Crime Oregon recriminalises drug possession after overdoses rocket

09FA7E4E-F5BB-4987-9DE6-3E852D5B478E.jpeg


Oregon has approved a state law that recriminalises drug possession.

The law rolls back an experimental policy - the most liberal drug measure in the US - that made possession for personal use a ticketed offence with a fine up to $100 (£76).

The new legislation penalizes those possessing small amounts of drugs with probation, and up to 180 days in jail. The governor said the state still aims to provide a path for drug treatment, rather than punishing drug users.

Tina Kotek, the Democratic governor, signed the bill on Monday. It goes into effect on 1 September.

Rehabilitation and destigmatisation was the intention of the original law, known as Measure 110, when it was passed in a 2020 voter measure, but a spike in the number of overdoses caused lawmakers and supporters to backtrack. Measure 110 was seen by many as the most liberal effort in the US to decriminalise drugs like cocaine, heroine and methamphetamine.

State leaders admitted, however, that there were several implementation issues. Roadblocks to rehabilitation remained, and the upswing in fentanyl overdoses caused an uproar in the state.

In cities like Portland, sightings of people openly using drugs on streets, sidewalks and in front of stores increased and images appeared in national media.

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler told the New York Times: "The truth is that addiction rates and overdose rates skyrocketed." The mayor, who remained supportive of Measure 110, accused the state of failing to implement the law effectively. He said they decriminalised the use of drugs before putting the proper treatment services in place.

In addition to enhanced penalties for personal use possession, the new law still establishes ways for treatment to be offered as an alternative to criminal penalties.

Governor Kotek said the law's success will depend on coordination between multiple layers of government on the state and local level, as well as health care providers, all of whom she described as "necessary partners".

A few of those who originally supported Measure 110 voted for the new law during this year's legislative session, as there appeared to be signs of a new voter effort to overturn it. The state's more progressive Democrats opposed the change, however. They remained concerned that increased criminal penalties would only lead to more arrests and fail to address the root cause of the state's drug problem.

"Research is consistently showing that (for) people who are incarcerated in jails and prisons, overdose has gone up substantially," Kassandra Frederique, the executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, told USA Today.

"And the fact that when people leave jails and prisons, the likelihood of overdose deaths also goes up substantially in comparison to the general population."

 
The mayor, who remained supportive of Measure 110, accused the state of failing to implement the law effectively. He said they decriminalised the use of drugs before putting the proper treatment services in place.
He may as well be right, but no one really wants to fix the reason why people become addicts in the first place.
Personally when I see tranny news I want to get a stiff drink.
 
I knew a dude who would oscillate weekly between "Fuck, I can't leave my family all alone while I go to prison for three years. That's really selfish," and "Fuck it! Let them take me away. At least when I get out, I can use in peace without these drug tests and officers up my ass." This is the power of addiction. And, unless these people are allowed to hit a rock bottom, they won't be desperate enough to seek help. People will die. It's inevitable. But, enabling the continued anti-social behavior that arises from addiction doesn't help anyone.
 
Oregon approached this issue in the worst way they possibly could have. Legalizing (well, decriminalizing, but effectively legalizing) the possession of hard drugs while keeping the supply chain illicit is essentially the worst of all worlds. It means there's a thriving, unregulated black market and all the associated organized crime that comes with that, but without any effective means of stopping it.

The reason why the possession of hard drugs is illegal and not just the sale and supply of it is because one facilitates the other. It's not out of some concern for the well-being of the user. Also, the way the police get to the dealers to shut them down is by first arresting the users and offering them leniency in return for information. This law left Oregon police basically impotent- although given the culture of Oregon I'm being generous in assuming they were willing to pursue drug dealers to begin with.

If you're going to legalize hard drugs (not that I think that would be a good idea), the only way you could do that sensibly would be if you legalized every step in the supply chain, from manufacture to distribution to sale. The more policy wonks try to come up with "clever" solutions like this the more inadvertent harm they will cause.

This is also why I think Germany's new legalization of cannabis is going to end really badly - they've legalized the growing and possession of cannabis but not the sale of it, to try and prevent the industry from becoming commercialized and creating a "Big Marijuana" industry. The sakes aren't as high (no pun intended) as in Oregon as we're only talking about cannabis and not things like Fentanyl and Meth but I predict it will fail for similar reasons.
 
If you're going to legalize hard drugs (not that I think that would be a good idea), the only way you could do that sensibly would be if you legalized every step in the supply chain, from manufacture to distribution to sale.
Never, ever going to happen. Every government in the world needs off-books revenue to fund their glownigger/blackops projects.
 
If they wanted to do something reasonable just have drug offenses punished as normal (with treatment options or whatever they want) AND have them automatically expunged upon completion.
 
"It was an experimental trial run"

That's not what you said when it passed, you said "get owned racist police state Chuds and make room for the compassionate future!"
 
"It was an experimental trial run"

That's not what you said when it passed, you said "get owned racist police state Chuds and make room for the compassionate future!"
I've made a post about this before, but it's hilarious comparing the tone of the comments on /r/Portland and /r/Oregon about Measure 110 just after it passed compared to a couple of years later. If you sort the posts chronologically you can actually see public opinion slowly turning against it with each passing month.
 
I knew a dude who would oscillate weekly between "Fuck, I can't leave my family all alone while I go to prison for three years. That's really selfish," and "Fuck it! Let them take me away. At least when I get out, I can use in peace without these drug tests and officers up my ass." This is the power of addiction. And, unless these people are allowed to hit a rock bottom, they won't be desperate enough to seek help. People will die. It's inevitable. But, enabling the continued anti-social behavior that arises from addiction doesn't help anyone.
Survival of the fittest. We can show them to help all we want. But they have to make that first step in accepting help. I'm not a social darwinist, but with druggies I'll make an exception.
 
Step 1: Legalise drug use to increase the number of addicts.
Step 2: Recriminalise drugs so you can arrest the new addicts.
Step 3: Profit! (for the prison industrial complex)
 
Atrás
Top Abajo