💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Votos: 40 9.9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Votos: 14 3.5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Votos: 12 3.0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Votos: 192 47.5%
  • Continuance...

    Votos: 146 36.1%

  • Total de votantes
    404
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Just put the child down if you can't handle it and walk away. If you don't, bad things might happen.

It was in the context of being tired and exhausted and not being able to put a baby to bed.
I wonder if Lord Balldo had a drunken Jack Torrance style event where he got angry at his crying son and injured him. Leaning towards probably not but with what we've learned about Nick its very difficult to not view anything he does or says in the worst light possible.
 
Última edición:
1720034803274.png
 
Hey, it doesn't say "Locals Streams" so he's in the clear.
Well, no. Elissa Clips can be a witness of the state. His Locals' videos are probably harder to grab and likely anyone referencing "his videos" were talking about the many YT clips floating around. As if they're going to pay the $5/mo fee to see him eat ramen. Even the govt knows better than to waste money on that swill.

Yes, I know they can request it directly. It's a joke.
 
Nicholas Rekieta dijo:
Since you all are retarded and don't have any way to know...
Yes, Mr. Rekieta, we accept you accusation of being retarded and unknowledgeable. Could you please enlighten us with the primary source documents? If convenient, all the court provided evidence would be ideal. Thank you for your consideration.
 
Sorry Nick. But "not sufficient" is not the same thing as "no actual basis to them".

And "only" isn't a word you should probably use to refer to two CPS investigations concerning your family prior to your arrest. It really looks kinda bad.
He also appears to have implicitly confirmed that the May 16, 2024 document had nothing to do with the report from the pastor, since that clearly did not get "screened out as not sufficient and ignored".

letter5.png
letter4.png

This would be consistent my reading of the the documents posted in the past month which was that they weren't informed of the situation (and thus, likely, of the report from the pastor which precipitated the events) until after the search was about to get underway.

may.png
 
Press release from the Balldo General Office. Don't shoot the messenger.

Ver archivo adjunto 6151035
Walter-White-Screaming-At-Hank-thumbnail-url-5y8nni.jpg
NICK! NIIIICKKK!
DON'T DO IT! STOP THE SHOWER MESSAGES! OFFICER JOSHUA MONSOON, THE CPS WOMAN AND THE PROSECUTOR ARE READING THE FARMS! YOU ARE RUINING YOUR OWN CASE NICK! THIS ISN'T EVEN HELPING YOU WIN THE PUBLIC OVER!
 
Última edición:
Press release from the Balldo General Office. Don't shoot the messenger.

Ver archivo adjunto 6151035
Nick should stop being a pussy and just make an account, proxy posting via shower texting Jersh is pretty gay.

P.S. Nick, when you get out of prison, 25 years from now, what will be the first thing you do after your 41 year old son picks you up?
 
What a smug prick. "Erm actually the 2009 case was for the foster kids, not us, retards." Yeah, the thread was already speculating that was the case. Which you know because you're reading the thread. Maybe spend less time worrying about an Internet gossip forum and more time worrying about your ruined life, broken dick, blacked wife, and drugged children.
 
Oh yeah I'm definitely going to take a lying, disingenuous, censorious sack of shits word at face value. Too much of a cowardly little faggot to even just post here. Pathetic.
 
He also appears to have implicitly confirmed that the May 16, 2024 document had nothing to do with the report from the pastor. Since that clearly did not get "screened out as not sufficient and ignored".
So you are taking Nick to mean that 2/28/09 doesn't count, and 2/15/23 and 5/16/24 are the two that were ignored?

From the "State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta" thread OP:
On May 16th, 2024 a mandatory reporter reported (after four people had confided in him) in person to the police about possible child abuse at the Rekieta residence.
It is very likely that the mandatory reporter's information went from the police to CPS on 5/16/24. Technically CPS might have "ignored it" in the sense that they waited for the police to investigate and decide what to do. CPS did not intervene until the police told them that the Rekietas were going to be arrested.
 
Now having a CPS case or two against you in a city; that could be just nothing, people call CPS when they see a kid on a bike on the sidewalk sometimes.

But if you're off in a rural fuck-fuck house a billion miles from anywhere? That is either SWATTing (child stalker style) or something else. CPS closing the case because they don't have enough evidence to do anything doesn't indicate a damn thing.
 
Hi stupid fuck, since you're so very invested in 'correcting the record' do us all a favor and keep shitting out your cope streams. They definitely are working as intended and show you are a true crusader for our collective liberty against the no good rotten gubberment.

I hope you live forever and win a million dollars.
 
So you are taking Nick to mean that 2/28/09 doesn't count, and 2/15/23 and 5/16/24 are the two that were ignored?
That's literally what he said, so yes

There is only 1 report from 2009 and only 3 from before the arrest, so that interpretation is the only one possible

letter5.png

It is very likely that the mandatory reporter's information went from the police to CPS on 5/16/24. Technically CPS might have "ignored it" in the sense that they waited for the police to investigate and decide what to do.
:disagree:

Disagree.

That report would not have been "screened out as not sufficient and ignored because there was no actual basis for" it. Clearly there was a basis for it. It's not consistent with what Rekieta said.
 
Nick's gonna have to get used to not being believed since he took all his credibility and snorted it. You're gonna have to show some proof of any claims you make, your word isn't worth shit buddy.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo