Why is the Roman Catholic Church so Satanic?

Destacado
Badungus Kabungus

Badungus Kabungus

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
6 de Mayo, 2020
Totally a valid question nowadays.

Consider the following:
- Pope is a communist: https://www.tfp.org/pope-francis-if...nly-yes-i-am-a-communist-and-so-too-is-jesus/
- Pope loves trannies: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/09/world/europe/pope-francis-transgender-people.html
- Pope supports bringing migrants over and releasing them into your societies: https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/po...-backlash-against-migrants-in-europe-390ad042
- History of varying forms of child abuse: Practically a meme now.
- Idol worshipping: All the various saints, including some real crazy made up ones like Santa Muerte in Mexico.
- Snake themed altar and decorations:
1707579998740.png
 
Because the Pope has been trying to grab more power for himself for the last 1000 years, prior to the great schism he at most was considered the first among equals (though more often then not it was the Patriarch of Constantinople who was considered the highest authority of the greater Orthodox/Catholic Church) and was often appointed by the Eastern Roman Emperor.
 
It's right in the name "Roman Empire." The merger brought idols, a demi-god pantheon(saints), and pederasty.

They turned away from the word of Christ- Mark 12:17 and Jesus answering said to them, “Give back the things of Caesar to Caesar, and the things of God to God”; and they wondered at Him.(Literal Standard translation)

They took the "things of Caesar" power of the government, and became polluted.
 
There's a reason why priestcraft is considered evil. If it was so easy to pay your way into heaven, then there'd be no need for Christ's atonement.

When did the Catholic church start making it mandatory to pay your price of sin, again? The Pope who first instigated indulgence was clearly the first anti-Christ to take power.
 
Say what you will of the Pope and the Church, but that massive sculpture behind him is a grand and beautiful work of art.
https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/over-popes-shoulder-explosion-spirituality-bronze
The sculpture, titled "Resurrection," was partially inspired by the violence and chaos of the 1945 nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, Japan. The artist believed depicting a nuclear explosion would represent a powerful testimony of Christ's victory over even the most extreme forms of death and destruction as well as the moment when the material, through its annihilation, becomes immaterial.
Presiona para expandir...
 
Take your meds, fag. Nothing wrong with the Catholic church. Only CIA subversion. America hates the Catholic church because they're envious of institutions that have built civilisation, unlike America which hasn't. America is collapsing and deinstrializing the entire west, thanks America! Why don't Americans work harder? Are they lazy or something? Anywhere in the world is a better place to live than America. Karma exists. This is what America gets for destroying the world in 2 world wars. Not a single tear wept for Amerisharts.
 
Samson Pumpkin Jr. dijo:
Take your meds, fag. Nothing wrong with the Catholic church. Only CIA subversion. America hates the Catholic church because they're envious of institutions that have built civilisation, unlike America which hasn't. America is collapsing and deinstrializing the entire west, thanks America! Why don't Americans work harder? Are they lazy or something? Anywhere in the world is a better place to live than America. Karma exists. This is what America gets for destroying the world in 2 world wars. Not a single tear wept for Amerisharts.
Presiona para expandir...
Hello new copypasta.

I heard the Pope hat was designed to be that tall as to hide devil horns. Confirm, deny?
 
Badungus Kabungus dijo:
Beautiful art does not require a lengthy explanation why it's beautiful. Art evokes emotion instantly, and what emotion does this evoke?

It's another post-modern attempt of reimagining what "beauty" should be. Compare it to:
Ver archivo adjunto 5710480
Presiona para expandir...

OK, but comparing almost anything to Michelangelo's La Pieta is unfair. There just is no emotional equal in art, only IRL.
 
Kari Kamiya dijo:
When did the Catholic church start making it mandatory to pay your price of sin, again? The Pope who first instigated indulgence was clearly the first anti-Christ to take power.
Presiona para expandir...
Indulgences only relate to the temporal punishment for sins that are already forgiven. There's no way to achieve salvation through them whatsoever.

The root of the practice goes back to the early Church, where the sacrament of penance and canon law had very, very harsh requirements for absolution. As sacramental theology developed and greater emphasis was placed on receiving the Eucharist, it became more important for people to receive the sacrament of penance on a more frequent basis.

This is why the old form of indulgences listed years/months/days, to reflect the penances that would have been required under the Church's canons as in the early period. Conceptually the Church is providing a way to mitigate the burden of penance but has not eliminated the penalty, so indulgences allow someone to complete their full temporal punishment in a much lighter form than would be required otherwise.
 
Agamemnon Busmalis dijo:
Indulgences only relate to the temporal punishment for sins that are already forgiven. There's no way to achieve salvation through them whatsoever.

The root of the practice goes back to the early Church, where the sacrament of penance and canon law had very, very harsh requirements for absolution. As sacramental theology developed and greater emphasis was placed on receiving the Eucharist, it became more important for people to receive the sacrament of penance on a more frequent basis.

This is why the old form of indulgences listed years/months/days, to reflect the penances that would have been required under the Church's canons as in the early period. Conceptually the Church is providing a way to mitigate the burden of penance but has not eliminated the penalty, so indulgences allow someone to complete their full temporal punishment in a much lighter form than would be required otherwise.
Presiona para expandir...
1000 times yes. One thing people don't understand is that you can pray for 30 minutes or read the Bible for an hour and that counts as an indulgence. The church literally condemned the practices of Johan Tetzel for seling indulgences for money and for his teachings, which took the process of paying off temporal punishment for your mortal sins upon absolution and attempted to make money off of it. You can literally pray for people to be released from purgatory, which is not a place you want to end up as a Catholic in the first place.(Although its infinitely better of a fate than Hell, which is for all eternity). Also, while I don't like the artistic style of that mural, its literally supposed to be Christ triumphing over Nuclear weapons. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the main sites of the Catholic community in Japan.
 
Badungus Kabungus dijo:
Totally a valid question nowadays.

Consider the following:
- Pope is a communist: https://www.tfp.org/pope-francis-if...nly-yes-i-am-a-communist-and-so-too-is-jesus/
- Pope loves trannies: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/09/world/europe/pope-francis-transgender-people.html
- Pope supports bringing migrants over and releasing them into your societies: https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/po...-backlash-against-migrants-in-europe-390ad042
- History of varying forms of child abuse: Practically a meme now.
- Idol worshipping: All the various saints, including some real crazy made up ones like Santa Muerte in Mexico.
- Snake themed altar and decorations:
Presiona para expandir...
Ian Paisley gang rise up
IMG_1439.jpeg
In 1988, having given advance warning of his intentions, Paisley interrupted a speech being delivered by Pope John Paul II in the European Parliament. Paisley shouted "I denounce you as the Antichrist!" and held up a poster reading "Pope John Paul II ANTICHRIST". Other MEPs jeered Paisley, threw papers at him and snatched his poster, but he produced another and continued shouting. He was admonished by Parliamentary President Lord Plumb, who formally excluded him. He was then forcibly removed from the chamber. Paisley claims he was injured by other MEPs—including Otto von Habsburg—who struck him and threw objects at him.
Presiona para expandir...
 
Badungus Kabungus dijo:
Beautiful art does not require a lengthy explanation why it's beautiful. Art evokes emotion instantly, and what emotion does this evoke?

It's another post-modern attempt of reimagining what "beauty" should be. Compare it to:
Presiona para expandir...
But it literally did evoke an emotion, you showed fear and discomfort, you have clearly found it deeply unsettling. Which a depiction of a nuclear attack on your people SHOULD DO. The statue is basically a representing the great capacity of humanity for evil, and you put it front cover of a post about how 1/7th of the population of the earth are demonworshippers.

I think its done its job.
 
CryoRevival #SJ-112 dijo:
But it literally did evoke an emotion, you showed fear and discomfort, you have clearly found it deeply unsettling. Which a depiction of a nuclear attack on your people SHOULD DO. The statue is basically a representing the great capacity of humanity for evil, and you put it front cover of a post about how 1/7th of the population of the earth are demonworshippers.

I think its done its job.
Presiona para expandir...
But is it appropriate to have something evoking fear and disgust from the inherent ugliness of the whole thing used as a backdrop for the Pope? Do you want the Pope to be unsettling?

Wouldn't you want something depicting, oh, I dunno, the light of Christ's teachings? The flash of a nuclear blast does not count.

Not saying all Catholics are demon worshippers, only upper management. Although some of the rituals do seem rather macabre and almost cannibalistic to me.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo