Crime Harvey Weinstein's rape conviction overturned in New York - The New York Court of Appeals found the trial judge "erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes."

1714054254782.png

The rape conviction of movie producer Harvey Weinstein has been overturned by New York's highest court.

The New York Court of Appeals, in a scathing 4-3 opinion, overturned Weinstein's conviction on sex crimes against three women, finding the trial judge "erroneously admitted testimony of uncharged, alleged prior sexual acts against persons other than the complainants of the underlying crimes."

The court said that testimony "served no material non-propensity purpose" and "portrayed defendant in a highly prejudicial light."

Weinstein spokesperson Juda Engelmayer told ABC News, "We are happily surprised and we are studying the ruling."

The Weinstein team, which was eagerly awaiting a ruling, was not expecting it to be in Weinstein's favor after a succession of rulings in different courts all went against Weinstein.

Weinstein was also convicted of sex offenses in Los Angeles and sentenced to 16 years in prison there.

Because Weinstein is already convicted in California, he will not be released, but instead transferred to the custody of prison authorities in California.

Weinstein, 72, was a well-known, powerful man within the entertainment industry and prosecutors said he abused his power to take advantage of aspiring female actors, like the alleged victims, to coerce them into unwanted sexual encounters. According to the prosecution, the quid pro quo of assisting them with their careers in exchange for sexual favors on demand was both common behavior and a well-known secret throughout the film industry.

An explosive New York Times article in October 2017 reported Weinstein had reached at least eight settlements with women who accused him of sexual misconduct over decades. The story, which featured actress Ashley Judd publicly accusing Weinstein of propositioning her in 1997, sparked an avalanche of accusations from women who came forward with similar accounts and largely kicked off the #MeToo movement, targeting prominent celebrities for sexual misconduct.

Weinstein was arrested on May 25, 2018, and charged with first- and third-degree rape for one victim, and first-degree criminal sex act for another woman.

Prosecutors said the testimony of women other than those whose claims formed the basis of the criminal charges spoke to Weinstein's state of mind to use forcible compulsion. The majority opinion, however, said that eviscerated the time-tested rule against propensity evidence, "which, in criminal cases, serves as a judicial bulwark against a guilty verdict based on supposition rather than proof."

The Manhattan district attorney's office could decide to retry Weinstein.

"We will do everything in our power to retry this case, and remain steadfast in our commitment to survivors of sexual assault," a spokeswoman for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg said in a statement.

Prosecutors are now reviewing the language of the opinion and must make sure the alleged victims are on board to testify if Weinstein were to be retried.

The Court of Appeals decided the evidence of uncharged crimes allowed at trial "was unnecessary" to establish Weinstein's intent and "served only to establish defendant's propensity to commit the crimes charged."

The opinion also said the trial judge, James Burke, abused his discretion when he allowed Weinstein to be cross-examined about the uncharged conduct, ruling it "served no purpose other than to display for the jury defendant's loathsome character."

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/harvey-weinstein-conviction-overturned-new-york/story?id=109621776 (Archive)
 
Última edición:
Hey remember when the judge admitted irrelevant social media posts in the show trial of Challenger Man from Charlottesville?
Same with Daniel Perry in Austin.

We no longer have rule of law, we have rule of men.
 
Hey remember when the judge admitted irrelevant social media posts in the show trial of Challenger Man from Charlottesville?
Same with Daniel Perry in Austin.
Look on the bright side Trump can now use this in his own defence for maximum funny.
We no longer have rule of law, we have rule of men.
We’ve always had law depending on who you get on the day. And it’s always favored those with actual power.
 
...What a way to top off Clownworld. The guy who wound up starting the Pound Me Too movement and torpedoing men and women relations for years to come may just get off scott free.

And butterball here still has the money and connections to restart his casting couch biz because Hebrew.

We’ve always had law depending on who yet get on the day. And it’s always favored those with actual power.
Unfortunately true. This also turbo pisses off the people in power when their influence completely fails and the plebs take the law into their own hands. Such is the case with the founding story of the ADL with Leo Frank when the Heeb tried to pin his crime of raping and killing a girl onto a nigger and the KKK decided to lynch the Jew instead. Much kvetching and the ADL was formed.
 
I would LOVE to hear the opinion of the woman who was yelling at Null through a phone call about how Harvey Weinstein stalked her.
 
So what I'm getting here is that, yes, Harvey was a piece of shit, but legally speaking, the case against him was on shakier ground than a folding table in an earthquake.
Not surprised. Can't wait for the screeching from the harpies that sat on this info for decades and then immediately went after him when he stopped getting them roles, allowing him to continue his actions as long as they got paid.
 
You can't go around just arresting rapists (who happened to be donors to the Democrat party), you know. It would adversely affect Joe Biden's chances of getting re-elected.
Always found it funny that MeToo died the moment Biden got accused and they immediately rushed to defend him because he was the democrat frontrunner.
 
It ruined relationships for a generation and it ruined the lives of perfectly innocent people.
that was already happening without MeToo. It just made it more public outside of the colleges. Women have become too liberal for their own goods.
 
I love how this nigga gets dressed up to look as bad as possible. How he really slumps on the walker. His lawyers probably know a jury (of mostly women) will disregard most evidence when they see good enough acting and make-up.

Chicago the musical was based on the writings of like three female reporters getting progressively angry at how women would commit terrible crimes and get away with it due to their lawyers presenting them a battered women and selecting a jury to be sensitive to that. One of them basically got all the credit, but another effectively bitched hard about feminists defending whores killing their John’s.
The entire modern murder and self-defense trial is effectively not about the circumstances, but entirely about who is who.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo