US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
You forgot, Acting like a lolcow when he loses the slapfights he starts as well.
That, and the dozens of weirdos (and purported right-wingers) who are oddly fixated in writing parasocial fanfics to Hulk Homo on this very thread and on his profile, in a very "tee hee" tranny way no less, as if this site is just their own custom version of Bluesky. Makes you think about how disingenuous those users are.

Anyway: How is it not regarded as a crime to help unlawful border crossers to evade law enforcement following the largest foreign invasion in human history? Yet not only is Tito Rodriguez of Local Hearts Foundation not apprehended for treason, he is lionized by the complicit media:
https://xcancel.com/Rightanglenews/status/1936777995085123703
1750785936262.webp


Shitlib propagandists jerk on heartstrings so as to prevent the gullible from thinking.
 
Cernovich has always been coal wym
What is he malding on xitter or something?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=OqjEUt-BOgE
Some KOMO news for the HOMOS that wanna cry about the liberal news source and venerate the random twitter screencap

MSNBC, CNN, Fox, all of em only disagree on opinion pieces, they all get their talking points from AP and Reuters who get the ok on what they can pass on/publish from the State Department and more recently DHS.

We give China and Russia shit for being "propaganda states" but truth is post 9/11 the United States became a propaganda state with the signing of the patriot act.
So is it fair to say the US strike was not really successful? All the reports i am seeing say that Iranians managed to move out some/a lot of the enriched uranium before the strike(Obvious thing to do cause the US informed them that they would be striking before hand.)
 
That dogfucker Al Green has introduced his resolution to impeach Trump and the Clerk is reporting it right now:

1750786158472.webp

ETA the text of the resolution hasn't been added to congress dot gov yet so no link.
 
Agreed. I think paying attention to end times signs is good, although date setting “it’s happening RIGHT NOW” sets a lot of people up for significant failure and ruins reputations/faith for some, but when you make an attempt to “force God’s hand” in a way, you are discounting him. He has a specific time (the fullness of the gentiles), and trying to speed it up means less souls to be saved.
People have been trying to tell Harold Camping this stuff for decades, but it never stopped him from putting up those billboards.
 
What is he malding on xitter or something?

So is it fair to say the US strike was not really successful? All the reports i am seeing say that Iranians managed to move out some/a lot of the enriched uranium before the strike(Obvious thing to do cause the US informed them that they would be striking before hand.)
Having a pile of uranium isn't helpful if you don't have the facilities to refine more or build a bomb with it. Similar deal with STUXNET, where a bomb would have eliminated the threat outright, but the goal was to slow them down rather than stop them outright because they obviously rebuilt the damaged centrifuges.

If nothing else, the can is kicked down the road again.
 
That dogfucker Al Green has introduced his resolution to impeach Trump and the Clerk is reporting it right now:

Ver archivo adjunto 7550884
Once the Dems take the house next year, we will be going through the entire impeachment inquiry/ impeachment trial again. I suspect if trump makes it to the end of 4 years they would have attempted to impeach him 2-3 more times
 
What is he malding on xitter or something?

So is it fair to say the US strike was not really successful? All the reports i am seeing say that Iranians managed to move out some/a lot of the enriched uranium before the strike(Obvious thing to do cause the US informed them that they would be striking before hand.)
They don't have the other parts to make the enriched uranium useful for anything but a dirty bomb, which is not easy to put together.

Also, the warning and allowing the uranium to be moved likely save a large amount of land being made radioactive if it had been blown up. The US took away Iran's ability to make a nuke while minimizing casualties and preventing a horrific environmental release of radioactive materials and proving that all they intended to do was deprive Iran of the possibility of making nuclear weapons.

It's honestly pretty badass. They told the Iranians they would destroy their nuclear weapons development, and they did so as surgically as possible, even giving them the chance to avoid loss of life.
 
That dogfucker Al Green has introduced his resolution to impeach Trump and the Clerk is reporting it right now:

Ver archivo adjunto 7550884

ETA the text of the resolution hasn't been added to congress dot gov yet so no link.

After the Clerk finished reading the cane-waving fucker's resolution, a rep from Georgia moved to table the measure, they're proceeding with a fifteen-minute electronic vote on that. Come on you jackasses, there are Post Offices to name.
1750786563873.webp

If anyone else is interested in watching the House proceedings live, you can go to this link. More often than not it's full of bloviating fuckery, but you get to see the sausage made (or not) in real time.
 
The thing that makes this "easy" to dismiss is that it was carried out by Israelis who'd want to prove genetic legitimacy to the land. Though Mormons carried out that native American study once and discovered Native Americans were Asian so maybe it's legit.
They’ve walked back the scale of their claims in a manner like some Christians trying to reinterpret Genesis as being compatible with Old Earth Creationism without just declaring it all pure literary storytelling. Early Mormons showed frequently that they believed all American Indians were Lamanite and that there were massive Aztec style civilizations across North America. Modern Mormons often restrict the claim to that there was a small tribe somewhere in the interior that was founded by Lamanites, which is a lot easier to find evidence for, but not consistent with what Smith expected.
 
I did this same thing with Dems by asking them if transwomen are women.
Another one less inflammatory is to ask if Trump could ever do a good, or what would it take for them to agree with Trump.
His "fuck these retards in the middle east" might have hit that spot for a few I believe.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo