US Social Security projected to cut benefits in 2035 barring a fix - It was previously forecasted the federal program would cut benefits in 2034.

The timeline to replenish Social Security is being extended. The federal retirement program said Monday it may not need to cut benefits until 2035, one year later than previously forecast, because of stronger performance by the U.S.

The new projection, from the Social Security Board of Trustees' annual report, amounts to "good news" for the program's 70 million beneficiaries, said Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, in a statement. Even so, he urged Congress to take steps to shore up the program to ensure it can pay full benefits "into the foreseeable future."

Social Security relies on its trust funds to provide monthly checks to beneficiaries, with the funds primarily financed through the payroll taxes that workers and businesses provide with each paycheck. But the funds' reserves are drawing down because spending is outpacing income, partly due to the wave of baby boomer retirements and an aging U.S. population.

Experts underscore that if the trust funds are depleted, benefits won't suddenly disappear. Instead, Social Security beneficiaries will face a cut to their monthly checks, with the agency on Monday projecting that recipients would lose 17% of their current benefits.

That would be painful for millions of retired and disabled Americans, but it represents a modest improvement from last year, when the Social Security Administration projected that benefits could be slashed by 23% if the trust funds reached the point of depletion.

Advocates for older Americans praised the improved outlook, while pressing Congress to take action on shoring up the program.

"Congress owes it to the American people to reach a bipartisan solution, ensuring people's hard-earned Social Security benefits will be there in full for the decades ahead," AARP CEO Jo Ann Jenkins said in a statement. "The stakes are simply too high to do nothing."

Lawmakers have yet to take action despite being aware of the looming funding crisis, noted Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a think tank that focuses on the federal fiscal policies, in a statement.

"Every year we get closer to the deadline, we seem to get further away from the solutions," she said. Without a fix, "Social Security's retirement trust fund will be insolvent when today's 58-year-olds reach the normal retirement age and today's youngest retirees turn 71."

Economic boost​

O'Malley attributed the improved Social Security forecast to the stronger economy, pointing to what he called "impressive wage growth, historic job creation, and a steady, low unemployment rate." In other words, a healthy job market is resulting in more Social Security taxes going into the funds' coffers.

The report comes as Social Security's financial outlook has become a political lightning rod, with Republicans proposing that the retirement age be raised — effectively cutting benefits for millions of current workers — and former President Donald Trump indicating he would be open to cuts to Social Security and Medicare.

Democrats argue that there are other ways to fix the program without cutting benefits, such as raising the cap on payroll taxes. Currently, individual income over $168,600 is exempt from the Social Security payroll tax.

Medicare's "go broke" date​

Meanwhile, Medicare's go-broke date for its hospital insurance trust fund was pushed back five years to 2036 in the latest report, thanks in part to higher payroll tax income and lower-than-projected expenses. Medicare is the federal government's health insurance program that covers people age 65 and older and those with severe disabilities or illnesses. It covered more than 66 million people last year, with most being 65 and older.

Once the fund's reserves become depleted, Medicare would be able to cover only 89% of costs for patients' hospital visits, hospice care and nursing home stays or home health care that follow hospital visits.

In a statement on Monday, President Joe Biden credited his administration's economic policies for Social Security and Medicare's stronger outlook.

"Since I took office, my economic plan and strong recovery from the pandemic have helped extend Medicare solvency by a decade, with today's report showing a full five years of additional solvency," he said. "I am committed to extending Social Security solvency by asking the highest-income Americans to pay their fair share without cutting benefits or privatizing Social Security."

Article Link

Archive
 
Most people don't get #3500/month from SS. I sure don't.
I'm aware, I believe that's the max. So every middle manager who breaks 200k and throws whatever's left after taxes and life into building a nest egg now gets told SS is taking a 12.5% bigger bite, but in exchange don't worry you'll still get your 30-40k SS, is going to say nah burn this welfare program down.
 
Última edición:
I'm aware, I believe that's the max. So every middle manager who breaks 200k and throws whatever's left after taxes and life into building a nest egg now gets told SS is taking a 12.5% bite of everything, but in exchange don't worry you'll still get your 30-40k SS, is going to say nah burn this welfare program down.
SS is also up to 85% Federally taxable, depending on your total income. I know, 85% of my SS is taxed.
 
I've pretty much accepted that I wont get a chance to get SS when I'm an old man.
Better keep buying guns and firearms training.
 
It’s been said a million times. Gen-X here and never once have I looked at SSI in my retirement calculations. Ditto for Medicare.

If I get SSI, every dollar of it will go to partying.
 
In other countries, well civilized ones meaning Asian countries, when they have a social security program it's a personal account tied to the individual and if they die before they can collect it gets inherited in the will as stated. In our "capitalist" country we're forced to pay for others and are then told we'll never collect the money paid in. Anyone who thinks America is capitalist is living a fantasy.
 
Now many places are struggling to pay those bloated pensions.
genuinely surprised everyone in government just decided to give COL increases, literally all of it could have been solved by announced "fuck the boomers" and not giving COL increases and suddenly it becomes solvent because you technically just dropped the amount given by half. Trust me i've had to talk to enough old people recently that didn't give a shit about the COL that its clear they don't really care enough to keep track. use their "it only cost a quarter to buy a coffee" bullshit aganist them for once.
That sounds a bit generous. I give it 2027.
the first gen Xers are getting their checks next year, meaning the boomer wave is effectively over. There's a reason they announced an extra year, a lot more old fuckers died.
 
Can't wait to see what kind of wacky dictator Gen X votes in when a shitton of them are destitute in their twilight years. At least we have term limits now so they can't vote in another perma-president like FDR.
The elderly during the Depression were likely to have a family structure, not so much Gen X.
 
SS tax is the thing that probably makes me the most angry. I won’t ever see a dime of it, and the boomers who do get it rarely deserve it. I'd rather every boomer reliant on social security freeze to death on the streets than I pay another cent.

There's nothing more frustrating than the fact that I, someone who never was reliant on government handouts in the slightest, is penalized for living within my means and working hard. I've done everything right, so why must my labor be stripped from me and handed out to the lumpenproletariat to continue their existence?
 
Can't wait to see what kind of wacky dictator Gen X votes in when a shitton of them are destitute in their twilight years. At least we have term limits now so they can't vote in another perma-president like FDR.
The elderly during the Depression were likely to have a family structure, not so much Gen X.
I’m hoping for a Franco or a Mussolini. Those guys at least weren’t German or Slavic.
 
I'm sure the litany of illegals and people faking disabilities on the dole aren't helping the whole "we're running out of money" thing either.

They desperately fucking need higher standards. I know someone in my family who got it after an accident left them physically unable to work, which then led some other relatives of mine to all apply because of “muh mentals”, and as far as I know they all ended up getting it themselves. Now these completely “able-bodied” people all just do nothing and coast on their tugboats, when they used to actually have jobs.
 
I distinctly remember being told that Social Security cannot go insolvent, and that everything is actually fine with it. Strange!
It is, it's just a shell game. If benefits get cut, Congress will move faster than light to fund the shortfall from general appropriations.

Strange how the Federal Reserve could print $7 trillion dollars no-questions-asked in two years to prop up stonks during the sniffles but it's a battle for every dime going to SS or other federal programs. Really makes you wonder.
 
If you raise the income cap, do you raise the benefits along with it (leaving you with the same problem), or do you just turn it into a straight up welfare program? Right now they can at least claim it's your money being invested (although if you're a fucking huwite male it's a negative return, and the only ones getting a "return on investment" are Womyn of Calories).

Taking 12.5% of everything would turn most of the upper middle class against it entirely, because they're already paying 32-38% Federal, 4-8% State, 3-4% Medicare/Medicaid, and instead of whatever's left going into their 401k/IRA, you're saying to confiscate it and promise them 3.5k/month.

With respect to "borrowing from it", there's no "it" to borrow from, just like there's nothing to "pay it back" with. Every dollar of tax revenue is already spoken for, so the "fund" is a bunch of US treasury IOUs.
No. The rich can pay more taxes. Stop simping for the rich
 
Gen X will get double hit, as starting in 10 years our parents will start getting less and less money due to this. No more SS COA adjustments, it will be SS reductions. If you have a Boomer parent in their 70s now, when they are in their 80s they will be getting the equivalent of 3/4 to 1/2 of what they are getting in purchasing power now. Xers who have not already or are not preparing for this are going to have to start supporting their parents more.

Then of course, when they retire SS will be the equivalent of $250 a month in today's money, a tiny stipend in purchasing power.

My family is pretty well ready for this I think, but many will not be.
 
It doesn't matter what shell games you play, there simply aren't enough young people to provide old people a long, comfortable retirement. It doesn't matter if it's a government pension or a 401(k). Retirees live on the resources that the working young create. Boomers told everyone that having kids in your 20s would ruin your life, and the younger generations listened, and now, well, here we are.
 
No. The rich can pay more taxes. Stop simping for the rich
All those 168k+ "rich" whose ability to save you're about to obliterate, about 15% of households who make too much for any of muh programs but get hit with all the taxes, are going to go from begrudgingly accepting SS taxes they never expect to get back, to seeing it become their 2nd highest tax bite and a full on welfare program.

You think they're going to say "oh well, I'll just pay 50% instead of funding my Roth accounts"? Or do you think we'll see politicians courting an unholy Boomer-Zoomer alliance to kill the thing off entirely?
 
Forget millennials and zoomers, going bust in 2035 means Gen X won't even get to collect.

Boomers really did pull the ladder up after them didn't they?
It was a pyramid scheme that was always going to fail. Lower birth rate means less people pay into the system. Why do you think your Boomer parents were always up your ass to give them Grandbabies? It's not because kids are cute.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo