😵‍💫 Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votos: 36 9.9%

  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votos: 327 90.1%
  • Total de votantes
    363
Destacado
LagoonaBlue dijo:
So it wasn't done by CAMHS like most are?
Presiona para expandir...
Mine was pre-Labour reform of mental health. That was from 2003 onwards; my diagnosis originates from 1996. This was before CAMHS had actually existed as an independent body and before autism was considered psychiatric, in the neo-Freudian sense, as opposed to neuropsychiatric -- think Amber's conception of the thing. We now know autism isn't neurodescriptice but before we did, it was treated like any childhood terminal illness in like fashion and hence the diagnostic route undertaken.
 
Autphag dijo:
Mine was pre-Labour reform of mental health. That was from 2003 onwards; my diagnosis originates from 1996. This was before CAMHS had actually existed as an independent body and before autism was considered psychiatric, in the neo-Freudian sense, as opposed to neuropsychiatric -- think Amber's conception of the thing. We now know autism isn't neurodescriptice but before we did, it was treated like any childhood terminal illness in like fashion and hence the diagnostic route undertaken.
Presiona para expandir...
Imagine having to put up with your shit for 21 fucking years. Ye gods.
 
NotAKitty dijo:
Imagine having to put up with your shit for 21 fucking years. Ye gods.
Presiona para expandir...
Amber is one to speak of the inherent negligence behind providing somebody of so "innately unstable", to directly borrow in reference without acknowledging the strawman, a disposition the services he has advocated denying; meanwhile, far more detrimental effects have ensued from the problematization of autism enabling treatment protocol such as issuing neurodegenerative SSRIs from a relatively late period despite no incident having occurred without intervention some 12 years prior. From 1996-2008, nothing was done and I was fine; a directly drawable gradient exists between psychiatric service intervention unrequested by and imposed upon myself, and the increase of severity of dysfunction.

Other than the numerous problems entangled with such epistemology as a conception of autism treatable with the available options (whether it shouldn't or not is irrelevant, actually) that had invoked my ire upon reading the terminology used in the brief newspaper column covering my proceedings (an intended editorial stint on Amber's part of coercing Vic Rodrick ubdoubtably), that I was seeing Haselgrove to " treat my Asperger's " (a fetishization of a model of the condition in which antipsychotics induced erasure of all behaviour can be falsely equivocated with improvement without perceived fault), it strikes me as absurd that nobody would bat an eyelid when presented with the very valid arguments, given the above's consideration, behind such an intervention's inherent negligence in its own right.

The intended reservation of meliorative treatments for conditions other than autism spell out the lattermost's intended designation as a category for a diagnosti dumping ground upon which only the most antiquainted, side-effects ridden and neurodegenerative inebriants -- such that these treatments, innately unconducive to improvement, are tantamount to -- are retained. Autism will be made a legacy condition and see a moratorium of diagnosis with legacy treatments, disguised in the pseudostatistical analysis of epidemiology and epistemology to falsely scapegoat the condition. My experiences in the anecdotal are a testament to that.

So there was nothing like 21 years in which I'd burdened the system. They intercepted me at 16 whilst relatively intact, to burn me out with nearly a decade of their shit.

LagoonaBlue dijo:
Erm, no. I asked you a question, I expect YOU to give me an answer.
Presiona para expandir...
You evade the answer, in a sort of reversal of the usual process where the question is the thing ducked; I've told you outright and you refuse to accept it, so stop toying with someone you distrust and speak to someone you trust more.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Autphag dijo:
You evade the answer, in a sort of reversal of the usual process where the question is the thing ducked; I've told you outright and you refuse to accept it, so stop toying with someone you distrust and speak to someone you trust more.
Presiona para expandir...

I don't trust anyone and you know that.

So give me a straight answer. Who the fuck is Amber?
 
LagoonaBlue dijo:
I don't trust anyone and you know that.

So give me a straight answer. Who the fuck is Amber?
Presiona para expandir...
Let me quote myself and highlight the pertinent phrase:

Autphag dijo:
You evade the answer, in a sort of reversal of the usual process where the question is the thing ducked; I've told you outright and you refuse to accept it, so stop toying with someone you distrust and speak to someone you trust more.
Presiona para expandir...
Your willful ignorance isn't my problem.
 
chekovia dijo:
What if Amber doesn't exist and is just a figment of Chris' increasingly damaged imagination? This is a guy who actively believes in multiple conspiracies, surely this is just another one of them?
Presiona para expandir...

I mean they have multiple opinions on me.

One minute I am a cis woman who is allied with Cuntster or Cunster's alt account, the next minute I'm a MtF transgender person who is trying too hard to prove I am "cis", then after that I am an effeminate cis man.
 
I'm just :wow: at the attempt to justify shite grammar ("like I" on the last page where "like me" is correct) and even more shite spelling with an appeal to Mark Twain. Twain (Samuel Langhorne Clemens) was a journalist. While he is far better known today for his fiction, he got to break the rules there because he knew them upside-down and inside-out, as displayed in his reportage, and he would have about no time for wee Autie eating the sides off normative grammar out of the most unearned sense of superiority, especially in the area of words. But then wee Autie probably thinks Twain would be posthumously "on his side" or some such failsauce simply because Twain wrote a book in which a black slave is portrayed as having had no access to education. Who would think, right?

Edited to add: When he does get that dress, please, merciful heaven, no Spandex, no Lycra, no body-con fabrics or styles. Something a bit more forgiving would seem in order.
 
LagoonaBlue dijo:
I mean they have multiple opinions on me.

One minute I am a cis woman who is allied with Cuntster or Cunster's alt account, the next minute I'm a MtF transgender person who is trying too hard to prove I am "cis", then after that I am an effeminate cis man.
Presiona para expandir...
Bloke is just jealous, is all, that's pretty obvious.
 
I'm not sure that makes the time-travelling-trans-women conspiracy any better, but thanks for the clarification. Doesn't that mean his problems with them could be avoided by travelling west to Glasgow or north to Dundee for treatment?
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo