UN Israeli strikes in Iraq could be ‘imminent,’ US reportedly warns - Washington allegedly told Iraq it has exhausted "all means of pressure" on Jerusalem and has urged Baghdad to take swift action to prevent the attacks.

1.png
Mourners march with the body of slain Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Abbas Nilforoushan during his funeral in Najaf, Iraq, Oct. 14, 2024. Photo by Qassem Al-Kaabi/AFP via Getty Images.

The United States has informed Baghdad that Israeli strikes in Iraq are “imminent” if the Iraqi government fails to stop Iranian-backed militias from attacking the Jewish state, Arab media reported on Wednesday.

The U.S. told Iraq it has exhausted “all means of pressure” on Jerusalem and has urged Baghdad to take swift action to prevent these attacks, the reports by Al-Hadath and other Saudi-owned news outlets claimed.

On Monday, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar called on the United Nations Security Council to take “immediate action” against the Iranian-backed militias in Iraq launching drones and missiles at the Jewish state.

In a letter sent to the Security Council president for November, British Ambassador Barbara Woodward, Sa’ar expressed “grave concern over the significant increase in the frequency and the intensity of attacks on Israel conducted by the Iranian-backed militias” since September.

He warned that the ongoing attacks “have the potential to further drag the region in a very dangerous escalation while posing a significant threat to international peace and security,” noting that Jerusalem’s right to self-defense against threats from Iraq is enshrined in the U.N. Charter.

Israel has already warned the Iraqi government that unless it reins in the militias, it faces Israeli strikes on its territory, the Saudi website Elaph reported earlier this month. Unnamed officials told the news outlet that satellites were monitoring the movement of ballistic missiles and related equipment from Iran to Iraq, which could be used in an attack on Israel.

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani dismissed Sa’ar’s letter as a “pretext and argument to attack Iraq” and to “expand the war in the region,” speaking in a statement on Tuesday. His office claimed that Baghdad has refused to enter into the regional conflict with the Jewish state while “seeking to provide relief to the Palestinian and Lebanese people.”

The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an Iranian-backed amalgamation of terrorist groups, on Wednesday claimed responsibility for an attempted drone attack on a “military target” in Israel’s north on Tuesday night.

The IDF confirmed that it shot down a drone that was fired at the Jewish state “from the east,” a phrase the army uses to refer to Iraq. The drone was shot down before entering Israeli airspace, the Air Force said.

On Oct. 3, two Israeli soldiers were killed when an explosive-laden drone launched from Iraq hit an IDF base in the Golan Heights.

Article Link

Archive
 
Why is it that there's never peace in the Middle East?
Jews.

But honestly, even if the Jews weren't there the many tribes and schisms of Islam mixed with the severe lack of critical resources (beyond oil, which even that is only concentrated in a few areas) guarantee religious, cultural, resource and tribal conflicts.

Its a sandy shithole that should have been glassed decades ago. I just say let them fight it out and whoever wins can rule over the sandy ashes.
 
The U.S. told Iraq it has exhausted “all means of pressure” on Jerusalem and has urged Baghdad to take swift action to prevent these attacks
lol what terrible diplomacy. It makes us look so lame.

“Uh sorry Iraq. Israel said they wear the pants so… you know… anyways. Good luck you little scamps. Israel needs me so I gotta make dinner tonight and then sleep in the cuck shed. Sigggghhhh…”
 
I mean it's 100% on the Iraqi government at this point. It's not hard and pretty simple. Stop these violent terror attacks/legit acts of war. They have no reason to complain if they can't even exercise basic sovereignty.

The middle east isn't the Brits fault any more than it's the Jews. The turk empire was already starting to collapse before WW1, if the Brits didn't do it they would have done it themselves or someone else would have.. They may have did a better job at creating borders but it wouldn't have changed anything. Ethnic and sub ethnic conflicts are every bit as serious as the inter-religious/islamic ones. You would have either ended up with different arbitrary boundaries or 100 different micro states normal warring instead of civil warring.

The whole Brits/west excuse is poor cope based on simplistic understanding of the area and or historical narratives/agendas at play.
 
Última edición:
How much influence does the Iraqi government truly have over the militias? From my vague understanding they don’t even control parts of their country (autonomous regions) and Iran has a great deal of influence over them.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo