Vermont senator Bernie Sanders introduces four-day workweek bill - He introduced a bill to establish a four-day US working week.

get up work early.jpg

Vermont senator Bernie Sanders introduces four-day workweek bill

Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont who twice ran for the Democratic presidential nomination, introduced a bill to establish a four-day US working week.

Studies and pilot programmes have shown that four-day workweeks can increase productivity and happiness. Given Republican control of the House and a Senate split 51-49 in favour of Democrats, however, the legislation stands little chance of success.

“Moving to a 32-hour workweek with no loss of pay is not a radical idea,” Sanders said on Thursday. “Today, American workers are over 400% more productive than they were in the 1940s. And yet millions of Americans are working longer hours for lower wages than they were decades ago.

“That has got to change. The financial gains from the major advancements in artificial intelligence, automation and new technology must benefit the working class, not just corporate chief executives and wealthy stockholders on Wall Street.

“It is time to reduce the stress level in our country and allow Americans to enjoy a better quality of life. It is time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay.”

The legislation is co-sponsored by Laphonza Butler, a Democratic senator from California, and Mark Takano, a House Democrat from the same state.

Butler said: “The Thirty-Two-Hour Workweek Act would allow hard-working Americans to spend more time with their families while protecting their wages and making sure profits aren’t only going to a select few.”

Takano hailed “transformative legislation that will be a win for both workers and workplaces”.

Sanders’ office hailed endorsements from unions and campaign groups and cited predictions of a shorter workweek from business giants including Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, and Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JP Morgan Chase.

“This bill underscores the escalating trend towards diminishing work hours,” said Dr Dale Whelehan, chief executive of 4 Day Week Global, a pressure group.

“Increasing evidence firmly supports that reducing working hours yields beneficial outcomes for businesses, individuals and the broader community … We are thrilled to support this endeavour … marking further progress towards a future of work that prioritises sustainable human performance and wellbeing.”

Also on Thursday, Sanders staged a hearing of his Senate health, education, labor and pensions committee.

“One of the issues that we have to talk about is stress in this country, the fact that so many people are going to work exhausted physically and mentally,” Sanders said.

“And the fact that we have not changed the Fair Labor Standards Act – this was in 1940 – we came up with the 40-hour workweek in 1940. Who is going to deny that the economy has … fundamentally and radically changed over that period of time?”

Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, the ranking Republican on the committee, said 32-hour workweeks could work for individual businesses but should not be mandated.

“We won’t maintain the status of being the world’s wealthiest nation if we kneecap the American economy with something which purports to be good for the American worker but indeed will lead to offshoring of jobs seeking for a lower-cost labour force,” Cassidy said.

Shawn Fain, president of the United Auto Workers union, had fiery words in return: “The truth is, working-class people aren’t lazy. They’re fed up.

“They’re fed up with being left behind and stripped of dignity as wealth inequality in this nation, this world, spirals out of control. They’re fed up in America. In America, three families have as much wealth as the bottom 50% of citizens in this nation. That is criminal.”
 
Yeah, I'm self employed and I won't go with the 4 day week myself.

I already do 6 days.

I think it's a stretch there Bernie. Love the idea, but the practicality is soemthing else. With all the holidays and farting around the Senate and House do I understand why they think a 4 day week would work, but for regular people, nah.
 
Good.

We won’t maintain the status of being the world’s wealthiest nation if we kneecap the American economy with something which purports to be good for the American worker but indeed will lead to offshoring of jobs seeking for a lower-cost labour force
Lol, as if this isn't happening already. Businesses are too happy to hire illegals and pajeets already. It won't pass though, the kikes want their sheep to live for work, giving them time for themselves may give them ideas that aren't beneficial to the chosen people.
 
He has rolled over and sucked the cock for the establishment throwing American workers under the bus for millions of illegal aliens to drive down wages. all the while collecting millions of dollars, multiple homes. Now he wants to pretend to be his pro worker, Marxist bullshit again. He is such a fucking fraud and I hope he gets hit by a bus driven by an illegal.
 
I don't get it, why not introduce a bill for some mandatory minimum levels of PTO like the rest of the world? Why immediately jump to this? I guess he's either dumb or doesn't care about his bill being shot down and is using it as a virtue signal rather than an actual proposal.
 
Would I be able to continue to work 5 days per week for a 20% pay increase?

Of course the answer is no because nobody wants to give a 20% pay increase to the majority of the American workforce. So assuming the amount of work doesn't alter (probably would but lets explore this line first), this is effectively a means of forcing work to be spread out amongst more people and force additional hires. Which would likely lead to a sharp drop in productivity in many sectors because whilst one bricklayer on Friday and pick up a different bricklayer's work from Thursday, the same is not true for coding/research/project management/any number of complex jobs.

Now the qualifiers on the above. The "sharp drop in productivity" I postulated. The proposal is that there isn't a drop in productivity and even potentially a rise because people will be more focused on their work due to being fresher. This will not happen. There might be a short initial burst in per-day productivity that will quickly return to the set point of previous. That's it. Zero chance productivity is maintained.

The assumption that the amount of work doesn't alter? Well there are quite a lot of people who don't do much (mostly in Middle Management). These people can compress their work into four days with no change in outcome. So depending on how you view it, the amount of work could change but really it would just be cutting cruft in work but still paying the same.

Now if people wanted to do four nine and a half days, that can work in some scenarios, but it's not great for most.

Best thing? Sort out America's PTO and weird "sick leave" culture. The phrase "I have some sick leave to use up" should never, ever be uttered.
 
Let's be real here. It's not like anyone here would enjoy those four day work weeks, it will all be women and minorities doing government work (that is already around 5 daily hours) that will give even less service days for shit your tax money pays for. Your corpo job will still keep on ticking and any government service you need will require 25% more time waiting in line.
 
By all means, most of the country could work a 3 day work week even. They have no skills or value to the economy. There are entire sectors of the economy set up to ensure that they don't sit around at home idle while collecting welfare. They're called service jobs (i.e. food service, entertainment, retail, etc.).

Useful people? Sorry, you're going to work a 996 just like you already do. Always a shortage of people with a desirable skill and enough competency to get stuff done.

Train up useless people? Nah, let's just import infinite pajeets and spics instead. Gotta suppress wages somehow despite an eternal shortage of competent people.
 
its doable but it would require massive overhauls in scheduling and a reshuffling of a lot of jobs that have a lot of down time. The issue I see with this is like with my job I have downtime throughout the day but its necessary for me to be in 5 days a week for the uptime that's spread throughout the day.
 
How would the same weekly pay be maintained with one day missing? Not everyone is on salary, and the government can stipulate when overtime starts for hourly workers but can't set the pay rate. I feel like companies are jumping on board with the '32-hours' part because they've already figured out how they can get around the 'no reduction in pay' part.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo