😵‍💫 Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votos: 36 9.9%

  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votos: 327 90.1%
  • Total de votantes
    363
Destacado
Cuck Norris dijo:
Again, you could have just said "no u" to get your point across.
Presiona para expandir...
Nah. That was the most succinct way I could summarise your orthodox approach to language. People like you are idiots for constraining your diction and grammatical syntax in this pseudointelligent way, while pseudotranny bastards like Cuntster/Amber get away with running circles around you using North Korean news agency style word salads. We've figured out the secrets of human semantic manipulation. Ahaaahaaahaaha imbecile.
 
Have you learned how to write in Hangul properly yet?
 
I might add to what Cuck Norris said that "attackative" from a few pages back is a neologism, and a silly one at that. The perfectly good existing word "belligerent" would have done; it has the same number of syllables, so you could have gone on being needlessly polysyllabic without taking the trouble to invent words that sound like an ad agency for an insurance firm tried to be clever. There's nothing wrong with coining terms as long as they fill a need, don't already duplicate the function of an existing word that most reasonably bright people would know, and don't sound childish -- "Mummy, I hate that attackative doggie next door!" You're not inflating anyone's opinion of you but your own.
 
NobleGreyHorse dijo:
I might add to what Cuck Norris said that "attackative" from a few pages back is a neologism, and a silly one at that. The perfectly good existing word "belligerent" would have done; it has the same number of syllables, so you could have gone on being needlessly polysyllabic without taking the trouble to invent words that sound like an ad agency for an insurance firm tried to be clever. There's nothing wrong with coining terms as long as they fill a need, don't already duplicate the function of an existing word that most reasonably bright people would know, and don't sound childish -- "Mummy, I hate that attackative doggie next door!" You're not inflating anyone's opinion of you but your own.
Presiona para expandir...
Moar prescriptivist gibberish!
 
Autphag dijo:
You're a failed psychopath of the system-abiding type. I am a failed psychopath of the system-rebelling type. But will either of us ever know what it is like to ve Cunster, a successful psychopath of the system-manipulating type? No. You're wasting your time taking quarrels with me, bud.
Presiona para expandir...
So when confronted with truth you regress to spouting more gibberish. Good to know. Also, no one cares about Cuntster but you. You can keep trollshielding but it's not going to take the focus off you.
 
Autphag dijo:
Oh I see. You're one of those stupid "prescribed grammar" faggot. We know the reason you can't refute the "brevity is wit" cliché is because you are the moron.
Presiona para expandir...

"The writer either has a meaning and cannot express it, or he inadvertently says something else, or he is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything or not. This mixture of vagueness and sheer incompetence is the most marked characteristic of modern English prose, and especially of any kind of political writing. As soon as certain topics are raised, the concrete melts into the abstract and no one seems able to think of turns of speech that are not hackneyed: prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated hen-house."

Autphag's Word Salad tendencies in one paragraph.
 
Gook Choy dijo:
"The writer either has a meaning and cannot express it, or he inadvertently says something else, or he is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything or not. This mixture of vagueness and sheer incompetence is the most marked characteristic of modern English prose, and especially of any kind of political writing. As soon as certain topics are raised, the concrete melts into the abstract and no one seems able to think of turns of speech that are not hackneyed: prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated hen-house."

Autphag's Word Salad tendencies in one paragraph.
Presiona para expandir...
In other words, Orwell was so hopeless at interpreting the works of his contemporaries that he had the tenacity to engage in a pseudointellectual tardrage where, disguised under a meaningful dismissal of their meaning, he tacitly admits to having a deficient enough discernment as to be completely bereft of critical literary comprehension.

His proto-postmodernist tard rages are (were?) like Cuntster trying to explain autism through his monoculturally negroid prism of perception; it falls under that same folly alleged in his charges of the pseudopolemic critique of others.

And considering none of you properly interpreted that he was attacking the writing styles more properly characterised by your stilted overscientificness (not that it changes my position -- a hack is still a hack), it's even more hilarious that you would use any quote of Orwell's (hopelessly out of context) to attempt to characterise my writing.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo