What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

There are a few, but one not brought up here: Helen Keller's original handler completely lied about what she was communicating to push a feminist agenda. There was so much feminism nonsense pushed with her as the golden example of how women can succeed, which got her (and her handler) into the spotlight. And it even got lawmaker attention. But when her caretaker died and got replaced, feminism was never talked about again from her, and instead, she was advocating for Blind/Deaf awareness.

I cannot and will not ever be convinced this isn't what happened. It is the easiest thing to lie about both to the public and to Keller herself. And think about it. Why the fuck would a blind and deaf woman push a feminist message when blind and deaf people have it much harder? And why the fuck would the feminist nonsense end as soon as her handler died? It's clear she was used entirely for propaganda that public schools still push to this day. She should be a disability icon, not a feminist one. A scummy caretaker literally bullshitted the entire public and her disabled patient for a social agenda and Keller probably died unaware of it.
 
There are a few, but one not brought up here: Helen Keller's original handler completely lied about what she was communicating to push a feminist agenda. There was so much feminism nonsense pushed with her as the golden example of how women can succeed, which got her (and her handler) into the spotlight. And it even got lawmaker attention. But when her caretaker died and got replaced, feminism was never talked about again from her, and instead, she was advocating for Blind/Deaf awareness.

I cannot and will not ever be convinced this isn't what happened. It is the easiest thing to lie about both to the public and to Keller herself. And think about it. Why the fuck would a blind and deaf woman push a feminist message when blind and deaf people have it much harder? And why the fuck would the feminist nonsense end as soon as her handler died? It's clear she was used entirely for propaganda that public schools still push to this day. She should be a disability icon, not a feminist one. A scummy caretaker literally bullshitted the entire public and her disabled patient for a social agenda and Keller probably died unaware of it.
I am about....75% of the way to being convinced that the entire fucking Story is a god damn sham.
 
I am about....75% of the way to being convinced that the entire fucking Story is a god damn sham.
Funny enough, this whole idea stemmed from a much larger conspiracy that Helen Keller was just a retard who didn't understand anything. However, there were some holes in it (it's been too long, so I don't remember what the holes were). There are loads of YT videos talking about it. But then some people dug into it and looked at the fact that the focus of her activism changed for no discernible reason, and thus, it leads me to this. But since people are more often to discuss the much more bold "she was actually a retard who never had any idea of what was going on around her ever in her life" conspiracy, people will overlook this one about her original handler lying that is much easier to digest and very plausible.
 
>She should be a disability icon, not a feminist one.
Disabled people are the most oppressed group, and the only objectively oppressed one across the world, they have collectively experienced the most abuse from society, the medical industry and even their caretakers and those closest to them, and are the only group of people with objective and physical troubles that surpass societal treatment, and yet they always get shafted even when it comes to the matters of equality, presumably because they're hard to wrangle

They don't have a collectivist identity, they're not a part of a racial culture or have a single personality trait that can be appealed to, those with physical disabilities are hard to fake and those with mental ones are either too "scary" as they are difficult to control and mindwash, or inversely, too low functioning to make for good social soldiers, and overall they're not aesthetic enough...
Recently there's been an attempt to claim and co opt the higher functioning, easier to fake mental disorders, like ADHD or autism, by people who don't have them in order to make themselves feel better about the years of abuse they levied towards them, but those people are still frightened by an actual case, that's why they so desperately want to cement themselves as the true and honest cases, and everyone who doesn't tow the line 'doesn't count'
You're not gonna get some undesirable autistic 40 year old man who only cares about trains and in-depth analysis of a single abstract movie from the 80's to start watching his mouth and worrying about his social credit score, so you need to label him a weirdo who isn't truly autistic and replace him with a quirky cute teenage girl who will do all that and serve as the real face of oppression, then occasionally flap her arms to show how truly autistic she is only when someone is watching her of course
 
Nothing really serious, but I have a pet theory that a lot of old Russian folk and fairy tales are apocryphal stories about Ivan the Terrible's youth. A lot of princes named "Ivan" plus Eastern Orthodox theology in those stories/historic folk narratives.
 
Ok, hear me out:
Human_migrations_and_mitochondrial_haplogroups.PNG
I love the mysteries that genetics keeps digging up.

Like, what’s up with maternal haplogroup X2? I just stumbled onto it because my maternal line is cree so it’s no surprise that it’s x2a. But unlike the rest of the new world haplogroups, it’s found in Europe and North America but not Siberia.
IMG_0288.webp
I’m sure there’s an explanation, like they just got wiped out in Siberia thousands of years ago, but it is still pretty odd.
 
I love the mysteries that genetics keeps digging up.

Like, what’s up with maternal haplogroup X2? I just stumbled onto it because my maternal line is cree so it’s no surprise that it’s x2a. But unlike the rest of the new world haplogroups, it’s found in Europe and North America but not Siberia.
Ver archivo adjunto 7288851
I’m sure there’s an explanation, like they just got wiped out in Siberia thousands of years ago, but it is still pretty odd.
Look at the map another way:
1745811801045.webp 1745811534707.webp
Maybe they didn't go Siberia-ways.

Nothing really serious, but I have a pet theory that a lot of old Russian folk and fairy tales are apocryphal stories about Ivan the Terrible's youth. A lot of princes named "Ivan" plus Eastern Orthodox theology in those stories/historic folk narratives.
Explain more?
 
Dentists are full of shit. Not all of them, but a lot.
I agree, dentists perform a lot of unnecessary procedures
The majority of wisdom tooth extractions are unnecessary, and even a non professional can tell just by looking at the angle that the tooth is coming out in whether it'll be a problem that needs fixing or a completely harmless process that'll simply result in your wisdom tooth being out and in your mouth, but the dentist will tell you it needs pulling either way because it's one of the most profitable surgeries
Not all fillings are necessary either, the topmost layer of your tooth CAN regenerate and a very small hole will fill itself if you just take care of it, but they'll lie to you and say it can't and scare you into getting it drilled and filled "before it's too late"

But that's not unique just to dentists, most doctors in general are full of shit and would rather feed you pills or put you through complex tests using all the machinery they have before even doing the most basic checkup, it's just part of the business
 
Considering many Russian fairy tales are about princes named "Ivan" and would have been spread orally for centuries, plus the Eastern Orthodox thing in Russia of viewing the tsar a close second to God. Plus the fact that Ivan the Terrible was the first Tsar of Russia.
it's one of the most profitable surgeries
Something I realized after getting my wisdom teeth taken out this past January: it's like male circumcision, needless cosmetic surgery so medical people can make more money than they already do.
 
I agree, dentists perform a lot of unnecessary procedures
The majority of wisdom tooth extractions are unnecessary, and even a non professional can tell just by looking at the angle that the tooth is coming out in whether it'll be a problem that needs fixing or a completely harmless process that'll simply result in your wisdom tooth being out and in your mouth, but the dentist will tell you it needs pulling either way because it's one of the most profitable surgeries
Not all fillings are necessary either, the topmost layer of your tooth CAN regenerate and a very small hole will fill itself if you just take care of it, but they'll lie to you and say it can't and scare you into getting it drilled and filled "before it's too late"
Something I realized after getting my wisdom teeth taken out this past January: it's like male circumcision, needless cosmetic surgery so medical people can make more money than they already do.
On this note, can anyone tell me some of those things dentists actually DON'T want you to know?

Ones I know already:
  • Dentists can tell if you've recently given oral sex, bite your nails, or sucked your thumb as a kid
  • The dental hygienist can see and diagnose many things, but is not legally allowed to do so
  • An experienced dentist can see how often you drink alcohol
  • Silver fillings last twice as long as ceramic and there's no reason to remove existing silver ones despite the claims they leak mercury
  • Alcoholic mouthwash is bad for you because it kills the symbiotic bacteria in your mouth
Something I've heard but have not had explained to me:
  • Your teeth can tell if you are the product of incest, even if you have no other physiological signs
 
I'm waiting on Charles to force peace talks in the middle east and/or die this year. You should read up on your Iraqi royals history and who started the eco/green movement.
King Charles is clearly "compromised" in some way. It's impossible to make any affirmative claim in this regard, at least in terms of a conspiracy. What I mean by compromised is that Charles clearly supports ideologies/ideas that are severely harmful to his own realm and "subjects". He is not only a passive observer of the Islamification of the UK, he is also an active participant in this process. Charles is constantly showcasing the diverse "communities and cultures" that have been brought to the UK (especially England) by immigration.

The attached picture of Charles being poked in the chest by a Rothschild has probably been posted ad nauseum. His connections with Jimmy Saville are also well-known. We can only wonder whether this man is a truly depraved, or hopelessly blackmailed individual.

As a slight digression, it is interesting to consider Charles and his mother versus the traditional archetype of how "princes", or monarchs, should perform in European history. The "mirror to princes" genre of literature, mostly written in later medieval times, provides an example of these hoped-for virtues. In the eyes of most people throughout the centuries, Elizabeth would probably be considered an egregious failure as a monarch, having presided over the collapse of her empire and the economic/cultural disintegration of her country. Her sins, however, seem to be those of omission rather than commission. Charles, on the other hand, seems to be actively anti-British in some ways. Reference his meeting with Muslim faith leaders after gangs of Muslims and Indians roamed the streets of English towns, carrying knives and machetes, during the summer of 2024.

Not to PL, or continue this tangent, but I feel some sympathy for Charles. Putting squirrels and birds on coins is probably what I would do if I could control how my country's coins looked. However, the guy is suffering from a terminal illness of whatever length. Charles' grandson will either never become king, or will end his life in political exile. Perhaps with Charles' direct complicity, the British monarchy has become a tool of globalism, and will perish along with many other traditional European institutions.

TLDR: Charles III is a malicious agent of globalism, the British monarchy will collapse because of this and other trends.
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • GettyImages-467631086.webp
    GettyImages-467631086.webp
    558.9 KB · Vistas: 32
King Charles is clearly "compromised" in some way.
The House of Windsor exists solely to perpetuate the theater, friend. All club members, no matter their origin or purpose or "bloodline", exist strictly to perpetuate the theater. I wouldn't worry too too much about any of them at this point, frankly. The club itself will spend the rest of its "life" gasping and clinging to anything which (used to) delay its inevitable undoing. There is no going back to their bullshit..plainly put.
 
The House of Windsor exists solely to perpetuate the theater, friend. All club members, no matter their origin or purpose or "bloodline", exist strictly to perpetuate the theater. I wouldn't worry too too much about any of them at this point, frankly. The club itself will spend the rest of its "life" gasping and clinging to anything which (used to) delay its inevitable undoing. There is no going back to their bullshit..plainly put.
Everyone kneels to someone, we don't even know their names.
 
Something I realized after getting my wisdom teeth taken out this past January: it's like male circumcision, needless cosmetic surgery so medical people can make more money than they already do.
You got lucky, I noticed mine were coming in when I couldn't shut my jaw fully anymore. Turned out the lower wisdom teeth were coming it at near 90 degrees and pushed against everything.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo