Best fucked up books

Junji Ito is pretty much one of the only manga artists I like but I also haven't explored much manga/anime outside of him. That said Viz Media has been releasing translated versions of his work for a while in high quality hard cover anthologies. His adaption of No Longer Human by Osamu Dazai is probably one of his best since there's a lot more depth to the story and characters than his usual monster shock shtick. I've been thinking of doing a compare and contrast of the two but I'm not sure I'm ready to be that emotionally devasted quite yet.
I haven't, either, really. Maybe I've skim-read some of those Pokemon mangas, which are more hardcore the anime, but that's it. No idea where I'd scour for Ito's works.

@Lokenstien (Addressed to you again specifically, because I edited this comment, and wanted to make sure you got my reply) Oh, yeah, sorry. See what I mean about my skim-reading? I completely missed you mentioning Viz Media. Ta for that link, by the way, and the CBR link, as well.
 
Última edición:
No idea where I'd scour for Ito's works.
Bruh. The highlighted text in my post is the link for the hardcover translated anthologies. You can probably order them cheaper on Amazon though. Here is another link that lists pretty much everything he's done that I found from one online query for his work. Junji Ito is probably one of the most popular horror manga artist out there so it shouldn't be hard at all to find his work posted abundantly on manga archive sites.
 
I don't think anyone ever came close to the Marquis, but I would say Justine is his most difficult book to read, he wrote a protagonist who is easy to sympathise with and ultimately feel sorry for, instead of just another sexual deviant. The monastery episode is particularly haunting in a Kafkaesque manner, which incidentally makes me wonder if Kafka read him.

My other pick would be Lolita. Nabokov's prose conceals many horrific events on the first read, and exposes and makes them all the more disturbing on the second. Also, I remember reading somewhere that back when it was first published, many readers, casual and critics alike, found Dolores spoiled and partially guilty, somehow missing that the novel was written as a memoir to be presented to a jury by a pedophile, who is attempting to manipulate both them and the reader into thinking he wasn't all that bad. Incidentally, there are a few references to Justine in the novel.
 
Nabokov's prose conceals many horrific events on the first read, and exposes and makes them all the more disturbing on the second. Also, I remember reading somewhere that back when it was first published, many readers, casual and critics alike, found Dolores spoiled and partially guilty, somehow missing that the novel was written as a memoir to be presented to a jury by a pedophile, who is attempting to manipulate both them and the reader into thinking he wasn't all that bad.
Oh, there's still heaps of morons saying that Lo deliberately seduced and manipulated Humbert. Every second thread on /lit/ was a fight over Lolita, every third was people swearing at or by Atlas Shrugged. Occasionally other works were discussed.

It was mind numbing having to go over Humbert's clinical targeting of a young girl with few family members, few community ties, and a vain, stupid, easily manipulated narcissistic mother with whom she had a difficult relationship, his increasingly extreme actions as he fought to keep her isolated and unable to escape him, and her gradual but inevitable mental collapse.

"Did Humbert really love Lolita?" was asked twice a week. Love her? He didn't love her. He didn't even like her all that much, he just wanted her body. He knew her body in every conceivable way, but if someone had asked him what her favourite comic, song, colour, animal etc was, his face would BSoD, before he eventually recovered enough to whine about her lack of class.
 
"Did Humbert really love Lolita?" was asked twice a week. Love her? He didn't love her. He didn't even like her all that much, he just wanted her body. He knew her body in every conceivable way, but if someone had asked him what her favourite comic, song, colour, animal etc was, his face would BSoD, before he eventually recovered enough to whine about her lack of class.
There's the scene of Humbert and Dolores briefly reuniting near the end of the book, that's what I've seen some of those posters reference in support of their arguments, but I think its main purpose was to show that Humbert still had power over Dolores. It's a tragic scene under the surface, she finally has enough control over her body to reject him but not enough over her life to go on without his money.

The more I think back on Lolita the more impressed I am by its complexity (and the more jealous of Nabokov's prose).
 
It's a tragic scene under the surface, she finally has enough control over her body to reject him but not enough over her life to go on without his money.
Education for girls wasn't quite as big a thing back in the 1950s, but still, the lack of consistent schooling would still have barred Lo from what few legitimate professions were available. As Charlotte Haze's husband, he stole what would have been Lo's inheritance; remember that Charlotte was wealthy, and that Humbert found her tastes crass, I doubt that Lo would have been allowed to keep a single trinket of her mother's.

Humbert took just about everything there was to take from Dolores, shy of cutting her open and taking her fucking kidneys. Him giving money to her in the end wasn't a sign of his love; he was returning what was left of her property in exchange for the name of his enemy, the man who bested him, because Humbert Humbert always had to win and there was no way that he was going to let that shit stand. Humbert was better than anyone else, he was certainly smarter, and he paid up so that he could prove it.

Even at the end when he says, "I loved her!" he has to mention all the unsightly adult characteristics of her body, convinced that this makes him some fucking high minded martyr. A non personality disordered individual, thinking of a lost love, would remember the time they spent together: sex, certainly, but also the long conversations, walking home in the rain, sharing a pina colada at the bar. Humbert Humbert: "She's got hairy legs and some random put a baby in her, but I love her anyway! I'd totes take her on another extended road trip! And the baby too, I'd be the best daddy ever, especially if she has a little girl that grows up to look just like her mother!"

True love, ladies and gents. True love.
 
Don't have any titles to share at the ready right now but just wanted to drop in and say thanks to everyone in this thread for all the great suggestions and authors.
 
I don't think anyone ever came close to the Marquis, but I would say Justine is his most difficult book to read, he wrote a protagonist who is easy to sympathise with and ultimately feel sorry for, instead of just another sexual deviant. The monastery episode is particularly haunting in a Kafkaesque manner, which incidentally makes me wonder if Kafka read him.

My other pick would be Lolita. Nabokov's prose conceals many horrific events on the first read, and exposes and makes them all the more disturbing on the second. Also, I remember reading somewhere that back when it was first published, many readers, casual and critics alike, found Dolores spoiled and partially guilty, somehow missing that the novel was written as a memoir to be presented to a jury by a pedophile, who is attempting to manipulate both them and the reader into thinking he wasn't all that bad. Incidentally, there are a few references to Justine in the novel.
I liked Pale Fire more. Though Nabokov revels in how pathetic, awkward, or delusional protagonists like Humbert are too much for things like Lolita to be pure tragedies. At times Lolita came off like the prison diary of a chomo Don Quixote with how much the character bloviates and embellishes.
 
Higanjima 彼岸島 and its sequels the last 47 days 最後の47日間 and 48 days later... 48日後…: most likely the longest japanese horror gorefest body horror manga that is still ongoing today (2002-present)
Story is not its strong point, human characters are samey design with many characters having same facial expressions and dumb motives, the monster designs and backgrounds are the star of the show.
wikipedia link
some random book cover art and artwork for show (most like nsfl):
1724141000048.png1724140866907.png1724140917212.png

1724141316267.png1724141459557.png1724141713332.png1724141912201.png1724142049085.png
 
Haven't read the entire thread so apologies if these have already been discussed but:

Sharks and Little Fish by Wolfgang Ott is the best novel of WW2 I've ever read. It follows the career of a sailor who is conscripted to work on minesweepers and then on U-boats. It is not shy of depicting the horrors of war and makes Das Boot and The Cruel Sea seem prissy and dated. (Ott himself actually served on submarines, unlike the guy who wrote Das Boot.)

The Wooden Shepherdess by Richard Hughes, a brilliant writer who only ever completed four novels despite living to his 70s. This was the last one he finished, although it was meant to be the second in a trilogy. It's a historical novel with a broad sweep but the first section is really disturbing. The hero is a naive young English aristocrat who somehow finds himself stranded in backwoods America and falls in with a gang of kids who are all much more experienced and knowledgeable about sex than he is.
 
Eh, it’s a short fun read. It’s nothing that you don’t expect from a ‘bUT what iF we treat humans JUST like our MEAT’ shtick. But I do hope there to be better novels about the theme. I don’t need a vegan preaching how apathetic we are towards nature. Even Matthew Stokoe’s “Cows” got me thinking about an inherent, consumerist perversion more than Tender is the Flesh does. Given though, it’s also in the genre of extreme horror where everyone tries to out-gross each other.
Similar but not really political (and still written by Mr. Edgy) Neuropath by R. S. Bakker.
 
I'm not into Manga, but I've been meaning to get into some Junji Ito.
I might be a little late, but I have a bunch of Ito's collections and Shiver is probably my favorite one. Someone has uploaded a lot of his work to the internet archive: https://archive.org/details/ito-junji-stuff-3

Personally I like flicking through the books more than reading them online, but it's worth reading a few of them digitally to see if you'd enjoy the books.
 
I might be a little late, but I have a bunch of Ito's collections and Shiver is probably my favorite one. Someone has uploaded a lot of his work to the internet archive: https://archive.org/details/ito-junji-stuff-3

Personally I like flicking through the books more than reading them online, but it's worth reading a few of them digitally to see if you'd enjoy the books.
No, I appreciate it, actually. I'm late in coming back to this thread, anyway, so who am I to judge for being tardy to the party, as it were?
 
That book made me feel bad and empty inside. It was great, one of my favorites.
I don't remember much of it but I loved the "well-founded" hopelessness. Wish I knew of more books that depicted the whole "giving the fuck up on life and your potential in life" without it just being a doomer circlejerk. Maybe more realistic: Moving back home and trying to make something of life in your original community. Anyone?
 
I don't remember much of it but I loved the "well-founded" hopelessness. Wish I knew of more books that depicted the whole "giving the fuck up on life and your potential in life" without it just being a doomer circlejerk. Maybe more realistic: Moving back home and trying to make something of life in your original community. Anyone?
I don't know what genre that would specifically be, maybe slice of life or melodramas? But doomer circlejerk books is partially the theme of this thread so I don't think you're going to be finding much recommendations for books about hope from the people recommending books about skull fucking and suicide.
 
I think it was okay, enjoyed it best with brain on autopilot as the protagonist’s do all kinds of random nonsense according to a plan everyone but the reader knows, with Soviet Union sociopolitical commentary drizzled in. “Day of the Oprichnik” is in the same vein
I read only "tastiest" parts of this book because I found getting through the whole soviet "social realism"-esque text irritating.
"Blue Lard" by the same author is a whole different story. It's just DIFFERENT
 
I'm not into Manga, but I've been meaning to get into some Junji Ito.
Another skin-crawler manga is Shuzo Oshimi's Chi No Wadachi (Blood on the Tracks, or A Trail of Blood, depending on who you ask).

It's about a kid who's slowly realizing his mom is psycho. You will be hard-pressed to find more disturbing hyper-realistic drawings of the human face.

a410ae9045120c3051efb60599ad2147-2484029724.jpg
 
Atrás
Top Abajo