- Registrado
- 28 de Abr, 2021
Mod ruined forever.
/r/TNOmod and the Reddit HOI4 modding community - When a subreddit for a video game mod turns to utter insanity
- Iniciador del tema Pointless Pedant
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Errôneo
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 26 de Feb, 2023
Its over. Never playing it again.
- Registrado
- 11 de Feb, 2017
It's hard for me to make fun of KR anymore because they keep steadily doing more of the things that people would joke about them doing in the future.
- Registrado
- 11 de Jun, 2021
Moot???
- Registrado
- 19 de Mayo, 2024
I always knew that those radical alt-right extremists at 4chan were gonna cause trouble but nobody listened
- Registrado
- 11 de Ene, 2023
I believe he's a leader in one of the German paths yeah, don't know the details though.
Grave Ghost
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2021
The worst part about the new DLC is that it delayed the France update for TFR.
- Registrado
- 2 de Abr, 2022
HoI4 DLCs be like: "Here's an overcomplicated way of designing weapons of war and some focus trees for countries no one gave a shit about in WW2. Also we'll fuck up your mods in your playlist. Better hope your favorites didn't get abandoned."
At least the France update will come out by tomorrow, according to the devs.
winderson_silva
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Feb, 2021
Whos the guy?
foreman 89
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 23 de Feb, 2021
James Vardaman probably - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_K._Vardaman
- Registrado
- 6 de Feb, 2021
New Kaiserredux update is interesting.
- Registrado
- 20 de Mar, 2024
Went to do another Russia MD run, and I just found out that there's content for an American collapse. Sadly, it can only happen in the early 2000's by picking one of the first starting events (as far as I can tell? Not sure) so no extremist factions. The content is pretty barebones, only one faction has a full focus tree and only 2 or 3 factions have "teaser" trees which are super short, there isn't even a news event for it. What I really wanna see is more US states and a more radical collapse ala TFR.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 5 de Feb, 2021
Coming back to HOI4 after giving up video games as part of my Lent is going to be a very interesting experience.
- Registrado
- 8 de Feb, 2021
Jumping into a Reformist Atomwaffen (Regular National Socialism) game for your return!
- Registrado
- 6 de Feb, 2023
Is that a new path they’re bringing out?
- Registrado
- 30 de Sep, 2022
- Registrado
- 21 de Sep, 2024
Made my first go at GUI modding. Quite simple in a sense.
I also purged a slew of errors.
A TRUE andhonest ORTHODOX Christian would know that the only PROPER lent is where he forgoes animal products and FASTS.
OF COURSE, then he would know that ignoring the fast is also acceptable as MASSIVE GAINS enable him to SERVE Christ better.
The LORD carried the Cross and WE must carry the barbell my ERSTWHILE kin!
I also purged a slew of errors.
Typical PAPIST making PETTY vows before the Lord as if they will alleviate his sins and convince the Lord to OVERLOOK his SCHISMATIC DOCTRINES.
A TRUE and
OF COURSE, then he would know that ignoring the fast is also acceptable as MASSIVE GAINS enable him to SERVE Christ better.
The LORD carried the Cross and WE must carry the barbell my ERSTWHILE kin!
- Registrado
- 19 de Dic, 2019
Religious Schisms aside, I just noticed Paracuck posting some damage control about the absolute state of their newest DLC recently.
I can tell that somebody over at Paradork has been getting into some serious shit over the current imperiled state of Johan's "Swedish meatballs and Mediterranean vacations" fund .
Greetings all,
At the risk of stating the obvious, the release of Graveyard of Empires has not gone the way we wanted. Today, I want to post a mini-retrospective that explains some of what happened leading up to the release, and how we plan on acting on the results of that and on subsequent feedback and reception moving forwards.
One of the most important parts of the pre-release process we perform in Studio Gold is the Go/No-Go meeting. This is where each discipline; QA, Tech, Design, Marketing, Business et al, present their perspective on the state of the game and expectations on the likely reception thereof. We do this so we’re all on the same page, and so we can jointly arrive at a consensus on whether to launch or not. In GoE’s case, while we identified some areas of uncertainty mostly relating to dev diary feedback, we agreed that there was nothing out of the ordinary here, and that a release at this stage was acceptable. I don’t want to diminish my role here or throw anyone under the bus: as Game Director I can overrule in either direction, and I did not - I did not see what I should have seen.
Collectively, and personally, we were quite clearly wrong. As an organization we were unaware of the issues present in this release, and this represents a serious need for some inward thinking on how we arrived at this decision, and how we reorganize ourselves to prevent it occurring again. I have few answers for you right now as we’re focusing on the short-term goals for putting Graveyard of Empires right, but we have no intention of sweeping this under the rug.
From a long term perspective, this is now the second release of a Country pack which has performed worse than expected. Review score is actually a surprisingly difficult metric to evaluate. It is better to think of it as a snapshot that, on balance, gives us an idea of how much of the community considers everything surrounding a release to be a net positive or negative. This can include price, quality, scope, overall opinion of a company, and many other things. What we tend to do is aggregate the key sentiments of negative and positive reviews and work out, on balance, where the main points for and against are. The two main negatives on Trial of Allegiance were, in first place the regional price adjustments in two specific markets, followed by scope. It’s a bit early to say for Graveyard of Empires, but first impressions are content direction & quality (as we’ve acknowledged), followed by scope.
Both regional pricing and content quality are things that I would hope are relevant only to the individual releases here. They’re localized. Scope, on the other hand, represents a clearer area where we need to offer more on a fundamental level. Scope in this context, is the nature of what we’re offering: focus trees, mechanics, 3d models; the whole package. Content-only releases are popular with some HoI fans, but on balance are not enough to resonate with the majority of the community. Once again, I don’t have an answer yet here, but we’re aware of it, and will be evaluating how to make these releases more exciting to more people.
And finally, in the short term, I want to address our plans for Graveyard of Empires. Beginning this week, we have a series of patches and updates planned for GoE as well as for the base game in order to both fix and improve content that you found lacking. I sincerely appreciate all those who have reached out with constructive suggestions. We have all hands on this endeavour right now.
/Arheo
Timeline:
12th March - Patch (Operation HEAD)
20th March - Patch (Operation KNEE)
Late March - War Effort (Operation SHOULDER)
April - Updates & Changes to GoE content
At the risk of stating the obvious, the release of Graveyard of Empires has not gone the way we wanted. Today, I want to post a mini-retrospective that explains some of what happened leading up to the release, and how we plan on acting on the results of that and on subsequent feedback and reception moving forwards.
One of the most important parts of the pre-release process we perform in Studio Gold is the Go/No-Go meeting. This is where each discipline; QA, Tech, Design, Marketing, Business et al, present their perspective on the state of the game and expectations on the likely reception thereof. We do this so we’re all on the same page, and so we can jointly arrive at a consensus on whether to launch or not. In GoE’s case, while we identified some areas of uncertainty mostly relating to dev diary feedback, we agreed that there was nothing out of the ordinary here, and that a release at this stage was acceptable. I don’t want to diminish my role here or throw anyone under the bus: as Game Director I can overrule in either direction, and I did not - I did not see what I should have seen.
Collectively, and personally, we were quite clearly wrong. As an organization we were unaware of the issues present in this release, and this represents a serious need for some inward thinking on how we arrived at this decision, and how we reorganize ourselves to prevent it occurring again. I have few answers for you right now as we’re focusing on the short-term goals for putting Graveyard of Empires right, but we have no intention of sweeping this under the rug.
From a long term perspective, this is now the second release of a Country pack which has performed worse than expected. Review score is actually a surprisingly difficult metric to evaluate. It is better to think of it as a snapshot that, on balance, gives us an idea of how much of the community considers everything surrounding a release to be a net positive or negative. This can include price, quality, scope, overall opinion of a company, and many other things. What we tend to do is aggregate the key sentiments of negative and positive reviews and work out, on balance, where the main points for and against are. The two main negatives on Trial of Allegiance were, in first place the regional price adjustments in two specific markets, followed by scope. It’s a bit early to say for Graveyard of Empires, but first impressions are content direction & quality (as we’ve acknowledged), followed by scope.
Both regional pricing and content quality are things that I would hope are relevant only to the individual releases here. They’re localized. Scope, on the other hand, represents a clearer area where we need to offer more on a fundamental level. Scope in this context, is the nature of what we’re offering: focus trees, mechanics, 3d models; the whole package. Content-only releases are popular with some HoI fans, but on balance are not enough to resonate with the majority of the community. Once again, I don’t have an answer yet here, but we’re aware of it, and will be evaluating how to make these releases more exciting to more people.
And finally, in the short term, I want to address our plans for Graveyard of Empires. Beginning this week, we have a series of patches and updates planned for GoE as well as for the base game in order to both fix and improve content that you found lacking. I sincerely appreciate all those who have reached out with constructive suggestions. We have all hands on this endeavour right now.
/Arheo
Timeline:
12th March - Patch (Operation HEAD)
20th March - Patch (Operation KNEE)
Late March - War Effort (Operation SHOULDER)
April - Updates & Changes to GoE content
Última edición:
Batko Bandera
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 30 de Dic, 2023
Finally, these fuckers haven't released a good DLC since Holy Fury for CK2.