😵‍💫 Skitzocow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votos: 403 71.8%
  • Autphag

    Votos: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votos: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votos: 50 8.9%

  • Total de votantes
    561
Nobody cares what you think because you're an ignoramus. I get that you're playing stupid to troll me, the funny part is that you actually are extremely stupid and ignorant. How does that feel?

Anytime you want to be slightly less of a dipshit, try reading this.
www.angelfire.com/rebellion2/goyim/je1.pdf

There is really nothing more to say.

In this place the consensus would say most people here would be accepting of me, at the very least.

You know absolutely nothing about my background or knowledge base, frankly, you're being rude like a typical BAMN activist.
 
In this place the consensus would say most people here would be accepting of me, at the very least.

You know absolutely nothing about my background or knowledge base, frankly, you're being rude like a typical BAMN activist.

Yeah that's why you post here, all of your e-friends will automatically your dumbass opinion over the "cow", no matter how patently fucking stupid you are. You're an insecure loser. So were you just pretending to have no understanding of even the word heritability? Were you just pretending when you called me a Nazi then refused to even look at what so called Nazis think? I think we all know you weren't. So hide behind your "powerlevel" faggot. You're an utter fool. Have fun with that as you go through life.

Do you have any proof besides discredited professors?

Explain how he was discredited? Are we to believe that you are unable to refute Nazism?
 
Última edición por un moderador:
@Mikemikev - To your credit, one thing you're actually often right about is that argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy and being a designated "cow" puts you at a disadvantage where public opinion here is concerned but that doesn't make you wrong. (It's your shitty arguments, or lack of any arguments, and chimping out that accomplishes that. And you're wrong to flip that fallacy around and extrapolate from the existence of a bandwagon against you to that somehow automatically making you right...but these aren't the points I wanted to make, I just felt the need to strongly and carefully qualify what I'm actually giving you credit for.)

With that said, @chekovia was responding to your assertion that "nobody cares what [he] thinks." So this is actually a case where other people's opinion of him is clearly and directly relevant, and you're the one who brought it up.

Who is the "stupid" and "foolish" one again?
 
Explain how he was discredited? Are we to believe that you are unable to refute Nazism?
His uni has disassociated itself from his works (http://www.daily49er.com/news/2008/...isassociates-itself-from-professor-macdonald/) and he was notably the only supporter of David Irving when the latter was found guilty of Holocaust denial (http://web.csulb.edu/~d49er/archives/2004/spring/news/volLIVno119-civil.shtml); he's also apparently cited the Talmud incorrectly when writing his kooky theories (https://jhate.wordpress.com/2011/03/12/kevin-macdonald-is-hilarious/).
 
His uni has disassociated itself from his works (http://www.daily49er.com/news/2008/...isassociates-itself-from-professor-macdonald/) and he was notably the only supporter of David Irving when the latter was found guilty of Holocaust denial (http://web.csulb.edu/~d49er/archives/2004/spring/news/volLIVno119-civil.shtml); he's also apparently cited the Talmud incorrectly when writing his kooky theories (https://jhate.wordpress.com/2011/03/12/kevin-macdonald-is-hilarious/).

The truth isn't a popularity contest so the vote of some cat lady professors who undoubtedly didn't even bother to look at his work is irrelevant. You dismissed it without reading right? In fact you're doing that now. It's something I would never do and suggests very low academic standards.

He supported David Irving? Whether or not Irving was right, which he was, that's not an argument. The truth isn't ruled in court and "associciating with someone who was wrong about something" doesn't invalidate anything you say.

Can you summarize the error of quoting? Just we know you understand what you're talking about and aren't just googling and copy pasting links regarding things you know nothing about.

It's your shitty arguments,
Regarding what? Give some examples.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Regarding what? Give some examples.

I would, but you just ignore any posts, or elements of posts, which irrefutably show you to be wrong or stupid. The fact that you didn't quote or address me pointing out that you brought up how others perceive @chekovia and then mocked him for addressing how he's perceived as a direct response to you is a great example of this.

LOL

Mikemikev PM.png


(Normally I wouldn't share PM's publicly, but I think I can ethically make an exception in this case.)
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I would, but you just ignore any posts, or elements of posts, which irrefutably show you to be wrong or stupid. The fact that you didn't quote or address me pointing out that you brought up how others perceive @chekovia and then mocked him for addressing how he's perceived as a direct response to you is a great example of this.

No posts show me to be wrong. You just assert it. The posts here are "u r wrong u r stupid". Which is the essence of your posts too. I've no idea what your second sentence even means. Why would I quote you when pointing out the self evident fact that the trolls here automatically agree with each other?
 
LOL

Ver archivo adjunto 213414

(Normally I wouldn't share PM's publicly, but I think I can ethically make an exception in this case.)

This is in reference to your post on my profile.


So now you're going to pretend a response to your power levelling e-buddy applies to you, because your incapable of explaining how an alleged misinterpretation of a quote in a blog post refutes a book length analysis of Jewish monopoly in academia in politics?
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Última edición:
No posts show me to be wrong. You just assert it. The posts here are "u r wrong u r stupid". Which is the essence of your posts too. I've no idea what your second sentence even means. Why would I quote you when pointing out the self evident fact that the trolls here automatically agree with each other?

Yes, race does matter, but not as much as you think.

Let's say Jews do act as a cultural and political bloc and have done so as an adaptive process, so do lots of other middleman minorities. Their intermarriage rates in the U.S have been affected by the very Liberalism they created. Their birthrates, aside from hasidim, are the same as white Liberal birthrates: below replacement. Nobody escapes a dysgenic culture, Mike.

That applies to you as well, kid, you're a ranting degenerate. The problem here is you're enraged continually at everybody here while still halfheartedly trying to get acolytes for Stormfront. We've all seen your internet history, you're a strange little gnome that spergs out in public, that's your thing...I guess. I's pretty sad, actually.
 
Yes, race does matter, but not as much as you think.

Let's say Jews do act as a cultural and political bloc and have done so as an adaptive process, so do lots of other middleman minorities. Their intermarriage rates in the U.S have been affected by the very Liberalism they created. Their birthrates, aside from hasidim, are the same as white Liberal birthrates: below replacement. Nobody escapes a dysgenic culture, Mike.

That applies to you as well, kid, you're a ranting degenerate. The problem here is you're enraged continually at everybody here while still halfheartedly trying to get acolytes for Stormfront. We've all seen your internet history, you're a strange little gnome that spergs out in public, that's your thing...I guess. I's pretty sad, actually.

You can choose whether you want to discuss issues or engage in playground name calling. My guess is you finish with the latter because you don't do so well on the former. Which is it to be?
 
You can choose whether you want to discuss issues or engage in playground name calling. My guess is you finish with the latter because you don't do so well on the former. Which is it to be?

That's not a choice I need to make, frankly. I can do both.

Every time people have tried to corner you on race you run away into insults and denials. You seem to believe that race is a zero sum game. People are affected by their surroundings, Mike, pretending that the consequences of slavery and Jim Crow racism haven't created dysgenic black communities in the U.S does you no favours.
 
That's not a choice I need to make, frankly. I can do both.

Every time people have tried to corner you on race you run away into insults and denials. You seem to believe that race is a zero sum game. People are affected by their surroundings, Mike, pretending that the consequences of slavery and Jim Crow racism haven't created dysgenic black communities in the U.S does you no favours.

Of course you can do both. And you do it because nobody is going to address you rationally when you end by spewing mindless abuse. And then of course you accuse me of doing exactly what you are doing. Feel free to repost that without the insults and I'll respond to it.

Yes, race does matter, but not as much as you think.

Let's say Jews do act as a cultural and political bloc and have done so as an adaptive process, so do lots of other middleman minorities. Their intermarriage rates in the U.S have been affected by the very Liberalism they created. Their birthrates, aside from hasidim, are the same as white Liberal birthrates: below replacement. Nobody escapes a dysgenic culture, Mike.

That applies to you as well, kid, you're a ranting degenerate. The problem here is you're enraged continually at everybody here while still halfheartedly trying to get acolytes for Stormfront. We've all seen your internet history, you're a strange little gnome that spergs out in public, that's your thing...I guess. I's pretty sad, actually.

So the format of your posts is:

1) Dumbass ignoramus point
2) Mindless personal abuse so the stupidity is not refuted

Like if I wrote to a physics professor

"I think you're wrong force equals mass times acceleration. Because my mom pushes a shopping trolley and the acceleration is the same if she is tired.

And you are always tired because you are a weak stupid faggot and you are one foot tall and you have autism you are angry and you fuck animals."

and then claimed to be correct about dynamic physics when he didn't respond.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
So the format of your posts is:

1) Dumbass ignoramus point
2) Mindless personal abuse so the stupidity is not refuted

Like if I wrote to a physics professor

"I think you're wrong force equals mass times acceleration. Because my mom pushes a shopping trolley and the acceleration is the same if she is tired.

And you are always tired because you are a weak stupid faggot and you are one foot tall and you have autism you are angry and you fuck animals."

and then claimed to be correct about dynamic physics when he didn't respond.


mike sounds like chrischan more and more each day
 
Atrás
Top Abajo