US D.C. elections office beset by calls opposing noncitizen voting - Agency’s executive director says the environment around elections feels ‘more unsafe.’

D.C. elections office beset by calls opposing noncitizen voting
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Ellie Silverman
2024-06-03 23:27:44GMT

dc01.jpg
A message opposing the right of noncitizens to vote in local elections outside the voting center at the Georgetown Library on Sunday. Monica Evans, executive director of the D.C. Board of Elections, said election workers washed away the message before voters arrived. (D.C. Board of Elections)

D.C. election workers have been fielding angry calls and emails for more than a month from people who oppose allowing noncitizen residents to vote in local elections, leaving the head of the D.C. Board of Elections concerned about safety at the polls in Tuesday’s primary election.

“I am definitely nervous,” said Monica Evans, the executive director of the D.C. Board of Elections. “The environment around elections has felt more unsafe.”

In one voice mail, which Evans played for The Washington Post and was first reported by WUSA9, a caller yells: “Where the hell do you get off letting illegals vote? This is the nation’s capital. You are traitors, traitors to our country.”

Evans said that employees have been encouraged to cover up any D.C. Board of Elections paraphernalia they may be wearing or holding while outside the office in case someone who opposes noncitizen voting directs their opinion toward a staffer. D.C. police spokesman Tom Lynch said in a statement Monday that officers would be near polling locations “ensuring safety for voters.”

These precautions come amid heightened concerns across the country that bitter partisanship could lead to disruptions at the polls, voter intimidation and potentially violent challenges to the November presidential election results. The D.C. Board of Elections added armed security to its office headquarters and mail ballot processing center this year, Evans said.

For the first time in this year’s D.C. primary election, noncitizen residents — some of whom have lived in the District for decades — will be allowed to cast a ballot.

The new D.C. law stipulates that noncitizens are eligible to vote if they are at least 18 years old as of Election Day, have been a D.C. resident for at least 30 days before the election, have not been deemed by a court legally incompetent to vote and are not claiming the right to vote in any state, territory or country. As of May 29, 523 noncitizen D.C. residents were registered to vote, said Sarah Graham, a spokeswoman for the D.C. Board of Elections.

The law has faced opposition from those who argue that noncitizens, regardless of how long they have lived and worked in this country, should not be able to vote. The U.S. House advanced a bill last month to block noncitizen voting in D.C., though it’s unlikely the bill will move forward in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Graham, the spokeswoman for the D.C. Board of Elections, estimates the office has received more than 60 calls and voice mails opposing the right of noncitizens to vote. As recently as Sunday, the anger made its way to an early-voting center at the Georgetown Library in the form of a chalk message that read: “VOTING NOT A RIGHT. IS A PRIVILEGE OF CITIZEN,” according to a photo shared by Evans.

Evans said election workers noticed a spike in angry calls after Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.), shared a message on X criticizing noncitizen voting. He wrote that “Washington, D.C. is actively encouraging noncitizens to vote” and called it “absurd” above a photo of a pamphlet from the Board of Elections.

In a response to a request for comment, Steil said in a statement, “There is absolutely no place for violence or intimidation aimed at election workers.”

Steil’s message also misrepresented the D.C. Board of Elections’ role in the process, Evans said; her office was simply providing nonpartisan information to voters.

“I just wish people would appreciate the fact that we are merely doing our jobs. We are merely adhering to the law,” Evans said. “I think I would be in more trouble if I decided to pick and choose what laws we were going to enforce.”
 
This is getting really, really close to 1776 territory.
No, it's getting close to straight up despot territory.

Sooner or later TPTB will drop the charade and just have an unelected ruler. The difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was just a single new layer of government that added a "first person" above the existing governmental structure.
 
No, it's getting close to straight up despot territory.

Sooner or later TPTB will drop the charade and just have an unelected ruler. The difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was just a single new layer of government that added a "first person" above the existing governmental structure.
Eh, Octavian killed his entire opposition and made examples of the few who tried to backstab him. He effectively was an autocrat who knew that you needed to please the people who managed day-to-day and season-to-season operations more than the guys who “technically” owned land, but had been renting it out for centuries.

He basically just killed the middle men for a while.
 
In a sane society any non citizen would be watched carefully. In a sane society any non-citizen who committed a crime against a citizen would be swiftly and publicly executed. The question now is why would you even want to be a citizen? You gain no benefit. Why should you pay taxes other than the threat of violence?

To the average person the theatrics are in dire proximity of falling apart and revealing to the citizen the chains they wear. The second the citizen really comprehends the truth of their chains is the time when people start looking up and applying learnings from YouTube. Remember folks, no knot has practical use like that of the hangman's noose!
 
These precautions come amid heightened concerns across the country that bitter partisanship could lead to disruptions at the polls, voter intimidation and potentially violent challenges to the November presidential election results. The D.C. Board of Elections added armed security to its office headquarters and mail ballot processing center this year, Evans said.
This is a literary device called "foreshadowing."
 
When are they just going to openly say US elections will be held online for everyone in the world to participate in?

It's the logical endgame at this point.
You left out the part where they only count votes for the Democrats.
If you aren't a US citizen, you should have no right to vote, period.
Sadly a lot of US politicians didn't get that memo or outright ignore it.
 
Eh, Octavian killed his entire opposition and made examples of the few who tried to backstab him. He effectively was an autocrat who knew that you needed to please the people who managed day-to-day and season-to-season operations more than the guys who “technically” owned land, but had been renting it out for centuries.

He basically just killed the middle men for a while.
I'm not arguing that Octavian didn't purge the offices and certain senators, it's that the internal structure still remained the same.

By keeping most of the bureaucracy intact you could fundamentally change a country while still appearing to be 100% legitimate.
 
This is another instance of me being completely wrong when I said “We’re not that retarded” eight years ago.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo