2025 Mass Deportations Electric Boogaloo

[Slur Generator]

 

[CryptoHermit]

Because we never act.

Substack chuds have been posting FUD on the deportions too citing Trump's past amnesty (and Indian client groups...)
Trump's Second Term: What To Expect On Immigration

Donald Trump came to prominence in 2016 by running on a hardline anti-immigration platform. In his initial run, Trump centered a promise to build a wall on the US-Mexican border and emphasized a 10-point-plan to detailing the mechanisms he planned to use to embark on an unprecedented campaign to deport all illegal aliens residing in America. In one September 2016 speech, Trump swore he would order the removal of millions of migrants in his first hour in office.

A week after winning the election, Trump immediately began distancing himself from his own words. In an interview with 60 Minutes as president-elect, Trump reduced the target of his immigration rhetoric to aliens who had committed serious crimes. After four years in office, he wasn’t even able to accomplish this narrowed objective.

As president, Trump’s immigration record was abysmal, effectively deporting fewer criminal aliens than the previous Obama administration, all while inflows of illegal migrant crossings remained steady.

After a year of squawking like an immigration hawk, Trump struck a Reaganite tone once he settled into the White House. In one 2018 episode, Trump offered his hard won political capital as cover for a bipartisan amnesty bill that would potentially legalize millions of illegals, reportedly telling Senator Lindsay Graham, “If you want to take it that further step, I’ll take the heat.”

A year later, as re-election approached, Trump provoked his base into a frenzy by offering the Democrats a DACA extension in exchange for a small amount of funding for the promised border wall his administration and Republican congressmen had been procrastinating on delivering.

Towards the end of Trump’s presidency, Jared Kushner and Trump designed a plan for a “Canadian-style” immigration system that would serve as an alternative to the status quo. Canada’s immigration system, which is effectively a bureaucratically formalized version of open borders, has induced a furious backlash against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who in turn has been forced to embrace measures that turn away foreigners just to maintain national stability.

Voting majorities in all countries in the world consistently vote for fewer immigrants when it is offered. Polls taken earlier this year show that the majority of Americans support mass deportations, and Trump — along with down ballot Republicans — have once again enthusiastically vowed to satisfy this popular demand.

Trump’s 2024 immigration plan, a rehash of his 2016 campaign proposal, would require defying activist federal courts, billionaire donors, and securing tens of billions or hundreds of billions from the purse of a broadly pro-immigration US Congress. In other words, it is a throwaway campaign lie.

Far more likely in a second Trump term is an immigration amnesty akin to Ronald Reagan’s 1986 Simpson-Mazoli Act, which legalized the status of practically all illegal migrants in America in exchange for largely unfulfilled border security concessions.

There is evidence that this was Trump’s plan for his second term all along. Weeks before the 2020 election, the Heritage Foundation released an outline of what Trump’s immigration priorities would be if he were to be re-elected. In it, Lora Ries of the think-tank’s Border Security and Immigration Center confidently forecasted,

“In a second term, President Trump would pursue merit-based immigration reform with Congress, navigate rescinding DACA while negotiating an amnesty with Congress (for anywhere from 800,000 to up to 11 million illegal aliens), and continue to secure the border in the face of strong COVID-economy immigration push factors.”

The political pressures that kept Trump from selling out his base on immigration during his first administration will not exist this time around. Fears of a primary challenge from an anti-immigration candidate to his right or losing a national election are now moot. If currently available exit polls are correct, the paleo-conservative fearmongering of America transforming into a one-party Democrat state has been refuted by Trump’s massive inroads with minority voters during this election cycle, witnessed in his commanding victories in states such as Florida and Texas.

Conservative media outlets that previously held Trump’s feet to the fire, such as Steve Bannon’s Breitbart or Fox News era Tucker Carlson Tonight, are no longer threats. Serious immigration restrictionists such as Ann Coulter, Kris Kobach, Steve King, and Jeff Sessions, who played an enormous role in Trump’s 2016 white identitarian campaign, have been dumped in favor of self-serving opportunists and social liberals such as Elon Musk, RFK Jr, and Joe Rogan, all who either back massively expanding the legal immigration system or support granting illegal aliens a pathway to citizenship.

Republicans are expected to have majorities in both the Senate and possibly the House. In the Senate, the favored candidates to replace Mitch McConnell as majority leaders — Rick Scott, John Thune, and John Cornyn — are among the most pro-amnesty, pro-immigration Republicans in Washington.

If the Republicans hold on to their majority in the House, Mike Johnson is favored to lead for another term. Last summer, Johnson was provided an opportunity to leverage Ukraine aid in exchange for funding towards immigration enforcement, yet he refused, with Trump’s blessing. Yesterday, Laura Ingraham grilled Johnson on his immigration plans, even going so far as to accuse him of plotting an amnesty.

In his debate with Sam Harris, Ben Shapiro — a Never Trumper who is now a Trump insider — confirmed that the president-elect’s mass deportation promise is an empty campaign fib. Illegal aliens have told journalists that they don’t believe Trump will deport them, while Venezuelan border crossers, who have been the subject of controversy throughout the Western Hemisphere in recent years due to their higher levels of criminality, are some of Trump’s biggest supporters, citing his 2021 Deferred Enforced Departure memo that made them impossible to deport.

The incentive structure points to Trump potentially being worse on immigration in his second term compared to his first. The MAGA movement of 2024 is largely an apolitical celebrity cult, granting Trump a free hand to broker an immigration deal a Democratic president could only dream of.

 

[Shopping Cart Nationalist]

states like Texas and other rural sheriffs are chomping at the bit.

Champing. The expression is 'champing at the bit.' Common mistake.

Where do I sign up?

https://www.ice.gov/

Remember these guys are literally ISIS terrorists for arresting illegals that committed multiple crimes in the U.S, but hadn't been kicked out.

Actually the intro to that video sounds pretty based, NGL.

What argument is there against deporting illegals?

Sir, have you seen this image of a black man crying? We HAVE to let every single Hatian into our country.

https://abc7news.com/alix-idrache-west-point-graduation-cadet-cries/1357201/

"Border Czar" is a made-up position, little more than theater.

Pam Bondi ostensibly will be DOJ head, and Kristi Noem at Homeland Security. Tom Homan knows better than anyone what needs to be done, and it seems like the plan is for him to create and monitor the implementation deportation policy. All that remains is to see how far they get.

It will drive labor costs up for sure

Rising wages? Oyyyy, how anti-semtic, straight outta Mein Kampf.

Man I'm so excited for the seething and malding when we deport 1,000,000+ people at the minimum.

That and every single illegal alien that commits a crime. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

Here's the neat part. As soon the intent is announced to do this, some start leaving on their own. As soon as you start to implement it, more leave. When some leave, frequently they take their illegal welfare sucking brood with them. Fuck OFF, were full!

 

[John Badman]

Is this satire? Do you actually believe this is going to happen?
Oh my god... Did you vote for Trump because you actually thought it would be that easy to solve the ongoing invasion? You can't be this stupid, Man.

Whose sock are you?

 

[TaimuRadiu]

Is it really going to happen this time?

 

[D&P 2: 2 Drunk 2 Pour]

What argument is there against deporting illegals? Have any of the dissidents tried to rationalize their opposition to it?

There are too many white people in America with traditional Judeo-Christian American values that make them harder to control, so we need to dilute their votes/influence/presence to retain our power by flooding the nation with people used to being held under the thumb of people who hold that power.

Of course they can't say that out loud, so something about family separation or grocery prices, or whatever.

 

[Slur Generator]

Judeo-Christian

Ewww

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

It seems to me - these guys gotta go

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

What argument is there against deporting illegals? Have any of the dissidents tried to rationalize their opposition to it?

"We need a slave caste to make green numbers go up and drive up the cost of boomer property".

 

[MightyMorphin'Willbender]

What argument is there against deporting illegals? Have any of the dissidents tried to rationalize their opposition to it?

The logistics are a nightmare.
Even before all the yapping about the Anchor babies, no documentation, etc. Even finding everyone and sending them somewhere else is very expensive.

Europoors often try doing it the cheapest way of just giving them a flight ticket and dropping them off at the airport. There are even movies about how these illegals would just turn around and get a cab back to town.

The most effective way to move them en masse is to somehow trick them into believing they are being moved to a better location (btw if they are already in a pretty good area this persuation will not work) , or else you'd also expect shenaningans like mutiny in buses/plans/boats and THAT would really grind any effort to a halt.

Plus they will just try try again, specially if you send them somewhere close enough like mexico or canada.

 

[High-Fructose Corn Syrup]

@SacreBleu another concern trolling faggot.

 

[John Badman]

I ant reading aldat bruddah Y R U Gey?

 

[Paper Machete]

All you have to do is be stricter on businesses and farms when it comes to who they're hiring. They'll deport themselves and no longer come.

You could also go after NGOs and organizations supporting such. That's very optimistic. But they're the main reason we're in this mess. It's honestly insane to me that so much money and effort is put into getting people who can survive perfectly well in their home countries or countries closer to their home and aren't actively getting blown up in warzones over here because people have been psyopped into thinking it's some sort of charitable good and that anyone darker than a slight sun tan is automatically a refugee too retarded to wipe their own ass.

 

[MightyMorphin'Willbender]

Prosecuting the glutenous, offal (pun intended as derived from awful), employers who illegally provide the invaders with income, and prosecuting the greedy, hypocrite, landlords who illegally provide them with shelter, is tantamount to a surgical strike on the invaders supply lines. The laws to enable this prosecution already exist and are unused which reveals the greater problem that faces our nation, or what remains of it--We do not expect or demand the uniform and consistent enforcement of the law.

If you are under the impression this is somehow cheaper or easier to do than figuring out how to send loads of people out of the country I have a bridge to sell you.
Plus the question was about deporting; Not making them feel somehow unwelome and decide on their own to leave.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

All you have to do is be stricter on businesses and farms when it comes to who they're hiring. They'll deport themselves and no longer come.

There are also other classical approaches:

 

[MightyMorphin'Willbender]

We don't need to remove them from the country, per se. As a matter of fact, the invaders are a resource that we should utilize as slaves for internal improvements.

Seems that's already what the powers that be are on it, so what's the problem with illegals, then?

 

[anti SJW]

 

[cybertoaster]

Rising wages? Oyyyy, how anti-semtic, straight outta Mein Kampf.

Not even Hitler would've done this!

/sneedo

Sir, have you seen this image of a black man crying? We HAVE to let every single Hatian into our country.

Is that where this smuggie comes from?

There are even movies about how these illegals would just turn around and get a cab back to town.

Link? I seen the euros doing this but they will escort them all the way to the plane to make sure they get on it. Of course there's sometimes some retard on the plane trying to stop it, like that finngol girl starting a ruckus because some literal rapist its being deported...

Prosecuting the glutenous, offal (pun intended as derived from awful), employers who illegally provide the invaders with income, and prosecuting the greedy, hypocrite, landlords who illegally provide them with shelter, is tantamount to a surgical strike on the invaders supply lines. The laws to enable this prosecution already exist and are unused which reveals the greater problem that faces our nation, or what remains of it--We do not expect or demand the uniform and consistent enforcement of the law.

Which wont happen, Trump might not be "old money" but he's money, he's got pals and contributors who profit from this shit, and he's the guy who was pardoning gangsta thugs for money after losing in 2020, did everybody forget that?. For all the laugh and jokes I expect an almost nominal strengthening of migratory policy to maybe dubya levels, an almost token amount of deportees, mostly criminals, and less generous amnesty to illegals which is already the most generous in the entire northern hemisphere BTW, but the H1B and fencejumpers will keep coming. An improvement? yes, but tiny compared to what was expected.

You could also go after NGOs and organizations supporting such. That's very optimistic. But they're the main reason we're in this mess.

Drop in a bucket, everyone working in those NGOs or financing them should be thrown in jail, no exceptions I don't care if you rescued a sinking boat full of babies if you brought them here, but the vast majority of illegal migrants come here because there's money to be made, not because some hippie shit helped them at the very end of the journey. And the money comes from megacorps who need new serfs, simple as that.

 

[The giant penis of doom]

You could also go after NGOs and organizations supporting such.

This cabinet is so incredibly philosemitic, that's an impossible ask.

 

[porkWellington]

We, I mean posters in this thread, should focus on what we can do and accept that supporting Trump is a mistake.
He made the same promises before winning the 2016 Election that he made before winning the 2024 election.
He does not deliver on his promises.
It really is a contemptible position to support Trump on the basis that he is the "Best of the Worst", but it's the majority opinion when arguments about political representation are left on the burner long enough to be reduced to their bare elements, because nothing else is done to address the consensus that he is part of the worst group.
Think about it this way: You are being offered a "Shit Sandwich" or a "Shit Sandwich with Cheese". Either way, if you accept this proposition, you are accepting shit and doing nothing to address the clearly established trend of your choices being limited to fecal matter.
Stop accepting shit sandwiches and wasting everyone's time with your irrational arguments to cope with your shame, guilt, and embarrassment at eating shit.

I didn't vote for Trump and don't think he's going to miraculously fix the country but when it comes to Trump's promise on illegals I think Tom Homan's been his smartest cabinet pick. He's been involved with the border since the 80s, he got an award from the Obama administration for being good at deporting, and there's no dirt on him. I particularly like that he wasn't a party loyalist who relied on kissing Trump's ass like Gaetz and Hegseth.