Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch - Turns out he was a groomer

[AI Wendigo]

Are you retards back to arguing semantics on what "inappropriately messaging a minor" means. He is the one who said he was inappropriately messaging a minor. It's also not hard to realize that "inappropriate messaging" was him probably downplaying how serious it actually is to avoid further backlash. That's why he's not dropping logs or trying to clear his name, because he's a pedophile that was chatting up kids and anything else he says will damn him further.

And no one ever mentioned the minor's age, it's his retarded fans that keep saying "well it must have been a 17 year old" because they're huffing copium and don't want to accept he was trying to diddle kids.

He said that there were conversations with a minor, (which could be anything under 21 years in the USA depending on State as you can't even drink until you're 21) which leaned into the inappropriate side.

What kind of retard thinks people are talking about 20 year olds when they say "minor".

This edgy pedophile isn't worth all this effort to trollshield.

 

[Contracted Weeb]

The fact that a 40 year old man with a wife and daughter texted a minor inappropriately says everything. I appeal to him to drop the logs and prove his innocence but he wont because he knows what hes done. Yeah its good to have evidence to back it up but he literally admits to it in his statement. Whatever the severity of it he still knowingly had innapropriate conversations with a minor.

Sorry kid your favourite streamer is a pedophile.

 

[Ricardo Canitrot]

I think he'll get his ytt partner program reinstated with YouTube and be back there. I think he'll be back by October at the latest for the drop of the new COD.

And you know what, he'll be bigger than ever. All the haters will be flocking to his streams to try and drop their favourite doc to pdf shit tier meme spergs in his chat. In pure seethe as they are there to downvote and hate watch.

He's coming back. And there's nothing that the blue haired trannies can do about it.

Oh baby baby

are you a tranny or under age? the doc wont fuck you

 

[Insuficiencia renal]

shocked

 

[luigismanslave]

are you a tranny or under age? the doc wont fuck you

if he was underage he'd probably have a chance, but alas he's naive and stupid enough to think youtube isn't also run by blue haired trannies, and that even if disrespect was somehow vindicated and proven innocent by the logs he hasn't turned himself into a toxic asset by confessing to kiddy diddling in character and then proceeding to get in retard battles with xitter retards over it. a man that goofy will fuck up again, and nobody is gonna want a piece of that.

 

[NERF or NOTHIN']

The fact that a 40 year old man with a wife and daughter texted a minor inappropriately says everything. I appeal to him to drop the logs and prove his innocence but he wont because he knows what hes done.

If he ever drops the logs (he won't) then he'll stop getting harassed. He's taking the "lol you can't do anything about it" approach, it appears.

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

are you a tranny or under age? the doc wont fuck you

You know you'll be hate watching too, right?

 

[Ricardo Canitrot]

You know you'll be hate watching too, right?

lol no i almost have no game for games anyways

 

[Bob Barbas]

The fact that a 40 year old man with a wife and daughter texted a minor inappropriately says everything. I appeal to him to drop the logs and prove his innocence but he wont because he knows what hes done. Yeah its good to have evidence to back it up but he literally admits to it in his statement. Whatever the severity of it he still knowingly had innapropriate conversations with a minor.

Sorry kid your favourite streamer is a pedophile.

Don't forget he also then tried to edit out the "Minor" part of that statement, then immediately put it back in when people called him out on it.
Like genuinely, how braindead do you have to be?

 

[The handsome tard]

Don't forget he also then tried to edit out the "Minor" part of that statement, then immediately put it back in when people called him out on it.
Like genuinely, how braindead do you have to be?

You dont understand like I do. Its a conspiracy theory to bring Dr Disrespect down, that minor was a paid actor and he is being forced into a false confession!

PS: Its satire, niggas

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

lol no i almost have no game for games anyways

I know there's a reply that makes sense in there somewhere... Maybe try again? But without your cock in your mouth?

On topic. What, if anything, has Twitch said publicly about this situation?
And no, not the clout chasers who used to fucking work there.

 

[VasonJoorhees]

Lmfao, this Act Man guy is such an attention whore. He HAS to insert himself in every situation when he has no place in them.

That and Act Man was fighting tooth and nail to defend Docs' name when the accusations originally came out, defending him like his life depended on it. Pretty sad considering Doc never even acknowledged this guys existence, they weren't friends or anything.

Now seeing him trying to dunk on Doc after he was one of his most staunch supporters should tell you everything you need to know, don't buy any clout chasing bullshit this guy is selling.

Did he admit to sexting a child? This is the grey area on word interpretation. He didn't say that. He said that there were conversations with a minor, (which could be anything under 21 years in the USA depending on State as you can't even drink until you're 21) which leaned into the inappropriate side.

There is no "grey area" lol. Minor means "not a legal adult", not "someone below legal drinking age". Go virtually dickride predators elsewhere.

 

[Redoniblueoni]

There is no "grey area" lol. Minor means "not a legal adult", not "someone below legal drinking age". Go virtually dickride predators elsewhere.

The issue here is you guys can't see grey areas, it's pure black/white thinking. He's either only guilty, a predator, a pedo, and the worst of the worst or he's completely innocent on all fronts and it can't possibly be the 2nd because he did say he inappropriately messaged a minor.

The issue is what exactly did he say, was it terribly inappropriate, like sexts to a very young child? Possible. Was it inappropriate jokes to someone who counts as a minor which could be anyone under 18? Who knows. If he really was reported to NCMEC as Slasher says, it's more likely to be the latter since it wasn't taken further, like through the legal system.

I'd feel differently if he had a track record of making weird comments about under 18s, had done this multiple times, ect. He hasn't. Hes much different to Chris Tyson, and yet, alot of the people most vocal about Dr Disrespect are completely silent about Chris Tyson or even running defense for him. Smells weird.

Also even if it was innocent jokes it really wouldn't benefit him to leak the logs if he can do that at all. He would be guilty in the eyes of people who already hate him regardless. He might not be able to as well, as this is all tied up in NDAs and the settlement with twitch after his payout. Also why doesn't twitch release the logs? Why didn't slasher? If they're so damning you can ask the same thing about them.

 

[Bob Barbas]

That and Act Man was fighting tooth and nail to defend Docs' name when the accusations originally came out, defending him like his life depended on it. Pretty sad considering Doc never even acknowledged this guys existence, they weren't friends or anything.

Now seeing him trying to dunk on Doc after he was one of his most staunch supporters should tell you everything you need to know, don't buy any clout chasing bullshit this guy is selling.

Wow, I mean I was pretty neutral on Act Man before, he had some brainlet takes but overall his videos were usually enjoyable, well his non-drama related videos anyway.
Always thought it was kind of gay that he started doubling as a drama tuber.
Hearing this though, yeah he's definitely shaping up to be a bit of a lolcow, I was under the impression he was at least somewhat familiar with Disrespect or knew him in some way. That's just sad. Yeah, his seeming need to insert himself into situations that he has absolutely no stake in is going to bite him in the ass majorly eventually. It's inevitable.

The issue here is you guys can't see grey areas, it's pure black/white thinking. He's either only guilty, a predator, a pedo, and the worst of the worst or he's completely innocent on all fronts and it can't possibly be the 2nd because he did say he inappropriately messaged a minor.

Okay, I admit I do somewhat understand this line of thinking. But Disrespect himself is definitely not helping his case by being such a bumbling retard and trying to keep his faggot persona in the midst of all this. I feel like he would have been way better received if he stopped playing pretend for 5 minutes and addressed the situation as Herschel Beahm, not Dr. Disrespect. Why any sane adult would think that's a good idea in the slightest is beyond me which leads me to believe he's genuinely retarded in some way.

Spoiler: The Long Answer

Like how autistic do you have to be to not take off the shades and wig for 5 seconds to address serious allegations? He clearly lacks professionalism and I feel like as many have theorized before that the "character" isn't as much of a character as he would lead you to believe but moreso an outlet to be an asshole under the guise of it being a "character" he plays.

That being said Twitch's actions do not make any sense either. NDAs do not cover illegal activity so that definitely leans more into him having not committed a crime, so that would mean no explicit pictures were exchanged however there is the rumor he was planning to meet up with them at a con before Twitch pulled the plug implying they prevented the potential crime from taking place. But since no crime truly took place there was nothing they could give to the authorities.

Though why would they make a deal with him behind closed doors? The obvious answer is money, you see it all the time. Pedos and freaks covering eachother for cash. Maybe Twitch even held it over his head in some way which is why it took so long for them to actually ban him? Maybe he did or said something behind the scenes they were unhappy with and decided "Alright this guy is done." but since it would technically be illegal to slander him publicly they elected not to?

It's all just guessing at this point, honestly to me both sides are looking retarded and guilty in some way. Dr. Disrespect is obviously guilty for being a 30+ year old man privately talking to some random kid online he has no relation to AND HE ADMITTED IT WAS A KID, you can cope all you want but he wouldn't have tried to cover up the minor part if that wasn't the case and then immediately add it back when people noticed what he did.

But Twitch is also retarded for playing his retard games and not just kicking him to the curb for being a weirdo. If they really wanted to get rid of him they should've done it immediately instead of years later hence why I feel like money was involved, they were trying to get as much cash out of the creep as possible before casting him aside. Covering for a freak tranny chasing pedo like him for cash is pretty deplorable.

The Short Aswer: Both sides are guilty in some manner. Twitch for covering for him for so long and Doc for being a tranny chasing bumbling retard.

 

[ddlloo]

The issue here is you guys can't see grey areas, it's pure black/white thinking. He's either only guilty, a predator, a pedo, and the worst of the worst or he's completely innocent on all fronts and it can't possibly be the 2nd because he did say he inappropriately messaged a minor.

The issue is what exactly did he say, was it terribly inappropriate, like sexts to a very young child? Possible. Was it inappropriate jokes to someone who counts as a minor which could be anyone under 18? Who knows. If he really was reported to NCMEC as Slasher says, it's more likely to be the latter since it wasn't taken further, like through the legal system.

I'd feel differently if he had a track record of making weird comments about under 18s, had done this multiple times, ect. He hasn't. Hes much different to Chris Tyson, and yet, alot of the people most vocal about Dr Disrespect are completely silent about Chris Tyson or even running defense for him. Smells weird.

Also even if it was innocent jokes it really wouldn't benefit him to leak the logs if he can do that at all. He would be guilty in the eyes of people who already hate him regardless. He might not be able to as well, as this is all tied up in NDAs and the settlement with twitch after his payout. Also why doesn't twitch release the logs? Why didn't slasher? If they're so damning you can ask the same thing about them.

He himself said it was inappropriate, dude. He offered no defence or mitigating circumstances. In fact about the only refutation he offered was a false one, where he said he never met up with the person but the allegation was that he was planning to meet up with them.

I just don't see how a guy known for cheating on his wife, then further outed for chasing a tranny and getting his rocks off to it while lying to her about getting her a twitch partnership, gets much of a benefit of the doubt with this stuff.

Pedo? IDK. I don't have much reason to think he wouldn't fuck an underage fan if he thought he could get away with it. However I can confidently call him scum, and I don't need to know the explicit details of his messages to believe that.

 

[Redoniblueoni]

@ddlloo Do you have a source where he said he intended to meet up with a minor?

Also the tranny post was unsubstantiated outside of what the tranny said and said tranny deleted the post shortly after it was made. That's not exactly rock solid proof to me and not something I trust 100%. But it's possible

And like I said these things are tied up with legal implications. He might end up telling the full story in the future, and I'd say it's likely we'll get more information when he inevitably returns. As others have pointed out, those tweets he made were probably written or heavily influenced by lawyers.

 

[ddlloo]

@ddlloo Do you have a source where he said he intended to meet up with a minor?

Reread what I said. The allegation was that he was planning to meet up with them, but his refutation was that he didn't meet up with them. Two different things.

 

[Redoniblueoni]

Reread what I said. The allegation was that he was planning to meet up with them, but his refutation was that he didn't meet up with them. Two different things.

He just said he never sent pictures or met up with them, and the absolute worst possible read of that based off allegations in which we have no proof is that he might have wanted to meet up with them, which we have no proof of. If you want to condemn a man for your opinion he wanted to meet up with a minor based off no proof that's fine but it does demonstrate the black/white thinking I mentioned already.

 

[ddlloo]

He just said he never sent pictures or met up with them, and the absolute worst possible read of that based off allegations in which we have no proof is that he might have wanted to meet up with them, which we have no proof of. If you want to condemn a man for your opinion he wanted to meet up with a minor based off no proof that's fine but it does demonstrate the black/white thinking I mentioned already.

If I accuse you of beating a guy up and you retort by saying you never killed them, do you think the initial accusation is more or less likely to be true?
It's the exact same argument here. He could have denied trying/organising to meet up with them, but he didn't and that wasn't because he was ignoring the allegation.

 

[Redoniblueoni]

If I accuse you of beating a guy up and you retort by saying you never killed them, do you think the initial accusation is more or less likely to be true?
It's the exact same argument here. He could have denied trying/organising to meet up with them, but he didn't and that wasn't because he was ignoring the allegation.

That would make sense if Dr disrespect was responding to someone directly which he was not. He was addressing allegations in a post written or guided by lawyers in all likelihood. You're drawing conclusions for yourself based off what Slasher has accused. You don't have to address every possible worst case accusation in your PR statement. If Slasher is to be believed here and that is what happened, as you suggest, we should also believe slasher saying he was reported to NCMEC. If there was real intent to meet up at twitchcon that certainly sounds illegal and worth pressing charges for. Unless you think NCMEC is in on this and is protecting dr disrespect for... reasons.