Should people who produce pornography be executed?

[dick brain]

Porn is not a new invention. Trannies are.

All trannies are coomers, but not all coomers are trannies.

Are you fucking joking?

Yeah, porn used to be a physical magazine or 90 minutes of video you had to swallow your pride and drive to a seedy shop to pay money for and hide under your bed because going to all that effort to jack off carried the tacit implication that you couldn't get laid.

Now there's an infinite amount of it in every single human being's pocket at all times, and we are currently witnessing the effects of that on the very first generation to have experienced it since childhood, and wow would you look at that they're fucked up who would have thought! I'm sure young men becoming so sex obsessed that they try to skinwalk as pornstars has nothing to do with it though.

You fucking clown.

 

[isalaide]

Yes. Just use your fucking imagination

 

[Eternal Spirit of Light]

Nudity isn't evil, retard

Ver archivo adjunto 6828436

Would you ban classical art? Should women should be draped in burkas? Obsession or disgust of the human form is a personal problem. If you don't like looking at naked women then you could always fuck dudes, this problem has been solved for centuries. Or simply just don't consume media you are not interested in. They don't want you to know this but you are in control of the media you consume.

When have I said that nudity is evil?
Pornography is made purely for sexual gratification and pleasure. You are posing a disingenuous argument.

 

[CowPox]

How do you even know about pornograghy?

 

[11apocalyptic11]

0:32

Nudity isn't evil, retard

Ver archivo adjunto 6828436

Would you ban classical art? Should women should be draped in burkas? Obsession or disgust of the human form is a personal problem. If you don't like looking at naked women then you could always fuck dudes, this problem has been solved for centuries. Or simply just don't consume media you are not interested in. They don't want you to know this but you are in control of the media you consume.

In what world do your gay paintings justify rape video creators not getting sent to the gas chamber.

 

[Google.com]

Not only wishing death upon a fellow farmer but also your own mother. Despicable behavior

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

Are you fucking joking?

Yeah, porn used to be a physical magazine or 90 minutes of video you had to swallow your pride and drive to a seedy shop to pay money for and hide under your bed because going to all that effort to jack off carried the tacit implication that you couldn't get laid.

Now there's an infinite amount of it in every single human being's pocket at all times, and we are currently witnessing the effects of that on the very first generation to have experienced it since childhood, and wow would you look at that they're fucked up who would have thought! I'm sure young men becoming so sex obsessed that they try to skinwalk as pornstars has nothing to do with it though.

You fucking clown.

So? All you're saying it that it WAS available, but only at a smaller scale. There have always been coomers, even if not as many, but trannies are a new thing. Why?

You know what else the internet made readily available at around the same time? Social media.

Trannies come from two sources: Narcissists and opportunists seeking to abuse the troonshield, and queers love bombing and borging lonely young men into their cult. Same as any other cult. I'm not saying that the association with porn is a coincidence, far from it. By its very nature, trooning out is an act associated with sexuality.

But let's say you're right. Let's say there are people who watched so much porn that they decided to cut their dicks off. Do you genuinely believe that banning porn would fix the problem? Or is it just possible that there might be other factors at work here?

 

[No. 7 cat]

Reported for antisemitism.

Yes, it shows a deep hatred of a renown Jewish business.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

Now there's an infinite amount of it in every single human being's pocket at all times, and we are currently witnessing the effects of that on the very first generation to have experienced it since childhood, and wow would you look at that they're fucked up who would have thought! I'm sure young men becoming so sex obsessed that they try to skinwalk as pornstars has nothing to do with it though.

You fucking clown.

And of course there is nothing else currently different in the world. The entirety of society is perfect, everyone is active and well integrated into their communities, they have a purpose and hope for the future, stress is at an all time low, the only thing that's different that could explain pathological behaviors among young men is obviously the existence of easily accessible porn.

Are you guys sure some of you aren't just unable to handle your own porn consumption, feel guilty about it, and are therefore projecting it as some ultimate big bad?
I don't think it's good to watch porn either, but then you just don't watch it. It's very easy.

When I'm looking at some person whose entire life consists of rolling out of bed, walking over to their computer, jerking off/playing videogames for 12 hours, then rolling back into bed, my assumption is that they're jerking off to cope with their miserable, directionless life and unspent neurotic energy, not that the porn itself is precipitating their lifestyle.

Granted, porn almost definitely plays a role in a specific subset of transexuals, that's undeniable, but so does being a failed male with no sense of role fulfillment. The porn is just part of a wider set of issues.

I'm not even going to bat for porn here, it's not like its existence inherently benefits the average person's world, but endlessly hearing this weird kiwi obsession with the idea of porn sickness as the root cause of almost every modern behavioral issue is what's really clownish.

 

[11apocalyptic11]

And of course there is nothing else currently different in the world. The entirety of society is perfect, everyone is active and well integrated into their communities, they have a purpose and hope for the future, stress is at an all time low, the only thing that's different that could explain pathological behaviors among young men is obviously the existence of easily accessible porn.

Are you guys sure some of you aren't just unable to handle your own porn consumption, feel guilty about it, and are therefore projecting it as some ultimate big bad?
I don't think it's good to watch porn either, but then you just don't watch it. It's very easy.

When I'm looking at some person whose entire life consists of rolling out of bed, walking over to their computer, jerking off/playing videogames for 12 hours, then rolling back into bed, my assumption is that they're jerking off to cope with their miserable, directionless life and unspent neurotic energy, not that the porn itself is precipitating their lifestyle.

Granted, porn almost definitely plays a role in a specific subset of transexuals, that's undeniable, but so does being a failed male with no sense of role fulfillment. The porn is just part of a wider set of issues.

I'm not even going to bat for porn here, it's not like its existence inherently benefits the average person's world, but endlessly hearing this weird kiwi obsession with the idea of porn sickness as the root cause of almost every modern behavioral issue is what's really clownish.

I don't care about any of this nofap reddit stuff, the porn industry is just a front for the rape and sex trafficking of women and anyone involved should probably die.

 

[Kari Kamiya]

Nudity isn't evil, retard

Unironically there is a fine line between art and eroticism.

It's okay to admire the human figure for its natural beauty and want to showcase it in art, and all artists have to do life drawing to ensure you can accurately portray anatomy. However, if all you do is put focus on erogenous zones and/or once you start to pleasurably touch yourself, you have transformed that artwork into wank material. And artists tend to be open about being perverts, although people did used to be respectful and kept their shit to themselves back then, so it's not 100% guaranteed every single artist who did a nude painting was doing it to get off/get laid without the artist having put it down in writing "I fucking love titties and want to motorboat a pair until I die".

Also are you jokingly calling yourself a coomer, or are you admitting to being a coomer? It's hard to distinguish sarcasm from seriousness in text and this is more important than the ethics of nudity in art.

 

[dick brain]

So? All you're saying it that it WAS available, but only at a smaller scale. There have always been coomers, even if not as many, but trannies are a new thing. Why?

You know what else the internet made readily available at around the same time? Social media.

Trannies come from two sources: Narcissists and opportunists seeking to abuse the troonshield, and queers love bombing and borging lonely young men into their cult. Same as any other cult. I'm not saying that the association with porn is a coincidence, far from it. By its very nature, trooning out is an act associated with sexuality.

But let's say you're right. Let's say there are people who watched so much porn that they decided to cut their dicks off. Do you genuinely believe that banning porn would fix the problem? Or is it just possible that there might be other factors at work here?

No shit there are others factors -- social contagion, anime, the depersonalizing effects of living your life online, internalized misandry from a society that vilifies men, lobbying from the pharmaceutical and medical industry to pipeline young impressionable people into volunteering for unnecessary surgeries and lifelong consumption of drugs, xenoestrogens, phytoestrogens, synthetic hormones in the form of birth control re-entering the water table, Atrazine, BPAs and good old fashioned dysgenics. I am acutely aware of the confluence of dystopic factors at play here, but that wasn't the question; the question was "should pornographers be executed" and the answer is "yes" because it causes -- sorry, is in 100% of cases correlated with -- young impressionable people castrating themselves, along with pedophiles grooming children on children's video games, furries raping animals, the proliferation of cuckoldry, the memification of incest and homosexuality (step bro, femboys), the erosion of chastity as a value, declining birth rates, the tomboy genocide, and is in general a weapon of mass distraction.

And for what? The ability to watch other people have sex while you jerk yourself off? Are you a cuck or something?

Yes, there are other people who should also be executed. That doesn't absolve pornographers or make porn anything less than a net negative.

Are you guys sure some of you aren't just unable to handle your own porn consumption, feel guilty about it, and are therefore projecting it as some ultimate big bad?

Ah yes, I'm an arachnophobe so I must secretly want to fuck spiders.

Didn't read the rest.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

No shit there are others factors -- social contagion, anime, the depersonalizing effects of living your life online, internalized misandry from a society that vilifies men, lobbying from the pharmaceutical and medical industry to pipeline young impressionable people into volunteering for unnecessary surgeries and lifelong consumption of drugs, xenoestrogens, phytoestrogens, synthetic hormones in the form of birth control re-entering the water table, Atrazine, BPAs and good old fashioned dysgenics. I am acutely aware of the confluence of dystopic factors at play here, but that wasn't the question; the question was "should pornographers be executed" and the answer is "yes" because it causes -- sorry, is in 100% of cases correlated with -- young impressionable people castrating themselves, along with pedophiles grooming children on children's video games, furries raping animals, the proliferation of cuckoldry, the memification of incest and homosexuality (step bro, femboys), the erosion of chastity as a value, declining birth rates, the tomboy genocide, and is in general a weapon of mass distraction.

And for what? The ability to watch other people have sex while you jerk yourself off? Are you a cuck or something?

Yes, there are other people who should also be executed. That doesn't absolve pornographers or make porn anything less than a net negative.

Jesus, man, did Larry Flynt rape your dog or something?

I'm broadly opposed to the use of porn for religious reasons, but you are advocating for people who publish naked pictures to literally be killed by the state. Do you really think that's proportional, or that it will solve anything?

Excessive use of ANYTHING is bad for you. In that regard porn is no different from cigars or alcohol or cake, and I oppose banning those for the same reason.

I have a new theory that I pulled out of my ass 5 minutes ago. I have no idea whether it applies to you personally. What's the average age of the new anti-porn movement? Because I'm starting to suspect that the generation that correctly rejected the moral panics of the left is too young to remember what a moral panic looks like coming from the right.

 

[Jive]

When have I said that nudity is evil?
Pornography is made purely for sexual gratification and pleasure. You are posing a disingenuous argument.

You didn't explain why you believe pornograpy is evil so what so what do you expect me think. You just said porn was objectively evil so I interpreted you as an extreme puritan who hates all nudity and sex. It doesn't help when you admonish all things that are pure for sexual gratification. Like are blowjobs evil to you? If a woman sucks your dick, should that be evil because it serves no higher purpose than gratifying you? Explain yourself better and it would be harder to be disingenuous.

Unironically there is a fine line between art and eroticism.

I agree, and that should be up for discussion. Not whether those who cross the line should be put to death.

".Also are you jokingly calling yourself a coomer, or are you admitting to being a coomer? It's hard to distinguish sarcasm from seriousness in text and this is more important than the ethics of nudity in arart.

No lol I'm not a coomer, op's poll was just retarded. He asked if pornographers should be put to death or are you just a coomer. I don't think they should be put to death so I guess that makes me a coomer.

I just disagree with the extreme puritanism that been happening online recently and belive that it's more unhealthy for people than sex and porn.

 

[HyperboreanRightsActivist]

Would you ban classical art?

That painting's romanticist, not classical, retard.

 

[Cnidarian]

Nudity isn't evil, retard

Would you ban classical art? Should women should be draped in burkas? Obsession or disgust of the human form is a personal problem. If you don't like looking at naked women then you could always fuck dudes, this problem has been solved for centuries. Or simply just don't consume media you are not interested in. They don't want you to know this but you are in control of the media you consume.

That's disingenuous as fuck. Most pornography, and all the worst of it, are videos or photos of sexual acts. The human body is natural and normal to appreciate, sexually or non-sexually, but vicarious prostitution is not.

 

[tehpope]

How big is OP's porn stash do you think? The people who usually push for this super moralist shit are usually the biggest degens behind closed doors.

No, we shouldn't kill people who produce pornography. And if we did, you will need to define the terms "produce" and "porn".

 

[Jive]

Has op ever taken a dick pic and should he be put to death for it?

 

[Two Hands]

OP's avatar made me hard, kill this faggot for producing pornographic con-chent neooow.

 

[Eternal Spirit of Light]

You didn't explain why you believe pornograpy is evil

Pornography is lust, lust is evil.

an extreme puritan who hates all [...] and sex

Sex should only be done for the purpose of bearing a child.

Like are blowjobs evil to you?

should that be evil because it serves no higher purpose than gratifying you?

Yes, sodomy is evil.

But I don't believe that all lustful people should be put to death, no. The difference is that a pornographer spreads evil into the world, he does it for personal material gain. Committing sodomy is not on the same level as producing pornography.
TLDR - lust is bad and one should not engage in it.

The people who usually push for this super moralist shit are usually the biggest degens behind closed doors.

This sounds like the lolicon copium and deflection.

Because I'm starting to suspect that the generation that correctly rejected the moral panics of the left is too young to remember what a moral panic looks like coming from the right.

Like the "grooming gang moral panic" right? Pornography is a disease, a parasite which must be exterminated.

Has op ever taken a dick pic

Why would I?