US Universities Struggle as Pro-Palestinian Demonstrations Grow - Dozens were arrested Monday at N.Y.U. and Yale, but officials there and at campuses across the country are running out of options to corral protests that are expected to last the rest of the school year.

Universities Struggle as Pro-Palestinian Demonstrations Grow
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Alan Blinder
2024-04-23 04:48:02GMT

ny01.jpg
Police arrest protesters outside of New York University on Monday night. Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times

At New York University, the police swept in to arrest protesting students on Monday night, ending a standoff with the school’s administration.

At Yale, the police placed protesters’ wrists into zip ties on Monday morning and escorted them onto campus shuttles to receive summonses for trespassing.

Columbia kept its classroom doors closed on Monday, moving lectures online and urging students to stay home.

Harvard Yard was shut to the public. Nearby, at campuses like Tufts and Emerson, administrators weighed how to handle encampments that looked much like the one that the police dismantled at Columbia last week — which protesters quickly resurrected. And on the West Coast, a new encampment bubbled at the University of California, Berkeley.

Less than a week after the arrests of more than 100 protesters at Columbia, administrators at some of the country’s most influential universities were struggling, and largely failing, to calm campuses torn by the conflict in Gaza and Israel.

ny02.jpg
Despite arrests at Columbia last week, protests continued on campus on Monday.Credit...C.S. Muncy for The New York Times

During the turmoil on Monday, which coincided with the start of Passover, protesters called on their universities to become less financially tied to Israel and its arms suppliers. Many Jewish students agonized anew over some protests and chants that veered into antisemitism, and feared again for their safety. Some faculty members denounced clampdowns on peaceful protests and warned that academia’s mission to promote open debate felt imperiled. Alumni and donors raged.

And from Congress, there were calls for the resignation of Columbia’s president, Nemat Shafik, from some of the same lawmakers Dr. Shafik tried to pacify last week with words and tactics that inflamed her own campus.

The menu of options for administrators handling protests seems to be quickly dwindling. It is all but certain that the demonstrations, in some form or another, will last on some campuses until the end of the academic year, and even then, graduation ceremonies may be bitterly contested gatherings.

For now, with the most significant protests confined to a handful of campuses, the administrators’ approaches sometimes seem to shift from hour to hour.

“I know that there is much debate about whether or not we should use the police on campus, and I am happy to engage in those discussions,” Dr. Shafik said in a message to students and employees early Monday, four days after officers dressed in riot gear helped clear part of Columbia’s campus.

“But I do know that better adherence to our rules and effective enforcement mechanisms would obviate the need for relying on anyone else to keep our community safe,” she added. “We should be able to do this ourselves.”

Protesters have demonstrated with varying intensity since the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel. But this particular round of unrest began to gather greater force last Wednesday, after Columbia students erected an encampment, just as Dr. Shafik was preparing to testify before Congress.

At that hearing in Washington, before a Republican-led House committee, she vowed to punish unauthorized protests on the private university’s campus more aggressively, and the next day, she asked the New York Police Department to clear the encampment. In addition to the more than 100 people arrested, Columbia suspended many students. Many Columbia professors, students and alumni voiced fears that the university was stamping out free debate, a cornerstone of the American college experience.

The harsher approach helped lead to more protests outside Columbia’s gates, where Jewish students reported being targeted with antisemitic jeers and described feeling unsafe as they traveled to and from their campus.

The spiraling uproar in Upper Manhattan helped fuel protests on some other campuses.

“We’re all a united front,” said Malak Afaneh, a law student protesting at University of California, Berkeley. “This was inspired by the students at Columbia who, in my opinion, are the heart of the student movement whose bravery and solidarity with Palestine really inspired us all.”

The events at Columbia also rippled to Yale, where students gathered at Beinecke Plaza in New Haven, Conn., for days to demand that the university divest from arms manufacturers.

Yale’s president, Peter Salovey, said Monday that university leaders had spent “many hours” in talks with the protesters, with an offer that included an audience with the trustee who oversees Yale’s Corporation Committee on Investor Responsibility. But university officials had decided late Sunday that the talks were proving unsuccessful, and Dr. Salovey said, they were troubled by reports “that the campus environment had become increasingly difficult.”

The authorities arrested 60 people on Monday morning, including 47 students, Dr. Salovey said. The university said the decision to make arrests was made with “the safety and security of the entire Yale community in mind and to allow access to university facilities by all members of our community.”

In the hours after the arrests, though, hundreds of protesters blocked a crucial intersection in New Haven.

ny03.jpg
Students protesters occupied an intersection near the campus of Yale University on Monday.Credit...Adrian Martinez Chavez for The New York Times

“We demand that Yale divests!” went one chant.

“Free Palestine!” went another.

Far from being cowed by the police, protesters suggested that the response at Beinecke Plaza had emboldened them.

“It’s pretty appalling that the reaction to students exercising their freedom of speech and engaging in peaceful protest on campus grounds — which is supposed to be our community, our campus — the way that Yale responds is by sending in the cops and having 50 students arrested,” said Chisato Kimura, a law student at Yale.

The scene was less contentious in Massachusetts, where Harvard officials had moved to limit the possibility of protests by closing Harvard Yard, the 25-acre core of the campus in Cambridge, through Friday. Students were warned that they could face university discipline if they, for instance, erected unauthorized tents or blocked building entrances.

On Monday, Harvard’s Palestine Solidarity Committee said on social media that the university had suspended it. National Students for Justice in Palestine, a loose confederation of campus groups, said it believed the decision was “clearly intended to prevent students from replicating the solidarity encampments” emerging across the United States. Harvard said in a statement that it was “committed to applying all policies in a content-neutral manner.”

Elsewhere in the Boston area, protesters had set up encampments at Emerson College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Tufts University. But those protests, for now, appeared more modest than the ones at Yale and in New York, where demonstrators constructed an encampment outside N.Y.U.’s Stern School of Business.

ny04.jpg
Protesters outside of New York University, before police arrived.Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times
ny05.jpg
“Students, students, hold your ground!” protesters roared. “N.Y.U., back down!”Credit...Adam Gray for The New York Times

N.Y.U. officials tolerated the demonstration for hours but signaled Monday night that their patience was wearing thin. Police officers gathered near the protest site as demonstrators ignored a 4 p.m. deadline to vacate it. As nightfall approached, sirens blared and officers, donning helmets and bearing zip ties, mustered. Prisoner transport vans waited nearby.

“Students, students, hold your ground!” protesters roared. “N.Y.U., back down!”

Soon enough, police officers marched on the demonstration.

“Today’s events did not need to lead to this outcome,” said John Beckman, a university spokesman in a statement. But, he said, some protesters, who may not have been from N.Y.U., breached barriers and refused to leave. Because of safety concerns, the university said it asked for assistance from the police.

At Columbia, Dr. Shafik ordered Monday’s classes moved online “to de-escalate the rancor.”

She did not immediately detail how the university would proceed in the coming days, beyond saying that Columbia officials would be “continuing discussions with the student protesters and identifying actions we can take as a community to enable us to peacefully complete the term.”

Some students and faculty members said support for Dr. Shafik was eroding, with the university senate preparing for the possibility of a vote this week to censure the president. Supporters of the censure complained that Dr. Shafik was sacrificing academic freedom to appease critics.

But Dr. Shafik was castigated on Monday by the very people she was accused of appeasing when at least 10 members of the U.S. House of Representatives demanded her resignation.

“Over the past few days, anarchy has engulfed Columbia University,” Representative Elise Stefanik, Republican of New York and one of Dr. Shafik’s chief interrogators last week, wrote with other lawmakers. “As the leader of this institution, one of your chief objectives, morally and under law, is to ensure students have a safe learning environment. By every measure, you have failed this obligation.”

A university spokesperson said that Dr. Shafik was focused on easing the strife and that she was “working across campus with members of the faculty, administration, and board of trustees, and with state, city, and community leaders, and appreciates their support.”

Amid the acrimony, and with scores of green, blue and yellow tents filling the Columbia encampment, parts of the campus sometimes took on an eerie, surreal quiet on a splendid spring day.

ny06.jpg
Some faculty members said support for Dr. Shafik was eroding.Credit...CS Muncy for The New York Times
ny07.jpg
At Columbia, many Jewish students stayed away from campus for Passover.Credit...Bing Guan for The New York Times

The unease was never all that far away, though, even with many Jewish students away from campus for Passover.

“When Jewish students are forced to watch others burning Israeli flags, calling for bombing of Tel Aviv, calling for Oct. 7 to happen over and over again, it creates an unacceptable degree of fear that cannot be tolerated,” Representative Daniel Goldman, Democrat of New York, said outside Columbia’s Robert K. Kraft Center for Jewish Student Life.

By then, in another symbol of the crisis enveloping Columbia, Mr. Kraft, an alumnus and owner of the New England Patriots, had launched his own broadside and suggested he would pause his giving.

“I am no longer confident that Columbia can protect its students and staff,” he wrote in a statement, “and I am not comfortable supporting the university until corrective action is taken.”
 
Two CNN articles of interest:

Amid campus protests, some teens and parents reconsider enrollment decisions​

CNN (archive.ph)
By Samantha Murphy Kelly, CNN
Updated 7:21 PM EDT, Wed May 1, 2024
Earlier this year, an 18-year-old high school senior from New York City had planned to enroll at Columbia University’s sister school Barnard College in Manhattan as an early decision student. But after her parents saw heightened tensions over the Israel-Hamas conflict surface across some US campuses, including at Barnard and Columbia, they went back to her list.

The student, who spoke to CNN under the condition of anonymity over privacy concerns, ultimately chose Brandeis University in Massachusetts, one of only two schools on the Anti-Defamation League’s 2024 list of 85 colleges that received an A grade for its response to antisemitic incidents on campus and its support for Jewish students.

“Barnard was my top choice. I was so dead set on going,” said the private school student, who is Jewish. “But after seeing what is happening on campuses, I feel so glad I am going to Brandeis. I feel really happy and safe knowing they got an A.”

The student’s mother said reconsidering where her daughter attends in the fall was a family decision.

“We know these issues are happening everywhere, but we prioritized how the university administration was responding, how many Jews are on the campus and if it had a Jewish community,” she said.

Other families also have been grappling with where to send their high school students in the fall as campus protests continue to play out at schools around the country, even as the final deadline fast approaches.

Students nationwide have only a few days left to submit their college deposits and make their decisions on where to enroll for the fall; many schools list their College Decision Day as on or around May 1. From impacting the logistics of visiting campuses to the confrontations splashed across television screens, the protests have, in the two short weeks since they’ve spread, further complicated making a final college choice for some members of the class of 2028.

On Tuesday night, clashes escalated between law enforcement and protesters at the University of California, Los Angeles after a violent confrontation broke out between pro-Palestinian protesters and counter protesters. In New York, about 300 protesters were arrested at Columbia University and City College after officers cleared protesters from encampments and an occupied building. In a statement shared with Columbia’s community, university president Minouche Shafik said the decision to ask the New York City Police Department to intervene was “because my first responsibility is safety.”

Since April 18, more than 1,500 people have been arrested on more than 30 college and university campuses across at least 23 states, according to a CNN review of university and law enforcement statements.

Mimi Doe – the co-founder and CEO of Top Tier Admissions, whose admission experts help students get into their college of choice – told CNN some students have already reconsidered where to attend, particularly when it comes to enrolling at Columbia University. Columbia has had perhaps the highest profile pro-Palestinian encampments and protests.

“We recently received frantic texts and calls from a student who got into Columbia … and [they] ended up taking the school off their list [due to the protests],” she said.

For privacy reasons, Doe and other college coaches declined to share contact information for the parents and students mentioned in this article but shared their responses based on CNN’s questions.

“Jewish students and Jewish parents are definitely making more informed decisions about where their students would feel safe, but it’s not just Jewish families. We just heard from another student who got into Columbia who is not Jewish, and their mom and dad said, ‘Nope, let’s take it off the table.’”

Revisiting a campus and perhaps a decision​

Some students this time of year participate in what’s called a “revisit day,” where they visit or drive through campuses one last time to get a better sense of the lifestyle and environment before accepting. But increased safety measures, such as universities closing their gates to outsiders or conducting heavy screenings to enter admission offices, have made this practice more difficult this year, Doe said.

While universities have been faced with an onslaught of controversy following the attack by Hamas militants on Israel on October 7, from antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents on campus to growing political unrest, the protests have been even more “jarring” for students and parents, she said.

In a Facebook post in the group Grown and Flown Parents, where more than 250,000 parents discuss college admission issues, one parent expressed concern over her son’s current commitment to Columbia on a scholarship.

“He went to visit this weekend and said he didn’t feel comfortable walking around and that there were a lot of protests that seemed unmanageable at best,” the anonymous user posted. “He is starting to question his decision and now I’m panicking.”

Over 500 parents responded to the post, many of whom said they would not send their children to school there due to recent events. “The school couldn’t pay me to send my child there,” wrote one parent. “The displayed hate is sickening.”

Columbia University declined to comment on how the protests are impacting its fall enrollment.

During a Congressional hearing in April, however, President Shafik defended how the university responded to events on campus and has prioritized the safety of its students.

“We do not, and will not, tolerate antisemitic threats, images, and other violations,” Shafik said. “We have enforced, and we will continue to enforce, our policies against such actions.”

Shafik said that she believes the university can “confront antisemitism and provide a safe campus environment for our community while simultaneously supporting religious academic exploration and freedom.”

The school remains at the epicenter of the demonstrations, where recently it banned from campus a student protest leader who in January said in a video that “Zionists don’t deserve to live.” (He later apologized.) More than 100 Israeli students wrote to school authorities saying they felt unsafe on the campus because of the general atmosphere at the school.

Columbia’s Senate –- a policy-making body representing faculty, students and administrative staff –- passed a resolution late Friday to investigate the university leadership’s handling of the protests. The protesters at Columbia have been demanding the school cut ties with Israeli academic institutions and disinvest from Israel-linked entities, as the death toll climbs from Israel’s bombardment of Gaza. Protesters at other campuses have similar demands.

Brian Taylor, a managing partner at private admissions coach company Ivy Coach, said the company has seen little change in where students are enrolling, despite the protests, except for one clear pivot.

“If the student was admitted to multiple Ivy league schools, then they’re not going to choose Columbia,” he said. “But if a student only got accepted to Columbia – if that’s the best school they got into – they’re still going to go.”

Taylor said some students who work with Ivy Coach called the day 100 students were arrested at Columbia’s protests to see if they had a better chance of getting off of their waitlist and admitted to the school.

“It’ll probably be pretty easy to get off the Columbia waitlist this year,” he said.

Still, he added “these encampments are obviously doing schools quite the disservice.”

At the same time, however, another student working with Top Tier Admissions said they decided to commit to Columbia despite the protests.

“Definitely one of the things that drew me to Columbia was the spirit of activism and the great political science professors that have a legacy there,” the student said. “I was a bit concerned about the administration as they’ve shown and continue to show their lack of care for students and the student voice. [But] I ultimately decided to enroll here because the same kind of thing is happening at every school at this point.”

Summer visits​

The practice of reconsidering which universities to attend may be even higher for high school juniors who have yet to formally apply, according to Doe. As families gear up for college visits this summer, she said some are changing up the names on their list because of the controversies the schools have faced.

“We started seeing some parents in the past five years say that they don’t want their kid looking at Yale because New Haven isn’t safe,” she said. “But now we have people saying, ‘I don’t even care so much about Ivies because politically they’d have an easier time elsewhere.’”

One junior in high school who is working with Top Tier Admissions said he was originally focused on getting into Ivy League schools but is applying elsewhere now due to how some of the schools have handled antisemitism on their campuses.

“As of this moment, if Columbia handed me a full scholarship and admission right this instant, I would turn them down without a second thought,” the student said. “I would reject these universities because, above all, I want to feel safe and accepted where I go to school.”

Doe said she’s seen other students and parents “edge away” from visiting certain schools, such as the University of Pennsylvania following reports of antisemitic activity on campus since 2021. In December, University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill announced that she was stepping down amid months of pressure.

At the same time, Harvard University applications dropped 5% this year, according to March figures that offered early clues into how the Ivy League school’s reputation has held up during its own period of historic turmoil. It faced a massive crisis last fall as its response to an anti-Israel letter was criticized by some powerful alumni and politicians.

Claudine Gay, the first Black president in Harvard history, stepped down in January amid controversy over her academic writings and performance at a congressional hearing on antisemitism. While the university has denounced antisemitism, it is still under investigation by the House Education Committee for related allegations.

But Harvard’s low admission rate – up to 3.58% from 3.41% last year, its second lowest in the school’s history – suggests demand to attend Harvard has not weakened dramatically.

Finding the right fit​

A high school guidance counselor based on Long Island, New York, said some Jewish families in her community made decisions early on about where to apply based on how school administrations handled events following October 7, such as taking a prompt response in condemning the terrorist act or looking at colleges that banned Students for Justice in Palestine, an organization that advocates for Palestinian solidarity.

“The resounding message is that it is important to be at a college with a Hillel or Chabad and a strong Jewish community because you will find your people regardless of the larger ‘tone’ of the college,” she told CNN.

Hillel and Chabad are Jewish organizations with cultural and religious affiliations where Jewish students can go to connect with each other.

Anna Ivey, a college admissions counselor, said this is not uncommon when controversial issues arise. Some students, for example, have reconsidered where to attend school for various reasons in recent years, such as when abortion laws changed in some states.

“At the end of the day, people have very different sensibilities,” Ivey said. “Families can decide what matters to them and what source of authority they want to pay attention to.”

Nonetheless, she said, some families are still “seriously debating” where to put deposits down in the next few days.


May 1 is usually college decision day, but FAFSA problems are causing delays​

CNN (archive.php)
By Katie Lobosco, CNN
Updated: 7:00 AM EDT, Wed May 1, 2024
May 1, known as college decision day across the country, is usually a celebratory time for high school seniors. But this year, many students are stuck in limbo as they wait for delayed financial aid award letters – and have yet to decide where to enroll this fall.

The holdup stems from problems with this year’s FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid), which students must submit to qualify for federal loans and grants, as well as for most financial aid offered by colleges and states.

A new version of the form was released by the Department of Education late last year. The changes simplified the form and are expected to make more students eligible for financial aid. But a number of processing problems and glitches led to major delays.

Typically, colleges and universities are able to deliver financial aid award letters to students in March. But many schools did not receive the FAFSA data they needed from the Department of Education until March, and once they did, millions of forms were found to have errors and needed to be reprocessed.

Many schools traditionally require students to decide by May 1 whether they are enrolling in the fall. Hundreds of schools have pushed back their deadlines this year. But not every college has changed the date, forcing some students to make a decision and pay a deposit without having all the information about how much college will cost.

The Department of Education has faced criticism for the botched rollout of the new FAFSA from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, as well as from college financial aid groups. At the request of some Republican members of Congress, the Government Accountability Office has started an investigation into the new form’s implementation.

The head of the Federal Student Aid office who is tasked with managing the FAFSA, Richard Cordray, said last week that he will step down soon. He will not continue his role for another three-year term but will stay on through June to help with the transition.

Where things stand​

The Department of Education said Tuesday that it is now processing FAFSAs quickly and accurately. A form submitted today will be processed and sent to the relevant colleges within one to three days.

Plus, the department has finished reprocessing all forms that were initially sent to colleges with errors.

“It’s certainly been a challenging year for the FAFSA, but I’m proud of the progress we’ve made in recent weeks,” James Kvaal, undersecretary of education, said Tuesday on a call with reporters.

Still, there are many families waiting for financial aid award letters.

As of April 23, only about half of colleges had sent aid packages to some or all students, according to the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators.

FAFSA completions are way down​

Overall, FAFSA completions among high school seniors are down 29% compared with the prior class at the same point last year, according to the National College Attainment Network.

There’s been bigger declines among students who may need the aid the most: at lower-income schools and at schools with a higher percentage of minority students.

This has raised fears that students are leaving money on the table and that some students may opt out of college altogether.

Students who may need help with filling out the form are less likely to have support after high school graduations, which in some parts of the country take place in a matter of weeks.

Problems with the new FAFSA​

The rollout of the new version of the FAFSA was delayed, and the form wasn’t available until three months later than the usual October 1 date.

Once students and families could access the form, some experienced a number of problems.

For example, students whose parents don’t have Social Security numbers have had trouble submitting the FAFSA form. On Tuesday, the Department of Education launched a new process for impacted families so they can more easily create online accounts without facing delays to verify their identities.

Additionally, the Department of Education did not provide the functionality for students to make corrections or updates until mid-April – a process that’s usually available immediately.

Further problems on the backend and a last-minute change to the aid calculation delayed the transfer of FAFSA information from the Department of Education to colleges and universities.

But the new FAFSA is easier and faster to fill out than the previous version, which could be a maximum of 108 questions. Now, some applicants have to answer as few as 18 questions.

The Department of Education has also estimated that 610,000 more students will qualify for a federal Pell Grant – which is awarded to those from low-income families – on an annual basis due to the changes to the FAFSA. And an estimated 1.5 million more students will be eligible for the maximum amount, which typically changes each year.

Commentary: Noisy protests that draw unfavorable media attention to campuses is one thing, but those protests actually hurting enrollment fucks with higher ed's bread and butter. As the second article indicates, the changes to the FAFSA process have turned things into a shambolic mess, but the reduction in interest is probably not solely due to problems with the process, but reflects a real and increasing skepticism on the value of higher ed by the American public. As I've mentioned many times, higher ed was already expecting to hit a demographic cliff in 2026, but these protests - and the hangover from the disruption in schooling caused by our response to Covid - are making Santa come a little early.

This is Bad News for higher ed generally - or at least, bad news as they're currently constituted - but probably overall good news for the public, if it means colleges begin to actually make the tough decisions that lead to lower price tags. If colleges were to actually be serious about enrolling underrepresented minorities, then a better way to do so is to make education affordable, rather than to create a huge, expensive administrative apparatus designed to coddle them at every turn.
 
The crackdown on the Palestinian left is a good thing because I hope it radicalizes the left into fighting the left I sincerely want to see more violence between the two sides.
There is no "the left" in this situation, there is only ivy league bourgeois progressives taking up the "left wing" cause of not wanting to be forced to bankroll an ethnic cleansing campaign, and the bourgeois liberal administrations, governors, and mayors taking up the "right wing" cause of trying their hardest to make sure that amerimutts don't break the zionist mind trance that has consumed them for the better half of the last century.

The terms "left wing" and "right wing" applied to issues like this are essentially fucking meaningless and only designed to activate people's lizard brains and keep them in the trance of Israel worship. The same thing was done with the occupy movement: "No goy, you can't oppose getting bent over and fucked in the ass by bankers, that's what LEFTISTS do, and you don't wanna be a leftist do ya goy???"
GDlsMk5XUAA9z_g.jpg
 
Última edición:
There is no "the left" in this situation, there is only ivy league bourgeois progressives taking up the "left wing" cause of not wanting to be forced to bankroll an ethnic cleansing campaign, and the bourgeois liberal administrations, governors, and mayors taking up the "right wing" cause of trying their hardest to make sure that amerimutts don't break the zionist mind trance that has consumed them for the better half of the last century.

The terms "left wing" and "right wing" applied to issues like this are essentially fucking meaningless and only designed to activate people's lizard brains and keep them in the trance of Israel worship. The same thing was done with the occupy movement: "No goy, you can't oppose getting bent over and fucked in the ass by bankers, that's what LEFTISTS do, and you don't wanna be a leftist do ya goy???"
Ver archivo adjunto 5954819
3a76274bd6fc9671c68adb11c086d6ce.png
Left wing? Right wing?
I just want to grill gas the Jews.
 
They've switched primarily to Discord and Telegram from what I've heard. They're using invite-only methods now and very carefully choosing what anyone not in their "Inner Circles" see.
That makes sense in light of Twitter changing hands and Antifa and its associates telegraphing (no pun intended) their codewords for causing trouble in public places four years ago. It's also interesting to see them keeping the mainstream media away this time around.

Busloads of officers just showed up and are mustering and seem to now be on the move. The ABC7 stream has a live shot of it right now. Get ready.
The news during my morning commute reported the latest happenings at UCLA as of that moment. Given what time it was in California when shit went down, this was quite the announcement to listen to.

but the reduction in interest is probably not solely due to problems with the process, but reflects a real and increasing skepticism on the value of higher ed by the American public.
With inflation as high as it's been post-COVID, families have less disposable income to allocate for overpriced college tuition and fees. When people have less money available to spend, what high-priced items they do spend money on generally get scrutinized more in terms of getting the most out of that money. For many majors being offered, the ever-increasing cost of a college degree no longer justifies the time, effort, and job prospects that come with receiving a fancy piece of paper on commencement day.

People are having fewer kids, so colleges that have expanded in response to growth are now dealing with enrollment that has now plateaued or started to drop. Instead of rightsizing, though, they merely raise tuition or ask for more state funding to cover the increased costs.

The whole SJW/DEI movement also hurts colleges, something they may or may not realize. With so many white people, especially white males, being told they won't or shouldn't amount to anything because of white guilt and privilege, they see neither reason nor incentive to pursue higher education - unless they fully buy into the SJW narrative - because they've been told they're lower than garbage on the Oppression Olympics totem pole.

The protests have given families on the fence about a college education for their kids another reason to carefully rethink the decision. In light of other violent acts that have happened at college campuses, parents who care about their kids well beings are pausing and thinking about that even more now - and it's actually playing a role in the decision-making as shown by the articles posted by @Reticulan Joe .
 
There is no "the left" in this situation, there is only ivy league bourgeois progressives taking up the "left wing" cause of not wanting to be forced to bankroll an ethnic cleansing campaign, and the bourgeois liberal administrations, governors, and mayors taking up the "right wing" cause of trying their hardest to make sure that amerimutts don't break the zionist mind trance that has consumed them for the better half of the last century.

The terms "left wing" and "right wing" applied to issues like this are essentially fucking meaningless and only designed to activate people's lizard brains and keep them in the trance of Israel worship. The same thing was done with the occupy movement: "No goy, you can't oppose getting bent over and fucked in the ass by bankers, that's what LEFTISTS do, and you don't wanna be a leftist do ya goy???"
Ver archivo adjunto 5954819
Left and Right are pretty dumb terms. Not because they're necessarily wrong, but because they come from the French 🤮

Also anyone paying for college is an idiot. You can do it basically for free by abusing corporate bullshit.
Step 1: Get job at Amazon, Chick Fil-A, or really most low class wage cages
Step 2: Work the required 2-3 months to be eligible for their tuition program
Step 3: Once their payment to the school has gone through quit, they don't rescind their tuition payment.
Step 4: Repeat the next year

I know two guys who paid for almost all their education doing this. I think they ended up paying about 2k out of pocket in total for a bachelor's.
 
Última edición:
Left and Right are pretty dumb terms. Not because they're necessarily wrong, but because they come from the French 🤮

Also anyone paying for college is an idiot. You can do it basically for free by abusing corporate bullshit.
Step 1: Get job at Amazon, Chick Fil-A, or really most low class wage cages
Step 2: Work the required 2-3 months to be eligible for their tuition program
Step 3: Once their payment to the school has gone through quit, they don't rescind their tuition payment.
Step 4: Repeat the next year

I know two guys who paid for almost all their education doing this. I think they ended up paying about 2k out of pocket in total for a bachelor's.
My definition of Left and Right is that the Left believes Humans are interchangeable while the Right does not. Also the Left is way too obsessed with economics while the non-libertarian Right doesn't give a shit, and just focuses on Culture
 
There is no "the left" in this situation, there is only ivy league bourgeois progressives taking up the "left wing" cause of not wanting to be forced to bankroll an ethnic cleansing campaign,

They aren't even taking up the cause for real though, just want to appear that they care to those who matter and also fuck you dad! while having a festival atmosphere. You can probably get facepaint done right next to the learn to pray booth.

I predict Shlomo will easily bring them back in because Shlomo trained them on their tactics. These kids simply strayed from the path big time, went out on their own, used them tactics in the #1 most worst case scenario wrong way wrong target
 
Última edición:
Also anyone paying for college is an idiot. You can do it basically for free by abusing corporate bullshit.
or just go to a community college and transfer so you can save yourself thousands of dollars, instead of deciding that you need to take your gen ed requirements at fucking stanford for some reason.
I would love to see a leftie try to explain how these protests are peaceful and law-abiding in such a way that wouldn't also imply that the Jan 6 protests were peaceful and law-abiding
Isn't that the irony though? The same cuckservatives who rightfully called bullshit on the J6 insurrection narrative are now calling these student protests modern day pogroms. The cuckservatives are no better at this shit, they're just as hysterical, except instead of doing it in defense of the sacred temple of democracy™ (a national government institution) they're doing it for our greatest ally™ (a foreign government institution)
They aren't even taking up the cause for real though, just want to appear that they care to those who matter and also fuck you dad!
If they're willing to get arrested for it I'd definitely say they're "taking up the cause for real"
These kids simply strayed from the path big time, went out on their own, used them tactics in the #1 most worst case scenario wrong way wrong target
Not unprecedented, the same thing happened with the occupy movement is why it was swiftly subverted with idpol nonsense about "no rape zones" and the progressive stack. Cointelpro was so successful in the 60s and 70s that the feds don't even need to do the work anymore, AWFLs and other assorted HR cat ladies will do it for them.
Remember a time when radical Muslim terrorists were seen as enemies
Yeah it sucked ass and I hope we never go back to the shitty GWOT counter jihad era of boomer politicking, the biggest silver lining of zoomers being pozzed leftoid faggots it is the death of that era of politics. Very glad they didn't make the bargain of "we are woke now but give pissrael and the war machine a pass"
and college campuses weren't such circuses of identity politics?
>"Identity politics bad but also jews good, israel is our greatest ally, and muslims are brown and LE BAD"
1714679571866.png

Cuckservatives LOVE identity politics, they're just mad that the identity politics are now vaguely anti-jewish because it blasphemes the cuckservative idol that is the state of Israel.
 
Última edición:
You will be not only disappointed, but horrified and shocked, when, in spite of your mutual hatred of Jews, Muhammad abu-Poopooskin jizzes in your headless neck stump.

The "human sacrifice" part isn't literal. It's to communicate that ragheads are neanderthals whom you should not look up to.

Would you also look up to subsaharan hottentots because they're "based" on the issue of faggotry? Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Your standard should be truth and reality, not some nebulous notion of "based", "enemy of my enemy" retardation, or litany of technicalities.
It's simple. I don't like muslims. I don't care about palenstine. None of that shit matters to me.

What matters is that muslims were used as a weapon against my people and heritage. And now that weapon is backfiring on the heebs.

I don't expect some brotherhood from muslims. I expect muslims to be the savages they've proven to been. Only now I expect them to be savages to the heebs.

Two enemies fighting is a win.
 
If they're willing to get arrested for it I'd definitely say they're "taking up the cause for real"

I think of this in a couple ways of 1 "that wont happen to me" and 2 just the cult/mob mentality, most of them would have never started this if there was a hint of arrest.

I would call it kinda a cult mentality when they're sitting around by themselves "peaceful" talking about cops never getting them they have group invincibility and (fake) righteousness on their side. And mob when it's frenzied action time and they'll gang up 4 on 1 to beat on a 110 pound girl or something, disobey the cops telling them to leave or arrest when they (probably) would never have dreamed of doing those kind of thing a month ago.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo