Someone pointed this out, but if they'll do this for transgenders why don't they add options for physical disabilities to be more inclusive to disabled people? Is it because being disabled isn't trendy enough?
The thing is, honestly, when it comes to character creators in video games, I'm not opposed to a developer giving a player
as many options as possible. I'm a big fan of the old (good) Saints Row games, where your character could have a big fuck off Jew beak of a nose, metallic blue skin, gigantic saggy tits and a huge fat belly if you wanted.
People made a big thing about the new (bad) Saints Row game having the option to create an amputee character, but I actually didn't mind that, because I might want to make a cool peg-legged pirate character or whatever.
I'm not even against people making scarred up, disfigured characters in games. Hogwarts Legacy has a character creator, and though it's not especially in-depth like it is in a lot of other games, I like that you can give your characters facial scarring that seems to suggest they got caught in the blast of a fireball or whatever.
Things like that are cool and fun and add to the character, maybe in a bit of a Mary Sue-ish way, but I don't care. It's my game, I'm the main character, I'm the chosen one, I should be allowed to look cool or wacky or outrageous or whatever.
However, this isn't 'Scar Option #27' or whatever. This is specifically and deliberately listed in game and (more importantly)
advertised to the audience as 'top surgery scars'. And that brings with it an awful lot of real world baggage, that I do object to.
Chandelier dijo:
The male option exists, but pooners don't want that. They want to SIGNAL their in group status to feel special. They keep saying they're real men, yet aren't aware top surgery scars is direct proof they aren't. The zipper tits are a dead giveaway.
Also, just as the thought occurs to me, whatever happened to 'always playing a character of the opposite sex in a video game' being one of the archetypal 'egg' behaviours that mean you were definitely always 100% transgender?
If you were being true and honest, wouldn't you just be playing a male character? Because that's what you truly are, right?
Or does that only apply to MTF trannies making their dream waifus in character creators to play out their autogynephilic fantasies with?
