UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
My point is that the scapegoat argument doesn't hold water. If the Trust invented a story about Letby being a murderer, in order to prevent them looking incompetent... they'd still look incompetent, because harbouring a murderer isn't any better.
It's not so much they invented her being a murderer, it's more that they got awarded a golden goose to pin all their gross incompetence on (The historically high deaths on our watch are all the fault of a rogue nurse being the second coming of Beverley Alitt, yes even the ones she was not physically present for). They just assumed that the fact she was a irredeemable child murderer would mean nobody would look closely at the flawed evidence used to convict her.
 
Ah yes, Lucy "I'm evil, I did this" Letby, the great martyr of our time.
The amount of simping that's still going on for her shows how she was able to get away with it for so long.
I am not convinced she’s innocent. I do however want there to be a full enquiry because I can see how completely shit some trusts are. It can be possible that she killed them, AND that the trust was working far below the level it should have been.
 
I am not convinced she’s innocent. I do however want there to be a full enquiry because I can see how completely shit some trusts are. It can be possible that she killed them, AND that the trust was working far below the level it should have been.
Who would thought that a socialist nightmare of a public institution, which sucks down money like Destiny sucking cock, which also hires unqualified third world niggers and sandworm at a preferable rate over natives, is completely dogshit in terms of its very reason to exist?

Not me, fren.
 
is completely dogshit
There are little pockets of sanity and brilliance in the NHS. There are places where a few senior people have carved out a little fiefdom and hold it secure against the endless bullshit. If you can land in one if these little kingdoms, either as patient or worker, you’ll be singing the praises of the NHS forever. The problem is they’re increasingly rare, and all under constant threat from the Bureaucracy.
The NHS needs gutting and rebuilding, but it’s too big a job for anyone sane to do
 
My point is that the scapegoat argument doesn't hold water. If the Trust invented a story about Letby being a murderer, in order to prevent them looking incompetent... they'd still look incompetent, because harbouring a murderer isn't any better.
They're so incompetent that their attempt to hide incompetence is incompetent
 
Could save a lot of money sacking all the DEI and other nonsense managers. People that have to handle literal human faeces shouldn’t make less than people that do nothing but have meetings or write SOPs.
 
Minister to hold talks on UK’s post-Brexit relationship with EU
The planned talks follow a dinner between Sir Keir Starmer and other European leaders in Brussels at which the prime minister outlined his plans for a broader reset of relations.
Thomas-Symonds said the UK would show “ruthless pragmatism” to go “beyond the status quo” of the current Brexit agreement and added that the time of “ideologically driven division” was over.
“It is through a new partnership between the UK and the EU that we will deliver for the people of the United Kingdom and for people across the continent,” he said.
 
Minister to hold talks on UK’s post-Brexit relationship with EU
We had a perfect opportunity to side-step all of this angst by negotiating to join the European Economic Area and the EFTA. Access to the single market, without being bound inside the common customs border, or having to operate under the huge burden of the acquis, and with an independent voice on all of the international regulatory organisations that the EU is subordinate to (and at which member states cannot have an independent position). It would have taken thirty or forty years to fully untangle us from the EU, but taking that first step would have made the process inordinately easier.

So naturally, May's negotiating team conspired with the EU to hamstring the UK at the very first step, by imposing a two year deadline, a crash-out "no deal" position in the event of failure to reach an agreement, and the imposition of the northern ireland "back-stop" to create economic havoc within the UK even when an agreement was reached. It was a deliberate act by the political class, to punish the people of Great Britain for daring to seek a different path than their unaccountable technocracy and leave a path to bounce us back into membership once everyone got fed up of the situation they had created.

Make no mistake, they will try and force us to join again, but this time as a fully subservient member, without any of the claw-backs negotiated previously. The UK was the second largest net contributor to the EU budget, even with the rebate; our leaving hurt them financially in ways that are still shaking out, so they want us back for that reason alone.
 
Southport killer's case closed prematurely (prevent)

The now convicted triple-killer was referred to Prevent three times between December 2019 and April 2021 due to his interest in terrorist attacks and school shootings.
Wondering why it failed?
The review said while officers at Prevent had shown a "high level of compliance" with policies in place at the time, it criticised the decision not to escalate Rudakubana's case to the next level in the process, known as Channel.

I have two questions:

1) What did/didn't Alex do to have his case escalated - what was the reason he wasn't deemed fit to pass on to Channel (Whatever the heck that is).

2) How many people are on Prevent's list that could be in the same situation as Alex's?

While there was no evidence of a fixed ideology or motivation, Rudakubana was obsessed with violence and his case should have been escalated as an example of what was then referred to as "mixed unclear and unstable ideology".
He had no ideology but should have been referred for unstable ideology. lol, lmao even.
 
If he wants to keep his place at the table, they'd say no. Reform is leading currently and will be for some time. I honestly think if Rupert Lowe were to lead them, they'd be even stronger because Lowe is more likable.
Farrage needs to step aside and put Lowe in charge of things.
I have two questions:
A third question, if the attack wasn’t terrorist related why is this an issue? Fourth question, how are us retards in this evil doxxing haram website asking better questions than journalists?
 
There are little pockets of sanity and brilliance in the NHS. There are places where a few senior people have carved out a little fiefdom and hold it secure against the endless bullshit. If you can land in one if these little kingdoms, either as patient or worker, you’ll be singing the praises of the NHS forever. The problem is they’re increasingly rare, and all under constant threat from the Bureaucracy.
The NHS needs gutting and rebuilding, but it’s too big a job for anyone sane to do
I'm all too aware. In my little shire, the limited times I've dealt with the local GP, it's been very good. Same for my wife with the rare hospital referrals, requests for extra work, etc. All been good so far.

At any moment however it can all go to shit.
 
If he wants to keep his place at the table, they'd say no. Reform is leading currently and will be for some time. I honestly think if Rupert Lowe were to lead them, they'd be even stronger because Lowe is more likable.
I go to Rupert Lowe's twitter for some hardcore hopium. It's the only thing that sustains me in a backdrop of de facto blasphemy laws, a two tier 'justice' system and policing to not to protect the public but to enforce any perceived slight against the state.

I know Kier's lock down breech is being touted as a way to take him down but surely even the most brain dead labour voter can see through the fucking chagos deal??? 22 billion black hole BTW but heres 18 billion to take this land off our hands???

Treason.
 
by imposing a two year deadline, a crash-out "no deal" position in the event of failure to reach an agreement,
And then they repudiated "no deal" when it looked like it might actually happen, leaving the UK with zero leverage. Biggest political throw in my lifetime.
I know Kier's lock down breech is being touted as a way to take him down but surely even the most brain dead labour voter can see through the fucking chagos deal??? 22 billion black hole BTW but heres 18 billion to take this land off our hands???
It's the pre-Trump cuckservative mindset: "quarantine rules are what were used to take down BoJo, Starmer will be held to the same standard, right? ...right?"

As for the Chagos Islands, how many people can even find them on a map?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo