🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[net and yahoo]

Spoiler

0:15

Okay, I turned the camera off - what do you want to really say now

Well, well, well. It comes naturally with Steven. He just can't help himself.

Has the statue of limitations expired on this one boys?

 

[Datman]

Destiny copes about people comparing his drama with Hasan, saying it's just "personal stuff."

https://youtu.be/tjOLEPmk7NY?t=7310

Nigga it's literally a public lawsuit involving people who were frequently featured on your stream that you've provably lied about on multiple occasions and omitted information about (Pxie's intent, your subreddit post). You could twist this same stupid argument in defense of Tim Pool with the Tenet media stuff and it would hold just as much validity. Both of these situations (the tenet media and Destiny scandal) both hold serious implications on their credibility with respect to being honest with their audiences. Also isn't consent something that he'd constantly talk about on stream?

Not to mention, some of the leaks show that you were willing to platform, and change your views for, a now confirmed Russian asset in exchange for romantic and sexual benefits - If that's not something that's not a "politically" relevant critique that directly impacts your content than idk what is.

 

[Nothing Worth]

Not to mention, some of the leaks show that you were willing to platform, and change your views for, a now confirmed Russian asset in exchange for romantic and sexual benefits - If that's not something that's not a "politically" relevant critique that directly impacts your content than idk what is.

Case in point: Hasan's 3 million dollar house and the way he spends his money.

Usual preface, Hasan is bad and awful and shouldn't have a platform.

Destiny and co. love showing the contrast between Hasan's stated values (collectivism, elimination of billionaires, leftist authoritarianism) and how he actually lives his life. Hasan is spoiled and shallow and is perfectly happy with the status quo because in this system and his stated ideal system he would be okay. Hasan is fine with consumption and exploitation. These criticisms of Hasan are valid.

Likewise, Destiny talks about consent and respecting women (to an extent). If we hold that liberal values allow for men and women to freely give their consent either interpersonally or by virtue of their vote then someone who openly violates consent and maliciously records and logs people should have no place talking about these topics broadly and be taken seriously. If we operate from the idea that women can and should earn their place in the workforce given the opportunities and necessary respect then someone who disrespects women and platforms only women who have been sexually useful to him should not be taken seriously.

If everyone is in it for themselves, whether that's Destiny's penchant for sex crimes or Hasan's spending habits or Tim Pool's Russian connections than all things are equal. A commentor with a criminal history has no leg to stand on when their opponents biggest moral failings are, to date and until proven otherwise, not crimes.

 

[hFkL9]

Destiny copes about people comparing his drama with Hasan, saying it's just "personal stuff."

https://youtu.be/tjOLEPmk7NY?t=7310

Nigga it's literally a public lawsuit involving people who were frequently featured on your stream that you've provably lied about on multiple occasions and omitted information about (Pxie's intent, your subreddit post). You could twist this same stupid argument in defense of Tim Pool with the Tenet media stuff and it would hold just as much validity. Both of these situations (the tenet media and Destiny scandal) both hold serious implications on their credibility with respect to being honest with their audiences. Also isn't consent something that he'd constantly talk about on stream?

Not to mention, some of the leaks show that you were willing to platform, and change your views for, a now confirmed Russian asset in exchange for romantic and sexual benefits - If that's not something that's not a "politically" relevant critique that directly impacts your content than idk what is.

So much for the "Live your morals" guy, what a fucking faggot lol, this molested retard can talk shit about hasan living in a mansion all day, but if we talk about how his lifestyle is treating woman as subhuman filth that lives just to entertain his worm dick, now thats personal and not okay, kill yourself Destiny.

Also it is funny how to destiny every single woman that turns against him it's because she got rejected.

Anavoir, chaeiry, lauren delaguna, this random person that he was talking weeks ago that was clearly thisting for his ugly dick and totally not baiting him at all! What a feminist! Saying every woman that had bad interactions with you are either vengeful rejected whores or gold diggers(pxie).

 

[Baap]

chaeiry with some word salad on twitter:

https://x.com/itschaeiry/status/1886479508124975464 | https://ghostarchive.org/archive/DiYyH

 

[Gabriel Apostate of Hate]

chaeiry with some word salad on twitter:
Ver archivo adjunto 6937430
https://x.com/itschaeiry/status/1886479508124975464 | https://ghostarchive.org/archive/DiYyH

I disagree. I think that is an apt description of the coomer gremlin himself. Tiny is extremely interested in preserving his image of this logical, moral, and reasonable liberal. As much as its memed on, he DOES want to be the Joe Rogan of the left. That is why he constantly purges wrongthink in his community, to make sure that image is preserved. The only thing that is held higher than that image is cooming.

 

[Datman]

Destiny and co. love showing the contrast between Hasan's stated values (collectivism, elimination of billionaires, leftist authoritarianism) and how he actually lives his life. Hasan is spoiled and shallow and is perfectly happy with the status quo because in this system and his stated ideal system he would be okay. Hasan is fine with consumption and exploitation. These criticisms of Hasan are valid.

Highlighting his hypocrisy, and his hypocrisy with respect to his stated VIEWS on hypocrisy (e.g. his Vaush debate on living your values) is certainly valid to point out.

I think what needs to be pointed out more, since I'm starting to she it crop up worryingly a lot, is just how shallow the "it doesn't impact his politics," or the "separate the art from the artist" arguments actually are in this case. There is a deference between retrospectively appreciating a piece of art (e.g. a Roman Polanski movie), and doing something that either purposefully or unintentionally enables the vehicle that allows a bad actor to continue whatever their misconduct that they've shown to be a pattern of behavior.

To use an example - One of my favorite horror movies growing up was Jeepers Creepers. The writer and director of that movie, Victor Salva, is a well-known pedophile and groomer. My appreciation for that movie is not at all impacted by this fact as it isn't really doing anything to enable that behavior. Lets say however, hypothetically that I continued to this day to promote his NEW movies and projects, then i think that changes how justifiable it is. I use Victor Salva as an example because he has, in the past, directly used his position as an director to sexually groom and abuse child actors in at least one of his movies - Even going as far as to direct scenes a certain way that that but the child actors in more "reveling" positions and outfits.

The point being, you can directly tie his work as being what enabled his misconduct since it gave him access to a child actor he was able to get close to because he was friends with the parents. (a better example to use would probably be dan schneider since his case was even more of a pattern of behavior, I'm just more familiar with this one)

So yeah, TLDR - Loan-Her-Box is a fucking retard for saying you can do the "separate the art from the artist" shit to whatever overlap there is with his and Destiny's community.

 

[Nothing Worth]

So yeah, TLDR - Loan-Her-Box is a fucking retard for saying you can do the "separate the art from the artist" shit to whatever overlap there is with his and Destiny's community.

This kind of thinking is also in framing it as "the artist is dead." That you, the consumer of art, are the only arbiter of the qualities of the art regardless of the artist's original intent. This isn't a wrong framing where applicable re: enjoying art but this is nearly impossible in the modern age. Artists themselves use their life experiences to explain the art they create and even if they try to erase themselves from the work they are still present within it. i.e. I can understand why all of Woody Allen's movies are about faux cosmopolitan ideals with put upon dorky leads and screeching women because the main character is a Woody Allen self-insert.

You can enjoy art that is done by a bad person or has a taboo subject as long as you aren't defending the artist and you understand what little thing it says about you if you're actively seeking out and consuming the work.

The whole problem is the political is personal. We cannot arrive at political positions without having some kind of life experience or profitable grift leading us there. Steven and Destiny are not separate people; Destiny is not a character on stream with a made-up backstory about his wacky sex life. Destiny uses his life experiences to minister to others. Is debate the artform in question? It doesn't matter. It's all a cope to justify putting eyes on him and money in his pocket without having to self-examine why his content is more important than your time and integrity or just plain admitting that you like his content without shame.

 

[twitter clout chaser]

I wonder if tiny knows what he's gotten himself into with empathychan...she's currently throwing jetneptune of fishtank fame under the bus for trying to fuck her, has screen shots and voicemail recordings etc.

i wonder how much shit she has on tiny...

 

[kendoubleyou]

We don't disagree too much on the previous points, except for one or two things. But I think it's worth reiterating my position on this specific issue, which is the crux of my initial post, albeit a bit pedantic.

To be mean. Your posts suck and don't make any sense. I'm not going to make an arguement, just state basic facts that I hope will get through to you.

Destiny engages in purposeful intellectual dishonesty constantly. He's much more concerned with the image of being intellectual than actually being intellectual. This is because destiny is the archetypical egomaniac. His main goal isn't to be the smartest, it's literally world domination. He wants to control everything. He considers himself to be God. He needs influence to get to that position, and in order to acquire that influence he thinks he has to construct a public persona of a godlike genius type.

He isn't even intelligent, he's a master manipulative and is willing to do whatever it takes to get to the top and sit on a throne of skulls. You seem very confused about the guy, hopefully this helps.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

Little did we know, Trump is Destiny’s greatest alog.

Suffah Blav

 

[Code Cave]

https://x.com/itschaeiry/status/1885934500292509867 | https://ghostarchive.org/archive/56gJV
Some random clips:
"I've fucked with a lot of people on twitch, no-one has ever come out and ever accused me of being rapey.."
"I probably was in the early 2010s.."

0:21

Joking (?) about selling a Lauren Delaguna sextape that she didn't know about:

0:31

Personal favorite, he would agree with this tweet if "multiple women that were coming out with accusations" against him :

https://x.com/DatKatee/status/1632522369842413568 | https://ghostarchive.org/archive/dFsad

0:42

 

[Luke gama]

Even a broke clock is right twice day.

The idea of someone who is in the middle of 2 sex cases moralising over internet sweeping is just bizarre.

 

[Nothing Worth]

I'm not sure if these clips of Destiny's views on consent have been posted. These clips are both from a clip of a stream where a caller asks Destiny hypothetical situations where someone's consent could be/could not be violated.

Uploaded May 2nd, 2023

Destiny Scares Lilypichu Away w/ Hard Consent Question\ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y-HC1vVbA8 / https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/4Y-HC1vVbA8​

0:50

In the above clip, the caller offers a hypothetical of candid photos being posted to an anonymous forum where people will inevitably jerk off to them.

Transcription pulled from Youtube and edited for formatting:

Caller: Uh, let's say you're posting candid photos of somebody on an anonymous forum where you know people will jerk off to them?
Destiny: Probably
Caller: Okay, what's the meaningful distinction there?
Destiny: Um, you're taking some of these pictures and you're reposting them which, in and of itself, is already a little bit hairy, and then now you're posting in a place that's explicitly for like, sexual consumption.
Caller: Okay, so, if it -- okay. So if you were reposting them somewhere else just for fun with no sexual intention or like sexual intention ?
Destiny: Yeah, it could still be wrong but it would be a lot different the type of wrongness would be quite a bit different, I think.

0:48

In the second clip above the caller poses hypotheticals where if the other party doesn't know or will never know about something done to them if their consent was violated.

Transcription pulled from Youtube and edited for formatting:

Caller: I forget your stance on cheating. Do you think if the other person never figures out if there's actually something wrong with that, or no?
Destiny: Yeah, I guess so, that's kind of the question is could you theoretically do-- Well, because there are some things you could not get caught doing that we'd still consider probably a violation so for instance like peeping on somebody, like binoculars into somebody's window, probably not be good, right?
Caller: Yep
Destiny: Because somebody has a right to privacy. (Addressing chat) Do you have a right to a person sitting across here to not be stealth masturbating? I don't know, I'm not sure, that's a really hard one.
Caller: Well, could you like-- Let's say you could steal something from somebody and you know for a fact that they would never know that it's gone, is that okay?
Destiny: No, that's still that's an easy wrong because you shouldn't be stealing things from people even if they're not aware that they're losing it right stealing one dollar from somebody's immoral even if they don't know they're gonna miss it right but that's an easy one you're taking something from somebody.
----

 

[Phantom Kant]

To be mean. Your posts suck and don't make any sense. I'm not going to make an arguement, just state basic facts that I hope will get through to you.

Destiny engages in purposeful intellectual dishonesty constantly. He's much more concerned with the image of being intellectual than actually being intellectual. This is because destiny is the archetypical egomaniac. His main goal isn't to be the smartest, it's literally world domination. He wants to control everything. He considers himself to be God. He needs influence to get to that position, and in order to acquire that influence he thinks he has to construct a public persona of a godlike genius type.

He isn't even intelligent, he's a master manipulative and is willing to do whatever it takes to get to the top and sit on a throne of skulls. You seem very confused about the guy, hopefully this helps.

The problem with this (common) position, and the reason why I decided to post in this thread at all, is that by simplifying your criticism of Steven to this surface level analysis you allow him to dismiss all other criticism directed towards him as unilaterally ignorant of how he operates, and thus not worthy of taking into consideration. If you think calling him an egomaniac, narcissist, manipulator, degenerate, con man, wikipedia warrior, or any other standard line of attack, will reach him you are wholly incorrect. Not only that, you are playing right into his handbook. People like you are the very reason why he has become so confident in his own understanding of the world. Steven's life would probably have been very different if he had come into contact with European intellectuals earlier on, the rampant stupidity of most Americans is what allows him to play as the one-eyed king in the land of the blind. The quality of posts seems to have gone severely down since Blav was banned.

 

[Irregardless]

Buddy what? I don't wanna act like I'm pro feminist or whatever, but this is unironically some of the most blatantly misogynistic shit I have ever seen, nigga is literally saying "Destiny might be a pedophile sex criminal, but at least he never supported Trump".

It's just more proof that all these male feminist pro degeneracy types don't actually support women, they just want to get laid without consequences. When the rubber hits the road though and they actually have to stand for what they claim to believe in though, it's basically "The only thing that matters is getting Trump out of office, it doesn't matter if a dude raped a women as long as he's helping the cause, and if you get raped by him and you say anything about it you're actually a bad person".

 

[Day Old Donuts]

I wonder if "Epsteiny" somehow entered Hassan's repertoire if it would trigger Tiny into a defamation lolsuit.

 

[deletethis]

I disagree. I think that is an apt description of the coomer gremlin himself. Tiny is extremely interested in preserving his image of this logical, moral, and reasonable liberal. As much as its memed on, he DOES want to be the Joe Rogan of the left. That is why he constantly purges wrongthink in his community, to make sure that image is preserved. The only thing that is held higher than that image is cooming.

one of the most important things in the world to him is his wikipedia page. its the official narrative of his existence and its the one he has the least amount of control over. he has taken great measures to protect it from artifacts of misconduct and its going to absolutely destroy him when his history of sex crimes is finally documented and published.

 

[edgymovies]

I wonder if "Epsteiny" somehow entered Hassan's repertoire if it would trigger Tiny into a defamation lolsuit.

I'm certain i've heard Hasan call Destiny both "Epsteiny" and "sex pestiny" in recent videos.

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

Buddy what? I don't wanna act like I'm pro feminist or whatever, but this is unironically some of the most blatantly misogynistic shit I have ever seen, nigga is literally saying "Destiny might be a pedophile sex criminal, but at least he never supported Trump".

It's just more proof that all these male feminist pro degeneracy types don't actually support women, they just want to get laid without consequences. When the rubber hits the road though and they actually have to stand for what they claim to believe in though, it's basically "The only thing that matters is getting Trump out of office, it doesn't matter if a dude raped a women as long as he's helping the cause, and if you get raped by him and you say anything about it you're actually a bad person".

The whole Trump rally shooting thing completely broke the minds of Destiny, his community, and everyone adjacent to it. Since then no matter what "their side" does or says its ok because the "other side" is worse.
Im convinced that Epstiny could just livestream himself shooting some random person in the face and DGG would still go "Hey, at least he is helping us fight against Trump!" or something like that.