Moleman, through the Fire and the Flames

No, it doesn't, and to imply it does is serious "fursecution".
"Fursecution". Just wow to that, you do know that there are things within the furry fandom that are disturbing and disgusting? Just ask one of the furries who is a part of this forum. He himself can admit that the furry fandom has its share of weirdo's and creepers and people who think society persecutes them just because they are furries.
 
It being an existing term and for lack of a better word, yes, though this is a serious case unlike most cases where the term is invoked which are usually more joking.
Even though it can be a joke, some furries take it seriously and see any criticism as "fursecution". I willing to bet that some furries think that claims of some furries that want to lie down with a dog is "fursecution" from critics.
 
"Fursecution". Just wow to that, you do know that there are things within the furry fandom that are disturbing and disgusting? Just ask one of the furries who is a part of this forum. He himself can admit that the furry fandom has its share of weirdo's and creepers and people who think society persecutes them just because they are furries.
The problem is that here, they are automatically equating any mention of "furry" with such disgusting cases.
 
It being an existing term and for lack of a better word, yes, though this is a serious case unlike most cases where the term is invoked which are usually more joking.

Furries are an advanced strain of autistic, so far gone that they can longer be considered human. The most humane thing to do for them is chemical castration and an immediate execution.
 
It being an existing term and for lack of a better word, yes, though this is a serious case unlike most cases where the term is invoked which are usually more joking.
"Fursecution" has never existed and is used by degenerates to convince themselves that dog fucking is ok.

Are you part of this group?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo