Deep Thunks: Relationships and Sex - Off-Topic

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I certainly understand how modern one night stand culture creates broken people and how having one partner you love is vastly superior choice.
The casualisation of that level of intimacy has always seemed so wrong imo. Sleeping around and engaging to such an intimate level with someone you barely know is absolutely vile and I've never understood why it's so highly revered, particularly these days
 
Rule 1: Sow whatever wild oats you can whilst your single. Keep your fucking word and stay loyal whilst committed. Whilst you do both of these keep in mind the most important rule, be discrete.

Society doesn't punish sex, or chastity, it punishes indiscretion. It is why we laugh at Ben Shapiro for believing that women dont get wet when turned on and laugh at Destiny for talking about his fetishes and sucking Nick Fuentes's dick. The sin both of them committed wasn't the lack of sex or the degeneracy, it was being indiscreet and disclosing details in a stupid way which let everyone else know about their sex life. Be discreet.

Rule 2: If you're a pedophile or into beastiality you should be fucking lynched.
 
Oh christ I wish I didn't feel the need to say this.

Human beings are just mammals, mammals are not monogamous for more than one mating cycle. The minute you have fucked 20-30 women in your life or had 3 or 4 FFM threesomes you have cursed yourself. At that point you can't just repent and embrace monogamy without some kind of massive life change, like a near death experience and accepting religion.

The other aspect is even worse in a traditional male/female relationship. I thought this was all an exaggerated joke for decades women lock down a successful man and inch by inch stop putting effort in, for sex for housework etc. Nothing at all may change, especially from the man's level of effort and they become less appreciative of the man keeping the household together. The woman nags the man for some higher form of commitment like moving in or marriage and all too frequently she him locked down and that is it.
 
Being in a relationship is a zero sum game. Ego boost may be worth it but not really, it's not like anyone here is ever gonna get into a relationship, say thanks to the internets.
My hot takes?
Women and men are incompatible, just by design of nature, and misandry/mysogyny is completely healthy and normal, not despising the opposite sex at this point might be a sign of some kind of mental trouble.
Before the apocalypse, some feminists actually had the right idea. Patriarchy did BTFO men harder than women, for example how act of eating pussy was childishly called homosexual or the female orgasm was called a "myth". Lawl.
1735141099869.png


The standards of that half of the population have skyrocketed so hard that i'm now considered a truecel while back then i could've been called a "pretty boy 8/10". In two more years, Tiktok will tell them that men like me are lowest of the low, whlist anyone below would quite literally, not even be considered a clump of cells worthy of breathing, killing them would just be considered animal cruelty or minor vandalism. Next generation will be Nephilim, and anyone below that will be simply bred out of the gene pool. If we're talking about incredibly rare neurodivergent women, then it's a whole different story. They just delve into transsexuality, homosexuality and bestiality en-masse lol, akin to men. Us and them are not that different, you know.
 
then i could've been called a "pretty boy 8/10". In two more years, Tiktok will tell them that men like me are lowest of the low, whlist anyone below would quite literally, not even be considered a clump of cells worthy of breathing, killing them would just be considered animal cruelty or minor vandalism. Next generation will be Nephilim, and anyone below that will be simply bred out of the gene pool. If we're talking about incredibly rare neurodivergent women, then it's a whole different story. They just delve into transsexuality, homosexuality and bestiality en-masse lol, akin to men. Us and them are not that different, you know
Reading this made me feel sad. I hope your thoughts are on nice things for the rest of Christmas day, instead of ruminating on your insecurities.

Merry Christmas and God bless you.
 
The standards of that half of the population have skyrocketed so hard
You'd have to be pretty fucking stupid to think that women who had no rights and were sold off by one man to another man had "lower standards". Their standards didn't fucking matter, they were things. Men who lament that women aren't fucking things anymore, and expect our empathy.
That's a lawl from me dawg.
 
You'd have to be pretty fucking stupid to think that women who had no rights and were sold off by one man to another man had "lower standards". Their standards didn't fucking matter, they were things. Men who lament that women aren't fucking things anymore, and expect our empathy.
That's a lawl from me dawg.
I think you should learn how to read. I'm not bitching about women's rights, retard. I'm comparing 2022 to 2024. I actually think women's rights regressed in that time period, say in the united states. Kek.
 

Ver archivo adjunto 6786235
Evidence would suggest we do not pair-bond like birds. Also note that science used to just be called "natural philosophy". Monogamy is great when it works, which is very occasionally.
>Using a reported study with no methodology or any real pertinent data as some sort of proof of anything

People like you are fucking retarded and should be beaten repeatedly until you get the memo that sociological data is worthless unless you want to prove something is occuring (and even then rarely).

Hot take (perhaps?): Sex is much better with a long time partner you love. Shit out of porn like gangbangs and fucking a girl you met 5 minutes ago aren't really fulfilling. I had an ex of 4 years, and while I don't really miss her, we did break up for a good reason, the sex was God-tier. All one time flings after that have been a pale and lame imitation.

While I don't want everyone to live in Nick Fuentes White Sharia medieval peasant society where you're married at 13 until death...I certainly understand how modern one night stand culture creates broken people and how having one partner you love is vastly superior choice.
Exactly. The man that frequented the whorehouse in the past and the nymphomaniac woman within weeren't normal healthy people. They were broken people using sex as a coping mechanism.

One man and one woman having sex for life is ideal and literally all evidence points to this (in the form of how such a pairing even built up civilization in the first place via marriage and childbearing and how our cavemen ancestors practiced this), but at the very least you shouldn't be looking for sex from randoms. It should be within the context of a long term relationship. If shit happens and you break up, that sucks but at least you weren't whoring yourself to a nobody.

Frankly, people forget that romantic relationships are long-term friendships and see them as purely economic/political/cultural artifacts. This thinking has damaged most marriages due to not understanding how important it is to build something with your spouse and to create new life and a family therein.

The casualisation of that level of intimacy has always seemed so wrong imo. Sleeping around and engaging to such an intimate level with someone you barely know is absolutely vile and I've never understood why it's so highly revered, particularly these days
The reduction of modern relationships (of all forms including many non-sexual ones like friendships) into economic propositions is the result of how fake, gay and retarded a lot of modern life is. Even people in the Balkans have more sane standards when it comes to being intimate with someone on any level.
 
Cheating on your partner is wrong, redefining cheating to make it sound more acceptable is also wrong. There; glad to help.
I have never met a single poly person that does communicate w ppl about who they’re fucking and “seeing”. I saw this shitty band, got on their social media, and the guitarist just omitted to a bunch of ppl that they weren’t in a solo relationship. Three different ppl found out they were dating a fucking serial cheater in a post about her relationship with the bassist.
These ppl deserved to be muzzled. If you’re going to be a dog, you deserve to be treated like one.
 
I think that people with high sociosexuality will commit adultery and act promiscuously whether they are in an ostensibly monogamous relationship or not. And even without regard to sociosexuality, there are people who are just not going to operate very well within a committed, monogamous relationship because of various behavioral and cognitive abnormalities. It's easy to see why those people would be inclined towards polyamory or open relationships. I'd imagine if you examined people in polyamorous relationships you'd see an extreme prevalence of depression, anxiety, psychopathy, narcissism, and even autism. But for people that don't have these problems, monogamy is not something that they have to sacrifice for. It's just normal to them, and polyamory is not even something that crosses their mind. If on occasion it ever does, they are mildly repulsed by it.

I don't have anything intrinsically against polyamory. As far as I am concerned they can keep to themselves and fuck their way to an early grave if they want to. But it's certainly not for me, and I think there are a lot of very understandable objections to people that engage in polyamory. The worst is that you'll get other people, who are also mentally ill, that use these examples of people who do this shit in order to "blackpill" people about monogamy . It's all a scam.

The Internet shows people who are truly a minority as representative of the entire population. However, this is a warped perspective. There is a minority population of people with high sociosexuality and associated behavioral, cognitive, and emotional disturbances, who interact with other people like them. It's the same group of people on dating apps. It's the same group of people cheating on their spouses. It's the same group of people that have issues with substance abuse and addiction. For instance, if you filtered out relationships or marriages involving young African males, a group of people who are significantly more likely to have high sociosexuality and cognitive/behavioral problems, rates of divorce, poverty, domestic abuse (especially marital rape), adultery, and STDs plummet. So when people use statistics like how 50% of marriages end in divorce, and something like 15-20% of people cheat on their partners (they inflate even that to imply everyone cheats, just like them), or how women are riding around on the cock carousel, it's all nonsense.

If you know someone, maybe they are in your friend group or you meet them through some youth organization, and enter into a committed relationship with them, regularly go to church with them, are the same race and nationality (excluding certain exceptions, like AMWF/WMAF relationships), with no clear history of substance abuse or criminality, your likelihood of being cheated on or getting divorced is almost nonexistent. People like Rekieta are the exception that prove the rule. And he is an example of someone who had the underlying mental health issues and profile associated with this shit, but suppressed it in order to obtain money and support from his parents.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo