US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I wonder how much rampant mental health issues and resulting psychiatric medication has on likelihood to have children.

Lots of younger people I see say they can barely take care of themselves, let alone a child. It's hard to comprehend being responsible for a baby, if being responsible for yourself is already overwhelming due to mental illness.

SSRIs don't just dull depression and despair but also positive emotions like happiness and excitement too.
People say they feel like zombies on them. Do zombies want kids?

SSRIs can also have known effects resulting in loss of libido and sexual dysfunction, so perhaps also lack of desire for family and children as well.

Depression and anxiety are rampant, people are told it's just genetic or to pop pills to handle it instead of looking for root causes (as it turns out, often related to overall poor health and nutrition) and poor health can also result in issues like PCOS (where birth control pills are often given to "manage") and infertility.

I know several people who say they can't have kids because they're infertile due to PCOS, another condition which can be improved by improving overall health.
It would also explain why these patterns are everywhere. Global health has declined right alongside birthrates.

I doubt this is the only cause. Financial struggles, social incentives, culture, I'm sure all of those factor in too. But I do wonder about this.
Look at the rates of children with mental illness nowadays. Psychiatric meds being handed out like candy. People on meds lifelong with who knows what kind of long term consequences (SSRI trials typically only last a few weeks or something, so long term effects aren't known).
This might sound like a schizopost but I'm just saying it's worth considering.
Also it seems like every mass shooter is on SSRIs which can't be a coincidence either. SSRIs are fucking people up badly and the fact that there doesn't seem to be much research about this is insane.
 
Trump keeps walking shit back while China has made no concessions. None literally 0.

China can replace America. American exports are only 3% of China's GDP America can not replace everything made in China.
Ahh the Wumao pedo is spreading bullshit again. Enjoy your 50 cents.
 
From ChatGPT:

When the integer value of two is incremented by an additional integer value of two—where each "two" represents a distinct whole number quantity greater than one and less than three—the resulting sum, derived through the fundamental principles of arithmetic addition, is equal to the integer value of four. This conclusion aligns with the universally accepted rules of mathematics, whereby the operation known as "addition" combines two discrete numerical values into a singular, cumulative total. Thus, in this specific instance, 2 + 2 equals 4.

That's as "proper" as I could find.
 
The biggest issue is that it’s been beaten into women’s brains that if they have kids that means their career prospects are over. And to be fair thats probably true with our current crop of boomer elite, who view people as economic assets and not people
It's generally true because you only have finite time and energy. If you have kids, things that are less important will take a back seat. You have to choose your priorities. The problem is women just don't want kids all that much. Dating is fun. Sex is fun. Having money is fun. Changing diapers is not. Commitment is not.
 
Will they be bothering with the standard means test or do they just automatically get a free lawyer no questions asked?

Not that I've ever been charged with a crime (because I'm a dipshit who apparently insists on living life on hard mode, i.e. not thieving, murdering, raping, etc.), but it's my understanding that as a wage-earning white man I'm not entitled to free representation (since I can technically afford my own).
They'll automatically pass the test because they're a poo widdle bwowny wowny uwu wot don't have no job (that they'll admit to).

We need to see Trump start targeting the legal firms and other NGOs helping these fucks.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't all the chip factories built in the US started by the last admin that required them to hire a certain percentage of non-whites? Shouldn't be a shock that something that requires skilled workers doesn't work to well with low-iq niggers, and spics.
TSMC basically made the psyduck face when they realized how much DEI shit was attached to CHIPS Act funding. Quotas for female construction workers (that were well above the actual national proportion of construction ladies), strict requirements for Supplier Diversity Programs, environmental plans locking them into the maximum possible amount of renewable energy regardless of cost, strategies for reducing climate injustice, community reinvestment into local minority groups, family formation leave for homosexuals, etc.
 
It's generally true because you only have finite time and energy. If you have kids, things that are less important will take a back seat. You have to choose your priorities. The problem is women just don't want kids all that much. Dating is fun. Sex is fun. Having money is fun. Changing diapers is not. Commitment is not.
The issue then becomes how do you even fix the problem? Guys don’t want to change diapers either
 
TSMC basically made the psyduck face when they realized how much DEI shit was attached to CHIPS Act funding. Quotas for female construction workers (that were well above the actual national proportion of construction ladies), strict requirements for Supplier Diversity Programs, environmental plans locking them into the maximum possible amount of renewable energy regardless of cost, strategies for reducing climate injustice, community reinvestment into local minority groups, family formation leave for homosexuals, etc.
Cultural revolution 2.0 At least our marxists are retarded.
 
it's pretty damn evil and sorrowing to see how a person can be turned into a barely functional and genuinely disembodied state, especially if these are people of your family or friends that they are purposefully targeting, because they know precisely who to sick this kind of mental warfare unto, those who don't have good foundation to stand on to begin with,

I've been wondering about targeting and fucking with vulnerable people online as well as broadly spraying ideas that will predictably worsen the mental health of a percentage of the people exposed to it for a long long time, since the very early days of sudden jihad syndrome, and what happened during covid almost made me sure that this is happening.

but the almost and not entirely is that I can't come up with a plausible story of who is doing this. it's just too competent to be the government.
 
I mean hell, look at emulation. Emulation has come so far since I was a kid in the 90s, that I now have access to every single game I ever wanted to play for every system that ever existed before 2000. There are so many great games that I overlooked back then that I have finally gotten a chance to playthrough, and most emulators will play on a literal potato now. You can download either the entire romset for your chosen system or single games, and have more to play than you could ever play in a lifetime.
Autism rant on Emulators incoming:

Up until I would say PS1 or N64 generation, you can play 99 percent of games extremely well on phones. Pretty much transporting your phone into a mini PS1. PSP has some success on lower tier systems, but PSVita doesn't unless you got a S25 or something of that nature.

With a mid-range PC, you could reasonably emulate Xbox, PS2, hell some PS3 and 360 games as well.
 
The issue then becomes how do you even fix the problem? Guys don’t want to change diapers either
You should really change your kid's diapers. Those formulative years will determine whether your child views you (the father) as this big inaccessible authority figure to be afraid of, or their dad. Even something as simple as being the person who brings relief to a baby by changing their diaper can make a massive difference years down the line. This sounds retarded, but consider how many problem people documented on this website could have been fixed by a better father figure.
 
I've been wondering about targeting and fucking with vulnerable people online as well as broadly spraying ideas that will predictably worsen the mental health of a percentage of the people exposed to it for a long long time,
you should try it, shit's fun af
 
https://tahrirumich.org/statements/fbi
ANN ARBOR, MI - Early this morning around 8:00 am, FBI agents, the Michigan State Police, and local police officers in unmarked vehicles arrived at the homes of University of Michigan pro-Palestine activists across Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, and Canton.

Law enforcement officers confiscated electronics, questioned, and detained two activists, who were later released from their Ann Arbor residence. Officers from the Michigan Department of the Attorney General, the Plymouth Police Department, and the FBI raided an Ypsilanti residence, confiscating personal belongings, and detaining 4 individuals who were later released. The Canton Police Department and the FBI raided an additional residence in Canton, MI, detaining none.

At first, officers refused to present warrants at the Ypsilanti raid. A communiqué from the City of Ypsilanti reads, “the FBI informed Chief Anderson that all inquiries regarding the execution of this warrant should be directed to the Attorney General’s Office.”

ICE presence at the raids is unconfirmed as of yet.

Contact: tahrircoalition@gmail.com

Erm.....based?
 
One of my relatives was FREAKING THE FUCK OUT about the SAFE Act over Easter and said that "it's going to keep married women from voting"

But I looked it up and the only requirement seems to be a government issued photo ID with your legal name on it.

Am I missing something or is this another histrionic MSM lie?
Its the MSM hyping people up over what is in reality stronger voting requirements.
 
Back in the 70's and 80's there was a concentrated effort to make motherhood a less appealing choice for women, this was feminism in action. They said you should wait to have kids, if you have them at all, and pursue your own career and wealth first. Stay at home moms were not mocked per see but they were implied to be less "stonk wyman" then the career driven AWFL wine aunts who were seen to be strong empowered don't kneed no man types.
It's always been very strange to me how there's a parallel movement of telling girls that they have no value unless they have active professional careers in predominantly masculine sectors and telling girls that there is tons of value in being a prostitute (doing "sex work") either in real life or on the Internet. Being a "sex worker" is literally the least impressive thing a woman can do for a living—you need no skills, no education, and no professional ambition to spread your legs for cash. You don't even need to be literate. It's the oldest profession in the world because it requires nothing special and can be done by any woman at any time. It appeals to the basest part of male desire and produces nothing of value for society. And it's time limited by how long you can remain physically appealing.

All of the traditional feminine paths—motherhood, teaching, etc.—have been pillaged by modern feminism telling girls they have to shoot for careers that ultimately do not make many women happy in the long term. And those who can't do that—because not every woman, much less every man, can be an elite lawyer, successful businessman, or astronaut—are told to earn cash by whoring themselves out.

The reason teaching in this country used to be so much better is because very strong, intelligent, and capable women taught as a career (or were librarians, etc.). It was seen as a respectable and worthwhile position for women. Now why would an ambitious, intelligent girl want to teach when she can make 300k working 80 hours/week as a lawyer in a big law firm? What's left are those who couldn't or wouldn't make it in the traditionally masculine, "elite" careers, and their mediocrity weighs down our education system.

Ironically, it's subversive today to say there is great personal value and fulfillment for some women in being mothers and homemakers, even though one of the core mantras of modern feminism is to declare that women should be allowed to pursue what fulfills them the most. Apparently, the only "respectable" fulfillment women today can have is either slaving away in an office or whoring out their body for pocket change on the Internet. Until that idea is repudiated entirely, we'll continue to see sex-based problems in our society.

Even as a man, I would rather have a career working in a library (my favorite job when I was in school) and spending more time with my children than slaving away in an elite firm with golden handcuffs. And that's before accounting for the innate biological and evolutionary urge in most women to have children just at the stage in their life where professional ambition matters most for career advancement. It's really a fucked up situation.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo