Culture I Can’t Believe They Announced Joker 2 During Pride - Director Todd Phillips announced a sequel to his polarizing “Joker” film and the internet lit up with jokes and grievances: “One pandemic at a time please.”

1654886415682.png

The leader of the incels, Monsieur Todd Phillips himself, has crashed Pride Month this year. What a shame. Can’t we celebrate in peace? Is nothing sacred?

Yesterday, the anti-woke director revealed his plans for a sequel to his controversial box office hit in an Instagram carousel post, the first photo revealing a screenplay cover and the second showing Joaquin Phoenix smoking a cigarette while reading it (lovely). In any case, get ready for Joker: Folie Á Deux.

Did Todd Phillips realize the harm he was causing when he announced this news? Did he even pause to think about how, for the next few years, we’ve just got to sit, waiting, worrying, dreading the next release of Joker 2 news?

And without any “Are you in the right headspace to receive information that could possibly hurt you?” warning in sight. What a mess.

1654886488037.png

1654886531832.png

As to be expected, the reactions for Joker 2 arrived quickly—and they were sure harsh. As they should be, don’t get me wrong! “One pandemic at a time please,” one user quote-tweeted the news.

Hell, even the Joker fans aren’t so pleased about a sequel! “Joker had a perfect ending,” one devotee shared. “A sequel feels very unnecessary.” Hey—if you can’t beat them, join them.

The best feedback, though, included a handful of pitches for Joker 2. A flurry of Joker “fans” had some ideas: Emily in Paris-themed? Zach Galifianakis? Or what about this: “Danny Glover trying to catch the Joker during an LA heat wave and also there’s a war brewing between Colombian and Jamaican cartels.”

Sound familiar? Remember the allegations about how Joker 1 ripped off Taxi Driver almost completely? Well, now begins the search to find another film for Phillips to copy, and Predator 2 appears to have joined the ranks.

Luckily, Joker 1 (and Taxi Driver) star Robert De Niro has been contributing to some lighter headlines in today’s news cycle. While teasing this year’s Tribeca Film Festival, the beloved actor revealed his secret love for Taylor Swift: “I have all of her albums,” De Niro told Variety. “I’m not not a fan. I probably hear her music and like it on the radio.”

Not a Joker-related comment in sight. What bliss. At least someone is trying to cleanse the internet of all Joker news. But that’s probably because his character, TV moderator Murray Franklin, is assassinated in the first Joker film. What will a new Joker movie even be without De Niro?

We don’t officially know if Joaquin Phoenix, the Oscar-winning madman himself, will return for more joking, but Deadline reports that the actor is nearing a deal to reprise his role. If not, it seems Barry Keoghan is willing and able to step into those clown shoes.

There has been, dare I say it, some good to come out of the release of Joker. “This happened to my buddy Eric,” a post on Letterboxd reviewing the film, is one of the funniest things I’ve ever read. “We live in a society” memes are equally hilarious. It seems that, after the debut of Joker, pop culture was split in two: folks who were able to mock the film, and the select batch of incels who related to this nonsense.

If you fall in the former half, let’s get going. There are a million Joker: Folie À Deux jokes to be made before the sequel’s inevitable (and unannounced) release date.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/joker-2-announced-by-todd-phillips-during-pride-month-of-all-times (A)
 
Are journalists STILL seething about the Joker being a massive financial success and not inspiring a million mass shootings like they predicted?
 
Everyone must stop literally everything and sing praises to the fags. But seriously why does Joker need a sequel? This is like how they made a Jarhead 2.
 
Pride month... so now the entire world must re-think normal activities due to a made up month.

They needed a spin to make things all about them, and I guess they found another one.

Pretty funny that SJWs mald at Joker when Joaquin Phoenix is basically one of them. Can't wait for him to bawl about cows again.

If he were truly one of them, he would have turned down the role originally, took to Twitter to leak the script, and try to cancel the entire crew.

The average liberal or centrist is pretty different from a woke Twitter leftie, who sees no common bond with other leftists, only a constant, unending need to make woke performative gestures for Twitter, at the expensive of everyone else, especially the average liberal.
 
If Folie à Deux doesn't also refer to Bruce Wayne's relationship to Fleck, Phillips will be fucking up.
To be fair, I'm pretty sure that was the same consensus people were saying back when there was first word of a solo Joker movie.
Oh, I'll see it. The director has earned the benefit of a doubt.
 
Oh, I'll see it. The director has earned the benefit of a doubt.
I'll wait to hear from others if the franchise has been turned into debased goon-fodder first.
The last thing I want to see is a scraggly homicidal maniac fucking.
It's not just about ruining the franchise, but your very soul.
 
Why do I get the impression the journo who wrote this article hasn't actually seen Joker?
I know this is a necroed thread due to the trailer but The entire point of the first film was the classic "lack of love for your fellow man in modern society fucking sends overall good people down dark ass paths" and there's literally an entire part of the big finale of the movie when he actually goes on the talkshow where he literally rants about that. You can tell it wasn't watched by them due to how they talk about it. it's either that or they did see it and they're lying about it for social clout like people that used to be internet shitlords that now fearmonger about the scary internet extremists 24/7 and only interview with clickbait rag journos while blocking everyone that points their stuff out or even tries communicating with them in any form of sane manner.

Ironically the way the media reacted to Joker being "violent" kinda matches how Murray framed his initial fuckup when doing standup as the entire thing when we clearly see he imagines his potential black single mom GF in the audience as a coping mechanism to get over his stage fright and keep going, ultimately doing pretty well.

Second movie might be shitty since the first was a very clearly self contained tale and this trailer seems mainly like a retread with callbacks to the first movie but with like his totally for real not him coping this time gf doing it with him or replacing him doing certain things like the little funny bang gesture that was supposed to just be a little funny one off elevator convo about stress at work and shit.

To be fair, I'm pretty sure that was the same consensus people were saying back when there was first word of a solo Joker movie.
It was blatanlty an original story riding partly on brand recognition of the joker and batman franchise to get people's eyes on it. You can tell this by the fact his name is "Arthur Fleck" and not "Jack Napier" like literally every other incarnation of the joker. He's not a mobster or a guy that gets roped into gang shit as a fall guy, he doesn't get his skin fucking bleached, he doesn't even commit actual elaborately planned terrorism. He's just a single dude with a really fucked up life that goes down a downward spiral of constantly being fucked over while having mild mental issues due to literal head trauma brain damage he got as a small child.
 
I'll wait to hear from others if the franchise has been turned into debased goon-fodder first.
The last thing I want to see is a scraggly homicidal maniac fucking.
It's not just about ruining the franchise, but your very soul.
Any sex scene should probably be depicted abstractly as a dance number.

Or something like that. I want Phillips to go really wild with this one since he basically has a blank check and a lot to prove.
 
Any sex scene should feature a trauma-induced freakout and no actual sex, due to the first film having made clear that Fleck's childhood was monstrously abusive and emotionally incestuous. Having chosen to get on that train, Phillips should respect that and stick the landing.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo