern population to bring their slaves into the West may create more pro-slavery Congressmen, sure, but it also spreads that limited Black population thinner to where it's more likely for these states to be able to shift to anti-slavery in the long run.
After first hearing this it really stuck in my mind.