US Military recruits would not be tested for marijuana under House draft bill

Archive: https://archive.ph/roxLl
Source:https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us...-testing-military-ndaa-recruits-13889432.html
1716706999445.png
WASHINGTON — New recruits and incoming officers into the military would not have to undergo mandatory cannabis testing under the House’s version of an annual must-pass defense policy bill.
The draft of the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act bars the services from requiring an individual to submit to marijuana testing as a condition of enlisting or commissioning.
Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., attempted to add the provision as an amendment to last year’s authorization bill, which sets priorities for the Pentagon, but was unsuccessful. Its inclusion this year was “a collaborative effort,” he said Friday.

Supporters of the measure believe it will help the military attract recruits at a time when few young people want to or are eligible to serve.
“I do not believe that prior use of cannabis should exclude Americans from enlisting in the armed forces,” Gaetz said last year. “We should embrace them for stepping up to serve our country.”
The military has long maintained a zero-tolerance, marijuana-use policy but has revisited and loosened its rules in recent years as more states legalized the drug.
The Air Force and Space Force began a pilot program in 2022 that allows some recruits who test positive for THC — the main psychoactive component in marijuana — to retake the test after 90 days.
The Army, Navy and Marine Corps also give applicants second chances to take a cannabis test and the Navy announced in February that it will no longer send home recruits who test positive for marijuana upon their arrival at boot camp.
A 2021 Rand Corp. study of the Army’s marijuana waiver policies showed recruits who received waivers for testing positive for cannabis or admitting to past drug use “perform no worse” than other soldiers.

“That should be welcome news in recruiting offices nationwide. More than half of all new recruits come from states where marijuana is now legal, at least for medicinal use,” an essay accompanying the study said.
Recreational marijuana is now legal in 24 states – almost half the country – while medical marijuana use is legalized in another 14 states, according to the Pew Research Center.
The use and possession of marijuana remains illegal under federal law but President Joe Biden’s administration moved Thursday to downgrade marijuana from the most dangerous and restrictive category of drugs.
“Far too many lives have been upended because of a failed approach to marijuana, and I’m committed to righting those wrongs,” Biden said.

The House Armed Services Committee is expected to meet next week to discuss the defense authorization legislation. The Senate Armed Services Committee has not yet released its version of the bill.
1716707064435.jpeg
 
It's kind of odd to me that the US military even gives a shit about weed a this point. A pot head is an infinitely more capable soldier than a morbidly obese tranny, and those are mostly the types the military is after these days. At the very least there's some upsides to the pot head soldier.
 
It's kind of odd to me that the US military even gives a shit about weed a this point. A pot head is an infinitely more capable soldier than a morbidly obese tranny, and those are mostly the types the military is after these days. At the very least there's some upsides to the pot head soldier.
It's a leftover from prior moral panics about drugs and also the Nixon administration being spiteful towards the people who didn't vote for him. Anyway, it's long past time the US stopped caring so much about cannabis usage.
 
And here I thought they would look for people who do meth from time to time.
 
I’ve seen dudes while I was in the Navy completely self-destruct their lives and career from boozing. Married guys who got carried away with drinking completely capitulating their responsibilities to their family, 20 year olds (Japan’s drinking age is 20) showing up to work still wasted because they keep getting fucked up every night, and even an officer that got hit with a DUI by the gate guards coming in after a night of drinking.

I don’t know if relaxing the rules on weed is the right choice, but the military already has problems with alcohol big time. I developed a really bad drinking habit while I was in, but I doubt I would’ve been drinking as much as I did if I could’ve just smoked a joint after work.
 
It takes what, a week of sobriety to pass a drug test? Maybe a month if you comically overindulge? They want to enlist/commission people who are still using, and are possibly high at MEPS. And it only applies to accessions, it doesn't affect drug use in service, so the military will have to deal with all the stoners that normally would've been filtered out at MEPS. But at least the recruiting crisis will be solved.
 
I can't really see any issues, hardcore stoners aren't going to join the military anyways.
 
I’ve seen dudes while I was in the Navy completely self-destruct their lives and career from boozing. Married guys who got carried away with drinking completely capitulating their responsibilities to their family, 20 year olds (Japan’s drinking age is 20) showing up to work still wasted because they keep getting fucked up every night, and even an officer that got hit with a DUI by the gate guards coming in after a night of drinking.

I don’t know if relaxing the rules on weed is the right choice, but the military already has problems with alcohol big time. I developed a really bad drinking habit while I was in, but I doubt I would’ve been drinking as much as I did if I could’ve just smoked a joint after work.
That's kind of one of the things I wonder about it too. Most of the alcoholism is directly tied to stress, and weed is a relaxant.

Edit:
At the same time though, weed is psychologically addictive.
 
Just legalize it already
Completely legal from 1607 to 1937. 1585 in fact, I don't think the Roanoke Colony had drug laws. It's amazing how conditioned people have become to accept the federal government taking away rights and freedoms for "their own good". Just like alcohol prohibition, this was never the norm in the history of this country, it was entirely up to local communities and individuals to deal with these issues.

I really think the 17th Amendment and Prohibition caused most if not all of our problems today because those laws destroyed fundamental trust in and respect for laws and the government and turned the republic into nothing but mob rule.
 
Completely legal from 1607 to 1937. 1585 in fact, I don't think the Roanoke Colony had drug laws. It's amazing how conditioned people have become to accept the federal government taking away rights and freedoms for "their own good". Just like alcohol prohibition, this was never the norm in the history of this country, it was entirely up to local communities and individuals to deal with these issues.
Even if has a history of legality, it must be pointed out the situation with cannabis today is somewhat different then it was in the past.

For one, marijuana for a very long time was primarily used in a medicinal way.

1.png

Continuing on from this, the USA is probably going to see the recreational usage of weed on an unprecedented level if or when it is fully legalized.

2.png
2 2.png

Lastly, cannabis available today is usually a lot stronger then what would of been available in the 1700s or 1800s.

4.png
 
Even if has a history of legality, it must be pointed out the situation with cannabis today is somewhat different then it was in the past.
Sure, but there were a lot of other drugs that are identical to those today that were completely legal.

Continuing on from this, the USA is probably going to see the recreational usage of weed on an unprecedented level if or when it is fully legalized.
Which is completely fine as long as people are responsible and laws are enforced against impaired driving. If people substitute it for alcohol we come out ahead given the relative risk of the two. That being said, people shouldn't be swapping one substance to self-medicate with another, that's a sign of a much deeper issue.

Lastly, cannabis available today is usually a lot stronger then what would of been available in the 1700s or 1800s.
I question this one simply because of how THC breaks down over time and the ineffective testing that would have been in existence in the 1970s, THC as a component of cannabis itself wasn't isolated until the mid-60s. I don't think it was ever anywhere near as strong as it is today but it was higher than <2%.

Kind of the same situation that happened with gin in the UK though. Unlike beer or wine it was a much more concentrated version of the drug and led to more problems until it was regulated.
 
At the same time though, weed is psychologically addictive
This shit is retarded and only people who have never tried quitting an actually psychologically addictive substance believe this garbage. There are no negative effects when you stop smoking weed other than having weird dreams for a few nights. If I don't have a coffee by 10am I'm miserable as fuck and have a splitting headache.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo