Billionaire-backed plan to erect model California city qualifies for ballot

The billionaire proponents of a brand new city that would rise from the rolling prairie northeast of the San Francisco Bay cleared their first big hurdle Tuesday, when the Solano County Registrar of Voters certified the group had enough signatures to put its proposal before local voters in November

The group backing the measure, called California Forever, must now convince voters to get behind the audacious idea of erecting a walkable and environmentally friendly community with tens of thousands of homes, along with a sports center, parks, bike lanes, open space and a giant solar farm on what is now pastureland.

Led by entrepreneur Jan Sramek, a former Goldman Sachs trader, the venture is backed by a sparkling roster of tech titans, including LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman; venture capitalist Marc Andreessen; and Patrick and John Collison, who founded the payment-processing company Stripe.

In an interview Tuesday, Sramek said the question before Solano County voters is nothing less than “a referendum on what do we want the future of California to be.”

The state, he said, was once a great place “that built all these incredible things, bridges, water infrastructure, great public works, and now it is this oasis for the rich, or people who bought houses when they were cheap and they get to live here.”

Amid a critical lack of affordable housing, he said, his proposed new city offers a way “out of this defeatist-build-nothing-argue-about-everything mode.”

But the proposal faces opposition from some local leaders, along with environmental groups concerned about the loss of natural habitat. Project opponents said a recent poll they conducted found that 70% of the people surveyed were skeptical.

"There’s a litany of reasons” to oppose the project, said former Solano County Supervisor Duane Kromm, who has pushed for growth limits in the county and heads the group that funded the poll. Among the reasons, he said, is the county’s longtime commitment to keeping development confined to existing cities, along with what he said is a lack of transparency by project proponents.


Rep. Mike Thompson (D-St. Helena) went so far as to publish an op-ed against the project in the local newspaper, writing: “I strongly support efforts to increase the number of good-paying jobs, implement clean energy, and provide opportunity for our region. But these efforts require sound public policy that works with our community, not lavish promises that may never be realized.”


Some of the opposition stems from California Forever’s rocky introduction to the local political scene: The effort, launched under a cloak of secrecy, became ensnared in controversy last year amid unfounded speculation that the land buyers were foreign agents intent on espionage.


That’s because for years before proponents revealed their plans, they used an LLC called Flannery Associates to buy up land from farmers in a vast swath of the county, stretching from Rio Vista in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and west toward Travis Air Force Base, without telling anyone why. News of the mysterious land sales, in an area so close to a crucial military installation, led some people, including government officials, to speculate it might be part of an effort by foreign spies to gain military secrets.


Last year, it was revealed instead as a bold plan to build a new city from the ground up and reinvent how housing is built in California.

In January, Sramek unveiled blueprints of the new community and announced his group would begin a signature-gathering campaign to put a measure before county voters to amend zoning regulations. His group spent $2 million on those efforts from January to March. The group also began rolling out a list of benefits voters could expect from the new community.


Among them: a pledge to create at least 15,000 jobs; $500 million to assist with down payments for housing, scholarships and other benefits for residents; $200 million to revitalize the downtown core of Solano County communities such as Rio Vista, Benicia and Dixon; and commitments to preserve open space, create walkable neighborhoods and improve traffic flow on nearby roadways.


On May 12, Californian Forever announced it was in conversations with 12 employers interested in expanding into the county. On May 21, the group said it had given out $500,000 in grants to local organizations. And on June 4, the group promised to build a regional youth sports complex, so children wouldn’t have to travel as often to San Francisco or Sacramento for club sports.


Sramek has moved with his family and their golden retriever to the Solano County town of Fairfield. He said Tuesday he feels welcomed in his new community and professed to love the heat — even on a day when the temperature topped 100 degrees.

He said he believes voters can be persuaded that his project could help solve the state's housing crisis and improve the county’s economic standing. People have been “disappointed by developers before,” he said. But he said his group is “really serious” about keeping its promises.


Some elected officials say they are listening.

Ron Kott, the mayor of Rio Vista, a city of about 10,000 that abuts the property California Forever wants to develop, said he sees “a lot of advantages.” Among them, he said, it could enhance his town’s retail scene, and possibly bring a much-needed health care clinic.


“I need more business,” he said. “I need more sales tax revenue. I need essential services.”

Article
 
I’m sure Night City Sramek City will be a great place to live.
 
Why do you need to vote to build a city? Just buy the land and build it.
It’s California their housing market is fucked specifically because the state government has so many different regulatory and planning groups, all of whom need to approve and be paid before any work can even be done.
It’s going to be at least a decade before they can even get the plans approved
 
Well, if they legally own the land, and it was just used as pasture land, isn't and never was a natural preserve and contains no endangered or threatened animals or would interfere with such, more power to them. It's not like the guy wants to build a toxic waste dump, he's actually trying to do something good for the area. Why would anyone with any sense object to that?

Californians are strange. Even in NY, if you buy the land, it isn't important for something like endangered animals, and you're not trying to build something like an industrial waste incinerator, you can basically do whatever the fuck you want with it. In most other states you don't even have to meet that level of scrutiny, you can just buy the land and fucking build on it. In a place like MI, you would only need to vote on it if you were trying to incorporate an unincorporated area just to make sure all the people living in the area want to be incorporated and you aren't trying to force them to do something they are against. If a simple majority of people vote "Yes, I want to live in Asshole Township" then boom, welcome to Asshole Township, enjoy being an Asshole with a capital A.
 
“I strongly support efforts to increase the number of good-paying jobs, implement clean energy, and provide opportunity for our region. But these efforts require sound public policy that works with our community, not lavish promises that may never be realized.”
Nigger the government of California is nothing but lavish promises never realized unless it involves fucking over productive people in which case they're lining up around the goddamn corner. Explain to me how the billionaires are any worse, exactly?
 
brand new city that would rise from the rolling prairie northeast of the San Francisco Bay
environmentally friendly community with tens of thousands of homes, along with a sports center, parks, bike lanes, open space and a giant solar farm on what is now pastureland.
Ah yes. Nothing screams environmentally friendly more than decimating wildlife and pastures to pave it over and install a "giant solar farm."
 
Can't wait for the new city to get its tenants in the form of homeless that infest San Fran and LA.

Do these billionaires really think that making a new city would just magically keep the dregs out of their territory?
This city is for the poors. That’s why it’s hyper dense with no cars with only a single train line to bring the workers to the offices and homes of the rich.
 
Well, if they legally own the land, and it was just used as pasture land, isn't and never was a natural preserve and contains no endangered or threatened animals or would interfere with such, more power to them. It's not like the guy wants to build a toxic waste dump, he's actually trying to do something good for the area. Why would anyone with any sense object to that?
I think the big sticking points as far as the government is concerned are going to be water availability, wastewater, public services such as police and fire, and transportation. The usual suspects are going to freak out about various fish, birds, and mice, but I think the place is going to be far enough away from the Delta shoreline that those will be handwaved.

They basically have to guess how many people are actually going to move out there and they don't want to blow a hole in the budget for a handful of assholes. The county doesn't want to pay to build a massive freshwater pipe going out there if it's going to be a hamlet of 50 houses that could be serviced by a well. Maybe the developer has to pay, IDK, but the state is full of half-built housing developments that were abandoned for various reasons. Like someone else said, this is going to be 10 years of paperwork before a single shovelful of dirt is turned, and the market could easily take a shit between now and then.

In the smoke-filled backroom, hunting is going to be the big one. It's good pheasant habitat and there are a lot of $$$$$$$ duck clubs in the area.

We're talking about the big blank spot in the middle of this map.

 
This city is for the poors. That’s why it’s hyper dense with no cars with only a single train line to bring the workers to the offices and homes of the rich.

So they saw Magnasanti and thought; "This is how humanity should live. One giant slum with us on top."

Then again, no surprise here. Hope they enjoy cyber dystopia problems.
 
California added 10x the number of cities in the time period from 1950-1970 that it did in the 21st century. Adding cities made California prosperous. Stopping cities from being erected in order to artificially inflate the cost of urban real estate made it crowded and unpleasant.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo