US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Man Carrying Things is one of the worst. I hate how smugly semi-centrist he comes off where you can tell he's just hiding his obvious leftism, and I hate his over-dramatic delivery he does in every video.
he's a zoomer (with horrific teeth!) who's dating some brown chick, of course he's one of the rare few leftists. I bet he's a nick fuentes tier spicy mayo too. this washington post guy i can sort of understand as well, generic "screw you dad" style look to him and therefore his politics.
Weird kids aren't masking anymore
YOU THINK CHRIS CHAN WAS MASKING?
 
And a federal judge in New Jersey has temporarily barred Khalil’s removal from the country.
The judge is taking it very slow in this case, avoiding any pitfall possible. The parties were briefing the issue of whether and to what extent a District Judge could develop an immigration case record (as opposed to an immigration judge), for example. The judge on his own raised whether his first decision (whether the case should be transferred to Louisiana, where the guy is detained) should be certified as an interlocutory appeal, which is quite rare. The media is presenting this as "barring his removal" but that's really subsequent to just trying to deal with the lawsuit.

They're not saying "you can't remove him because Trump bad," the judge is saying "he's suing so while we figure out this case, which is already quite weird because he's suing for habeas relief while being detained in Louisiana rather than letting the immigration proceedings play out, don't moot the case by deporting him to Syria." It's quite normal.

Khalil isn’t accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The government, however, has said that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country for expressing views that the administration considers to be antisemitic and “pro-Hamas,” referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
Khalil, a 30-year-old international affairs graduate student, had served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists at Columbia University who took over a campus lawn last spring to protest Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

The guy held himself out as a representative of a group that encouraged breaking the law—and whose members did break the law multiple times, resulting in tens of thousands of dollars of damage and disruptions to students paying lots of money to actually study. He then was involved in a library occupation in March, in which the occupiers literally distributed Hamas pamphlets. The pamphlets literally were from the Hamas foreign relations office—the pamphlets were branded and not secretive at all about their origin. The guy is a guest in our country and used his time here to hold himself out as a representative of a group that has committed and which continues to encourage criminal activity, and which explicitly hates the United States.

Khalil also is not a student. He was a student, but finished his program. How someone can be a serious student while spending all their time trying to foment mobs that hate white people, America, and Israel is another question. Add to that how he can continue to get funding from a university to house him and his wife while he's not even studying anymore because he finished his program. It's almost like half our universities have programs that are incubators for political activism rather than programs of study. Weird how that works.

deporting a Brown University professor who they said had attended the Lebanon funeral of a leader of Hezbollah,
"They said"? She was upfront about it. She said she was there to do that. This isn't in dispute, unless she goes back on her word.

The media truly is the enemy of the people. They obfuscate and lie to present with sympathy the people who hate our country and who support groups that proudly kill Americans. Even when they say a line that is technically true, they omit necessary information that contextualizes things. Journalists are scum.

Edit: They also love to always use the line "no criminal record." That just means they haven't been arrested, not that they're choirboys. A lot of illegal immigrant gang members have "no criminal record," but they're criminals anyways because they're part of criminal gangs. This is like reporting on the arrest of a child rapist and screaming "they're detaining someone without any criminal record."

And it doesn't matter, regardless. The immigration statutes are quite clear that you don't have to be formally arrested or convicted of anything to be deported.
 
Última edición:
Long story short: prior to their annexation by China, the Tibetans ran a feudal society that also used slaves. Both serfs and slaves were considered property by the elites and it was standard practice to abuse them. The stories of abuse sound like something from an Eli Roth film. Muslim warlords also ran amok in Tibet in the 20th century and did what you imagine Muslim warlords would do.
So, what you're really saying is that nothing much has changed.
 
The guy is a guest in our country and used his time here to hold himself out as a representative of a group that has committed and which continues to encourage criminal activity, and which explicitly hates the United States.
I just want to say, I literally don't understand the argument from the left. I mean I do. Brown people good. But I don't. He is a foreign propagandist. US politics should be for Americans. Not a nobody that wants to stir shit. I'd rather hear out a bum on the street that is American than listen to a foreigner spout off shit about my country IN my country.
 
I just want to say, I literally don't understand the argument from the left. I mean I do. Brown people good. But I don't. He is a foreign propagandist. US politics should be for Americans. Not a nobody that wants to stir shit. I'd rather hear out a bum on the street that is American than listen to a foreigner spout off shit about my country IN my country.
They are purposefully obfuscating the issue by repeating the mantra "free speech." Even foreigners have constitutional rights when in US jurisdiction, but those rights are a lot more malleable when they intersect with other areas over which the executive has sovereignty. Like immigration, foreign affairs, and the military. The Supreme Court has been clear about this for a long, long time. Even in the most recent decision by the Court about the guy in El Salvador, if you actually read it, the Court says that the District Court has to treat the executive with great deference in this area.

The left is just ignoring that and screaming "free speech!" But any actual thought would tell you that's retarded. Does al-Qaeda get to send immigrant "refugees" to distribute pamphlets encouraging people to become terrorists? Did the Soviet Union get to send agents into America to advocate for the overthrow of capitalism? Does the DPRK get to send people to America to encourage joining the DPRK military and fighting the West? No, of course not. But by the left's current logic, all of that should be protected by the First Amendment.

If you're American and want to incite anti-American hate, then you can do that within the bounds of the law. But if you're a foreigner, you can't. That's both morally and legally correct.
 
They are purposefully obfuscating the issue by repeating the mantra "free speech." Even foreigners have constitutional rights when in US jurisdiction, but those rights are a lot more malleable when they intersect with other areas over which the executive has sovereignty. Like immigration, foreign affairs, and the military. The Supreme Court has been clear about this for a long, long time. Even in the most recent decision by the Court about the guy in El Salvador, if you actually read it, the Court says that the District Court has to treat the executive with great deference in this area.

The left is just ignoring that and screaming "free speech!" But any actual thought would tell you that's retarded. Does al-Qaeda get to send immigrant "refugees" to distribute pamphlets encouraging people to become terrorists? Did the Soviet Union get to send agents into America to advocate for the overthrow of capitalism? Does the DPRK get to send people to America to encourage joining the DPRK military and fighting the West? No, of course not. But by the left's current logic, all of that should be protected by the First Amendment.

If you're American and want to incite anti-American hate, then you can do that within the bounds of the law. But if you're a foreigner, you can't. That's both morally and legally correct.
It's ridiculous. Simply absurd. Because you're right. Soviets we're banned from many areas of the country during the cold war. They couldn't even visit there, much less protest. Why should we put up with a rabble rouser that isn't one of our own? Again I go back to the homeless bum. Sure he lives out of a cardboard box. But he's American and has lived on that street for 25 years. I think he has a better grasp of America than some guy from Bumfuckistan.
 
What do you people think about the US dollar dropping in value and yields on US treasuries rising?, it looks like foreigners are choosing to stop investing in this country after "Liberation Day"
That’s good for American exports.

Most of China’s “price advantage” is due to the yuan being weak, not because they have an inherently cheaper cost of production.
 
The F-35 can attack from over the horizon. Unless you cover every square inch of your country in cameras, you’ll be dead before your cameras see the jet. That’s not getting into how this technique fails if there are clouds.
The F-35 is a magnificent sight in person. Utah has them stationed here so I get to see them fly. Loud bastards. But with a air of grace. They have so many sensors strapped on, the pilot can literally see through the plane with his helmet mounted display- a masterwork of hardware and software. All of this is to say, the pilot can see you before you see him. Optically, and on thermals.
 
The F-35 can attack from over the horizon. Unless you cover every square inch of your country in cameras, you’ll be dead before your cameras see the jet. That’s not getting into how this technique fails if there are clouds.
I didn’t watch this video, but is it saying you can spot them, or get a target lock? Because low frequency radar can generally spot stealth planes, it just can’t get a usable target lock
 
Atrás
Top Abajo