Citations on why Urban youth do crime - The left, right and center perspective on the obvious problem

I just wanna start this debate off by saying that no matter what evidence we find, no matter what reasoning we employ, no matter what centuries of observation and naked reality shows us, keep this in mind: we can always, always, always find a white person to blame when blacks behave badly. Remember we don't ever have to accept that blacks can be accountable for anything, ever.
 
-Humans are simultaneously complex and simple. No pun intended but it could just be monkey see monkey do. Blacks tend to be in areas with very dense populations which is a nightmare to properly enforce law. People hear about crime they may experience it, and so it seems normalized that way. Humans were not meant to live so close together.

-And then you have these attorney generals that think it’s a good idea to release predators back into the world despite the courts and jails insisting they aren’t rehabilitated, which makes no sense to me. In fact it almost seems like cruel sadism from their local government.

-And most of these local governments are single party rule: the DNC. They run virtually unopposed and so they don’t have to do jack squat to win over voters. It doesn’t matter how bad things get. Some of these cities have had the same mayor or representative longer than most kings and queens on earth have reigned.

Try those three points with your friend: people in big groups tend to be dumber than on their own, asinine decisions made by leadership, and the leadership simply cannot be held accountable due to corruption and calcified power, making them harder to uproot than a hickory tree.
 
I was hoping for some academic papers but that is the short end of the stick.
He is of course correct. It is literally just niggers being low IQ and thus impulsive and violent. Everyone understands this regardless of if they admit it or not and you can tell that they do because of how they react. A couple dozen black on black shootings in chicongo is just tuesday and they don't even really charge them ("mutual combat" lol) where as a white guy shoots someone and it's we have to stop him NOW (because he probably has a reason and is still dangerous, instead of shooting deshawUn over some faygo).

You ask for sources but saying this out loud has been verboten for some time so you will not get much. There is "The Bell Curve" (ISBN 0-02-914673-9) from the 90's. Basically peak criminality is at ~85 IQ and the bell curve for black people peaks around 85-90. If you know anything about statistics then it will be obvious that given this the rate of black crime is going to be WAY higher than white crime. That's where our wonderful 13/56 statistics come from.

Further IQ is significantly heritable. That means that no matter how much education, enrichment programs, etc. you lavish on "marginalized communities" it's not going to make a big difference. Factor in all the rhetoric about how it's wtypipos fault and all the gibs are probably a net negative.

This isn't unqiue to black/white either. Average IQ is basically Asian > White > Hispanic > Black and so are the crime stats (and non-pozzed med school enrollment, life achievement, and so on). You might also try to find that mirror study here from awhile ago where whtie and asian kids would recognize themselves before 2 but blacks didn't until like 5. They try to cope about it because 'kenyans don't have mirrors in their society' (which is kinda damning on it's own but...) as if water isn't reflective or something.
 
Low IQ also impacts empathy.

Niggers are too stupid to create a mental model of how they would feel if someone did to them what they are doing to others.
 
Basically peak criminality is at ~85 IQ and the bell curve for black people peaks around 85-90
Are we sure this isn't a "Population density map" issue?

Peak criminality is at 85 because most of the street-level crime is committed by people who happen to have low IQs but that doesn't necessarily imply a causal relationship between IQ and criminality.

For all we know you could somehow (For the sake of argument) raise the collective IQ levels of black people and see an equal rise in the IQ level for peak criminality.
 
Are we sure this isn't a "Population density map" issue?

Peak criminality is at 85 because most of the street-level crime is committed by people who happen to have low IQs but that doesn't necessarily imply a causal relationship between IQ and criminality.

For all we know you could somehow (For the sake of argument) raise the collective IQ levels of black people and see an equal rise in the IQ level for peak criminality.
I don't think it's a population density issue because the stats play out differently in cities with higher or lower percentage of nigs and between other races as well.

As to it not being causal are you taking the piss? I don't meant that derisively I am just bemused because it seems like you're saying that it's not IQ causing criminality but some other inherent trait of black people. Like we'd have a bunch of black people mag dumping glocks in the library over math proofs.
 
I don't think it's a population density issue because the stats play out differently in cities with higher or lower percentage of nigs and between other races as well.

As to it not being causal are you taking the piss? I don't meant that derisively I am just bemused because it seems like you're saying that it's not IQ causing criminality but some other inherent trait of black people. Like we'd have a bunch of black people mag dumping glocks in the library over math proofs.
Suppose one person is significantly smarter than the other, is low IQ mainly inherited from the men or the women?
 
Suppose one person is significantly smarter than the other, is low IQ mainly inherited from the men or the women?
I know you were looking for specific links but I don't have a specific study in mind or a link handy so this is just what I've read.

There have been studies looking for "intelligence genes" but there are no single genes that have a significant effect individually. iirc there were like 2000 genes that showed some correlation with IQ and the only real conclusion you could draw was "more of these more better". The amount shown on average in different races correlated with IQ as you would expect.
>Yeah, okay, great. I asked about which parent matter not for you to re-iterate "nigs dumb"
I know, but it's necessary background. As I'm sure you're aware the difference between a man and a women is only one chromosome and for men that chromosome is quite small. Because there's so many genes involved in intelligence changing one X to a Y isn't a big enough change to matter much. Obviously it's a down to random chance but on average you would expect the IQ of a child to be the average of the parents IQs.

I've also seen it suggested that men have the same average IQ as women but their bell curve is a bit flatter so there are more men at the tail ends (your chess grand masters and such) which I think fits. If you had a population that for example 5 genes determine intelligence and one that only had 3 (assuming the same min/average/max) obviously the population with 5 would have a smoother curve with more in the middle. And replacing an X with Y of course reduces the total amount of genes.

If you were looking for research on this I would look at companies that claim to be able to select smarter embryos for IVF. Most of them claim they can get at least 5 IQ points over random. I'm not sure I believe that (yet) but they will try to convince you they actually do something. There is another study I'm thinking of but can't for the life of me remember the name. If it comes to me I will try to remember to edit this.

Anyway you're not going to save the black race by "bleaching" all the babby mamas, sorry.
 
I remember years ago some black kid stole his grandmothers SUV and lead the police on a chase. When questioned why he answered, “It’s fun to do bad things.” Like two weeks later he beat his grandmother at a Walmart, he was like 8 years old. He got arrested again 8 years later for carjacking and robbery, his co-defendant was armed. I think he’s getting out in like 2030 or something.

I think part of it is culture. Like every other culture on Earth has customs, crimes, and myth about Justice. Religious ideas of Justice vary, but a lot of blacks I’ve met have a very retribution based sense of Justice when it comes to themselves. If they harm someone whatever, if you harm them they want an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.

I’ve heard the argument that to a lot of primitive societies interacting with advanced high societies is the same as introducing a culture that never experienced alcohol to alcohol. The basic idea is that they‘ve never dealt with addiction and it takes a lifetime to start developing the internal standards to deal with it.
 
As funny as "it's dey culture" is as an answer, I believe the biggest contributing factor is a multi generational government pysop intended to mold them into a permanent slave caste by instilling criminal behavior that is directly punishable by for profit enslavement.
 
As funny as "it's dey culture" is as an answer, I believe the biggest contributing factor is a multi generational government pysop intended to mold them into a permanent slave caste by instilling criminal behavior that is directly punishable by for profit enslavement.
If only we didn't have a whole continent where niggers are left to their own devices as proof that they are just born that way.

A few more interesting factoids:
- black women commit more violent crimes than White men, I think they are the only female demographic to achieve this
- the poorest White counties in the US have less crime than the richest black counties

Niggers are just niggers, it's as simple as that, and no amount of money, effort or time will ever change them.
 
Yeah skimming past the low-effort "lets sperg about how we think every problem in the world is caused by black people" responses....

.... personally, I've always had a theory that there's sort of a Fodor's Number thing going on here.

Basically, in a smaller community, the more tight-knit it is. If you had a tribal village with only twelve occupants, it would not only be harder to get away with crime because everyone would know everyone else.... you'd be less likely to want to commit crime in the first place, because you're more capable of empathizing with those around you.

However, the bigger the number of people gets, the less empathy there is to go around. Large crowds of people look like just so many hairless apes to you, and so it becomes easier to see them as "NPCs" and justify anything you want to do.

Whatever it is you think you see
Becomes criminal opportunity!


On top of that I feel like on some level, being anti-social might actually be a sort of default state.... for a lot of people, if not everyone. I think the existence of large amounts of people you don't know just scares some people. And therefore they see nothing wrong, especially if they're fairly young (since most people don't have anything resembling a moral compass until they turn 25 anyway).

That's my half-asleep thoughts, anyway.
 
If only we didn't have a whole continent where niggers are left to their own devices as proof that they are just born that way.

A few more interesting factoids:
- black women commit more violent crimes than White men, I think they are the only female demographic to achieve this
- the poorest White counties in the US have less crime than the richest black counties

Niggers are just niggers, it's as simple as that, and no amount of money, effort or time will ever change them.


I like the thoughts. The thoughts are good. I'd prefer citations or links to the source though.

id also like retarded liberal science papers on why this is an issue for a little compare and contrast
 
Atrás
Top Abajo