Ahh ok, that makes sense, yeah it's for stopping prosecution but the system still works the way it does up until that point. Thanks mate.
Ah yeah didn't see this till later.
More importantly, if he's being brought before congress to explain this, it wouldn't be the kid gloves treatment from friendly media allies with the responses heavily edited to make him look good. It would be, at least in theory, a hostile situation, live, broadcast to the world. The Democrats would have to go hell for leather to abuse the process to prevent anyone right of Mao from getting a single fucking word in with Biden. There's no way, at all, that they let him do it.
Based but this sets a REALLY bad precedent if a Democrat wins the next election.
As has been pointed out in the thread many times by now, Trump isn't allowing autopen use for anything touching on the powers of the President, and he's signing such documents in front of witnesses, often on camera. He's covering his ass AND forcing future presidents to match this level of transparency, all while making Biden look like garbage.
What in the flying fuck...?! I really wonder if Joe Biden himself was the one who told him this because it sure fucking sounds like it was.
Realistically it might be a challenge and look at the pardon process.
I absolutely don't give a shit I and many others in Europe are grateful that he ended the USA-AIDS programme that shoved down our throats globohomo bs. He also keeps the lulz going and provides endless tears of the privileged insufferable cunts.
Even if he realizes it happens, he can't retroactively agree to it. He has to direct his staff to use the Autopen. (And even that is bullshit. We wouldn't accept a copy/paste signature as a permanent thing. Autopen signatures should be temporary and null and void if not manually signed when the President can actually sign the document.)
I figured this out over 10 years ago when I started to really divulge into any sort of news to...just see what was going on. I wasn't even politically motivated I just started watching the news and saw how bullshit it was. Im not parading myself as some, "I aM ToO SmArT FoR ThE NeWs." type but honest to god if you even do take your job seriously in media you can get very big translation issues and misunderstandings that are borderline criminal. People just want to see and hear what they want to believe and be true instead of what's actually going on.
I would understand that argument if the Dems hadn't been pulling stunts like spying on the Trump campaign, imprisoning Douglass Mackey, and the Jan 6th kangaroo courts (and let's be real, they were probably behind both assassination attempts).
While if they have the evidence, Bidens orders or most stuff he signed would come into question lol. I'm pretty sure what Trump is doing is using this as an intimidation tactic. This is gonna go to the courts most likely and the evidence is gonna be laid out. I wouldn't be surprised if a couple of whistleblowers come foward. Will be really funny watching the dems squirm. There whole party is getting shit on over and over again the distrust the public has for them is nuts. This will probably be bigger then Watergate if they have the evidence.
