US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
The stock market has been in the red for 2 weeks now. There will be pain but you’ll be paying it, it only gets worse starting the 4th.
I check the stock market maybe once per year because I'm neither retired nor a day trading retard, and I could not give less of a fuck if it's red for two weeks or two years. In fact it probably needs to be red for a long time as we are long overdue for corrective market forces if we ever want to have a healthy economy again. The only reason it was green for the last decade was because of ZIRP papering over the last big blowup.
 
That's an interesting name. Perhaps they can find sort of a "third position" between the Communists of the far left and the capitalistic excesses of the modern Republicans.
It's a call back to Clinton whom touted his presidency as a "third way"
The stock market has been in the red for 2 weeks now. There will be pain but you’ll be paying it, it only gets worse starting the 4th.
Buy the dip
 
Don't give any of the French the benefit of the doubt. They're fucking French.
I have to justify learning the language somehow.
I check the stock market maybe once per year because I'm neither retired nor a day trading retard, and I could not give less of a fuck if it's red for two weeks or two years. In fact it probably needs to be red for a long time as we are long overdue for corrective market forces if we ever want to have a healthy economy again. The only reason it was green for the last decade was because of ZIRP papering over the last big blowup.
What's even funnier about this is that holding your assets is almost always a better option than responding to market fluctuations. The line almost always goes up no matter what.
 
I'll kinda miss having someone to shittalk every day for being a pants shitting retard, I might actually have to start following lolcows again just to get the same high.
If you want to shittalk someone shitting themselves over bad politics I can highly recommend the Pat Tomlinson thread.

He’s an expert that loves Biden and makes Biden look competent 😜
 
Imma stop you right there, notice the 90% of "the most advanced chips". The dirty secret nobody really wants to talk about is that we don't actually NEED these "most advanced chips" and could go on for years on "five year old tech" if we had too.

We bring the old tech in-house, and build on that. No need to bring the latest infinitely expensive super small shit over.

You're just as dead hit by a cruise missile with 1980s computer chips as you are if hit by the NipToaster9000™ from 1945. The most advanced chips are mainly for AI sperging and iPhones anyway.

The old tech is already in house. Global Foundries, Texas Instruments, and Intel all have active older process nodes. In the 1980s, we were making chips at 800nm. Global Foundries stopped at 14nm, which was cutting edge in 2014. TI focuses mainly at 45nm and 130nm, which were cutting edge in 2007 and 2001, respectively. Intel's latest process node, which hasn't been used in any product that have hit the streets yet, is 18A, and supposedly puts it even with or even marginally ahead of TSMC, but it also has some older fabs running. It's also not a single technology, either. These days, it's a constellation of technologies you built around a Dutch laser, one of the most critical of which is your clean room. Getting the room clean enough for the laser to work gets harder and harder and harder.
 
Biden made the economy suck so that all his commie buddies could get free cash. Trump is making the economy suck because the long-term good he wants to achieve requires some up-front pain. I'll take the latter.
I never saw NVDA dumping 10% frequently under Biden. There’s a flash crash occurring right now across the entire market. High sell volume has filled the gap.
 
I never saw NVDA dumping 10% frequently under Biden. There’s a flash crash occurring right now across the entire market. High sell volume has filled the gap.
If Trump did absolutely nothing else but shove NVDA back into whatever hole it and its AI shit came out of, he’s the best president of all time.

Fucking NVDA.
 
If you look at NVIDIA's stock value and the dates involved, you might come to the conclusion that its stock was overvalued due to the Biden administration's pork barrel spending in the first place. You can say that about a lot of stock. Maybe don't trust Keynesians?

John, I mean this as a friend: you were more fun when you were posting normally. You're not a good doomer troll. You don't have enough Badman in you to make it work. Deep down, you're a Goodman.
 
If you look at NVIDIA's stock value and the dates involved, you might come to the conclusion that its stock was overvalued due to the Biden administration's pork barrel spending in the first place. You can say that about a lot of stock. Maybe don't trust Keynesians?

John, I mean this as a friend: you were more fun when you were posting normally. You're not a good doomer troll. You don't have enough Badman in you to make it work.
I fucking hate keynesians. They are the cause of almost every economic problem in the west today.
 
I rewatched the 2016 debates and Trump seems to have a special hatred for Hillary, he went after her harder than anyone else during his whole circuit. Why though? I mean there's a hell or a lot of reasons, but what specifically? Trump is basically a 90s Democrat as the saying goes and she is married to THE 90s Democrat.
I don't think we'll ever know the specific reason for it, but considering they ran in similar circles for a long time I can imagine that she's said or done a plethora of things that earned his hatred. She's not a very likeable person, and most people probably ONLY tolerate her because of Bill's social currency, status and likeability. There are stories about her using army men as her personal servants among and other bad iterations that people have had with her.
She HATES Obama because he overstepped her "rightful" place as POTUS (and Michelle hates her in return.)

All I can say is with Trump soundly trouncing her in 2016, their mutual bad blood only runs deeper. You can tell how much she hates him when she speaks at Democrat events. lol
 
There are 2 powers on the world stage that are actively seeking total world domination,
The US isn’t really doing so willingly. We inherited our position, which just sort of.. resulted, from WW2, and then we got a terminal case of the glowies and don’t have a choice anymore.

The chinks, however, state that it is their right because they’re eldest or whatever
If the US secedes from Globohomo, what do Russia and the US have to fight over? I think good relations with Russia really are that simple.
My patrilineal line mostly has two occupations in it. Military or factory, or both at different times.

I’m steeped in enough personal lore that I’ll never be unbiased. I don’t think we should let a single Chinese step foot in our country without them accepting a face tattoo of the Taiwan flag
 

Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative deletes billions more from its list of savings.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency has deleted hundreds more claims from its mistake-plagued “wall of receipts,” erasing $4 billion in additional savings that the group said it had made for U.S. taxpayers.

Late Sunday night, the group erased or altered more than 1,000 contracts it had claimed to cancel, representing more than 40 percent of all the contracts listed on its site last week. The deleted items included five of the seven largest savings that it had claimed credit for just last week. At the same time, the group added about 1,000 additional canceled contracts, worth smaller total savings.

It was the second time in a week that DOGE had deleted some of its greatest claims of success. Early last week, it erased all five of the largest savings it had claimed when the wall of receipts, which is what the group is calling its list of canceled contracts, was originally posted on Feb. 19.
Since that first posting, the total amount of savings that the initiative has claimed from cutting contracts has steadily declined, from $16 billion at first to less than $9 billion now.
The “wall” shows only some of the cuts Mr. Musk has imposed on government, making it difficult to assess the claim that his initiative has saved taxpayers more than $100 billion. But the site is the only place where the group has given a detailed public accounting of its work, providing a rare look at its basic competence and familiarity with government data.
Contracting and budget experts say that look has been worrisome.
From its start, the list has been full of errors: claims that confused billions with millions, triple-counted the same cancellation, or claimed credit for contracts that had ended years or even decades before. Contracting experts said these mistakes raised questions about DOGE’s basic understanding of the federal government, at a time when Mr. Musk’s group is attempting to rapidly overhaul it.
“Overall, there’s a certain randomness to it,” said Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank. “It seems like DOGE had certain agencies pull together some random lists of contracts that may or may not currently exist anyway, and then, without checking the data very well, uploaded it onto a website and summed up the amounts. It doesn’t seem to be centrally coordinated.”
Mr. Musk’s group and the White House did not respond to requests for comment about the new deletions sent on Monday morning. Since news media outlets began to point out errors in the list, the group has added language on its website that shifts the blame onto individual federal agencies — saying the dollar figures on its site “originate directly from agency contracting officials.”
Among the largest claims that disappeared:
  • A $1.9 billion savings that the group said it had achieved by canceling an Internal Revenue Service contract for tech help. Before Sunday night, this had been the biggest single savings on the site. But The New York Times reported that the contract was actually canceled in November, while Joseph R. Biden Jr. was president.
  • A $149 million savings attributed to canceling a contract to provide three administrative assistants at the Department of Health and Human Services. The entry on the site last week contained numerous errors, including a link to a different contract, with a different company, that did not involve administrative assistants or $149 million. On Sunday, after The Times mentioned this garbled entry, it disappeared.
  • A $133 million savings that the group said had come from canceling a U.S. Agency for International Development contract for work in Libya. The contractor, Chemonics International, posted last year on LinkedIn that its work on that contract had already ended.
Even after the changes to the group’s website, however, some errors remained. As of Monday morning, the list still included claims that DOGE achieved $106 million in savings by canceling a pair of contracts that the Coast Guard signed for administrative help.
That was wrong. Federal procurement data shows that these contracts were actually completed in 2005 and 2006, when George W. Bush was president.
 
This basically elimination the ability to use an LLC or other structure to anonymize your property ownership/business activity from bad actors.
This is how most financial fraud is done especially securities fraud and money laundering. It took many years to get this far trying to pull the veil back and just like that, poof, it's allowed again.
 
Imma stop you right there, notice the 90% of "the most advanced chips". The dirty secret nobody really wants to talk about is that we don't actually NEED these "most advanced chips" and could go on for years on "five year old tech" if we had too.

We bring the old tech in-house, and build on that. No need to bring the latest infinitely expensive super small shit over.

You're just as dead hit by a cruise missile with 1980s computer chips as you are if hit by the NipToaster9000™ from 1945. The most advanced chips are mainly for AI sperging and iPhones anyway.
Nobody serious gives a shit about the "cutting edge" from the past century or even decade. If you want to keep up in the global economy, you need the best of today. Personally, I always subscribed to the Red Queen hypothesis/effect in economics. It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo