Opinion Women’s History is Trans History

Link (Archive)

Women’s History is Trans History​

5CF9B604-4F71-4A83-924B-4025AFB770D8.jpeg
Women’s History Month is meant to commemorate women’s vital contributions to society, and while we know a lot about the Suffragettes and Title IX, people like Sojourner Truth and Billie Jean King, trans women have been historically left out of the month-long recognition.

Advancements in rights for the entire LGBTQ+ community can be traced back to the tireless efforts and creative resistance of trans women. Because of the double forces of transphobia and misogyny, fundamental rights many take for granted, like housing, employment, medical care, and social support, remain difficult to attain for trans women and transfeminine people. LGBTQ+ history has moved because of the need to break these barriers, but they still exist for trans women, who still face higher risk of violence and other forms of victimization.

Trans women shouldn’t be erased from Women’s History Month. We invite you to take some time and learn, honor, and celebrate two important milestones in trans women’s history.

Compton’s Cafeteria Riot

Many know about the origin of Pride parades and the Stonewall Riot, but the Compton’s Cafeteria Riot in August 1966 was one of the earliest pivotal LGBTQ+ riots in American history, and is the event that set trans activism in San Francisco in motion.

Because of social abandonment, scant opportunities for employment, and the volume of harassment and violence trans people were subject to, many trans girls in San Francisco experienced homelessness, which subjected them to even further harassment by the police. Many local drag queens and trans women gathered at the late night establishment, Compton’s Cafeteria, and were often ticketed and harassed by police for cross-dressing, which was still illegal. A service fee specific for trans women and drag queens was even implemented by staff in effort to drive them away from the business.

Following a picket protest organized by Vanguard (the first LGBTQ+ youth activism group in the United States), tensions were high between authorities and the trans folks who frequented Compton’s. Staff called the police in as they often did; when a cop forcefully grabbed one of the women, she threw coffee in his face, which caused the restaurant to erupt. Demonstrations continued the next day after trans folks and LGB allies returned to picket the restaurant.

Trans historian Susan Stryker calls the riot “the first known incident of collective militant queer resistance to police harassment in U.S. history.” The first-ever peer-run advocacy group for trans people, the National Transsexual Counseling Unit (NTCU) was founded in the wake of the riot, a part of a wave of trans activism throughout the city of San Francisco.

The Gazebo Chat Room

A year after AOL lifted its ban on discussions of gender and sexuality in chat rooms in 1994, writer and organizer Gwendolyn Ann Smith started The Gazebo, a chat room specifically for trans people. Named in honor Lauren D. Wilson, a trans woman and friend of Gwendolyn’s who passed away by suicide, The Gazebo provided support, affirmation, and friendship for trans people across the country. This was before Internet use was widespread, and a desktop computer and home modem were necessary to access the web. For many trans folks, the connection to people who understand their experience was crucial to survival.

Much like our own platform for LGBTQ+ young people TrevorSpace, The Gazebo provided opportunities for trans folks from different backgrounds and communities to discuss issues of gender and sexuality: transition, relationships, pop culture, current events, and more. Gwendolyn said reflecting on The Gazebo that “We need places for us, by us. Somewhere we have more control over what can be within it, so that we can mold it into something that works for us.”

Our current recognition of Trans Day of Remembrance can also be traced back to The Gazebo — it was the organizing work of Gwendolyn Ann Smith, Penny Ashe Matz, and others that resulted in the annual day of recognition for trans people lost to anti-trans violence.

We move forward as a society because trans women stand at the forefront of liberation. These are just two important moments in trans women’s history, but we urge LGBTQ+ allies to spend time learning from trans women’s struggles and triumphs. The reality is that not enough has been done to free trans women from violence and bigotry. We still lose too many people too soon — people who deserve to live full, happy, liberated lives. History tells us how we can save our community from this fate, so it is essential that we listen.
 
I miss when women still believed in fighting the patriarchy.
feminism is distinctly rooted in the idea that women are equal to men
set aside whatever equity bullshit people bring up when it's been riding on that for the majority of its existence at this point
to admit they are legitimately being oppressed now is admission they are unequal in spite of their supposed gains
and admitting men and women are different so they should be separated goes against them being equal
feminism cannot fight against troonism in any meaningful capacity because they operate by the same twisted logic
feminists use their terminology because validation of feelings and victimhood is integral to both ideologies

They may deny it all they want but feminism was integral to tearing down the common sense that a man wearing a skirt is a perverted predator. TERFS offer absolutely nothing new. Most of them are the same useful idiots who got us to this point. It'd be funny how much they're in denial of it, but it's hard to laugh these days.
>Women are not all feminists
do you know anyone among them that believed in fighting a patriarchy that wasn't?
 
Trannies get two full months of the year: Pride (June) and Trans Awareness Month (November). Now they are trying to steal an entire third month of the year for themselves. It will never be enough for them.
 
Anyone google that Compton cafeteria thing? The management at the cafe had trannys loitering and bothering customers so they asked them to leave. Somehow the trannys were harassing the SF public enough so that even they were annoyed with them ,was a civil rights issue? Typically these civil rights things start with police violence, laws banning people from partaking in things. It sounds like these faggots were annoying a business it's customers and asked to leave. I suppose that has been the entire history of the transgender "struggle" Go where you are allowed and then offend everyone and overstay your welcome then immediately become a problem for everyone else and declare it a social injustice when people ask you to follow the rules everyone else does.
 
To see men react with glee that ‘the bitches deserve it’ is pretty depressing.
While I can sympathise with your perspective, I have to ask, what would you have men do?

Men are already vote against this, and its not like they can just bumrush troons on the street. Its not upto their hands anymore.
 
many trans girls
If there's anything in the world that I hate more than men pretending to be women because they think it's easy mode, it's infantilization. If you're trans, whatever, I don't give two shits, but at least call yourself a woman, not a girl. I don't even call the children "girls" at our church functions. They are "ladies", always.
 
While I can sympathise with your perspective, I have to ask, what would you have men do?

Men are already vote against this, and its not like they can just bumrush troons on the street. Its not upto their hands anymore.
A fair question. I guess I’d prefer a more ‘hands off our wimmin/touch my daughter and I’ll put your teeth through the back of your head’ response. Which is the response you get when family men realise what’s been going on and they realise their 11 year old daughter is being looked at by a ‘lady’ with a cock bulge in his swimmers at the pool changing, and complaining to the pool management gets him a lecture.
I dont know. It’s very dispiriting sometimes to see how much things like this brings out a latent hatred each sex has for the other.
Troons aren’t scared of women, and what kept men out of the ladies looks wasn’t the law so much as the threat of a beating. Now the state is daddy, I guess the men have checked out. I can’t blame them for that either.
I suppose the answer to your question is that I’d like to see everyone, mean and women, react the way they’d have reacted twenty years ago, ie absolute disgust, a robust community response, and shaming. I think shame may be extinct
 
how are these supposed to exist in lands where the divorce rate is a coinflip?
the state punishes all violent actions against societal perverts because being a pervert has been normalized
when it comes down to it, women support perverts and sexual degenerates more than men ever did or ever will and are the sex almost synonymous with hatred of shame
for fuck's sake, we all know what fatherlessness does but deliberately ignore the cause of fatherlessness is often the mother pushing him away or choosing a mate that doesn't stay
when you bring that up, you see the people who insist that women are capable and independent are simultaneously victims of a lack of male guidance or protection from men in general
the resulting effect is a feedback loop of women driving away men, opening themselves up to the degenerates willing to indulge these delusions (see male feminists), being victimized by these men, and then blaming the men they drove away for it

The fear of shame and the inability to accept responsibility has women creating an environment that actively works against them. Fuck I've seen this in the all-female workplace I used to be in. I don't understand how anyone could live like that for years. But now I realize it's because of how averse feminine behavior is to blame. So many women and feminine men would rather suffer than be blamed for anything. It drives people who genuinely want to help away because how are you supposed to help a person who doesn't want to be seen as needing help? Who gets mad at you anyway? Who has a damn attitude if you do? Lord forbid a woman's actions getting her child raped and killed have anyone blame her for it.
 
Lord forbid a woman's actions getting her child raped and killed have anyone blame her for it.
I’m not the poster saying the mother had nothing to do with it. From the looks of the initial report it looks like she may well have.
I don’t know why women sometimes support perverts. I’d quite like them all to be thrown in volcanoes, so I can’t offer any insight into that mindset.
the state punishes all violent actions against societal perverts because being a pervert has been normalized
This is a massive problem. It links in to almost all the other problems our modern day society has.
- the emasculation of men suits people who are physically weak but who want to retain power and don’t want the men killing them
- it enables them to prey on the weaker members of society
-it creates an environment where people can’t or won’t react to perversion like the previous generation did
It all reinforces the same thing - people who are perverts in places of power acting with complete impunity, while society crumbles around them.
And at the end of it all a thirteen year old girl is dead, and probably suffered for months before that. Nobody will do anything, nobody will reflect and learn anything.
 
Was I not supposed to laugh at that picture?


lmao

If women as a sex class don't legally, socially, medically, biologically, historically, or linguistically exist or are in any way distinguishable from men, what are trannies transitioning into and why do they need any "gender affirming care" to do it?

You think ideological consistency and continuity matters?



lmao
 
I know one thing troons are really good at regarding women

And that is patriarchy

They're more chauvinist pig than the piggiest chauviniest sweatiest chud ever
 
Women trying to fight this battle should focus on trying to persuade black women, not men. Black women are the demographic that has the Democratic Party by the balls. That’s who you need to convince.

If Riley Gaines was a black girl who could accuse Lia Thomas and the NCAA of racism too you could make Democrats and academia very uncomfortable.
 
I guess I’d prefer a more ‘hands off our wimmin/touch my daughter and I’ll put your teeth through the back of your head’ response.
And you know the exact police reaction to any man saying that in the UK right now.

Jail at worst, none crime hate incident at best. When the media get hold of it likely loss of job, named and shamed by the social media lot, widely circulated rumours describe them as someone who slaps around women and their wife/children targeted with the same. For men with a family to lose it's often better to just cede the ground and find a school/gym/other not as captured. Or ensure that there's no witnesses to testify which is a step further than mere threats.

The trans activist stuff is especially ugly because it targets women's safe spaces while also putting anyone outside of those spaces in a very awkward situation if they want to help.
 
An awful lot of us didn’t want this, and pointed out that the logical outcome of crashing the boys golf club was the loss of women only swimming sessions etc.
LOTS of women never wanted this. It’s a generational liberal thing. To see men react with glee that ‘the bitches deserve it’ is pretty depressing.
It also plays into the hands of the people pushing it. They will use this ‘ha you deserved it’ to push rules and laws through that will eventually hurt you:
Example: they want to curtail free speech. They take an example of some nazi pedo saying something and whip up a frenzy that what he said was dangerous. Instead of prosecuting him under laws to protect children they put laws against speech in. Anyone who objects is told ‘what? You support this guy? You too must be a Nazi pedo!’ And the law goes through and now suddenly it’s not used against the genuinely bad people but against the regular plebs, while the kids keep getting molested
Shutting up, looking at the floor, and putting up with this shit after it crosses countless lines is just as bad.

You will never see women fighting against this shit. You will see them standing for trannies and feeling "pity" for pedos and creeps.

Which is worse imo.
 
but the Compton’s Cafeteria Riot in August 1966 was one of the earliest pivotal LGBTQ+ riots in American history, and is the event that set trans activism in San Francisco in motion.

You mean the event that isn't recorded in any newspaper, police record, or anything else other than some trannies supposed recollection?


Basically, this is supposed to be the tranny Stonewall, but after reading it, I am starting to doubt this single event even happened, or if it did, it's several minor fights conflated in a single 'riot'.

The Compton's Cafeteria riot occurred in August 1966 in the Tenderloin district of San Francisco. The riot was a response to the violent and constant police harassment of drag queens and trans people, particularly trans women. The incident was one of the first LGBT-related riots in United States history, preceding the more famous 1969 Stonewall riots in New York City.[note 1] It marked the beginning of transgender activism in San Francisco.[1]

The Compton's Cafeteria riot began on an August night of 1966, the month directly following the July Vanguard picket. The exact date is unknown because there was no media coverage at the time and San Francisco's 1960s police records no longer exist.

If you check the sourcing, almost all of it goes back to a single source, a documentary from 2005, or sources that are circular back to the docu.

When one of the cops grabbed and attempted to arrest a trans woman, she threw a cup of coffee in his face.[5] According to the director of Screaming Queens, Susan Stryker, the cafeteria "erupted".[7][14] Patrons also said that they threw many items such as sugar shakers, tables, and dinnerware at the police and at the windows, causing them to shatter. They also hit the cops with their purses and high heels. In order to request backup, the police retreated into the streets, where the fighting continued. The protesters damaged a police car and burned down a sidewalk newsstand.[7][5] The police responded by fighting back, and they tried to arrest the protesters and load them into paddy wagons.

Burning down a newsstand didn't even get a single line mention in police reports? Vague date? A couple others on the talk page had the same questions I have. There was a picketing of the restaurant in July 1966 which was documented, seems odd a violent follow up wasn't?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo